It is not cheap.
Pricing and licensing is quite expensive. But for the value the product provides, it seems at par in the market.
It is not cheap.
Pricing and licensing is quite expensive. But for the value the product provides, it seems at par in the market.
It has always scaled for us. Cost scales up too, but that is not necessarily a bad thing. It's reasonable for what they're providing.
It costs the same amount it would if we were hosting it ourselves, so we are incredibly happy with the cost.
It has always scaled for us. Cost scales up too, but that is not necessarily a bad thing. It's reasonable for what they're providing.
It costs the same amount it would if we were hosting it ourselves, so we are incredibly happy with the cost.
It’s free of cost.
It is a true open-source solution, so there are no licensing costs.
It’s free of cost.
It is a true open-source solution, so there are no licensing costs.
Decodes on less used/popular protocols are available, but they should be included. Additional investment should not be required.
Pricing is based on the number of servers monitored, so for big applications, it is a bit expensive.
Decodes on less used/popular protocols are available, but they should be included. Additional investment should not be required.
Pricing is based on the number of servers monitored, so for big applications, it is a bit expensive.
Be cautious of metadata inclusion for log types in pricing, as there are some "gotchas" with that.
Our licensing fees are billed annually and per terabyte.
Be cautious of metadata inclusion for log types in pricing, as there are some "gotchas" with that.
Our licensing fees are billed annually and per terabyte.
The product’s licencing policy is competitive. However, properly identify and size your needs to get the best rate.
The cost is prohibitive.
The product’s licencing policy is competitive. However, properly identify and size your needs to get the best rate.
The cost is prohibitive.
Azure Monitor is a low-priced solution, which is why it would work best on small-scale projects.
The price of the solution is reasonable.
Azure Monitor is a low-priced solution, which is why it would work best on small-scale projects.
The price of the solution is reasonable.
Pricing is one of those situations where the more you use it, the more you pay.
The price of Elastic Observability is expensive.
Pricing is one of those situations where the more you use it, the more you pay.
The price of Elastic Observability is expensive.
The pricing and licensing are fair.
Our licensing fees are approximately $30 per user, per month.
The pricing and licensing are fair.
Our licensing fees are approximately $30 per user, per month.
I know we are saving at least several hundred thousand dollars in that we're not buying Cisco Prime.
We pay for the enterprise tech support.
I know we are saving at least several hundred thousand dollars in that we're not buying Cisco Prime.
We pay for the enterprise tech support.
The solutions are not the cheapest but are robust and stable. License model is rather complex and BMC do often change the model.
Pricing is very high.
The solutions are not the cheapest but are robust and stable. License model is rather complex and BMC do often change the model.
Pricing is very high.
Grafana is free and open source.
I use the open source model so it is free.
Grafana is free and open source.
I use the open source model so it is free.
The pricing for AWS X-Ray is a six out of ten.
The solution is a bit expensive.
The pricing for AWS X-Ray is a six out of ten.
The solution is a bit expensive.
I am currently using a self-hosted open version.
We are currently paying through Cloudera for the Sentry service.
I am currently using a self-hosted open version.
We are currently paying through Cloudera for the Sentry service.
The cost of using Stackdriver depends on usage.
The cost could be lower.
The cost of using Stackdriver depends on usage.
The cost could be lower.
Pricing and licensing is fair for what you get. It does have a great bang-for-the-buck appeal.
The product might cost you $30,000 USD to buy, but scaling this solution requires the purchase of additional polling engines at $20,000 USD each.
Pricing and licensing is fair for what you get. It does have a great bang-for-the-buck appeal.
The product might cost you $30,000 USD to buy, but scaling this solution requires the purchase of additional polling engines at $20,000 USD each.
Based upon 3 days of implementation by a single person, plus licensing costs would be approximately $60,000, including the virtualized hosts.
It is part of Real Application Testing, so no new investment is necessary for clients who already are already using RAT.
Based upon 3 days of implementation by a single person, plus licensing costs would be approximately $60,000, including the virtualized hosts.
It is part of Real Application Testing, so no new investment is necessary for clients who already are already using RAT.
The pricing is high and may be excluding the small to medium-sized enterprise businesses.
It has different subscription models.
The pricing is high and may be excluding the small to medium-sized enterprise businesses.
It has different subscription models.
Educational pricing is available for this solution.
We were given a year's worth of service. It was included within our ELA. We were trying to do a proof of concept, which is almost over now.
Educational pricing is available for this solution.
We were given a year's worth of service. It was included within our ELA. We were trying to do a proof of concept, which is almost over now.
Pricing between the two is quiet large therefore you can save some money if you don't require to collect all info on each device.
Decide what you want to monitor and only monitor those items. Absorb other elements as you grow.
Pricing between the two is quiet large therefore you can save some money if you don't require to collect all info on each device.
Decide what you want to monitor and only monitor those items. Absorb other elements as you grow.
You will get the best price if you get a single global deal.
Pricing and licensing is based on the requirements.
You will get the best price if you get a single global deal.
Pricing and licensing is based on the requirements.
This is an open-source solution.
The solution is not expensive.
This is an open-source solution.
The solution is not expensive.
It is very expensive, but it's well worth the money.
The biggest problem we have with this product is the expense.
It is very expensive, but it's well worth the money.
The biggest problem we have with this product is the expense.
The pricing is $1,200 per year which is a bit high compared to other vendors.
The solution is less expensive than one of its competitors.
The pricing is $1,200 per year which is a bit high compared to other vendors.
The solution is less expensive than one of its competitors.
If the scale of your monitoring will be to go everywhere in an organization, a site license is key.
Pricing is a bit high. Don't take that as the "be all, end all".
If the scale of your monitoring will be to go everywhere in an organization, a site license is key.
Pricing is a bit high. Don't take that as the "be all, end all".
It's a very cost-effective and competitive product.
When compared to other solutions, it is quite good.
It's a very cost-effective and competitive product.
When compared to other solutions, it is quite good.
I would prefer that the price be reduced, as it would be easier to implement it and to sell it.
Splunk pricing is high.
I would prefer that the price be reduced, as it would be easier to implement it and to sell it.
Splunk pricing is high.
It's not for free, clearly. But on the other hand, it offers very interesting functionality. We pay around €100,000.
Pricing is a little bit expensive.
It's not for free, clearly. But on the other hand, it offers very interesting functionality. We pay around €100,000.
Pricing is a little bit expensive.
The pricing is fair considering the value provided.
The pricing is higher than other solutions, but with such good features, I think it's worth it.
The pricing is fair considering the value provided.
The pricing is higher than other solutions, but with such good features, I think it's worth it.
Depends on the size of the product you need.
Althougth it is a bit expensive, it is really worth it
Depends on the size of the product you need.
Althougth it is a bit expensive, it is really worth it
There is an annual licensing fee to use OpsRamp.
I don't have any idea about the licensing cost for OpsRamp, but I just know that its pricing is based on the resource count for each tenant.
There is an annual licensing fee to use OpsRamp.
I don't have any idea about the licensing cost for OpsRamp, but I just know that its pricing is based on the resource count for each tenant.
I believe the current licensing cost is reasonable.
Since it's a negotiable rate, I would rate the pricing as a five out of five.
I believe the current licensing cost is reasonable.
Since it's a negotiable rate, I would rate the pricing as a five out of five.
Licensing is a little steep.
Depending on your requirements, there are two licensing models available. A simple point model, or an endpoint model.
Licensing is a little steep.
Depending on your requirements, there are two licensing models available. A simple point model, or an endpoint model.
The price and licensing are very, very high. They have to come down on the pricing to match with the industry standard.
In terms of licensing fees, I believe they were slightly higher.
The price and licensing are very, very high. They have to come down on the pricing to match with the industry standard.
In terms of licensing fees, I believe they were slightly higher.
We are paying roughly $5,000 a month.
The cost of the solution is per volume of data ingested.
We are paying roughly $5,000 a month.
The cost of the solution is per volume of data ingested.
It is a cost-effective solution.
The cost of this solution is not too bad, although it could be cheaper considering what you're getting for the price.
It is a cost-effective solution.
The cost of this solution is not too bad, although it could be cheaper considering what you're getting for the price.
It's not cheap, but there are a few different packages and different prices for enterprises with different product versions.
We have a yearly license for 16 devices.
It's not cheap, but there are a few different packages and different prices for enterprises with different product versions.
We have a yearly license for 16 devices.
The pricing is very reasonable, but it is not cheap.
The pricing is very reasonable, but it is not cheap.
This price of this product is expensive.
AppDynamics is more expensive than competitors.
This price of this product is expensive.
AppDynamics is more expensive than competitors.
This price of this solution is reasonable.
The license was paid yearly and included technical support.
This price of this solution is reasonable.
The license was paid yearly and included technical support.
The price is approximately €30,000 ($35,500 USD) for the enterprise edition.
If I compare with other vendors, other vendors are more expensive
The price is approximately €30,000 ($35,500 USD) for the enterprise edition.
If I compare with other vendors, other vendors are more expensive
The product is cheap.
The product is cheap.
