OpenText Application Quality Management and Microsoft Azure DevOps are key players in the application lifecycle management space. Azure DevOps has an advantage due to its strong CI/CD pipelines and integrated capabilities with Microsoft's ecosystem, while OpenText is better suited for large-scale environments requiring detailed traceability.
Features: OpenText AQM is ideal for large organizations with its strong traceability and customization features, easily managing complex testing environments. Its scalable reporting and robust data integrity make it suitable for extensive projects. Azure DevOps stands out with its CI/CD pipelines, allowing for efficient code integration and deployment. Its seamless integration with Microsoft's products and ease of tracing work items are also significant strengths.
Room for Improvement: OpenText AQM faces criticism for its high licensing costs, complex user interface, and limited browser compatibility, which can hinder agile adoption. Conversely, Azure DevOps requires enhancements in third-party tool integrations and reporting features, and needs to improve cloud environment support and project management capabilities.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText AQM is mainly deployed on-premises, favorable for environments preferring local data handling, though customer service experiences vary. Azure DevOps benefits from easy deployment on public and hybrid clouds and receives positive feedback for responsive and comprehensive customer service.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText AQM's high cost restricts its use among SMEs despite its long-term value, with upfront expenses being a deterrent. Azure DevOps offers competitive, flexible pricing through a subscription model, providing a favorable cost-benefit ratio, especially for organizations already using Microsoft's suite of products.
On a scale of one to ten, where ten is the best, I would say ROI is an eight.
It acts as an enabler for effective test and program management.
Resolving issues took time since understanding our unique problems was not always straightforward for support teams.
Technical support has been excellent.
Quality is always high yet not perfect.
The scalability has left me pleased, not just for our teams in Europe, the Middle East, and Asia, but as we expanded into North America, Africa, and even Australia.
OpenText ALM Quality Center is definitely scalable.
Everything works ninety-nine percent well.
The solution is stable, and we did not encounter any stability issues.
From a stability standpoint, OpenText ALM Quality Center has been pretty good.
Enhanced system guidance highlighting best practices would be beneficial, especially if experienced personnel are not available for support.
Those processes are a bit difficult for some customers who may not have technical knowledge and don't go through the entire documentation.
Instead of customers having to try many options themselves, they benefit from practitioner recommendations.
Improvements are needed so that the system can continue running without creating a new run.
I see a stable tool that remains relevant in the market.
HPLM has one of the best UIs compared to other test management tools, allowing for efficient navigation between test pieces, test folders, test suites, and test execution.
They don't even provide a POC where you can have a sandbox or stuff that you can go through and see how exactly it's costing.
I find it to be expensive.
It would be cheaper to use a cloud model with a pay-per-use licensing model.
No organization would use just one vendor, and the goal is about what works well, is scalable, performs well, and offers a reasonable total cost of ownership.
Our company organized a training session with a certified Azure expert, which was extremely beneficial for adopting best practices during the initial three months.
I can't approve my own request and move the code around without a review.
The integration with internal applications and CollabNet is made possible through exposed APIs, allowing necessary integrations.
It creates constant visibility into the test process, showing the status, bugs, and automated test results.
We can create a requirement for stability metrics with the test cases to ensure all requirements are covered.
Microsoft Azure DevOps is a cloud service that enables developers to collaborate on code development projects and create and deploy applications quicker than ever before. The service helps unite developers, project managers, and software development experts through a collaborative experience while using the application. For the users' convenience, Azure DevOps offers the user cloud services through Azure DevOps Services or an on-premises service using Azure DevOps Server. In addition, it supports integration with additional services and adding extensions, including the ability for the user to create their own custom extensions.
Azure DevOps provides a variety of unified features that can be accessed through their web browser or IDE client, such as:
Benefits of Microsoft Azure DevOps
Microsoft Azure DevOps offers many benefits, including:
Reviews from Real Users
Microsoft Azure DevOps stands out among its competitors for a variety of reasons. Two major ones are its ability to forecast how long each task will take and the ability for users to follow the entire development process.
PeerSpot viewers note the effectiveness of this solution. An executive chief operating officer for a cloud provider notes, “We can forecast tasks and the number of hours a task will take and can compare it with how long a task actually takes.”
Carlos H., a product and system director at SPCM, writes, “I think the most usable thing is that you can follow the whole progress of the development process. This makes it very useful for us.”
OpenText Application Quality Management offers extensive capabilities in test management, automation tool integration, and defect traceability, providing an efficient and user-friendly experience for tracking and managing testing workflows.
The platform supports test management by integrating with automation tools and managing the traceability of defects and requirements. It facilitates users with linking test cases to defects, uploading from Excel, and generating customizable reports, which enhances efficiency. Business Process Testing and requirement capturing for test cases further extend its capabilities. Users report concerns about its integration with other tools, particularly in DevOps and agile frameworks, as well as challenges with its complex interface and high cost. Improved integration, better browser compatibility, upgraded dashboards, and enhanced support for agile methodologies are recommended by many users.
What are the most important features of OpenText Application Quality Management?In industries such as finance, healthcare, and technology, organizations apply OpenText Application Quality Management for test management, planning, and automation. It is an essential tool for managing test scenarios, recording results, and supporting both manual and automated testing processes. This tool aids in regression testing, ensuring requirement traceability and acting as a repository for executing test cycles, thereby supporting robust quality assurance practices.
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.