

Microsoft Azure and Google Firebase are key players in the cloud computing market. Microsoft Azure appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive cloud service suite, extensive global presence, and hybrid solution flexibility, which provide an edge in enterprise environments.
Features: Microsoft Azure offers a comprehensive suite of cloud services for deployment, management, and scaling of applications. It supports a variety of programming frameworks and integrates easily with both Microsoft and non-Microsoft services. Google Firebase is recognized for its real-time database capabilities, authentication services, and efficient hosting solutions. It simplifies backend integrations in Android applications and offers quick deployment times for web and mobile apps.
Room for Improvement: Microsoft Azure users often face challenges with complex pricing structures and integration across services. There are concerns about the usability of the management console and pricing transparency. Google Firebase could benefit from enhanced control over function management and more complex data query support. Its pricing model is considered confusing and inconsistencies across global markets are noted. Technical support response times and documentation could also be improved.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Azure is well-regarded for its robust deployment capabilities and hybrid cloud options, though customer service can be inconsistent. Quality improves in specific support queues. Google Firebase is celebrated for easy deployment due to its serverless nature, particularly for mobile apps. Its customer service is generally praised, with quick response times and accessible resources in community forums.
Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Azure's pricing is competitive but complex, with a pay-as-you-go model that users find flexible yet desire more predictable cost forecasts. Azure often delivers good ROI when integrating existing Microsoft solutions. Google Firebase offers a generous free tier which is advantageous for startups, and while its pricing becomes more significant with increased usage, it remains generally affordable. A flexible pay-as-you-go model is available, though users call for better price transparency for budgeting.
The value for money is good, and Microsoft Azure has positively impacted our operational costs.
When we use Microsoft Azure, it provides enhanced security from our perspective, though I am not certain about the financial return on investment or benefits for our users as I do not have that information.
If the community doesn't have the answers, then I contact the Google Firebase team directly.
I do not currently find any other competitors that match its offering.
Microsoft needs to engage L3 and L2 in support when specified in service tickets.
We eventually get the resolution we seek.
I would rate their technical support a ten because we have various support channels available.
It can handle all tiers of the market effectively.
Google also has some other cloud services, but when we compare Google Firebase, it is not as scalable.
I would rate the scalability of Google Firebase as eight because I miss some features from MS SQL, particularly the SQL functions.
Microsoft Azure is not just one product; it is a platform with multiple products within Microsoft Azure, and I would say it is scalable and would rate it a nine.
The scalability of Microsoft Azure is excellent for growth and adaptation, depending on company requirements.
It has different kinds of designs that allow for management and deployment in multi-zones, offering both scalable and non-scalable options.
In our company, we have prototypes on Google Firebase and productions on AWS Cloud.
We noticed a few critical servers went down due to a Microsoft Azure-end hardware issue.
We are now migrating clients without the zoning into mandatory multi-zone deployments, so if one zone goes down, their application and database remain live.
Microsoft Azure is quite stable, but recent outages and security issues have slightly decreased my confidence.
Since Google Firebase is a NoSQL platform, areas for improvement include enhancing query functionalities to be more equivalent to SQL, like MS SQL.
Automation testing with mobile devices could be improved, especially in regression testing to ensure that new feature launches do not affect other features.
Recent outages and security issues are also a concern, causing a decrease in confidence, especially when partnering with third-party companies.
The administrative side is suitable for technical people, but our finance and HR super users find it less user-friendly, as they prefer drag-and-drop features to build their own solutions without contacting IT.
There is still room for improvement in terms of pricing.
They could have implemented credits based on usage so that users would be able to easily calculate the pricing and provide it to customers.
Google Firebase offers a reasonable pricing structure.
Microsoft solutions might be cheaper than some services like AWS, but some solutions may be more expensive depending on the services compared.
Copilot is expensive based on recent pricing for our POC.
They have discounts and also provide promotions for a three-year reservation which comes with significant discounts on the infrastructure part.
What I appreciate most about Google Firebase is the speed, accuracy, and security it offers.
It allows for pre-launch testing without publishing it on Google Play right away.
A real-time database.
Power BI, another feature of Azure, is extremely elegant and has robust features that support forecasting using R and Python.
If Microsoft gives a report, such as a server performance report in a detailed way, which shows what is consuming more CPU, memory, and disk IO, and network utilization during a particular time, it would be helpful to visualize that information.
What is very interesting in terms of scalability is the automatic possibilities to provision some new machines to be able to absorb the number of users we have in the system.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Azure | 10.8% |
| Google Firebase | 2.6% |
| Other | 86.6% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 29 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 10 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 140 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 53 |
| Large Enterprise | 150 |
Google Firebase is a stable, reliable, and scalable mobile platform that enables you to quickly develop apps, accelerate them, and monitor their performance.
With Google Firebase You Can
Google Firebase Features:
SDKs supported by Google Firebase:
Benefits of Google Firebase:
Reviews from Real Users
PeerSpot user Nilakshi S., technical team lead at AuthentiCode says, “The solution is very stable and very reliable. There aren't any bugs or glitches.”
"What I like most about Google Firebase is that it's one of the easier options to host a website or app quickly," says Craig F., application development manager at a financial services firm.
A senior developer at a consultancy says, “The documentation for Google Firebase is great. Also, what I like about it is the integration to Android, which is the reason I went with Firebase.”
Microsoft Azure integrates services and offers flexibility, ensuring compatibility with diverse environments. Its scalability, security, and cost-efficient features enhance deployment and management, making it ideal for infrastructure services and application hosting.
Azure provides a comprehensive suite of tools for application deployment, virtual machine management, and data analytics. It allows seamless integration with Power BI and offers a user-friendly interface supported by detailed documentation and technical support. Though users appreciate its capabilities, they sometimes face challenges with costs, setup, and interface complexity, alongside integration and performance issues. Frequent updates and a learning curve are also noted, though Azure's cloud-based security and scalability remain critical for disaster recovery and business continuity.
What are Azure's key features?Microsoft Azure is widely implemented in industries like financial services, healthcare, and logistics for hosting enterprise applications and vital services. Companies utilize its capabilities for IoT applications, DevOps, and Kubernetes clusters, benefiting from its cloud migrations, data analytics, and active directory support.
We monitor all Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.