Hyland OnBase vs SharePoint comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Hyland Logo
2,769 views|1,713 comparisons
Microsoft Logo
8,328 views|6,692 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Hyland OnBase and SharePoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Content Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Hyland OnBase vs. SharePoint Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"I like the cloud and its integrability.""We found the setup process to be okay since they do offer a troubleshooting guide.""OnBase is a remarkable tool. It is a well-done product. Hyland has a lot of experience in building it and looking for new things for clients in terms of functionalities. It has amazing stability, and it can grow horizontally and vertically. It is built for growth. Their technical support is also quite good and available throughout the year.""The most valuable features are that it's very secure and provides audit trails for our documents.""The solution is very developed and we are not taking full advantage of its functionalities.""The retention module is one of the most valuable features. Whatever we scan onto the system can be identified and we are notified when the records are due to be disposed."

More Hyland OnBase Pros →

"No code and low code, scalable, and stable collaboration platform. Straightforward to set up. Its support system is good and offers fast issue resolution.""The most valuable feature is the ability to easily build intranet sites for communicating within teams, storing documentation, product information, pricing policies, updates on product infrastructure, and other related news.""It has good integration with other MS products.""The workflow feature is valuable because it enables us to cascade responsibilities.""Its configuration management ability is critical for document-based systems.""It has helped us with storing all the documents, which means that people are not going to intervene. There is a way of extracting knowledge within documentation and tracking it. There are knowledge assets for where documentation is stored, indexed and searchable through SharePoint.""Document flows, storage, and numbering take off the actions for checking and assigning the numbering and running around with approvals and pre-approvals.""SharePoint has an option where you can open files on the browser, whereby more than five people can make amendments to one Excel online file."

More SharePoint Pros →

Cons
"We need to troubleshoot why our reports didn't get downloaded in a day. There is a workflow feature which powerful but also complicated.""The dashboards do have some room for improvement as compared to the other vendors which are there in the market.""For user experience, they would have to do more with the interface. It is not easy to work with and is a little messy. It is getting better, but it is not yet good enough. Other products are comparatively doing better in terms of the user interface. I have been hearing about Box, which is very easy to use and learn for the users. OnBase has to work on this aspect. It should have BPM capabilities. We compete with tools that provide the BPM feature and support those standards. They can do better in terms of the pricing model. It is a really expensive tool in Latin America. They should have different prices for different regions.""An area for improvement would be the training - getting our people up to speed on how to use it required more training than we expected due to the complexity of the solution.""We are struggling with duplicates and would like to have OCR functionality when using this solution.""The look and feel could be better. The integration with the user could be better. It could also be more user-friendly."

More Hyland OnBase Cons →

"The way to change the version of the files in SharePoint should be improved. The method of synchronizing files from local to the cloud can also use improvement.""No good process to import emails from several users into a single comprehensive SP repository.""Search can be improved a lot because we are always trying to compare it with Google Search. Beyond that, it would be helpful to tag the documents.""You still need a bit of expertise to add branding.""Replication needs improvement.""It does not integrate despite being part of the Microsoft family.""One issue is that when users mistakenly hide files or set permissions incorrectly, it can lead to files becoming inaccessible, requiring intervention from Microsoft support to resolve.""The product must provide more automation."

More SharePoint Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "They can do better in terms of the pricing model. It is a really expensive tool in Latin America. They should have different prices for different regions."
  • "OnBase is reasonably priced."
  • "There are a number of different types of licenses. There are concurrent licenses, individual licenses and imaging licenses."
  • "The tool's price is high."
  • More Hyland OnBase Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "As usual, Microsoft’s licensing structures don’t really seem to fit the needs of their products. This leads to always paying for a project you will never use fully or always be adding to."
  • "Licensing can be by server or by seat."
  • "It is very expensive.​"
  • "The data classification and search elements are cheap."
  • "The replacement costs for it are cheaper if you use only SharePoint."
  • "We have purchased add-ons to handle multiple site collections, form creation, and design."
  • "The cost is expensive, but worthwhile."
  • "The pricing works for us."
  • More SharePoint Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparison Review
    Anonymous User
    At Mediacurrent we often get requests to compare Drupal to other platforms used for intranet sites and social business platforms (like https://dev.twitter.com/ for example). This is often referred to as “Social Business Software”, which has grown in popularity in recent years. I decided to do a round-up of a couple of the more well known platforms and compare their products to Drupal. In this roundup we will be comparing Jive, Sharepoint and Drupal Commons. Drupal Commons is a popular distribution created by Acquia to compete with some of these other proprietary platforms. There are many other options out there, commercial and otherwise, to compare with Drupal but I want to focus on Jive and Sharepoint for a couple of reasons. I chose Jive because it is one of the leading competitors in this space in respect to market share. Next, I chose Sharepoint because I have some history with Sharepoint. This experience dates back to when I built www.adhe.edu with Sharepoint 2007 a few years ago. I subsequently wrote this blog entry about my experience shortly after joining Mediacurrent. This roundup will also act as a refresher for those who read my original “Drupal vs. Sharepoint” blog. Yammer, which was recently bought by Microsoft and is the tool we currently use for office communication will also get some mentions throughout this article. As I went through and tested each of these tools I used three main criteria in my evaluation Cost Ability to Customize Overall features… Read more →
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The solution is very developed and we are not taking full advantage of its functionalities.
    Top Answer:We need to troubleshoot why our reports didn't get downloaded in a day. There is a workflow feature which powerful but also complicated.
    Top Answer:Alfresco scores are high on all features of an ECM solution and tools.   Back office processing, rated as 3.36 good.  Business Process Application 3.55 Good to excellent.  Document Management 4.12… more »
    Top Answer:The pricing is competitive. That's why almost all the companies are using SharePoint. I rate the pricing a ten out of ten. When we buy the license, the person buying must be well-educated on how the… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    2,769
    Comparisons
    1,713
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    439
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    8,328
    Comparisons
    6,692
    Reviews
    17
    Average Words per Review
    562
    Rating
    8.2
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    OnBase
    SharePoint 2007, SharePoint 2010
    Learn More
    Overview

    OnBase provides a broad spectrum of turn-key industry and departmental solutions that are expertly tailored to meet specific business challenges. As an enterprise platform, OnBase has purpose-built integrations and connectors to core industry LOB applications such as Epic and Workday, supporting critical content and process solutions. With repeatable industry solutions, OnBase provides the capability to intelligently automate your business processes so your team can focus on higher value work without the need to build costly customized solutions. With business ownership of solutions, OnBase enables expansion beyond IT, delivering faster ROI.

    SharePoint is a Microsoft-based platform for building web applications. It covers a widerange of capabilities and while it is appropriate for experienced webdevelopers, even non-technical minded users can easily navigate through thesystem and execute functions such as collaborating data, managing documents andfiles, creating websites, managing social networking solutions, and automatingworkflow.

    Major areas that SharePoint deals with are websites,communities, content, search, insights, and composites. The purpose is to give usersthe ability to create or develop these key business components on their owneven without technical knowledge of, for example, how to build a website or howto integrate coding. Configuring SharePoint into a business's system is meantto cut out all of the complicated steps, and pave the way for easierimplementation all around.

    Sample Customers
    Honda France Industries, Hill County Texas, Hylant Group, ING Lease France, State of South Carolina, Syracuse University, Swindon College, Rhode Island Department of Human Services, Rochester Institute of Technology, Moen, Odense University Hospital
    Toyota, Aeroports de Paris, ASBBank Ltd., Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals, CambridgeshireConstabulary, D&M Group, NPL Construction Company, and The Regional Municipality of Niagara.
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Government12%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Insurance Company8%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Energy/Utilities Company8%
    University8%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Government12%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise22%
    Large Enterprise44%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise61%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business41%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise39%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise60%
    Buyer's Guide
    Hyland OnBase vs. SharePoint
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Hyland OnBase vs. SharePoint and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    765,386 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Hyland OnBase is ranked 8th in Enterprise Content Management with 8 reviews while SharePoint is ranked 1st in Enterprise Content Management with 146 reviews. Hyland OnBase is rated 8.0, while SharePoint is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Hyland OnBase writes "Stable content and workflow management solution with a valuable retention module". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SharePoint writes "Good integrations, helps with collaboration, and increases visibility". Hyland OnBase is most compared with Alfresco, OpenText Documentum, OpenText Extended ECM, IBM FileNet and Hyland Perceptive Content, whereas SharePoint is most compared with Citrix ShareFile, Microsoft OneDrive, Dropbox and Box. See our Hyland OnBase vs. SharePoint report.

    See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors.

    We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.