We compared Google Transfer Appliance and AWS Snowball based on our user's reviews in several parameters.
Overall, Google Transfer Appliance is praised for its speed, reliability, and compatibility, with users valuing its efficient data transfer capabilities and seamless integration. On the other hand, AWS Snowball is appreciated for its secure job handling, efficient data transfer capacity, and seamless integration with various AWS services. While Google Transfer Appliance focuses on simplicity and value, AWS Snowball emphasizes security and flexibility. Both products have received positive feedback, with customers highlighting different aspects that suit their specific needs.
Features: Google Transfer Appliance is praised for its efficient data transfer and seamless integration with existing systems, while AWS Snowball is highly valued for its secure job handling and seamless integration with various AWS services.
Pricing and ROI: The setup cost for Google Transfer Appliance is reported to be reasonable by users, who also appreciate the flexibility in licensing options. On the other hand, AWS Snowball has been praised for its straightforward setup process, competitive cost, and wide range of licensing options that suit specific needs., Google Transfer Appliance offers cost savings, enhanced data transfer efficiency, improved data protection, and increased productivity. AWS Snowball provides significant cost savings, improved data transfer speeds, seamless integration, enhanced data security, increased productivity, and scalability.
Room for Improvement: In terms of room for improvement, users have suggested that Google Transfer Appliance could benefit from faster and more reliable data transfer speeds, an enhanced user interface, and more intuitive controls. On the other hand, AWS Snowball could improve on its user-friendly interface, troubleshooting documentation, data validation processes, transfer speeds, customization options, and data encryption features.
Deployment and customer support: Based on user reviews, there are varying timeframes for the deployment, setup, and implementation phases of Google Transfer Appliance and AWS Snowball. Some users mentioned longer deployment times for AWS Snowball compared to Google Transfer Appliance, whereas others experienced similar durations for both deployment and setup with both products., Users have praised the helpfulness and guidance of customer service for Google Transfer Appliance. They appreciate the responsive support team and knowledgeable representatives. AWS Snowball also receives positive feedback for efficient and reliable customer service. Users mention prompt responses and detailed guidance.
The summary above is based on 1 interviews we conducted recently with Google Transfer Appliance and AWS Snowball users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
Earn 20 points
AWS Snowball is ranked 2nd in Data Migration Appliances with 5 reviews while Google Transfer Appliance is ranked 4th in Data Migration Appliances. AWS Snowball is rated 9.0, while Google Transfer Appliance is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of AWS Snowball writes "Excellent for handling large-scale data transfers". On the other hand, AWS Snowball is most compared with Microsoft Azure Data Box, IBM Cloud Mass Data Migration, Palantir Foundry and AWS Snowball Edge, whereas Google Transfer Appliance is most compared with Microsoft Azure Data Box.
See our list of best Data Migration Appliances vendors.
We monitor all Data Migration Appliances reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.