"OnBase is a remarkable tool. It is a well-done product. Hyland has a lot of experience in building it and looking for new things for clients in terms of functionalities. It has amazing stability, and it can grow horizontally and vertically. It is built for growth. Their technical support is also quite good and available throughout the year."
"I like the cloud and its integrability."
"For SharePoint, I believe the most valuable feature is the customization and allowing you to share and edit files and documents. Being able to share externally and the precise administration of the files in terms of giving permissions and controlling who has access to what is a very good feature."
"Ability to store files of any type."
"The most valuable features are the collaboration and sharing."
"The online editing capabilities, file sharing, auditing, information security, ease of solution management, and the easy user adaptation to the platform are the most valuable features."
"For user experience, they would have to do more with the interface. It is not easy to work with and is a little messy. It is getting better, but it is not yet good enough. Other products are comparatively doing better in terms of the user interface. I have been hearing about Box, which is very easy to use and learn for the users. OnBase has to work on this aspect. It should have BPM capabilities. We compete with tools that provide the BPM feature and support those standards. They can do better in terms of the pricing model. It is a really expensive tool in Latin America. They should have different prices for different regions."
"The look and feel could be better. The integration with the user could be better. It could also be more user-friendly."
"The way to change the version of the files in SharePoint should be improved. The method of synchronizing files from local to cloud can also use improvement."
"The workflow engine cannot support the business needs."
"It has worked very well for me. It seems like they've improved everything. I don't have any cons about it as such, but I don't think they have a talk-to-text, speech-to-text, or speech-to-type. That would be cool for accessibility."
"The solution lacks collaboration features."
Hyland OnBase is ranked 12th in Enterprise Content Management with 2 reviews while SharePoint is ranked 1st in Enterprise Content Management with 7 reviews. Hyland OnBase is rated 0.0, while SharePoint is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Hyland OnBase writes "A remarkable all-in-one platform with amazing stability and scalability and good technical support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SharePoint writes "Offers great OCR capabilities, metadata storage and proficient archiving ". Hyland OnBase is most compared with OpenText Content Suite Platform, Alfresco, IBM FileNet, Hyland Perceptive Content and OpenText Documentum, whereas SharePoint is most compared with WordPress, Citrix ShareFile, Box, OpenText Documentum and Oracle WebCenter. See our Hyland OnBase vs. SharePoint report.
See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
