Top 8 Workload Automation
Control-MOpConJAMSAutoSys Workload AutomationAutomic Workload AutomationActiveBatch Workload AutomationTidal AutomationIBM Workload Automation
The web interface is handy. It's easy to use, and Control-M provides you with the necessary materials to understand the features and perform various tasks.
The most valuable feature is the automation in general.
The end code response allows us to evaluate how a process finished, set the termination/end code appropriately, and then trigger further processing based on how it ended.
It makes everything that we want to do so much easier. We have had a number of instances in the past where we have had developers who have been working on a project, and even though we have had JAMS for all these years, they will create some SQL Server Agent job, or something like that, to run a task. When it is in code review and development is complete, the question always comes around, "Can JAMS do this?" The answer has always been, "Yes." Pretty much anything we have ever developed could be run by JAMS.
The solution has been stable.
The initial setup is easy.
I like that Automic Workload Automation has many features compared to other products. There are a lot of good features, and architecture-wise there is a valuable client concept. The architecture and the multi-tenancy is a multi-client concept. That is also useful.
Easy to configure and simple to develop new features.
One of the most valuable features of this solution is the versatility of the prebuilt jobs.
The Graphical Views feature is also very good for helping us to understand a job stream. It's great for providing a visual overview of the status of a workflow, especially the Critical Path view. That is one of our favorites.
This solution has a request feature where users can request the added features they need to have developed. Based on client voting for those features, these are developed and released.
Advice From The CommunityRead answers to top Workload Automation questions. 619,967 professionals have gotten help from our community of experts.
Workload Automation Articles
Workload Automation Topics
Benefits of Workload Automation SoftwareFeatures of Workload Automation SoftwareDifferences between Workload Automation and Job SchedulingThe Future of Workload Automation
Benefits of Workload Automation Software
The use of workload automation software can have a number of benefits:
- This software can streamline and centralize any and all business-related tasks that might be viewed as repetitive. Dedicated teams will no longer be necessary to schedule, manage, or complete tasks that could easily be handled by computers. Instead, costs can be cut and resources can be conserved and then assigned to areas of greater need.
- Workload automation can increase a company’s versatility many times over. It enables the mixing and matching of any number of tasks within the system in whatever way best meets the organization’s business objectives.
- Preset parameters ensure greater efficiency, eliminating worry that mistakes will be made somewhere along the line because of human error. Workload automation software can also increase efficiency through its adaptability. The computer can make automatic adjustments as required without requiring outside input. This will go far in granting organizational management peace of mind.
Features of Workload Automation Software
Workload automation software is extremely versatile. Any given piece of software can have any number of features. These are the most common features among the most effective programs:
- Automation triggered by specific events
- Remote access
- Built-in security
- Automatic resource management
- Ability to work across platforms
- Integration with outside technologies
- Pre-existing system logic
- Script changing tracking
- Centralized monitor screen
- Centralized management interface
- Secure files transfer
- Cloud management
Differences between Workload Automation and Job Scheduling
There are many who view the term “workload automation” to be interchangeable with job scheduling. Despite the fact that on the most basic level they can both perform many of the same functions, they are not the same. There are many important distinctions that should be made between the two.
Job scheduling can schedule various types of events to take place in the system in question. However, that is part of the problem. Basic job scheduling is more limited in the number of systems that it is capable of dealing with. It can only run on a single machine at a time. If you want to run a complex event, there will be gaps that will require manual adjustments to be made. Ultimately, valuable time and manpower are tied up making all of these adjustments.
Workload automation takes the idea of job scheduling to the next level. This limitation of only running on a single machine that holds the job scheduling back does not apply to workload automation. It can synchronize events across multiple machines and systems to run the processes that it needs to run at any given time.
There are clear limits as to how far job scheduling software can go as far as setting up events. Regular job scheduling software does not have the ability to run processes based on web-based events. Anything that an organization that relies on this wants to do is going to have to be created manually. This is going to be a drain on time and resources.
One of the great features of workload automation is the fact that the system can be programmed with web-event-based triggers. Instead of being forced to create and dedicate a team to initiate crucial system processes, event creation protocols can be set up. Whenever something like the submission of data occurs online, the workload automation software will respond to it immediately. Corporate teams will now be able to have the system react in their place. Any necessary updates can now be made without administrators needing to set events themselves.
When it comes to being compatible with different system management solutions, old-school job scheduling software falls short. The capabilities of such programs are not advanced enough to allow for them both to schedule the events and allow them to connect to solutions that would manage those processes that they set into motion. This connects to one of the distinctions that was mentioned earlier. The fact that it can only run events on the single machine reveals its inability to work with or connect to programs outside of its self-contained environment.
Workload automation however, can reach outside of itself and works with management outside of whatever machine it is running on. The fact that it can work together with outside solutions to bolster its management capabilities sets it far apart from job scheduling software.
Information contained within a system being run by job scheduling software is effectively trapped within the system. These systems do not possess managed file transfer capabilities, which could enable them to securely and efficiently move data from this system to somewhere else. Therefore, an organization that values security and efficiency would be unable to transfer data if they were using such a system. This is an additional area where workload automation excels. It has built-in security protocols that allow it to safely and reliably transfer any data out of the system and into any other that an organization might require.
The Future of Workload Automation
At the current time, it appears that cloud-based software is the future of computing. Workload automation is going to be affected by the rise of the cloud. The future of workload automation will most likely see ever-greater levels of emphasis placed on the use of cloud-based environments. This will greatly enhance workload automation’s management capabilities. Furthermore, it is likely that it will turn toward ever-more sophisticated predictive algorithms, which will enable problems to be predicted and dealt with before they ever occur.