We performed a comparison between Amazon API Gateway and Microsoft Azure API Management based on our users’ reviews in four categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Comparison Results: Azure is highly regarded for its stability, integration capabilities, and user-friendliness, whereas Amazon is appreciated for its flexibility and ease of use. Azure users express a desire for lower licensing fees, improved integration, and enhanced performance, while Amazon users seek better monitoring and security features. Azure's pricing is considered reasonable but could be more cost-effective, while Amazon's pricing is generally acceptable. The quality of Azure's technical support varies, while Amazon's support is generally satisfactory.
"It is easy to set up. It is also quick to deploy."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"t is easy for integrations if it is deployed in AWS Services."
"Amazon API Gateway can integrate with ECS and Lambda."
"It provides the flexibility to configure, switch, and manage configurations through cloud permissions or performance settings."
"It is a stable solution."
"In terms of scalability, I haven't encountered any issues with API Gateway. We've significantly increased our traffic from hitting it once or twice a minute to now hitting it ten to fifteen times within a minute. In an hour, we're receiving hundreds of hits. So, it's performing excellently."
"The most valuable feature in Amazon API Gateway is the itinerary release."
"Easy to integrate API management platform. It is a stable and scalable solution."
"We use this solution for API rate limiting and for its security features against DDoS."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Azure API Management is monitoring. When compared with Apigee, I prefer Microsoft Azure API Management."
"The tool helps to manage APIs."
"Azure API Management is an API gateway that can be used for different purposes, for example, to monetize APIs."
"It’s easy to set up."
"I like API Management's ability to do hybrid cloud stuff."
"The most valuable features are the API and integrations."
"There are certain restrictions that cannot be implemented without web access."
"The solution could improve signature validation."
"Its support for SAM integration could be made more accessible."
"From a use cases perspective, you need to have an internal and external gateway. AWS can only handle external traffic so has to be used together with another solution."
"When it comes to DDoS protection, I would like to see that become available at the API Gateway level."
"We would like to see more UI-based monitoring."
"API Gateway lacks some governance features that MuleSoft offers, and there are additional features that could make it even better."
"I believe better governance and monitoring features would be beneficial."
"Microsoft Azure API Management's most valuable features are the microservices we used to use. They were API callers to receive communication with the network and building system, to complete the request. The response would be through the processing system."
"What would make Microsoft Azure API Management better are more APIs. They keep updating their APIs, but it would be better if the solution had more APIs for the services and more integration with other platforms."
"Support for GraphQL could be better."
"I would like to see more integration with other platforms, as well as increased security."
"Microsoft Azure API Management could improve the documentation. The documentation feels like marketing information and not sufficient technical information. Your easiest option is to purchase services from a Microsoft partner and this is their marketing."
"Some of the DevOps stuff could be easier to work with. The migration paths are a little complicated, and moving code around could be more seamless. There should be less manual migration when several teams work together to publish code to the DevOps."
"One of the most important improvements for us would be if it supported the HTTP/3 version and new protocol over a quick connection."
"There is room for improvement in the user interface and workflow for hosting APIs, especially third-party APIs."
Amazon API Gateway is a fully managed service that makes it easy for developers to create, publish, maintain, monitor, and secure APIs at any scale. With a few clicks in the AWS Management Console, you can create an API that acts as a "front door" for applications to access data, business logic, or functionality from your back-end services, such as workloads running on Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (Amazon EC2), code running on AWS Lambda, or any Web application.
Microsoft Azure API Management is a reliable and scalable way to publish, consume, and manage APIs running on an Microsoft Azure platform. Azure API Management provides all essential tools required for end-to-end management of APIs. It ensures optimal performance of the APIs by tracking and enforcing usage and authentication.
Microsoft Azure API Management is primarily used to provide a central interface to create, provision, and manage APIs for web and cloud applications and services. Today's innovative enterprises are adopting API architectures to accelerate growth. With Microsoft Azure API Management, businesses can streamline their work across hybrid and multi cloud environments with a unified place to manage all their APIs.
Microsoft Azure API Management Features
Microsoft Azure API Management has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:
Microsoft Azure API Management Benefits
There are many benefits to implementing Microsoft Azure API Management. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:
Reviews from Real Users
Microsoft Azure API Management stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Some of these include its DevOps integration, its easy setup, and its dynamic pricing. PeerSpot users take note of the advantages of these features in their reviews:
Cecil S., a Software Engineer, writes of the solution, “The most valuable feature of Microsoft Azure API Management is the developer portal because it's very quick and easy to get something published."
Dmitri E., an Integration Architect at MiBanco, notes, “In particular, in API Management, used as front-end APIs, it's easy to manage. We use Microsoft due to the stability of the company. It is easy to set up. The solution is scalable. It is stable as a product as well.”
Amazon API Gateway is ranked 3rd in API Management with 16 reviews while Microsoft Azure API Management is ranked 1st in API Management with 39 reviews. Amazon API Gateway is rated 8.6, while Microsoft Azure API Management is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Amazon API Gateway writes "Easy initial setup and highly stable solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Azure API Management writes "Easy to set up with good access control but support could be better". Amazon API Gateway is most compared with MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager, Apigee, Kong Enterprise, WSO2 API Manager and Layer7 API Management, whereas Microsoft Azure API Management is most compared with Apigee, MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager, Kong Enterprise, IBM API Connect and WSO2 API Manager. See our Amazon API Gateway vs. Microsoft Azure API Management report.
See our list of best API Management vendors.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.