Cortex XSIAM vs Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XSIAM
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) (9th)
Palo Alto Networks Cortex X...
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
42
Ranking in other categories
Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (2nd), SOC as a Service (2nd)
 

Featured Reviews

Forrest Stevens - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 28, 2023
A robust security operation that ensures achieving automation, stability, and scalability
There is room for improvement in some areas, and I would highlight three key aspects. Firstly, the Attack Surface Management (ASM) module could benefit from more contextual depth. Currently, it tends to provide a broad overview without enriched context, and there's room for enhancement in this regard. Secondly, further integration capabilities with various other software products that can seamlessly tie into Cortex XSIAM would be advantageous. This would enhance its versatility and interoperability within a broader ecosystem. Regarding performance, there's potential for optimization. When multiple tabs are open in Cortex XSIAM, it can experience slowdowns, leading to longer load times for web pages. It's worth noting that this isn't a severe issue, and it doesn't entail waiting for extended periods, but there is room for improvement in terms of performance optimization.
Waheb Samaraie - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 24, 2023
Helps to enhance cybersecurity but needs improvement in pricing
From the security team's standpoint, the solution has improved our organization's overall cybersecurity The price of the solution could be improved. I have been using the solution for the past three and a half years. I rate the stability of the tool as a ten out of ten. I rate the scalability…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It operates on a single, extensive database which enables it to excel in detecting threats and anomalies across the network and endpoints, delivering a highly effective and comprehensive security solution."
"It does a better job of identifying anomalies that are more likely to be incidents of compromise without as many false positives or false negatives."
"The most valuable features of Cortex XSIAM are the machine learning used to identify threats, the complexity of the environment of products, and efficiency."
"It is an effective solution in terms of performance and functionalities."
"Its ability to deliver a substantial amount of security intelligence greatly enhances and optimizes our security operations program."
"The pricing is very good."
"The most valuable features of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR are the remote controller from the workstation that can execute commands and isolate the systems outside of the network. Only the system with an internet connection can execute the task because the main console is in the cloud."
"The drag-and-drop interface enables analysts with no programming knowledge to create playbooks easily."
"Many different playbooks are available and can be customized."
"The product is quite easy to use."
"The solution provides threat intelligence with EDR."
"It was useful as a ticketing tool."
"Cortex XSOAR's most valuable features are the playbooks, custom integration, the machine-learning model, and the layout, classifier, and mapper."
 

Cons

"The support could be a bit faster."
"The solution’s pricing and technical support could be improved."
"The platform isn't very developer-friendly and it should provide more flexibility and ease."
"Further integration capabilities with various other software products that can seamlessly tie into Cortex XSIAM would be advantageous."
"It could provide more integration with a large variety of products."
"There is room for improvement in support. The response time could be faster."
"It doesn't offer automatic internet reports out of the box."
"Implementing this solution requires a lot of involvement from the vendor and it should be made easier for the partners."
"The dashboard could be better."
"We need a little hands-on experience to install the solution."
"The price of the solution could be improved."
"It is been decommissioned by Palo Alto."
"Previously, when Demisto was, there was a community edition; we could use it, reinstall it, and customize it. Since Palo Alto took over, it has become more financially oriented. It's business, but they could offer a pro model and a lighter model for different needs."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is expensive compared to its competitors."
"In terms of pricing, we found Cortex XSIAM to offer a very reasonable and competitive rate."
"Since Palo Alto is trying to get as many new customers as possible, they're offering very competitive pricing."
"The solution comes at a significant cost."
"There is a perception that it is priced very high compared to other solutions."
"From the cost perspective, I have heard that its price is a bit high as compared to other similar products."
"On a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price, and ten is a high price, I rate the pricing a nine."
"My company did not make any payments towards the licensing costs attached to the product since we were only using its pilot version."
"When I first looked at Demisto, it had a price tag of $250,000 but when we finally purchased it, it was $345,000."
"It is approx $10,000 or $20,000 per year for two user licenses."
"The price of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR could be reduced. We are always looking for a discount. There is an annual license needed to use this solution."
"The solution's cost is high."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) solutions are best for your needs.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Government
7%
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cortex XSIAM?
It is an effective solution in terms of performance and functionalities.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cortex XSIAM?
I would rate the solution's cost a six out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive.
What needs improvement with Cortex XSIAM?
There is room for improvement in the support. It could be a bit faster.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR?
Whether the product is cheap or expensive depends on the company and how much they are willing to spend on security. Nowadays, security is important. The solution is not suitable for small business...
What needs improvement with Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR?
The solution is complicated to learn. Customers find it difficult to learn how the solution works. We need professionals to learn and understand how the tool works to expand it further. Our custome...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Demisto Enterprise, Cortex XSOAR, Demisto
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Cellcom Israel, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas City, esri, Cylance, Flatiron Health, Veeva, ADT Cybersecurity
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, CrowdStrike, SentinelOne and others in Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR). Updated: July 2024.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.