Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Microsoft Azure File Storage comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary
Updated on Mar 6, 2024

We compared Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) and Microsoft Azure File Storage based on our user's reviews in several parameters.

In summary, Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) is highly praised for its scalability, performance, and ease of use, with seamless integration with other AWS services. On the other hand, Microsoft Azure File Storage is appreciated for its strong security measures and efficient file sharing capabilities, with a focus on scalability and ease of use. Amazon EFS users value the system's reliability and intuitive interface, while Microsoft Azure File Storage users highlight its integration with Azure services and responsive customer support. Areas for improvement for Amazon EFS include enhancing performance and visibility, while Microsoft Azure File Storage could benefit from faster file transfer speeds and a more user-friendly interface. Both products offer reasonable pricing and a positive return on investment, catering to the diverse needs of businesses with efficient file storage solutions.

Features: Amazon EFS stands out for its scalability, high performance, ease of use, reliability, and seamless integration with other AWS services. Microsoft Azure File Storage excels in scalability, ease of use, integration with other Azure services, efficient file sharing capabilities, strong security measures, and cross-platform file management.

Pricing and ROI: The setup cost for Amazon EFS is described as straightforward and easy, with reasonable and affordable pricing. In contrast, Microsoft Azure File Storage has a straightforward setup cost and is considered reasonable and competitive in pricing. Users have expressed satisfaction with the flexibility and options provided by both products., Amazon EFS was praised for its efficiency, scalability, and cost-effectiveness, while Microsoft Azure File Storage showed significant ROI with cost savings, improved efficiency, and seamless collaboration features.

Room for Improvement: Amazon EFS could benefit from improvements in terms of performance and speed, increasing visibility and monitoring capabilities, and providing more flexibility in file system sizes and scalability. On the other hand, users of Microsoft Azure File Storage desire increased file transfer speed, a more intuitive interface, and expanded storage options.

Deployment and customer support: The duration required to establish a new tech solution, such as Amazon EFS and Microsoft Azure File Storage, varies among users. Some users reported spending three months on deployment for Amazon EFS, while Microsoft Azure File Storage had a mix of three-month deployments and setups., Amazon EFS customer service is highly regarded, with users satisfied with helpful and responsive support. Microsoft Azure File Storage also receives positive feedback for its prompt and reliable assistance.

The summary above is based on 37 interviews we conducted recently with Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) and Microsoft Azure File Storage users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs. Microsoft Azure File Storage Report (Updated: March 2024).
772,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Q&A Highlights
Question: Which file storage system is better - Amazon EFS (elastic file storage) or Azure File Storage?
Answer: Amazon EFS is easy to set up: you can use the AWS management console, API, or command-line. Amazon EFS can grow to petabytes and deliver consistent low latencies and high levels of throughput. This solution can scale up or down as needed (as files are added or removed). It is pay-per-use - you will only pay for the storage you are using. This eliminates storage administration tasks and is a real time-saver. There is no minimum fee and no setup cost. You do need to have some programming knowledge to use Amazon EFS. You need to closely monitor the time constraints in relation to the amount of data you are backing up with or your process may fail. You most likely need to manually pause applications and processes backing up, and only backups can be stored on Amazon EFS. With Azure File Storage you can easily share data across cloud and on-premises servers. Azure File Storage can help simplify hosting for high availability workload data and migrate file share-based applications to the cloud, with no code changes. You can access what you need anytime, anywhere, using any device. Setup and deployment with Azure File Storage can be quite complex. We believe this solution should support more legacy storage systems and have better overall integration with other solutions. Azure File Storage has some scalability limitations, which could be problematic for some. The pricing should be more transparent so that you have a better idea of what your incurred costs will be. Conclusion Using either of these solutions, one does need to be a bit tech-savvy. They are not for the complete novice. We like Amazon EFS best. The easy and flexible scale up and down protocol that it has in place is perfect for our ever-changing business organizational needs. For us, Amazon EFS is very cost-effective and time-efficient. We like that.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Its elasticity and flexible pricing are the most valuable. For Amazon EFS, you are charged based on the storage. It is also very fast and stable with a very simple and intuitive interface.""The solution's technical support is good.""The most beneficial feature of the product for data storage stems from the fact that it serves as a shared file storage.""We are not that big of a cloud user. We just use it for the storage of our bytes. The most valuable aspect is the storage.""The solution is scalable.""I appreciate Amazon's extensive range of services, which makes it a favorable choice.""The product's initial setup phase is easy, as per the configurations.""We can run code and deploy it whenever we want."

More Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) Pros →

"Its most valuable features are speed and security.""The initial setup is fairly easy.""It helps us with geo-redundancy.""It is a good service for file storage.""The tool offers a secure way to access storage. You can also easily share the files securely across Azure.""The storage in this solution is excellent.""The most significant aspect of Microsoft Azure File Storage is its life cycle functionality, which enables us to transfer files to various storage options, such as hot storage, full storage, and archive. This feature is crucial since we can apply a life cycle method to files that have not been in use for an extended period, and then move them to a cheaper cold storage option to save costs. Since the newest files are stored in the hot storage, it met our specific requirements. Consequently, older files can be transferred to archive and cold storage.""It's a scalable solution."

More Microsoft Azure File Storage Pros →

Cons
"The product's stability has some shortcomings where improvements are required.""Its deployment process could be faster while installing the Python package directly into the environment.""When we faced some issues, the support team took a lot of time to resolve them.""Specifically, when it comes to the file system for the learning system, we encountered performance issues with both Azure and AWS.""It should be simplified. There are people who don't have cloud experience. It should be storage that we are able to just connect to.""The interface seems strange and complicated.""Around 80 percent of the features of Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) are available on Linux and not in Windows, making it a major drawback of the product.""The lack of transparency in the costs attached to the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."

More Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) Cons →

"The storage account key could be a security issue.""The solution is not user-friendly.""Microsoft Azure File Storage should improve its pricing.""Some of the procedures are a bit more complex in Azure than in other providers.""Lacks integration with other platforms.""The product’s pricing could be better.""Firewall rules should be introduced to secure the access date from any virus attacks. Anti-virus should be introduced in the work filtering and document filtering.""In our use cases, we see the weakness in mobile internet connectivity."

More Microsoft Azure File Storage Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It has flexible pricing. You are charged based on your storage."
  • "The solution's price is mid-ranged."
  • "I would rate the pricing 7 out of 10."
  • "The product's price depends on the services and the size and capacity at which it is used in a business environment."
  • "Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) offers a pay-as-you-go model, so whenever you use its services, you need to pay."
  • More Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "For one terabyte of data, we are spending about 150 Euro every month."
  • "One of the major benefits for AWS is that they have a very large customer representative base where clients can be picked from, they offer large discounts and credit. We were not able to receive the same kind of offers from Microsoft Azure File Storage. We tried to approach Azure while hiring for our disaster recovery discussion, but we didn't receive anything from Azure."
  • "The price is comparable to other competitive solutions."
  • "There are fewer hidden costs involved compared to other solutions, and when our customer is already a Microsoft partner, they typically have access to more affordable fees."
  • "Microsoft Azure File Storage has a reasonable price."
  • "I give the pricing of the solution a seven out of ten."
  • "One needs to pay according to the storage they plan to use in the solution. The payments are to be made yearly. It is usually monthly, but we opted for yearly subscriptions in our company."
  • "Microsoft Azure File Storage is expensive."
  • More Microsoft Azure File Storage Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Storage solutions are best for your needs.
    772,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Amazon EFS is easy to set up: you can use the AWS management console, API, or command-line. Amazon EFS can grow to petabytes and deliver consistent low latencies and high levels of throughput. This… more »
    Top Answer:The product's initial setup phase is easy, as per the configurations.
    Top Answer:Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) offers a pay-as-you-go model, so whenever you use its services, you need to pay.
    Top Answer:The tool needs to be more intuitive. Also, the product name keeps changing. It can be confusing when product names change frequently, especially with Microsoft. Sometimes, if you refer to a product by… more »
    Ranking
    5th
    out of 52 in Cloud Storage
    Views
    2,201
    Comparisons
    1,922
    Reviews
    7
    Average Words per Review
    407
    Rating
    8.7
    Views
    5,971
    Comparisons
    4,883
    Reviews
    31
    Average Words per Review
    400
    Rating
    8.2
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    MS Azure File Storage
    Learn More
    Overview

    Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) provides simple, scalable file storage for use with Amazon EC2 instances in the AWS Cloud. Amazon EFS is easy to use and offers a simple interface that allows you to create and configure file systems quickly and easily. With Amazon EFS, storage capacity is elastic, growing and shrinking automatically as you add and remove files, so your applications have the storage they need, when they need it.

    When mounted to Amazon EC2 instances, an Amazon EFS file system provides a standard file system interface and file system access semantics, allowing you to seamlessly integrate Amazon EFS with your existing applications and tools. Multiple Amazon EC2 instances can access an Amazon EFS file system at the same time, allowing Amazon EFS to provide a common data source for workloads and applications running on more than one Amazon EC2 instance.

    It’s designed for high availability and durability, and provides performance for a broad spectrum of workloads and applications, including Big Data and analytics, media processing workflows, content management, web serving, and home directories.

    Fully managed file shares that use the standard SMB 3.0 protocol

    Key scenarios:

    • Share data across on-premises and cloud servers
    • Migrate file share-based applications to the cloud with no code changes
    • Integrate modern applications with File storage
    • Simplify hosting for high availability workload data
    Sample Customers
    Arcesium, Atlassian, Seeking Alpha, Zend
    Talon, Camden
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Educational Organization14%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Construction Company19%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Computer Software Company13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business50%
    Midsize Enterprise40%
    Large Enterprise10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise22%
    Large Enterprise59%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business41%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise41%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise62%
    Buyer's Guide
    Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs. Microsoft Azure File Storage
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs. Microsoft Azure File Storage and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    772,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) is ranked 5th in Cloud Storage with 10 reviews while Microsoft Azure File Storage is ranked 3rd in Public Cloud Storage Services with 44 reviews. Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) is rated 8.6, while Microsoft Azure File Storage is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) writes "Offers integration capabilities that improve areas like storage and security". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Azure File Storage writes "Various storage options available, high availability, and quick deployment". Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) is most compared with Google Cloud Storage, NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP, Amazon S3 Glacier, Azure NetApp Files and Amazon S3, whereas Microsoft Azure File Storage is most compared with Azure NetApp Files, Wasabi, Amazon S3, Amazon S3 Glacier and Google Cloud Storage. See our Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs. Microsoft Azure File Storage report.

    We monitor all Cloud Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.