IBM Db2 Database vs SQL Server comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 5, 2022
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Db2 Database
Ranking in Relational Databases Tools
6th
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
68
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
SQL Server
Ranking in Relational Databases Tools
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
260
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2024, in the Relational Databases Tools category, the mindshare of IBM Db2 Database is 7.4%, up from 6.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SQL Server is 18.7%, down from 23.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Relational Databases Tools
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

MR
Aug 3, 2022
99.99% availability, highly scalable, and capable of supporting half a million transactions per second
The management of Db2 should be simplified because there are not too many specialists in this area, and the learning curve of Db2 specialists is very long. After the courses, probably it takes one and a half or two years to get to the point when you are using the product properly in the production systems. So, the complexity is very high, and the most important thing is to simplify the management of the product, including self-maintenance. They should simplify the installation, management, and monitoring to simplify the product. It takes too long for a person to be a specialist in this product. The price should also be adjusted a little bit. IBM is quite expensive with respect to the product.
HS
Jan 23, 2021
A stable, scalable, and easy-to-deploy solution that pretty much covers everything
It is a pretty good solution. The on-premise version 2019 has many features, and they had introduced a really good and stable environment in version 2019. It has very good integration with big data clusters and other things. It covers pretty much everything that you can do with a SQL server. You can use any language to connect to it, which is not there in other solutions. They have also introduced Python, and it also has ArcScale. PaaS is a modern, scalable database. You can use Power Automate and a lot of features in this. It is very easy, and you don't have to worry about versions and upgrades. Microsoft keeps on adding new features to this solution. Microsoft is improving its connectivity on an ongoing basis. It connects well with Office 365. If you see something not working, in a couple of weeks, it is going to work because there is a team working on it. You can vote for the things that are missing, and Microsoft can work on them depending on the product that they're launching.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"IBM Db2 Database has good performance."
"The self-management and optimization features are probably the best on the market"
"We had a crash of the backup system and the IBM DB2 was always up and consistent. It's robust, and for us, it was always up and running."
"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten."
"It is a scalable solution."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its compatibility with IBM Power Systems."
"The solution is easy to install and simple to maintain. The most valuable aspect of the solution is its general user-friendliness for users of all kinds."
"The scalability and availability of this solution are the most valuable features."
"Scalability, cluster ability, ease of use, ease of implementation — these are all great."
"SQL Server, a widely adopted database management system, is utilized across numerous sectors. Initially competing with Oracle and Db2, SQL Server has gained popularity. It serves as the backend database for a variety of applications."
"It is easy to use and very stable."
"The technical support that Microsoft provides is great."
"I use the menu on the management view credit section to get information from the database."
"It is one of the most stable relational databases out there."
"I have seen that this is a very stable product."
"I have found the whole solution with all its features wonderful."
 

Cons

"GUI needs improvement."
"We need some time to improve the performance. We have to perform a weekly REORG, or else RUNSTATS for the databases."
"The product’s user interface is not easy to use."
"The only drawback that we see in Db2 Database is the crash recovery. When there is a crash and somebody has to do the recovery, Db2 Database first stops, and then it does any crash recovery. In Oracle Database, crash recovery happens within the database. The database is not shut down."
"The management of Db2 should be simplified because there are not too many specialists in this area, and the learning curve of Db2 specialists is very long. After the courses, probably it takes one and a half or two years to get to the point when you are using the product properly in the production systems. So, the complexity is very high, and the most important thing is to simplify the management of the product, including self-maintenance. They should simplify the installation, management, and monitoring to simplify the product. It takes too long for a person to be a specialist in this product."
"The application development requires a Java developer and not every company has these resources."
"The solution could be more modern and have updated database technology."
"Microsoft SQL Server is comparatively very simple to use. I wish IBM would move towards making Db2 easy to use for both basic and advanced users. This is where I see room for advancement. Db2 is also more expensive than Microsoft SQL Server, and its price can be reduced. The replication feature needs to be there in Db2. Microsoft provides similar functionality in SQL Server. IBM also has similar functionality, but it exists in a different product. So, to have the replication ability, you have to buy a different product. It makes sense to have this functionality within Db2 instead of a different product. It will also be helpful in terms of competition. In Africa, the problem for Db2 is competition. Oracle Database and Microsoft SQL Server have been in this market for a very long time. These companies have built the ecosystem and the brand within this market for a very long time. So, they are very popular with users. Db2 or IBM came a little later in the game, and that's where the problem lies. They also don't do a lot of marketing for it, which is also a problem."
"The number of concurrent users is too limited and other databases are better than SQL in this regard."
"The performance could be better."
"I do not think SQL Server is suited for a typical database warehouse environment. However, people do use SQL Server for data warehouse environments but the best use case is for very small databases. If somebody wants to store more than 10 TB of data querying then the performance really degrades. The performance should be improved in the future to allow more scalability."
"The user interface and the reporting could also be improved."
"Right now we don't get much technical support from Microsoft"
"The solution’s initial setup could be complex, requiring some design of how you want to lay everything out and what type of storage you want to put certain things on."
"I would like to see the integration with other platforms improved in the future."
"SQL Server could improve by increase the performance, it cannot handle large amounts of data. I did not find any additional features compared to others solutions."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We don't see what the specific price of the DB2 license is because we pay for the backup license as a package."
"It is expensive when compared to other products."
"Clients are required to purchase a license."
"It's very expensive."
"Compared to other databases, Db2 is relatively cheaper."
"The total cost of the solution depends upon the PVU licensing"
"They are competitive and honest (compared to how peer firms approach licensing conversations). ​"
"Db2 is less expensive than Oracle."
"We did a one-time payment. Its price, in general, can be reduced."
"Some of our clients purchase the license and others do not, they use Express SQL Server."
"Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."
"For medium-sized customers who don't need some enterprise features, the tool would be available for 200 USD per month. For the enterprise segment, the tool's cost can go up to 6,000 USD."
"​It has the easiest licensing."
"It is expensive, but you get what you pay for."
"Pricing is reasonable for small organizations, but the scaling increases the price."
"I don't need a license for it as I will be migrating to Office 365."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
55%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Computer Software Company
5%
Government
4%
Educational Organization
45%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Computer Software Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Db2 Database?
Db2 database scalability and performance capabilities match our database needs. It covers pretty much everything a database administrator or engineer might need.
What needs improvement with IBM Db2 Database?
The data table names are very short which is not user friendly compared to the Oracle SQL server. It should have longer column and table names.
Would you say the price of SQL Server is high compared to that of similar products?
SQL Server is fairly priced because it has various editions, depending on the number of users, servers, or core packs you are using. If you compare the product to others in this category, the price...
Has using SQL Server helped your organization in any way?
SQL Server has helped my organization through partitioning to distribute the workload, as it splits them up into smaller pieces so the machines can easily deal with it. However, this comes with a h...
Which authentication mode is best for SQL Server?
My company connects through SQL Server authentication. We have company Windows accounts, but we do not want to connect the two, out of security concerns and to keep things separated for our own pur...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

DB2
Microsoft SQL Server, MSSQL, MS SQL
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Knorr-Bremse, Mizuho Bank Ltd., Australian Government Department of Defence, SCHWENK Zement, Friedhelm Loh Group, YAZAKI Europe Limited, Ekornes ASA, Baldor Electric, VSN Systemen BV, Lion Brewery (Ceylon) PLC, PLANSEE Group, TE Connectivity, Hansgrohe SE, Openmatics, University of Toronto
Microsoft SQL Server is used by businesses in every industry, including Great Western Bank, Aviva, the Volvo Car Corporation, BMW, Samsung, Principality Building Society, Wellmark Blue Cross and Blue Shield, and the Catholic District School Board of Eastern Ontario.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Db2 Database vs. SQL Server and other solutions. Updated: July 2024.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.