GitLab vs Microsoft Azure DevOps comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
GitLab Logo
15,166 views|12,258 comparisons
98% willing to recommend
Microsoft Logo
19,315 views|14,609 comparisons
95% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary
Updated on Jun 18, 2023

We compared Gitlab and Microsoft Azure DevOps based on our user’s reviews in four categories. After reviewing the collected data. you can find our conclusion below:

  • Ease of Deployment: GitLab's setup is customized to the user's needs and experience, while Azure DevOps is generally simple and direct. Third-party integrations with GitLab can be problematic, while Azure DevOps has a learning curve. Maintenance for Azure DevOps is minimal, and deployment times are generally quick due to its cloud-based nature.

  • Features: GitLab provides a complete package of features that are simple to deploy, backed up by useful customer support, and can be integrated with other platforms. Meanwhile, Microsoft Azure DevOps is customizable and adaptable, with smooth navigation and integration with Microsoft tools. It is especially beneficial for agile delivery and prioritizing backlogs. GitLab could improve by reducing outages, simplifying deployment processes, improving integration with other tools, providing better documentation, offering more cloud-native capabilities, improving security features, and reducing costs. On the other hand, Microsoft Azure DevOps could improve by better integrating with other tools, lowering pricing, improving support for Waterfall projects, and adding more features to the classic pipeline.

  • Pricing: GitLab has multiple pricing options, including a free version and paid versions with different features. Microsoft Azure DevOps has a diverse pricing structure which some users find reasonable and cost-effective. However, GitLab may be expensive for smaller teams. GitLab's initial setup cost is considered excellent, while the pricing and licensing experience with Microsoft Azure DevOps varies depending on individual needs and preferences. GitLab showed promise in terms of ROI due to its ability to accommodate a large number of users and improve DevOps score. On the other hand, Azure DevOps received positive feedback, but measuring ROI was challenging. It was suggested that GitLab may be more appropriate for bigger teams.

  • Service and Support: While GitLab's customer service is inconsistent among customers, Microsoft Azure DevOps generally provides good customer service with excellent support and helpful forums. However, some users feel that Microsoft could do more to improve their support.

Comparison Results : GitLab is the preferred option due to its comprehensive product that eliminates the need for multiple solutions and offers a single platform for various management tasks, including source code, build, test, artifact, and deployment management. The platform also has better integration with other platforms, more cloud-native capabilities, and a lower initial setup cost. However, Microsoft Azure DevOps is particularly useful for agile delivery and project management due to its easy navigation, customization, and integration with other Microsoft tools.


To learn more, read our detailed GitLab vs. Microsoft Azure DevOps Report (Updated: March 2024).
767,496 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Q&A Highlights
Question: How does Microsoft Azure DevOps compare with GitLab?
Answer: Microsoft Azure DevOps may be better for an organization that already uses other Microsoft products and services and needs a comprehensive DevOps solution with a broad range of features. GitLab may be a better choice for organizations looking for an open-source and free DevOps solution that is reportedly more straightforward to set up and manage. Of course, the best way to decide between Microsoft Azure DevOps and GitLab is to consider your organization's specific needs and requirements carefully, but here are some of the pros and cons of each solution: Azure DevOps Pros: Integrated tightly with other Microsoft products and services Has a broad range of functionality and features Provides good support for enterprise requirements Cons: Managing and setting it up may be more complex Could be costly, as reported by others GitLab Pros: Open source and may be free to use Reportedly easier to set up and manage Has a strong community support Cons: May not be as tightly integrated with other products and services as Microsoft Azure DevOps Reportedly has fewer features than Microsoft Azure DevOps May not be as well-suited for enterprise requirements
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"As a developer, this solution is useful as a repository holder because most of the POC projects that we have are on GitLab.""Their CI/CD engine is very mature. It's very comprehensive and flexible, and compared to other projects, I believe that GitLab is number one right now from that perspective.""I have found the most valuable feature is security control. I also like the branching and cloning software.""The tool helps to integrate CI/CD pipeline deployments. It is very easy to learn. Its security model is good.""GitLab's best features are maintenance, branch integration, and development infrastructure.""It is scalable.""CI/CD and GitLab scanning are the most valuable features.""GitLab is a solution for source code management, container registry, pipelines, testing, and deployment."

More GitLab Pros →

"The most valuable features of Microsoft Azure DevOps are high-level protection. The protection is very important to the customers to prevent eavesdropping. eavesdropping is when a hacker tries to get into the solution. With this solution is it difficult for them to do it.""The installation is straightforward. We can create a whole new organization in less than a day.""It is possible to add third-party extensions to increase the usability of the product.""The most valuable feature of this solution is that it saves time.""The most valuable feature is the ease of use and performance.""The solution integrates well with other Azure services and third-party tools.""It is a well-integrated product in terms of the development lifecycle.""Detailed logs allow us to pinpoint the exact cause of any issues, making troubleshooting efficient and accurate."

More Microsoft Azure DevOps Pros →

Cons
"In the free version, when a merge request is raised, there is no way to enforce certain rules. We can't enforce that this merge request must be reviewed or approved by two or three people in the team before it is pushed to the master branch. That's why we are exploring using some agents.""Their RBAC is role-based access, which is fine but not very good.""We are having a few problems integrating with Jira at the moment, which is something that our IT department is investigating.""I would like to have some features to support peer review.""It would be better if there weren't any outages. There are occasions where we usually see a lot of outages using GitLab. It happens at least once a week or something like that. Whatever pipelines you're running, to check the logs, you need to have a different set of tools like Argus or something like that. If you have pipelines running on GitLab, you need a separate service deployed to view the logs, which is kind of a pain. If the logs can be used conveniently on GitLab, that would be definitely helpful. I'm not talking about the CI/CD pipelines but the back-end services and microservices deployed over GitLab. To view the logs for those microservices, you need to have separate log viewers, which is kind of a pain.""The price of GitLab could improve, it is high.""For as long as I have used GitLab, I haven't encountered any major limitations. However, I think that perhaps the search functionality could be better.""I used Spring Cloud config and to connect that to GitLab was so hard."

More GitLab Cons →

"It is not that intuitive. Sometimes, it is hard to find some of the functions. I would like to have an old-fashioned menu structure to be able to easily find things. Its environment setup is not very good. They should improve the way it is set up for different screens and make it easier to find functionalities and maintain team members.""Not all companies use the same methodology which could limit the use of this solution.""When converting to DevOps, it was difficult to map.""The dashboards need bigger with better extensions and layouts. There isn't a workflow related to the statuses on the dashboard. It only lists the statuses. You can have one started, and once done, but everything in between is only in progress and could be in any order you want, it lacks flow.""I want DevOps to have more automated reminders about tasks that don't need management. We don't have reminders, so a project manager must track the tasks. It's not automatic.""I would like to see more customization available to the administrator.""Being more technology-agnostic through ease of integration would be beneficial.""The UI, the user experience, is challenging for newcomers."

More Microsoft Azure DevOps Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I think that we pay approximately $100 USD per month."
  • "The price is okay."
  • "It seems reasonable. Our IT team manages the licenses."
  • "Its price is fine. It is on the cheaper side and not expensive. You have to pay additionally for GitLab CI/CD minutes. Initially, we used the free version. When we ran out of GitLab minutes, we migrated to the paid version."
  • "It is very expensive. We can't bear it now, and we have to find another solution. We have a yearly subscription in which we can increase the number of licenses, but we have to pay at the end of the year."
  • "I don't mind the price because I use the free version."
  • "We are using its free version, and we are evaluating its Premium version. Its Ultimate version is very expensive."
  • "The price of GitLab could be better, it is expensive."
  • More GitLab Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It's a good tool, quite rich, it has a lot of features, and quite a lot of analytical capabilities which are built on top of it so that you can see how your projects are going and all that stuff. It's a good tool."
  • "There is a licensing fee of $6/user per month."
  • "The price is cheaper than Jira and some of the other competing tools."
  • "It is the least expensive product in this class."
  • "I find that the pricing is good, and it is competitive with the other vendors in the market."
  • "Microsoft Azure DevOps is free for up to five users and allows you to track a maximum of three projects."
  • "It is a subscription model and I only pay for what I use."
  • "The price of this solution is fair."
  • More Microsoft Azure DevOps Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Release Automation solutions are best for your needs.
    767,496 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The tool helps to integrate CI/CD pipeline deployments. It is very easy to learn. Its security model is good.
    Top Answer:GitLab could consider introducing a code-scanning tool. Purchasing such tools from external markets can incur charges, which might not be favorable. Integrating these features into GitLab would… more »
    Top Answer:Jira is a great centralized tool for just about everything, from local team management to keeping track of products and work logs. It is easy to implement and navigate, and it is stable and scalable… more »
    Top Answer:TFS and Azure DevOps are different in many ways. TFS was designed for admins, and only offers incremental improvements. In addition, TFS seems complicated to use and I don’t think it has a very… more »
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of the solution is task management.
    Ranking
    2nd
    out of 32 in Release Automation
    Views
    15,166
    Comparisons
    12,258
    Reviews
    50
    Average Words per Review
    402
    Rating
    8.6
    1st
    out of 32 in Release Automation
    Views
    19,315
    Comparisons
    14,609
    Reviews
    22
    Average Words per Review
    650
    Rating
    8.2
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Fuzzit
    Azure DevOps, VSTS, Visual Studio Team Services, MS Azure DevOps
    Learn More
    Overview

    GitLab is a complete DevOps platform that enables teams to collaborate and deliver software faster. 

    It provides a single application for the entire DevOps lifecycle, from planning and development to testing, deployment, and monitoring. 

    With GitLab, teams can streamline their workflows, automate processes, and improve productivity.

    Microsoft Azure DevOps is a cloud service that enables developers to collaborate on code development projects and create and deploy applications quicker than ever before. The service helps unite developers, project managers, and software development experts through a collaborative experience while using the application. For the users' convenience, Azure DevOps offers the user cloud services through Azure DevOps Services or an on-premises service using Azure DevOps Server. In addition, it supports integration with additional services and adding extensions, including the ability for the user to create their own custom extensions. 

    Azure DevOps provides a variety of unified features that can be accessed through their web browser or IDE client, such as:

    • Azure Pipelines - Develop and deploy services to support ongoing application integration and delivery. Azure pipelines, which work with almost every project type and most languages, will automatically test code projects in order to make them available to others.

    • Azure Artifacts - Share packages and integrate package sharing between teams. Packages include NuGet, npm, and Maven, in addition to other private and public sources. Developers can now share and consume packages with other developers from different public registries.

    • Azure Repos - Offers source control of your code through Team Foundation Version Control (TFVC) or Git repositories. Developers can now keep track of any changes that are made in their code over the course of their project.

    • Azure Test Plans - Offers continuous and manual/exploratory app testing through several tools. Test Suites, or a collection of Test Cases, are grouped together in a container called a Test Plan.

    • Azure Boards - Provides a suite of Agile tools to track work, support planning, code defects, and general issues while using Kanban and Scrum software. Teams are in need of tools that are flexible and will help them grow. Azure Boards is a service that helps developers manage their software projects. 

    Benefits of Microsoft Azure DevOps

    Microsoft Azure DevOps offers many benefits, including:

    • A quick setup and easy deployment
    • An elastic scale
    • Exceptional security
    • No-maintenance operations
    • Effortless collaboration through domains
    • The ability to create and deploy products faster than traditional software

    Reviews from Real Users

    Microsoft Azure DevOps stands out among its competitors for a variety of reasons. Two major ones are its ability to forecast how long each task will take and the ability for users to follow the entire development process.

    PeerSpot viewers note the effectiveness of this solution. An executive chief operating officer for a cloud provider notes, “We can forecast tasks and the number of hours a task will take and can compare it with how long a task actually takes.” 

    Carlos H., a product and system director at SPCM, writes, “I think the most usable thing is that you can follow the whole progress of the development process. This makes it very useful for us.”

    Sample Customers
    1. NASA  2. IBM  3. Sony  4. Alibaba  5. CERN  6. Siemens  7. Volkswagen  8. ING  9. Ticketmaster  10. SpaceX  11. Adobe  12. Intuit  13. Autodesk  14. Rakuten  15. Unity Technologies  16. Pandora  17. Electronic Arts  18. Nordstrom  19. Verizon  20. Comcast  21. Philips  22. Deutsche Telekom  23. Orange  24. Fujitsu  25. Ericsson  26. Nokia  27. General Electric  28. Cisco  29. Accenture  30. Deloitte  31. PwC  32. KPMG
    Alaska Airlines, Iberia Airlines, Columbia, Skype
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Retailer10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization25%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company22%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Energy/Utilities Company12%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Government9%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business44%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise47%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise33%
    Large Enterprise52%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business31%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise51%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise68%
    Buyer's Guide
    GitLab vs. Microsoft Azure DevOps
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab vs. Microsoft Azure DevOps and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    767,496 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    GitLab is ranked 2nd in Release Automation with 70 reviews while Microsoft Azure DevOps is ranked 1st in Release Automation with 123 reviews. GitLab is rated 8.6, while Microsoft Azure DevOps is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of GitLab writes "Powerful, mature, and easy to set up and manage". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Azure DevOps writes "Good support, helpful management capabilities, and great Kanban boards". GitLab is most compared with Bamboo, AWS CodePipeline, SonarQube, Tekton and TeamCity, whereas Microsoft Azure DevOps is most compared with Jira, TFS, Rally Software, ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management and OpenText ALM / Quality Center. See our GitLab vs. Microsoft Azure DevOps report.

    See our list of best Release Automation vendors and best Enterprise Agile Planning Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.