Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM Integration Bus vs Mule ESB comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 30, 2022
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Integration Bus
Ranking in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)
1st
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
66
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Mule ESB
Ranking in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)
2nd
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
47
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2024, in the Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) category, the mindshare of IBM Integration Bus is 24.1%, up from 22.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Mule ESB is 25.6%, up from 25.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)
 

Featured Reviews

Avinash-Arepaka - PeerSpot reviewer
Apr 24, 2023
An excellent solution for transformation and routing with a responsive support team
The product helps us develop integration applications. It also enables communication between applications from different environments The features I have found most valuable in this solution are transformation and routing. IBM Integration Bus doesn’t provide some features that MuleSoft provides.…
DhivakarSekar - PeerSpot reviewer
Jun 22, 2022
Allows us to integrate with other software applications but could be more secure
We use this solution to integrate with other software applications. Now, we are running almost 50 integration APIs, and will have over 1 million billable transactions. The solution can be deployed on cloud or on-premises. I'm using version 4.2 It's open source, and there are a lot of community…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Promotes the reuse of developed resources to more efficiently consume resources."
"I found all features valuable. There are a lot of connectors."
"I recommend it for large enterprises but only for specific use cases. You need to have a relatively mature integration practice in your organization to leverage its capabilities fully."
"I consider the solution to be one of the most stable in the market."
"The features I have found most valuable in this solution are transformation and routing."
"The most valuable feature is the security."
"I have found the inbound and outbound adapter confirmations valuable."
"It aligns well with containerized environments, which increases its scalability and high availability."
"The most valuable features of Mule ESB are its ease of use, documentation, ease to adapt to newer security and vulnerabilities, and a lot of help available. Additionally, there is a lot of flexibility, many patches available, and they provide APIs. They are a market standard."
"Everything runs in Java, which is a useful feature."
"The most valuable feature is the Salesforce integration."
"Mule Expression Language"
"Mule ESB is a very easy-to-use and user-friendly solution."
"The transformation and the data format are the features that I like the most."
"It was pretty fast to develop APIs on this platform, which is something I liked about it. So, the time to value was pretty good."
"The connectivity the solution provides is excellent. There are often too many systems that we have to integrate and this helps with that."
 

Cons

"Licensing is too high. It is quite expensive."
"The solution is too expensive for smaller companies."
"IBM Integration Bus can improve JSON Schema validations. We don't have any kind of nodes that can support that kind of validation. If we want to containerize it by means of the docker's containers in the clouds, we are not able to manage it very well."
"Current aggregation implementation should be deprecated. MQ independent, as well as an intuitive solution, should be proposed."
"IBM could improve its connectivity."
"They should add connectors to banking applications and other specific industries."
"Some of the runtime properties need to be improved because if you want to load certificates as sales security, you have to restart the server."
"The interface could be more user-friendly."
"The initial setup is not easy."
"Documentation is cryptic, product releases are far too frequent, and upgrades become troublesome."
"The initial setup could be more straightforward."
"MuleSoft isn't as mature as some other integration technologies out there like IBM WebSphere. There's room for growth, and MuleSoft is working toward that."
"It needs more samples. Also, the dependency on Maven should be removed."
"One area that could be improved is the way that policies are propagated when APIs are moved from one environment to another. It's an issue, but when you develop and test the rest APIs in a lower environment and need to move them, there's a propagation process. This process moves certain aspects of the APIs, like the basic features. But when we move them, the policies don't always move with them. The policies should be able to move so we don't have to redo them manually. There are some APIs we use, but it's a bit tedious."
"The Anypoint platform consumes a lot of memory, and it would be great for developers if it were more lightweight."
"The payment system needs improvement."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing could be improved to make it more competitive."
"I generally do not get involved in the licensing or pricing because I'm a hardcore technical guy, but I'm aware of the fact that IBM is highly expensive, so not everybody can afford it. All the products are licensed."
"The price of the IBM Integration Bus is expensive. If you compare the price to the cloud version you can purchase what you need but the on-premise version price is flat."
"IBM is expensive."
"The price is reasonable considering the features we receive."
"The price of this product could be lower."
"The pricing of the solution is high."
"Pricing is on par with its competition."
"Mule ESB is an expensive solution."
"The various features and components for this solution are no longer free."
"Most of the challenges that I had with this solution were for smaller customers. There is not a good licensing model or pricing model. It is more expensive than other solutions, and that's the downside of MuleSoft. I had to be creative to be able to sell it to the business, but we did. This is something they have to work on because for large companies, it's affordable, but for small and medium businesses, it's very hard to sell."
"This product is cheaper than some offered by other vendors, although there is a problem because you have to pay for some third-party adapters."
"This product is expensive, but it does offer value for money."
"Mule ESB is a costly solution. We pay approximately $80,000 annually for the system. The cost of the number of instances, annual subscription, and cloud hosting services are expensive."
"The licensing is yearly, and there are additional fees for services."
"The price of the Mule ESB commercial version is expensive. However, they have a free community version."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) solutions are best for your needs.
801,314 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
21%
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Insurance Company
6%
Computer Software Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Retailer
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Migration from IBM Integration Bus to Mulesoft ESB for a large enterprise tech services company
I was previously part of the Oracle SOA/OSB development team. In my current capacity I architected solutions using MuleSoft Anypoint Platform on cloud / on-premises and hybrid modes and on PCE/RTF ...
IBM Integration Bus vs Mule ESB - which to choose?
Our team ran a comparison of IBM’s Integration Bus vs. Mule ESB in order to determine what sort of ESB software was the best fit for our organization. Ultimately we decided to choose IBM Integratio...
What do you like most about IBM Integration Bus?
The message queue, like, message queue connectors. Then they have a built in connectors for most of the systems, like SAP, oracle database, and this Civil connector is there. Of course, we have thi...
What do you like most about Mule ESB?
The solution's drag-and-drop interface and data viewer helped us quite a lot.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Mule ESB?
Regarding licensing and pricing, I find it somewhat flexible. They are more flexible with larger customers compared to small and medium ones, as their licensing model depends on ports and other fac...
What needs improvement with Mule ESB?
One notable drawback is the user experience aspect, particularly in terms of self-service functionality within Mule ESB. It would be beneficial if users could navigate the UI easily without extensi...
 

Also Known As

IBM WebSphere ESB
No data available
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Salesbox, €sterreichische Bundesbahnen (€BB), Road Buddy, Swiss Federal Railways, Electricity Supply Board, The Hartree Centre, ESB Networks
Ube, PacificComp, University of Witwatersrand, Justice Systems, Camelot
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Integration Bus vs. Mule ESB and other solutions. Updated: September 2024.
801,314 professionals have used our research since 2012.