Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform and Amazon EKS compete in the enterprise Kubernetes market. OpenShift appears to have the upper hand with its comprehensive feature set tailored to enterprise needs, including enhanced security and multi-cloud capabilities.
Features: Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform offers a rich suite of features including enterprise-grade security, advanced developer tools, and support for diverse environments like hybrid and multi-cloud. In contrast, Amazon EKS delivers a seamless user experience with features like integration with AWS Fargate, auto-scaling, and deep integration with AWS services.
Room for Improvement: Amazon EKS can improve in areas such as integration with other AWS tools and overcoming the learning curve in network configurations. It heavily relies on AWS-centric solutions which might not fit all business strategies. Red Hat OpenShift could improve in pricing structure and ease of on-premises setups. Users have also pointed out the need for enhanced documentation and streamlined cloud transitions.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon EKS is generally favored for its ease of deployment in the public cloud with solid documentation and support, though response times may vary. Red Hat OpenShift offers better flexibility in hybrid and private cloud setups but presents a steeper learning curve. OpenShift support is competent, but its on-premises deployment process is more complex.
Pricing and ROI: Amazon EKS provides a competitive pay-as-you-go pricing model beneficial for dynamic scaling needs but may be costly for smaller workloads. It offers a strong ROI through reduced management expenses. Red Hat OpenShift, known for its higher costs, justifies this with an expansive feature set aimed at enterprise-level applications, though potentially prohibitive for smaller businesses. The ROI is significant, especially in high-security environments.
We have cost explorer available, and a bill forecast based on usage allows us to determine whether resources are underutilized or overutilized.
It's a fast deployment, with very good documentation, and it's really helpful.
I can recommend using it to save costs and for faster deployment, better performance, security, and easy clustering.
We didn't need to manage etcd and those control management tools; it's totally handled from the AWS side, making it very beneficial.
I believe there should be a recovery solution available for at least a few hours so that we might bring it back.
They will set up a call, guide us, or provide solutions regarding integration with AWS or Amazon EKS.
They should prioritize skilled engineers for urgent issues.
The ability to scale based on requirements by deploying additional containers is a strong point for Kubernetes.
This allows us to scale our applications or APIs as needed, offering reliability through the automation of scaling processes.
If any node is not ready, the cluster autoscaler ensures that it is removed from the AWS auto-scaling group and replaces it with a new node in the cluster.
I rate the scalability of Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform as a nine, as I haven't encountered any issues with scaling a cluster or applications.
Scalability is rated nine out of ten.
There are multiple availability zones in the regions, meaning no single point of failure.
The control plane is quite stable in Amazon EKS, and I find it to be 100% available.
We haven't faced any challenges, and it consistently delivers on its committed SLA.
There haven't been any issues so far; it remains stable with no downtime or crashes, and even the upgrades are handled seamlessly without issues.
Simplifying these will enable more people, not just those with strong foundational knowledge, to work effectively with these services.
Amazon EKS can be improved by having the maintenance of Kubernetes versions managed better, as everything is handled by the Kubernetes team and possibly a separate team at AWS.
Adding logging would be a valuable improvement.
The solution itself doesn't require a high learning curve; it is actually quite good to manage.
I would like to see advanced cluster management added in future releases, such as a single pane of glass to manage multiple clusters.
The EKS service itself is free, but you will incur costs for the VMs used as nodes in that cluster.
The pricing structure is beneficial for large companies who pay for what they use, but it is not affordable for startups.
Now, it stands at six or seven due to optimizing our workload.
The current licensing cost for this solution is around $23,000 per year, per month.
Regarding whether Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform is expensive or if the price is reasonable for my customers, to me, the services it provides should incur some costs, but based on market feedback, it is quite expensive.
The most beneficial aspect of Amazon EKS is that it helps manage the Kubernetes master node, so I don't need to maintain the master node, including tasks like upgrading.
The main benefits that I received from using Amazon EKS are that it is a managed cluster and offers simplicity.
By default, if you just install Amazon EKS, you can deploy your application, but to have it enterprise-ready, you have to configure a number of other things that will boost productivity.
It is important for critical systems.
The cluster scaling features, such as the auto-scaling of cluster nodes and application replicas using horizontal and vertical pod auto-scaling, significantly impact our operations.
In terms of features in Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform, I find the orchestration itself quite useful for my customers because it integrates with lots of tools.
Product | Market Share (%) |
---|---|
Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform | 19.7% |
Amazon EKS | 11.8% |
Other | 68.5% |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 30 |
Midsize Enterprise | 18 |
Large Enterprise | 36 |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 14 |
Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
Large Enterprise | 39 |
Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service (Amazon EKS) is a fully managed Kubernetes service. Customers such as Intel, Snap, Intuit, GoDaddy, and Autodesk trust EKS to run their most sensitive and mission critical applications because of its security, reliability, and scalability.
EKS is the best place to run Kubernetes for several reasons. First, you can choose to run your EKS clusters using AWS Fargate, which is serverless compute for containers. Fargate removes the need to provision and manage servers, lets you specify and pay for resources per application, and improves security through application isolation by design. Second, EKS is deeply integrated with services such as Amazon CloudWatch, Auto Scaling Groups, AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM), and Amazon Virtual Private Cloud (VPC), providing you a seamless experience to monitor, scale, and load-balance your applications. Third, EKS integrates with AWS App Mesh and provides a Kubernetes native experience to consume service mesh features and bring rich observability, traffic controls and security features to applications. Additionally, EKS provides a scalable and highly-available control plane that runs across multiple availability zones to eliminate a single point of failure.
EKS runs upstream Kubernetes and is certified Kubernetes conformant so you can leverage all benefits of open source tooling from the community. You can also easily migrate any standard Kubernetes application to EKS without needing to refactor your code.
Red Hat® OpenShift® offers a consistent hybrid cloud foundation for building and scaling containerized applications. Benefit from streamlined platform installation and upgrades from one of the enterprise Kubernetes leaders.
We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.