

SCOM and New Relic compete in the IT monitoring market. New Relic has the upper hand due to its versatility across various technology stacks and user-friendly SaaS deployment.
Features: SCOM focuses on strong Microsoft application monitoring with integration in Windows environments, providing management packs for Microsoft applications and servers. New Relic offers real-time performance tracking with dynamic dashboards, widely appealing to both developers and operations teams. It is adaptable across various non-Microsoft ecosystems due to its browser monitoring and third-party integrations.
Room for Improvement: SCOM faces a steep learning curve and extensive customization requirements to prevent alert storms, along with costly licensing and poor support for non-Microsoft ecosystems. New Relic needs better alerting capabilities, improvements in data retention policies, and a reduction in pricing for startups. Data privacy and integration with on-premise systems are other concerns.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SCOM requires significant setup with its on-premises deployment, and customer service largely depends on having Premier Support, with varied responsiveness. New Relic’s SaaS nature facilitates easy deployment in cloud environments, earning positive customer support reviews. However, users seek better documentation for ease of use.
Pricing and ROI: SCOM's cost-effective licensing as part of the Microsoft System Center suite benefits enterprises invested in Microsoft, though additional costs may arise from custom management packs. New Relic’s pricing is deemed high due to data retention charges, yet many validate the expense for the insights provided. It is generally seen as an expensive choice but offers valuable returns with extensive monitoring features.
There is return on investment because since we reduced the downtime, we can definitely save a lot of money within that period.
There is a definite return on investment for New Relic, as we would not have invested in building its infrastructure if there were no returns.
After implementing New Relic, we have decreased staffing requirements while saving time and money.
If I drop an email to them, they will respond quickly to my email.
Customer support from New Relic is very good, and we rarely need to create support tickets.
They are very polite and helped him out.
They often treat issues in isolation, not considering how one problem might relate to another.
When I was working directly with Microsoft at TCS, my first company, the support experience was quite smooth, and we received solutions promptly.
We currently use New Relic for tens of thousands of developers and hundreds of teams within our organization, and we have not encountered any scalability issues.
It is also suitable for cloud native architectures, SaaS, or software as a service, and for high volume data ingestion also.
Regarding New Relic's scalability, it excels at the enterprise level for cloud integrations that can utilize tags.
The scalability of SCOM, meaning its ability to adapt to our needs, is excellent because we are working with SQL systems and multiple servers.
New Relic lags sometimes.
New Relic is stable based on my experience, as I have not seen any problems with the UI.
I have not seen many errors or frequent data loss because once we have installed the agent on the system and have the details, not much manual intervention is required.
SCOM is a bit unstable lately, primarily due to a lack of resources.
If they could improve the customer support by reducing their SLA within three to five days, if they could remediate everything, that will be so much helpful.
Using real-time data, if there are any malicious patterns or something happening, they can identify those.
Because of the pricing model, organizations have experienced uncontrolled costs and were not able to afford New Relic.
I would like to see a software-as-a-service version in Azure to eliminate the need for on-premise infrastructure.
SCOM is likely to be phased out in favor of more compatible tools like Icinga for application monitoring or when moving to cloud solutions like CloudWatch and Azure.
It would be beneficial to have a summary on one single dashboard, as there are many more possibilities available.
Considering the features New Relic offers, the pricing or cost setup has not been a blocker for our budget.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for synthetic monitoring is that minions used to cost a lot.
Using New Relic speeds up troubleshooting and resolution, giving us a clearer picture of where issues are, thus saving time and effort.
New Relic is very useful for teams that don't have much of a dedicated DevOps team but want to have observability for their platform, and it's an easy way to get started.
New Relic has positively impacted our organization by reducing errors, improving performance, and saving time.
It assists me in detecting server downtime and delivers basic performance monitoring right out of the box.
The most valuable feature of SCOM is its monitoring capability, and we have integrated SCOM with Grafana, which is a dashboarding tool.
SCOM integrates several systems and offers correlation features, like setting up everything around Active Directory or DNS.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| New Relic | 1.4% |
| SCOM | 1.6% |
| Other | 97.0% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 65 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 50 |
| Large Enterprise | 77 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 16 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 22 |
| Large Enterprise | 54 |
New Relic offers real-time application monitoring and insight into performance bottlenecks. Its customizable dashboards and APM integration provide efficient operational support, while server performance alerts ensure quick issue detection.
New Relic provides comprehensive monitoring of application performance, tracking bottlenecks across databases and front-end components. Users employ it for server and infrastructure monitoring, as well as analyzing key metrics such as CPU and memory usage. The solution's ability to integrate with tools like PagerDuty enhances incident management capabilities. However, users have expressed a need for improvements in query language simplicity, more detailed historical insights, and better mobile app monitoring support.
What are New Relic's most important features?In industries like e-commerce and financial services, New Relic supports application performance monitoring to enhance user experience and system reliability. Organizations leverage its insights for optimizing performance, particularly in server operations and infrastructure management. Its ability to monitor API failures through synthetic monitoring is crucial for maintaining high service levels.
SCOM monitors Microsoft environments with a focus on Windows servers and applications such as SQL, Exchange, and SharePoint. It offers integration with Active Directory and Azure, along with customizable dashboards, management packs, and robust alert mechanisms, aiding efficient management and control.
SCOM provides a comprehensive monitoring solution for Microsoft technologies, helping organizations track performance and availability of applications, services, and infrastructure. It integrates with Active Directory and Azure, offering capabilities for monitoring Windows and Linux environments. Extensive management packs, customizable dashboards, and automated alerts offer a refined monitoring experience. Users benefit from detailed performance data, network monitoring, and auto-discovery features, enhancing operational insights and server management efficiency.
What are key features of SCOM?In technology sectors, SCOM is widely implemented for its ability to monitor server applications and infrastructure components. Healthcare and finance utilize its monitoring and alert systems for compliance and uptime. Enterprises integrate SCOM for managing complex systems like Exchange, SharePoint, and Active Directory, enabling comprehensive analytics and reporting.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.