Amazon EKS vs Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 6, 2024
 

Categories and Ranking

Amazon EKS
Ranking in Container Management
3rd
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
39
Ranking in other categories
Container Security (15th)
Red Hat OpenShift Container...
Ranking in Container Management
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
43
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2024, in the Container Management category, the mindshare of Amazon EKS is 25.7%, up from 18.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform is 35.2%, up from 25.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Container Management
Unique Categories:
Container Security
0.1%
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

Richard Ortiz - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 2, 2023
Provides fast and cost-effective cloud adoption with excellent scalability and portability
The main use case is Cloud and IT applications It's a faster solution to adopt on native applications. I would like to see a cloud setup bank management feature. I have been using Amazon EKS for six years. I would rate the product's stability a nine out of ten. I would rate the tool's…
Eisa Shaheen - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 11, 2024
Has an efficient user interface, helping us accelerate the deployment process
Our primary use case for Red Hat OpenShift is to deploy applications. We utilize the platform to manage multiple pods and ensure seamless scaling of our nodes and servers to meet the demands of our high-availability applications The platform has significantly improved our organization by…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Initial setup is straightforward. It only takes 15 minutes to deploy."
"The solution is easy to use."
"The product's most valuable features are scalability, observability, and performance."
"The solution has very good basic features."
"The feature that I have found most valuable is that it is very user-friendly."
"The solution's Autoscaler option allows for an increase in worker notes whenever particular thresholds are exceeded."
"EKS provides autoscaling functionality."
"What I found most valuable in Amazon EKS is its maturity as a cloud computing technology."
"The architecture is the best. The solution is scalable if you are on a container-based solution."
"The most valuable feature for me in the OpenShift Container Platform is the option to manage different containers and environments and also being able to switch among them."
"Technical support is good; they are fast and reliable."
"Some of the primary features we leverage in the platform have to do with how we manage the cluster configurations, the properties, and the auto-scalability. These are the features that definitely provide value in terms of reducing overhead for the developers."
"It is very lightweight and can be deployed very fast, especially when it comes to containers."
"Integrating the product into our existing infrastructure was easy."
"The initial setup process is easy."
"On OpenShift, it's easy to scale applications. We can easily scale up or scale down."
 

Cons

"The management of the nodes in Amazon EKS should be improved."
"They should enhance the Jira integration."
"Amazon EKS is predominately public. However, the government has started to have a lot of interest in Kubernetes and is receiving more education on Kubernetes and Amazon EKS. If we can have the security of Amazon EKS align with the security that is set out by the government it would be much better."
"A cluster is required on-premises, which takes a lot of time."
"I'd like to see the solution add a service catalog."
"Setup depends on what kind of architecture you have"
"Amazon EKS needs to improve customer operations and technical support."
"I would like to see a cloud setup bank management feature."
"It can take 10 to 15 minutes to deploy a microservice. The CI/CD process takes a long time, and if it's because of OCP, that is something that can be changed."
"My impression is that this solution is pretty expensive so I think the pricing plan could improve."
"The initial setup can be hard."
"With the recent trend of cloud-native, fully managed serverless services, I don't see much documentation about how a customer should move from on-prem to the cloud, or what is the best way to do a lift-and-shift. Even if you are on AWS OCP, which is self-managed infra services, and you want to use the ROSA managed services, what is the best way to achieve that migration? I don't see documentation for these kinds of use cases from Red Hat."
"The support costs are too high."
"We've encountered challenges when transitioning applications between these environments."
"Whenever we onboard or deploy services that talk to Oracle Database, they take a lot of time to become active and serve the incoming request, so it would be good to see some improvement here. This could be an OpenShift issue or an internal network problem within our organization."
"The solution needs to introduce open ID connect integration for role-based access control."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"My company paid for the license."
"The solution is quite costly and developers will start exploring other solutions or moving their workloads to other clouds if costs aren't reduced."
"Amazon EKS is expensive."
"The product pricing depends on the specific requirements."
"I rate Amazon EKS’s pricing a nine out of ten."
"Cloud based pay-as-you-go pricing"
"The price could be cheaper. I would rate it as seven out of ten."
"The solution is cheaper than one of its competitors."
"The pricing and licensing are handled on an upper management level, and I'm not involved in that, but I understand the solution to be somewhat pricey."
"If you buy the product for a year or three, you get a lot of discounts...I feel that the product is worth its cost, especially since setting it up can be done with just a few clicks."
"Its licensing is completely incomprehensible. We have special people within our company. They discuss with Red Hat subscription managers. It is too complex, and I do not understand it. We are from the government, and we are trying to be as cheap as possible. Sometimes, I am just amazed at the amount of money that we have to pay. It is crazy."
"OpenShift Container Platform is highly-priced."
"The pricing is expensive for licensing."
"We currently have an annual license renewal."
"Its price is a bit high because it's a premium product, but as long as the business is ready to pay for that, it's okay."
"It depends on who you're talking to. For a large corporation, it is acceptable, other than the significant infrastructure requirements. For a small organization, it is in no way suitable, and we'd go for Amazon's container solution."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Management solutions are best for your needs.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
21%
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Insurance Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
22%
Computer Software Company
16%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon EKS?
The product's most valuable features are scalability, observability, and performance.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon EKS?
The product pricing depends on the specific requirements. For instance, clients between $3000-$4000 per month might find the pricing reasonable, with clusters priced around $70 to $80 plus addition...
What needs improvement with Amazon EKS?
The main thing to improve with Amazon EKS is the price. However, these services can be very expensive. For example, in countries like Turkey, the cost is too high. That's why we offer our cloud sol...
Which is better - OpenShift Container Platform or VMware Tanzu Mission Control?
Red Hat Openshift is ideal for organizations using microservices and cloud environments. I like that the platform is auto-scalable, which saves overhead time for developers. I think Openshift can b...
What do you like most about OpenShift Container Platform?
The tool's most valuable features include high availability, scalability, and security. Other features like advanced cluster management, advanced cluster security, and Red Hat Quay make it powerful...
 

Also Known As

Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

GoDaddy, Pearson, FICO, Intuit, Verizon, Honeywell, Logicworks, RetailMeNot, LogMeIn, Conde Nast, mercari, Trainline, Axway
Edenor, BMW, Ford, Argentine Ministry of Health
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon EKS vs. Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform and other solutions. Updated: July 2024.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.