Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery surpasses its competitors by offering swift data recovery, robust cloud-based solutions, and proactive support that ensures businesses experience minimal downtime and enhanced data safety.
Commvault Cloud offers robust data management and scalability with efficient backups. In comparison, Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery provides rapid deployment and automated failover. In contrast, Commvault's complexity can hinder ease of use, while Infrascale may require enhanced performance. Commvault Cloud is budget-friendly; Infrascale delivers long-term savings.
If budget allows using the per socket license and not the agent based with per GB counter for Dedup is the way to go.
New licensing is easy and affordable.
If budget allows using the per socket license and not the agent based with per GB counter for Dedup is the way to go.
New licensing is easy and affordable.
Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery is noted for affordability and strong support. In comparison, Rubrik offers advanced automation, scalability, and cloud integration. Infrascale's reporting tools need improvement, while Rubrik's documentation could be enhanced. Infrascale provides quick ROI, while Rubrik justifies its cost with long-term value.
It’s simple, straightforward, and we were able to see 50% hard savings.
The setup cost is a bit high, but the solution is an all-in-one solution.
It’s simple, straightforward, and we were able to see 50% hard savings.
The setup cost is a bit high, but the solution is an all-in-one solution.
HPE Zerto Software offers advanced disaster recovery features, ideal for enterprises needing robust capabilities. In comparison, Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery appeals to those seeking cost-effective data protection with straightforward deployment and efficient support, suiting small to mid-sized businesses.
Acronis Cyber Protect offers a unified approach to cybersecurity and backup, integrating anti-malware features. In comparison, Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery excels in disaster recovery and ease of use. Acronis has higher initial costs but long-term ROI; Infrascale is cost-efficient with quick deployment and strong support.
Doing what this is capable of doing, the cost of it is in line.
It has already paid off itself in the first few months that we implemented it.
Doing what this is capable of doing, the cost of it is in line.
It has already paid off itself in the first few months that we implemented it.
Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery excels with quick VM booting locally and in the cloud, enhancing data protection, while Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365 offers granular Microsoft application recovery. In comparison, tech buyers may prefer Infrascale for critical server coverage and choose Veeam for comprehensive data protection and Microsoft integration.
Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery excels with automatic backups, simplicity, and comprehensive solutions, appealing to users seeking ease of deployment and responsive support. In comparison, Cohesity DataProtect provides global deduplication, scalability, and complex integration, suited for enterprises valuing extensive features and long-term resources.
Licensing is per node and per protected terabyte. You will also pay 10-15% annually for support.
The ROI is huge. Not really measurable at this point, but the price of the unit was a fraction of what a couple hours of downtime could result in.
Licensing is per node and per protected terabyte. You will also pay 10-15% annually for support.
The ROI is huge. Not really measurable at this point, but the price of the unit was a fraction of what a couple hours of downtime could result in.
Dell Avamar excels in efficient data deduplication and diverse environment integration. In comparison, Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery offers superior disaster recovery features and versatile cloud storage. Dell Avamar requires significant expertise for setup while Infrascale provides an easier deployment process.
It is very expensive. It's a trust based licensing. So that's an ethical challenge.
This solution is less expensive than Veeam for us, although it depends on the customer because we get a great discount.
It is very expensive. It's a trust based licensing. So that's an ethical challenge.
This solution is less expensive than Veeam for us, although it depends on the customer because we get a great discount.
Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery offers strong customer support and straightforward deployment, making it ideal for smaller businesses. In comparison, N-able Cove Data Protection features extensive integrations and superior scalability, appealing to companies needing advanced capabilities despite higher costs.
The pricing of SolarWinds seems to be fair compared to the rest of the industry.
The price isn't extreme, but I'd love to pay less.
The pricing of SolarWinds seems to be fair compared to the rest of the industry.
The price isn't extreme, but I'd love to pay less.
Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery offers flexible and straightforward pricing, making it attractive for smaller organizations seeking cost savings. In comparison, VMware Live Recovery provides robust functionality but can be perceived as expensive, appealing to those prioritizing broad capabilities over immediate financial returns.
Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery offers flexible pricing and focuses on cloud ease of use, appealing to those seeking straightforward solutions. In comparison, IBM Storage Protect provides extensive features and scalability, ideal for large enterprises despite its complexity and higher costs.
Veritas NetBackup is ideal for large enterprises needing scalability and integration, while Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery appeals to businesses wanting simplicity and disaster recovery. In comparison, Veritas might need usability improvements, whereas Infrascale benefits from cost-effectiveness and quicker ROI.
Licensing was very expensive and did not scale well if needed to move between license models.
So far I can only say that the license structure could be looked at to be aligned as either capacity-based or traditional.
Licensing was very expensive and did not scale well if needed to move between license models.
So far I can only say that the license structure could be looked at to be aligned as either capacity-based or traditional.
Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery offers comprehensive disaster recovery features with enhanced local and cloud backup options, appealing to businesses needing hybrid solutions. In comparison, AWS Backup provides scalable, cloud-native functionality, ideal for companies operating fully within cloud ecosystems.
Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery appeals with competitive pricing and strong customer support, enhancing business continuity. In comparison, Clumio offers advanced cloud-native features, providing scalable, seamless integration with cloud services, making it ideal for businesses prioritizing innovative cloud capabilities despite a higher cost.
Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery is a cost-effective solution known for strong data recovery and customer support. In comparison, Cohesity Data Cloud delivers superior features and scalability. Infrascale users enjoy quick deployment, while Cohesity's excellent service and advanced capabilities justify higher costs.
Competing products sometimes use deceptive marketing to make their products seem a lot cheaper. Comparing apples-to-apples, DataPlatform wins out.
It's priced properly for the market.
Competing products sometimes use deceptive marketing to make their products seem a lot cheaper. Comparing apples-to-apples, DataPlatform wins out.
It's priced properly for the market.
It provides a good cost savings compared to our previous cloud backup.
We have a very good return on investment.
It provides a good cost savings compared to our previous cloud backup.
We have a very good return on investment.
The pricing of this solution is ok, but I'm expecting that the price will decrease in the future.
The pricing of this solution is good, and it is one of the easiest things that you can sell Azure with.
The pricing of this solution is ok, but I'm expecting that the price will decrease in the future.
The pricing of this solution is good, and it is one of the easiest things that you can sell Azure with.
Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery is ideal for SMBs due to its simplicity and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery offers advanced automation and scalability, making it suitable for larger enterprises. Users might prefer Infrascale for easy deployment, while AWS's integration with other AWS services is appealing.
We were happy with the pricing that they gave us.
They license us on a per machine basis. We have a set number of machines, which we have licensed.
We were happy with the pricing that they gave us.
They license us on a per machine basis. We have a set number of machines, which we have licensed.
This is an open-source solution.
We have a perpetual license.
This is an open-source solution.
We have a perpetual license.
Pricing is similar, but they don´t offer the same options/technology.
If your company can afford it, go for it.
Pricing is similar, but they don´t offer the same options/technology.
If your company can afford it, go for it.
I do not work with the pricing or licensing issues of the solution for our organization.
Normally our customers purchase the premium plus license, rather than the standard one, which provides more options.
I do not work with the pricing or licensing issues of the solution for our organization.
Normally our customers purchase the premium plus license, rather than the standard one, which provides more options.
Hornetsecurity Altaro VM Backup attracts tech buyers due to its ease of use and affordability. In comparison, Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery offers robust security and extensive recovery options, justifying a higher price. Hornetsecurity's deployment simplicity contrasts with Infrascale's feature-rich but complex setup.
There is a free version for Hosts with 2 VMs.
There is a free version for two VMs. I would advise to study the deployment environment well, prior to committing to order a license per host.
There is a free version for Hosts with 2 VMs.
There is a free version for two VMs. I would advise to study the deployment environment well, prior to committing to order a license per host.
Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery offers comprehensive cloud backup and robust data protection with flexible deployment options. In comparison, Barracuda Backup provides ease of use, strong security, and detailed documentation. Infrascale is noted for customer service and competitive pricing, while Barracuda is favored for its advanced features and reliability.
Veritas NetBackup Appliance is known for its customer support and deployment methods. In comparison, Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery stands out for innovative features and cost-effectiveness. Veritas offers robust security options, while Infrascale excels in fast restoration and cloud integration.
The licensing costs are approximately 150,00 Saudi Riyals.
The licensing costs for this solution are very high.
The licensing costs are approximately 150,00 Saudi Riyals.
The licensing costs for this solution are very high.
OpenText Data Protector offers comprehensive scalability and policy-based automation, addressing enterprise-level needs. In comparison, Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery provides intuitive management and hybrid cloud capabilities. OpenText's extensive features meet complex requirements, while Infrascale's ease of use and rapid deployment appeal to budget-conscious buyers.
It is fast, reliable, and its licensing policy is great.
The licensing structure provides cost savings to business.
It is fast, reliable, and its licensing policy is great.
The licensing structure provides cost savings to business.
Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery excels in quick VM boot-up and offers robust disaster recovery, while NetVault Plus highlights extensive database support and efficient search capabilities. In comparison, NetVault Plus is noted for its tape record functionality, whereas Infrascale offers broader deployment flexibility.
Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery excels in comprehensive support and ease of deployment. In comparison, Carbonite Server is favored for robust features and performance reliability. For straightforward deployment and responsive support, choose Infrascale. For dependable performance and seamless cloud integration, consider Carbonite.
We pay 9,000 dollars per year for our license.
The pricing is between $120 and $150 per year.
We pay 9,000 dollars per year for our license.
The pricing is between $120 and $150 per year.
Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery offers simplicity and comprehensive server coverage, appealing to users needing seamless operations and on-premises solutions. In comparison, Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud integrates cybersecurity with flexible subscription options, attracting buyers focused on centralized management and public cloud deployments.
Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery is valued for data recovery and encryption. In comparison, Quorum OnQ's strengths are scalability and real-time replication. Infrascale's performance concerns are significant while Quorum OnQ requires better integration and training. Infrascale offers cost-effectiveness; Quorum OnQ provides greater long-term value.
The licensing is based on how many nodes I want to be able to run as a virtualized recovery.
The total for our current solution's licensing is about $14,000 for 12 servers for three years.
The licensing is based on how many nodes I want to be able to run as a virtualized recovery.
The total for our current solution's licensing is about $14,000 for 12 servers for three years.
Druva inSync attracts tech buyers with its cloud-native architecture, offering secure, scalable backup and enhanced data protection, appealing to cost-conscious businesses. In comparison, Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery stands out for its comprehensive recovery features, appealing to those prioritizing disaster recovery investments.
Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery impresses with competitive pricing and ease of use. In comparison, NetApp AltaVault offers advanced integration and efficient data reduction. Infrascale supports straightforward deployment, whereas NetApp AltaVault excels in feature set and integration, despite higher costs and complex setup.
It's quite cost-effective.
The pricing is not too bad, but could be a little better.
It's quite cost-effective.
The pricing is not too bad, but could be a little better.
Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery offers user-friendly data management and flexible restoration options, appealing to those needing simplicity. In comparison, IBM Spectrum Protect Plus provides comprehensive automation and integration features ideal for complex environments, making it valuable for tech buyers seeking advanced functionalities.
If you need to extend it, it can be extended acting like a normal Spectrum Protect with a long archive.
The licensing model of Spectrum Protect Plus is more efficient and cheaper compared to the original.
If you need to extend it, it can be extended acting like a normal Spectrum Protect with a long archive.
The licensing model of Spectrum Protect Plus is more efficient and cheaper compared to the original.
Microsoft DPM provides robust data protection for Microsoft-centric environments. In comparison, Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery offers advanced hybrid cloud capabilities, making it suitable for varied infrastructures. Microsoft DPM attracts with cost-effective integration, while Infrascale delivers value through flexible deployment options.
Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery excels in pricing and customer service with effective deployment and quick ROI. In comparison, NetApp Cloud Backup offers comprehensive integration, scalability, and advanced features, catering to varied user needs, despite higher pricing and mixed customer service responsiveness.
Cost could be lower.
NetApp Cloud Backup has a subscription-based model and it is paid annually.
Cost could be lower.
NetApp Cloud Backup has a subscription-based model and it is paid annually.
Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery offers cost-effective, flexible solutions suited for small to medium businesses, emphasizing ease of deployment and responsive support. In comparison, Datto Cloud Continuity provides advanced ransomware protection and seamless integration, appealing to those needing comprehensive disaster recovery capabilities despite higher costs.
Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery appeals with rapid recovery and hybrid storage for businesses needing efficient support. In comparison, Synology C2 Backup attracts tech buyers with seamless integration and scalability, favoring those prioritizing long-term cloud efficiency despite higher initial costs.
Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery offers ease of use with its dashboard and server protection. In comparison, Azure Site Recovery excels in seamless integration with Azure environments. Buyers might choose Infrascale for simplicity or opt for Azure due to its enterprise-level advantages.
Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery competes with Dell Data Protection Advisor in providing comprehensive data protection solutions. While users appreciate the pricing and support of Infrascale, Dell stands out due to its extensive features, which users find worth the cost. In comparison, Infrascale's easy-to-manage capabilities and quick disaster recovery attract budget-conscious buyers. Dell's detailed reporting and extensive functionalities offer robust ROI over time.
It's not very expensive — I think the price is fair.
For pricing, I would rate Dell 2 out of 5. It's affordable.
It's not very expensive — I think the price is fair.
For pricing, I would rate Dell 2 out of 5. It's affordable.
Druva Data Resiliency Cloud is a comprehensive platform praised for its robust data protection capabilities, catering to modern organizational needs. It is primarily employed for backup and recovery, securing endpoint data across decentralized devices, and providing swift disaster recovery solutions. The platform also facilitates efficient archiving, thus helping organizations retain essential data without overwhelming their active storage systems. Additionally, it plays a crucial role in managing and protecting cloud-based applications, essential for cloud-reliant enterprises.
Users appreciate Druva's cloud-native architecture which ensures seamless scalability, allowing storage expansion without significant investments in physical infrastructure. The platform’s efficient and secure backup and recovery processes minimize downtime and protect against data loss. The centralized management interface, known for its user-friendly design, aids in effortless monitoring and administration of data policies across various environments. Moreover, its advanced encryption options provide a secure layer for sensitive information.
