"The product has good integration."
"I like Intersight because of the integration with HashiCorp, Kubernetes, and each cloud because Intersight is the IO module."
"Scalable portfolio of services for remote device management, with good cloud integration. It's also easy to set up."
"I can quickly manage the provisioned servers."
"Cisco Intersight needs some improvement in terms of stability. Hybrid cloud management and proper hyperscaler tie-up are other areas for improvement."
"The unique problem with Cisco Intersight is that it's not supporting some players."
"When new features are added, the service becomes full of bugs."
"Its user interface can be improved. It can be more user-friendly."
Cisco Intersight is ranked 30th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 3 reviews while Cisco UCS Manager is ranked 33rd in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 1 review. Cisco Intersight is rated 8.0, while Cisco UCS Manager is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Cisco Intersight writes "Scalable and easy to set up portfolio of services; good for remote device management and other functions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cisco UCS Manager writes "Stable, easy to deploy, and good for managing the entire Cisco ecosystem". Cisco Intersight is most compared with Cisco UCS Director, VMware vRealize Automation (vRA), HPE OneView, VMware vRealize Operations (vROps) and IBM Turbonomic, whereas Cisco UCS Manager is most compared with Nutanix Prism, HPE OneView, Zabbix, Zenoss Service Dynamics and WhatsUp Gold.
See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
