Top 8 Functional Testing

Tricentis ToscaMicro Focus UFT OneSelenium HQSauce LabsPerfectoWorksoft CertifyBlazeMeterReadyAPI
  1. leader badge
    Very user-friendly and the low code automation is really helpful.It's stable and reliable.
  2. leader badge
    Micro Focus UFT One is a great tool and can be used in a variety of ways.The entire framework is very useful. It's easily integrable with Excel.
  3. Buyer's Guide
    Functional Testing Tools
    January 2023
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Micro Focus, SeleniumHQ and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: January 2023.
    672,785 professionals have used our research since 2012.
  4. leader badge
    The most valuable feature of Selenium HQ is it provides support for third-party tools, such as screenshots, and automates Windows-based applications.I have found using IDE and Cucumber framework is good.
  5. leader badge
    Before implementing Sauce Labs, we tested physical devices that team members had to share. It was more feasible when we were all located in one office, but we couldn't leverage our offshore capacity. With this solution, we can do everything remotely, which is essential now that most of us work from home.
  6. leader badge
    Mobile testing is the most valuable feature as it has reduced dependency on physical devices. We are located offshore and we don't have the physical devices, and shipping physical devices after every new release would be a difficult task. But with Perfecto, it is easy.
  7. What I like about Worksoft Certify is that end-to-end testing becomes faster.Provides all the in-built functionalities and is a wonderful tool.
  8. report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    672,785 professionals have used our research since 2012.
  9. The on-the-fly test data improved our testing productivity a lot. The new test data features changed how we test the applications because there are different things we can do. We can use mock data or real data. We can also build data based on different formats.
  10. The most valuable features of ReadyAPI are the scripting tools and the connectivity to external data sources, such as Excel and PDF files. There are plenty of useful features that are useful, such as automating flexibility and usability. Overall, the solution is easy to use.

Advice From The Community

Read answers to top Functional Testing Tools questions. 672,785 professionals have gotten help from our community of experts.
Rony_Sklar - PeerSpot reviewer
Community Manager at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

What can be done to reduce the chances of software failing?

MarkusBonner - PeerSpot reviewer
MarkusBonnerCommon causes for software failure are: 1. Poor requirements definition… more »
5 Answers
Rony_Sklar - PeerSpot reviewer
Community Manager at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

There are so many tools to choose from to do SAP testing. In your opinion, which tool is the best choice for SAP testing? What differentiates this tool from its competitors?

Steven Roberts - PeerSpot reviewer
Steven RobertsMicro Focus delivers a wide portfolio of ADM products that include support for… more »
9 Answers
Rony_Sklar - PeerSpot reviewer
Community Manager at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

There are so many tools to choose from for non-SAP testing. In your opinion, which tool is best for non-SAP testing? What makes this tool stand out?

Steven Roberts - PeerSpot reviewer
Steven RobertsMicro Focus UFT One accelerates and simplifies end-to-end functional testing… more »
3 Answers
it_user891201 - PeerSpot reviewer
Sr Consultant at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Hi community, We are using Smartbear TestComplete but tried Ranorex as well. It is capturing some parts of data but because the data is constantly changing the script is failing as it couldn't find that particular field. We then need to export this data to excel.  Any suggestions?  Thanks!
Read More »
Francesco Pecchioli - PeerSpot reviewer
Francesco PecchioliIn my opinion, Microfocus UFT (Unified Functional Testing) is the right tool for… more »
19 Answers
it_user817473 - PeerSpot reviewer
User at a tech company with 51-200 employees
We need to test an application that can be installed on Windows, MAC, Linux, iOS and Android. The goal is to automate the testing. What would be the recommended tool to accomplish this and why would you recommend it?
Read More »
it_user514665 - PeerSpot reviewer
it_user514665I will recommend UFT Pro (LeanFT) as the tool of choice. LeanFT is a… more »
55 Answers

Functional Testing Tools Articles

Ariel Lindenfeld - PeerSpot reviewer
Ariel Lindenfeld
Sr. Director of Community
Aug 21 2022
We’re launching an annual User’s Choice Award to showcase the most popular B2B enterprise technology products and we want your vote! If there’s a technology solution that’s really impressed you, here’s an opportunity to recognize that. It’s easy: go to the PeerSpot voting site, complete the brie...
Read More »

Functional Testing Tools Topics

What is the difference between functional testing and manual testing?

As the name itself implies, manual testing is the process of testing software manually, while searching for bugs or anomalies in an application. With manual testing, testers follow a written test plan that describes the set of scenarios and steps to execute tests and verify the expected results. In contrast, functional testing allows you to test the software using a variety of methods including unit testing, integration testing, end to end testing, regression testing, and more. Unlike manual testing, functional testing can be done manually or by using automations.

What is the difference between UAT and functional testing?

UAT, otherwise referred to as user acceptance testing, is testing completed by end users or by the paying customer, whereas functional testing is testing done from a functional viewpoint by a business. In addition, UAT uses a series of different test steps, which verify whether specific requirements are working for the user. On the other hand, functional testing tests specific requirements and specifications of the software. While functional tests test the function of software and what it does, UATs test against some criteria of acceptance.

What are the 3 functional tests?

The 3 different types of functional tests are:

1. Unit testing: Unit testing is a type of software testing where the individual unit or component of the software is tested.

    2. Integration testing: After you’ve tested out all of your functions, the next step is to put the functions together and test to make sure that they work. With integration testing, you are testing to make sure that integrations work correctly. Integration testing includes two different approaches - bottom-up and top-down. Integration tests take more effort to create than unit tests, however they are important when you start to put functions together.

      3. Automation/acceptance testing: This type of testing is used to make sure that your product is acting how it should and whether it’s ready to be deployed.

        What are the different types of functional testing?

        There are several different types of functional tests. Some of them include:

        • Unit testing: This type of testing is used to test an entire software program, in order to make sure the individual parts work properly on their own.
        • Component testing: Component testing checks individual parts of an application.
        • Smoke testing: This is a type of acceptance testing that provides an initial check that a new software build and its critical functionality are stable.
        • Sanity testing: Sanity testing is a form of regression testing that is typically performed by QA professionals on new versions of stable builds to validate either new functionality or bug fixes.
        • Regression testing: This type of testing is used to make sure the software continues to function as expected.
        • Integration testing: Through integration testing, QA professionals verify that individual modules of code work together properly as a group.
        • API testing: With API testing, testers validate that API connections and responses function as intended, including how they handle data as well as user permissions.
        • UI testing: This type of testing entails QA professionals interacting with the graphical interface of a software program.
        • System testing: System testing involves QA professionals testing the software in its entirety, as a complete product.
        • White-box testing: This testing is used by organizations to test several aspects of the software, such as predefined inputs and expected outputs, as well as decision branches, loops, and statements in the code.
        • Black-box testing: In contrast to white-box testing, black-box testing involves testing against a system where the internal code, paths, and infrastructure are not visible.
        • Acceptance testing: The purpose of acceptance testing is to ensure that the end user can achieve the goals set in the business requirements.
        • Alpha testing: Alpha testing is a type of acceptance testing that uses internal team members to evaluate the product.
        • Beta testing: Beta testing occurs with a select group of end users after the internal team tests the product and fixes bugs.
        • Production testing: Production testing is used after a product has gone into production and aims to discover and triage user-reported defects as quickly as possible.
        Why do we do functional testing?

        Functional testing is critical in validating the quality and functionality of the software. Functional tests are also important because they allow quality assurance teams to verify the software functionality based on software requirements specification (SRS) and ensure the system functions as per user specifications. Additionally, functional testing helps determine whether the system is fixed for release and is error-free.

        Is UI testing functional testing?

        UI testing, also known as GUI (graphical user interface) testing, is a form of functional testing that takes into consideration the look, feel, and ease-of-use of an application, mainly to meet a customer’s demands. Because it tests the aspects of any software that a user comes into contact with, it requires testing the visual elements to verify that they are functioning according to requirements in terms of functionality and performance, and therefore is considered to be a type of functional testing.

        Functional Testing Tools Features

        When you choose a functional testing tool, it is best to make sure the following basic features are included:

        • Automated crash detection and remediation
        • Easy integration into your CI/CD pipeline
        • Object recognition, using machine learning and AI, identifies complex objects
        • Integrations with JIRA and other test management tools
        • Traceability reports and metrics
        • Integration with issue tracking tools
        • Reusable and modular test cases
        • Scalability and collaborative capabilities
        • Accessibility testing for your applications
        • Supports multiple languages for test scripts
        • User-friendly
        • Secure
        Functional Testing Tools Benefits

        There are many benefits to functional testing. Some of the top benefits include:

        • It produces a defect-free product.
        • It improves the quality of the product.
        • It ensures that all requirements are met.
        • It ensures security and safety.
        • It ensures that the customer is satisfied.
        • It ensures that the software/product work as expected.
        • It ensures the proper working of all the functionality of an application/software/product.
        Buyer's Guide
        Functional Testing Tools
        January 2023
        Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Micro Focus, SeleniumHQ and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: January 2023.
        672,785 professionals have used our research since 2012.