Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Microsoft Azure File Storage comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 6, 2024
 

Categories and Ranking

Amazon EFS (Elastic File Sy...
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Storage (4th), File and Object Storage (8th)
Microsoft Azure File Storage
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
44
Ranking in other categories
Public Cloud Storage Services (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2024, in the Cloud Storage category, the mindshare of Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) is 19.1%, up from 7.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Azure File Storage is 14.7%, up from 10.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Cloud Storage
Unique Categories:
File and Object Storage
0.2%
Public Cloud Storage Services
11.2%
 

Q&A Highlights

NC
Nov 21, 2021
 

Featured Reviews

Shailesh Tripathi - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 6, 2024
Useful for storing details of projects and has an easy configuration
The solution is useful for storing details of our internal projects The solution is pretty interesting. It is a very useful product for engineering. That is why we chose it. We can run code and deploy it whenever we want. I understand the configuration. The integration of EFS with other AWS…
Fed Yunis Zapata - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 21, 2022
Easy-to-implement , scalable and stable solution
We use the solution for file migration services to Azure.  The solution manages our file storage. It is a server and different users access it when they need files.  In general, it is a good service for file storage and maintaining your files in order.  They can improve the ability to assign…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I appreciate Amazon's extensive range of services, which makes it a favorable choice."
"We can run code and deploy it whenever we want."
"The initial setup was straightforward."
"We are not that big of a cloud user. We just use it for the storage of our bytes. The most valuable aspect is the storage."
"Its elasticity and flexible pricing are the most valuable. For Amazon EFS, you are charged based on the storage. It is also very fast and stable with a very simple and intuitive interface."
"The solution is scalable."
"The product's initial setup phase is easy, as per the configurations."
"The solution's technical support is good."
"The profile management option is another valuable feature that allows us to manage the profiles and secure them."
"The tool offers a secure way to access storage. You can also easily share the files securely across Azure."
"Integration with the entire Azure platform."
"The solution is easy to use."
"It's a stable product."
"The immutable storage features are valuable."
"It is very easy to use SSTP and some traditional code to move the data into a database because we can easily use the permissions and we don't have any integration or conversion issues."
"It is a very scalable solution. I rate the solution's scalability a nine out of ten."
 

Cons

"The user activity needs to be more connected."
"Its deployment process could be faster while installing the Python package directly into the environment."
"The product's stability has some shortcomings where improvements are required."
"The interface seems strange and complicated."
"It should be simplified. There are people who don't have cloud experience. It should be storage that we are able to just connect to."
"When we faced some issues, the support team took a lot of time to resolve them."
"Around 80 percent of the features of Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) are available on Linux and not in Windows, making it a major drawback of the product."
"Specifically, when it comes to the file system for the learning system, we encountered performance issues with both Azure and AWS."
"The pricing and technical support could be better."
"Importing and exporting data needs to have a bit more documentation."
"They should make the solution more user-friendly."
"A lot of things could be better, especially when it comes to accessing File Storage for monitoring. Azure Copy is fine, but there could be additional integration and security features for those who want more privacy and control over access to Azure."
"If the file is large, there may be a delay in download time."
"In our use cases, we see the weakness in mobile internet connectivity."
"The integration of the site storage with SQL was not completely seamless."
"It would be good if they added some features that make the solution easier to access for everyone."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the pricing 7 out of 10."
"Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) offers a pay-as-you-go model, so whenever you use its services, you need to pay."
"The solution's price is mid-ranged."
"It has flexible pricing. You are charged based on your storage."
"The product's price depends on the services and the size and capacity at which it is used in a business environment."
"For one terabyte of data, we are spending about 150 Euro every month."
"The solution is a bit pricey compared to AWS and Google."
"The pricing could be more flexible."
"We have Microsoft Azure File Storage's enterprise license."
"One of the major benefits for AWS is that they have a very large customer representative base where clients can be picked from, they offer large discounts and credit. We were not able to receive the same kind of offers from Microsoft Azure File Storage. We tried to approach Azure while hiring for our disaster recovery discussion, but we didn't receive anything from Azure."
"The price of Microsoft Azure File Storage is expensive, we do not know exactly how the price is calculated."
"We pay for both yearly and monthly licenses. The yearly one is cheaper than the monthly one."
"The price of the solution is reasonable. The pricing model is based on usage."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Storage solutions are best for your needs.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Educational Organization
15%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Which file storage system is better - Amazon EFS (elastic file storage) or Azure File Storage?
Amazon EFS is easy to set up: you can use the AWS management console, API, or command-line. Amazon EFS can grow to petabytes and deliver consistent low latencies and high levels of throughput. This...
What do you like most about Amazon EFS (Elastic File System)?
The product's initial setup phase is easy, as per the configurations.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon EFS (Elastic File System)?
Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) offers a pay-as-you-go model, so whenever you use its services, you need to pay.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure File Storage?
The price could be reduced. The tiered pricing model is good. The solution is a bit pricey compared to AWS and Google. We pay as we use.
What needs improvement with Microsoft Azure File Storage?
Some of the procedures are a bit more complex in Azure than in other providers.
 

Also Known As

No data available
MS Azure File Storage
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Arcesium, Atlassian, Seeking Alpha, Zend
Talon, Camden
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs. Microsoft Azure File Storage and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.