Azure DNS and Amazon Route 53 compete in the DNS management services category. Based on user reviews, Route 53 is considered superior for its extensive features and reliability, while Azure DNS is favored for pricing and support.
Features: Azure DNS offers automated records and strong integration with other Azure services, along with enhanced security. Amazon Route 53 is known for its fast DNS resolution, flexible routing policies, and robust traffic management features.
Room for Improvement: Azure DNS could add domain registration capabilities, better visibility for troubleshooting, and improved scalability in hybrid environments. Amazon Route 53 could enhance error diagnostics, simplify its pricing structure, and improve integration with on-premises systems.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Azure DNS is primarily deployed in public and hybrid clouds, benefiting from Microsoft’s variable support. Amazon Route 53 serves similar environments, offering good integration with AWS services and responsive technical support.
Pricing and ROI: Azure DNS is regarded as cost-effective, particularly within Microsoft environments, due to its pay-as-you-go model. Amazon Route 53’s volume-based pricing can be costly at high scales but is competitive due to its reliability and features, yielding a positive ROI.
The main factors are time-saving and security, even if the cost is slightly higher.
The ROI is always high because Azure DNS setup is essential and does not incur high charges.
Amazon services are very stable, and there are few problems.
Amazon's customer support is very good with a quick response time.
They provide a normal developer level of support, and within twenty-four hours for non-critical issues, which is acceptable for us.
Technical support is minimally required for DNS-related tasks if you have previous experience.
We haven't faced any scalability issues, thanks to its integration with AWS services.
Scalability became more challenging as they expanded the product line.
Amazon Route 53 is scalable as I use automation with YML files to handle scalability needs, and it works well.
I have not encountered any stability issues.
We use auto-scaling groups to manage load.
The solution is stable.
They need to ensure that the threats reported on are actual threats.
There could be improvements in the configuration process, particularly in the options provided during setup, such as subdomain configurations and certificate management.
In my project, everything is already configured, and we focus on monitoring and health checks.
Route 53 is more expensive.
The pricing of Route 53 is slightly higher compared to other services, however, it is justified by its high availability and reliability.
Azure DNS charges based on the number of zones enabled, offering some free queries monthly, which keeps costs low.
They do not alert on non-actionable items, making their alerts reliable and focused on concerns that matter.
I find Amazon Route 53 valuable for its ability to manage DNS records and efficiently route traffic with features like failover routing and geolocation routing.
Route 53 is valued for its health check feature and reliability.
Azure DNS provides end-to-end P2P connectivity and enhances security, making it more secure and reliable.
Amazon Route 53 is a highly available and scalable cloud Domain Name System (DNS) web service. It is designed to give developers and businesses an extremely reliable and cost effective way to route end users to Internet applications by translating names like www.example.com into the numeric IP addresses like 192.0.2.1 that computers use to connect to each other. Amazon Route 53 is fully compliant with IPv6 as well.
Azure DNS is a hosting service for DNS domains, providing name resolution using Microsoft Azure infrastructure. By hosting your domains in Azure, you can manage your DNS records using the same credentials, APIs, tools, and billing as your other Azure services.
We monitor all Managed DNS reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
