Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Hyland OnBase Logo

Top 10 Hyland OnBase Alternatives

Vendor: Hyland
3.9 out of 5
Leave a review

Top Hyland OnBase Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Hyland OnBase based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Camunda, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC), and Microsoft Power Apps. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Hyland OnBase surpasses its competitors by offering a robust document management system, seamless integration capabilities, and advanced workflow automation, enabling organizations to streamline operations, improve efficiency, and enhance decision-making processes effectively.

Hyland Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Hyland, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Hyland OnBase Logo
Camunda
4.1 out of 5
Hyland OnBase Logo
Camunda
4.1 out of 5
Hyland OnBase excels in document management, offering strong workflow automation and easy integration, attracting buyers focused on efficient data handling. In comparison, Camunda's open-source framework provides flexible process automation, appealing to those needing customization and scalability for complex workflows.
Download Camunda vs. Hyland OnBase Report
Hyland OnBase involves higher setup costs compared to Camunda, which offers a more cost-efficient initial setup.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
Hyland OnBase involves higher setup costs compared to Camunda, which offers a more cost-efficient initial setup.
Hyland OnBase Logo
Hyland OnBase Logo
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC)
4.0 out of 5
Informatica IDMC excels in data integration and governance, ideal for data-centric applications. In comparison, Hyland OnBase offers strong document management for various industries. A tech buyer may choose IDMC for enterprise-grade data management or OnBase for its modular workflow flexibility.
Download Hyland OnBase vs. Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) Report
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) requires a significant initial setup cost, while Hyland OnBase offers a more affordable setup, highlighting a potential cost advantage for OnBase in the initial implementation phase.
View comparison
Pricing
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) requires a significant initial setup cost, while Hyland OnBase offers a more affordable setup, highlighting a potential cost advantage for OnBase in the initial implementation phase.
Hyland OnBase Logo
Hyland OnBase Logo
Microsoft Power Apps
3.9 out of 5
Hyland OnBase excels in document management, making it suitable for compliance-focused industries. In comparison, Microsoft Power Apps provides integration versatility and a broad development platform. Tech buyers might choose Hyland for document-heavy needs or Power Apps for app-building flexibility.
Download Hyland OnBase vs. Microsoft Power Apps Report
Hyland OnBase has a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft Power Apps, making Power Apps a more budget-friendly option for initial installation expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Hyland OnBase has a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft Power Apps, making Power Apps a more budget-friendly option for initial installation expenses.
Hyland OnBase Logo
Appian
4.2 out of 5
Hyland OnBase Logo
Appian
4.2 out of 5
Appian offers agility with low-code development, excelling in Agile workflows and integrated business applications. In comparison, Hyland OnBase provides secure document management with robust audit trails. Appian appeals for rapid implementation, while OnBase’s strength lies in its configuration-based ECM standards.
Download Appian vs. Hyland OnBase Report
Appian's setup cost is reportedly higher, reflecting its advanced features and flexibility, while Hyland OnBase offers a more budget-friendly setup, appealing to organizations with tighter financial constraints and a focus on document-driven processes.
View comparison
Pricing
Appian's setup cost is reportedly higher, reflecting its advanced features and flexibility, while Hyland OnBase offers a more budget-friendly setup, appealing to organizations with tighter financial constraints and a focus on document-driven processes.
Hyland OnBase Logo
SharePoint
3.9 out of 5
Hyland OnBase Logo
SharePoint
3.9 out of 5
SharePoint offers robust collaboration and document management, ideal for flexible integration with Office 365. In comparison, Hyland OnBase focuses on secure document handling and strong workflow automation, making it suitable for enterprises needing intricate content management solutions. SharePoint excels in flexibility, while OnBase provides detailed business process integration.
Download Hyland OnBase vs. SharePoint Report
SharePoint features a more affordable setup cost, whereas Hyland OnBase typically incurs higher initial expenses, highlighting a key difference in upfront financial commitment between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
SharePoint features a more affordable setup cost, whereas Hyland OnBase typically incurs higher initial expenses, highlighting a key difference in upfront financial commitment between the two solutions.
Hyland OnBase Logo
Pega Platform
4.1 out of 5
Hyland OnBase Logo
Pega Platform
4.1 out of 5
Pega Platform excels in no-code development and case management, offering strong process automation for enterprises. In comparison, Hyland OnBase specializes in secure document management with industry-specific solutions, appealing to those needing comprehensive audit trails and strong deployment on-premises, despite complex upgrade processes.
Download Hyland OnBase vs. Pega Platform Report
Pega Platform has a higher setup cost, emphasizing its comprehensive capabilities, while Hyland OnBase offers a more affordable setup option, reflecting a focus on scalability and budget-conscious organizations.
View comparison
Pricing
Pega Platform has a higher setup cost, emphasizing its comprehensive capabilities, while Hyland OnBase offers a more affordable setup option, reflecting a focus on scalability and budget-conscious organizations.
Hyland OnBase Logo
Bizagi
4.2 out of 5
Hyland OnBase Logo
Bizagi
4.2 out of 5
Bizagi is appreciated for its intuitive process modeling and automation capabilities. In comparison, Hyland OnBase is praised for robust document management and extensive integration options. Bizagi offers substantial ROI through competitive pricing, while Hyland OnBase justifies its higher cost with comprehensive features meeting diverse business needs.
Download Bizagi vs. Hyland OnBase Report
Bizagi's setup cost is higher than Hyland OnBase, making it more suitable for larger budgets, whereas Hyland OnBase offers a more economical setup cost, appealing to budget-conscious buyers.
View comparison
Pricing
Bizagi's setup cost is higher than Hyland OnBase, making it more suitable for larger budgets, whereas Hyland OnBase offers a more economical setup cost, appealing to budget-conscious buyers.
Hyland OnBase Logo
Hyland OnBase Logo
Salesforce Platform
4.1 out of 5
Salesforce Platform offers robust customization and integration, making it highly usable, while Hyland OnBase excels in document management and workflow automation. In comparison, Hyland OnBase's comprehensive features are favored for document handling, and Salesforce Platform's strong customer support simplifies deployment.
Download Hyland OnBase vs. Salesforce Platform Report
Salesforce Platform has a higher setup cost compared to Hyland OnBase. Hyland OnBase offers a more budget-friendly setup solution than Salesforce Platform.
View comparison
Pricing
Salesforce Platform has a higher setup cost compared to Hyland OnBase. Hyland OnBase offers a more budget-friendly setup solution than Salesforce Platform.
Hyland OnBase Logo
IBM BPM
3.9 out of 5
Hyland OnBase Logo
IBM BPM
3.9 out of 5
IBM BPM excels in process orchestration and system integration, ideal for businesses seeking flexible modeling. In comparison, Hyland OnBase emphasizes document management with a modular architecture, appealing to those prioritizing strong content management and ease of configuration.
Download Hyland OnBase vs. IBM BPM Report
IBM BPM requires a higher initial setup cost compared to Hyland OnBase, providing distinct advantages for complex process integrations, while OnBase offers more affordable pricing, appealing for straightforward document management implementations.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM BPM requires a higher initial setup cost compared to Hyland OnBase, providing distinct advantages for complex process integrations, while OnBase offers more affordable pricing, appealing for straightforward document management implementations.
Hyland OnBase Logo
Hyland OnBase Logo
OpenText Documentum Content Management
3.8 out of 5
Documentum offers advanced metadata management and customization, ideal for managing diverse content forms. In comparison, OnBase appeals with its codeless platform and intuitive interfaces, suitable for non-technical users seeking flexible, low-code environments. Both face challenges in pricing and require UI enhancements.
Download Hyland OnBase vs. OpenText Documentum Content Management Report
OpenText Documentum Content Management often involves a significant initial setup cost, while Hyland OnBase is noted for its more economical setup expenses, highlighting a key cost difference between the solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenText Documentum Content Management often involves a significant initial setup cost, while Hyland OnBase is noted for its more economical setup expenses, highlighting a key cost difference between the solutions.
Hyland OnBase Logo
Hyland OnBase Logo
OpenText Content Management
3.9 out of 5
Hyland OnBase is preferred for its cost-effective deployment and support, catering to those seeking quick adoption and ROI. In comparison, OpenText Content Management attracts tech buyers needing advanced integration and compliance features despite a higher initial investment due to its comprehensive capabilities.
Download Hyland OnBase vs. OpenText Content Management Report
Hyland OnBase's setup cost is lower than OpenText Content Management, highlighting cost-effectiveness for budget-conscious buyers. OpenText Content Management involves higher initial fees, indicating a more significant investment for advanced features.
View comparison
Pricing
Hyland OnBase's setup cost is lower than OpenText Content Management, highlighting cost-effectiveness for budget-conscious buyers. OpenText Content Management involves higher initial fees, indicating a more significant investment for advanced features.
Hyland OnBase Logo
Box
4.2 out of 5
Hyland OnBase Logo
Box
4.2 out of 5
Box is favored for its collaboration tools, strong security compliance, and numerous integrations across platforms. In comparison, Hyland OnBase excels in providing modular workflow and content management solutions tailored to various industries, making it ideal for complex business needs.
Download Box vs. Hyland OnBase Report
Box's setup cost is competitive and straightforward, while Hyland OnBase requires a more substantial initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Box's setup cost is competitive and straightforward, while Hyland OnBase requires a more substantial initial investment.
Hyland OnBase Logo
IBM FileNet
4.1 out of 5
Hyland OnBase Logo
IBM FileNet
4.1 out of 5
IBM FileNet excels in managing vast content with strong integration and automation. In comparison, Hyland OnBase focuses on modular deployment and ease of implementation, appealing for its configurability and smooth business process integration. Both systems offer strong ROI despite different pricing models.
Download Hyland OnBase vs. IBM FileNet Report
IBM FileNet setup costs can be significant, while Hyland OnBase offers a more cost-effective setup option. The differences in initial investment highlight varying budget considerations for companies.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM FileNet setup costs can be significant, while Hyland OnBase offers a more cost-effective setup option. The differences in initial investment highlight varying budget considerations for companies.
Hyland OnBase Logo
Hyland OnBase Logo
Adobe Experience Manager
4.1 out of 5
Adobe Experience Manager is ideal for digital marketing with its Adobe Marketing Cloud integration and e-commerce support. In comparison, Hyland OnBase excels in document security and process orchestration, appealing to those prioritizing stability and a low-code environment.
Download Adobe Experience Manager vs. Hyland OnBase Report
Adobe Experience Manager has a higher setup cost compared to Hyland OnBase, highlighting a significant pricing difference between them.
View comparison
Pricing
Adobe Experience Manager has a higher setup cost compared to Hyland OnBase, highlighting a significant pricing difference between them.
Hyland OnBase Logo
Hyland OnBase Logo
Nintex Process Platform
3.9 out of 5
Nintex offers robust workflow capabilities and excellent Microsoft integration, making it ideal for complex business processes automation. In comparison, Hyland OnBase provides strong modularity and secure content management, appealing to industries needing stability and diverse content handling options.
Download Hyland OnBase vs. Nintex Process Platform Report
Nintex Process Platform typically involves lower initial setup costs, while Hyland OnBase generally presents higher upfront expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Nintex Process Platform typically involves lower initial setup costs, while Hyland OnBase generally presents higher upfront expenses.
Hyland OnBase Logo
Hyland OnBase Logo
ServiceNow Now Platform
4.1 out of 5
Hyland OnBase excels in document management and integration capabilities, making it ideal for organizations needing robust document workflows. In comparison, ServiceNow Now Platform is valued for its extensive service management features and scalability, making it suitable for enterprises seeking comprehensive service solutions.
Download Hyland OnBase vs. ServiceNow Now Platform Report
Hyland OnBase involves high initial setup costs, whereas ServiceNow Now Platform offers a more affordable setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
Hyland OnBase involves high initial setup costs, whereas ServiceNow Now Platform offers a more affordable setup option.
Hyland OnBase Logo
Hyland OnBase Logo
Boomi AtomSphere Flow
3.9 out of 5
Hyland OnBase offers robust document management and workflow automation for seamless document handling. In comparison, Boomi AtomSphere Flow excels in integration flexibility and real-time data processing for extensive data integration. Hyland OnBase features simpler deployment, while Boomi AtomSphere Flow justifies higher costs with extensive functionalities.
Download Boomi AtomSphere Flow vs. Hyland OnBase Report
Hyland OnBase has a high initial setup cost, while Boomi AtomSphere Flow offers a more affordable setup cost.
View comparison
Pricing
Hyland OnBase has a high initial setup cost, while Boomi AtomSphere Flow offers a more affordable setup cost.
Hyland OnBase Logo
IBM ECM
4.0 out of 5
Hyland OnBase Logo
IBM ECM
4.0 out of 5
IBM ECM's scalability and security cater to large enterprises. In comparison, Hyland OnBase integrates comprehensive workflow automation and superior support, excelling in diverse environments. IBM ECM appeals to cost-conscious buyers, while Hyland OnBase justifies higher costs with robust automation.
Download Hyland OnBase vs. IBM ECM Report
IBM ECM often involves higher initial setup costs, while Hyland OnBase typically offers a more budget-friendly setup.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM ECM often involves higher initial setup costs, while Hyland OnBase typically offers a more budget-friendly setup.
Hyland OnBase Logo
Laserfiche
5.0 out of 5
Hyland OnBase Logo
Laserfiche
5.0 out of 5

Powerful Document Management Software and Agile Enterprise Content Management Solutions

It is expensive. We have around 60 licenses. They are expensive.
View comparison
Pricing
It is expensive. We have around 60 licenses. They are expensive.

Related categories

Business Process Management (BPM)
Enterprise Content Management
Low-Code Development Platforms