ADONIS Reviews

There is a function to check if the model BPMN is being used correctly, but the report from the check is not always very clear. Sometimes the translations aren't clear. My customers are not as fluent in English (I work in France) so it's better when the software is well translated. They are improving this area, but sometimes it's still confusing. My main concern is to mix models and process automation. At the moment, I am getting used to the newest solution ADONIS Process Automation. My main expectation is for this package to be adapted for end-users which are not SW-developers.

I would advise you really to think about how you want to implement it. For example, Adonis recommends that you create new roles or applications for every subpartway modeling subprocess. We didn't do that, and now we're having to go back and change everything. We have the same rules with slightly different names because someone called it one way, and someone else called it another way. So we have to go through everything and fix it, which is really annoying. We should have solved this problem at the beginning. Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten. Because when you update a page, the information on the quick links sidebar on the left side doesn't stay in the same place. It moves down, so you have to scroll to find it. That's not very user-friendly. If that was fixed, I would give it a ten.

What is our primary use case We use ADONIS for the modeling of business processes as it has a good drawing system.  How has it helped my organization? Our department teaches students management and entrepreneurship and ADONIS has helped with this.  What is most valuable? The best…