Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

ADONIS vs Hyland OnBase comparison

BOC Group and Hyland are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. BOC Group is ranked #21 with an average rating of 8.7, while Hyland is ranked #17 with an average rating of 7.7. BOC Group holds a 3.0% mindshare in BPM, compared to Hyland’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of BOC Group users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Hyland users who would recommend it.
ADONIS
Read 8 ADONIS reviews
  • 2,373 Views
  • 2,302 Comparison Views
90% willing to recommend
Hyland OnBase
Read 13 Hyland OnBase reviews
  • 3,080 Views
  • 339 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Hyland OnBase and ADONIS compete in enterprise content management and business process management, respectively. Hyland OnBase excels in pricing and support, while ADONIS is often chosen for its advanced feature set.

Features: Hyland OnBase offers comprehensive document management and workflow automation that appeal to industries with stringent compliance requirements. It provides secure audit trails and a robust retention module for document-lifecycle management. ADONIS offers advanced business process modeling, simulation, and optimization tools vital for process-focused environments, alongside BPMN support and intuitive drag-and-drop functionality.

Room for Improvement: Hyland OnBase can be complex regarding keyword usage, which might lead to performance issues. Additionally, users may need to leverage additional modules for certain features. Improvements in the user interface could enhance usability. ADONIS may benefit from streamlined deployment features to reduce setup complexity, more simplified user training options, and enhanced integration capabilities with other systems to improve operational efficiency.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Hyland OnBase is known for a straightforward deployment process and robust technical support, aiding in efficient system implementation. ADONIS requires more effort during deployment due to its complex feature set but compensates with comprehensive training resources and outstanding customer support to guide users through the process.

Pricing and ROI: Hyland OnBase generally offers a more affordable initial setup cost, providing an attractive ROI for document-driven industries focused on cost-efficiency. Though ADONIS comes with higher upfront costs, it delivers significant ROI through extensive process optimization, proving valuable for organizations deeply invested in business process enhancement.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed ADONIS vs. Hyland OnBase Report (Updated: July 2025).
Buyer's Guide
ADONIS vs. Hyland OnBase
July 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 861,524 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

ADONIS
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
21st
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.3
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Hyland OnBase
Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)
17th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Content Management (5th), Low-Code Development Platforms (13th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of ADONIS is 3.0%, up from 2.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Hyland OnBase is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Business Process Management (BPM)
 

Featured Reviews

Teguh Surya - PeerSpot reviewer
Process capabilities impress while user setup requires streamlining
I stopped using ADONIS because it is not capable of integrating and automating business processes for the POC. I see that Camunda is more capable for our POC project to orchestrate business processes. We also plan to integrate with UiPath because currently, we are focusing on task automations, not process orchestrations. In the future, we plan to implement process orchestrations. I see that Camunda can integrate UiPath into the process, process model, and process integrations. ADONIS needs improvement mainly in user-friendliness, setup, and installations. As an administrator at that time, I found it quite difficult to manage users because I needed to open specific software, possibly Java-based, which is not web-based and should be installed first to manage the users.
Read full review
Srinivas Rao Kagitha - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers good dashboards and reports but fails to offer better migration features
The migration is a bit difficult in the tool. Whenever we make certain changes to workflow or other stuff, migrating the code from one environment to another is a bit tedious. The tool has an option for export and import, which is not robust. Most of the time, we need to do things stuff manually. For example, if we make any changes in the existing life cycle or any queues, we have to move those changes manually. There is no robust way to migrate code from one environment to a lower environment, like prod. When it comes to the product's technical support, the turnaround time is a bit longer than expected. The issue may be because there are a number of issues or a large number of customers who are reaching out to the support team for help. I believe that the solution's technical team can provide a solution more quickly.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It seems that the process mapping and modeling features are well and thoroughly covered."
"The best features of the system include good analytics for business processes including the calculation of time and cost."
"We haven't ever needed to take service breaks and we can scale it throughout our company without any problem."
"It's a very complete solution."
"It's easy to handle the solution thanks to being drag and drop"
"ADONIS supports the project hierarchy and allows collaboration through methodological reviews and comments, enhancing decision-making."
"The product is useful for designing business processes and for repositories."
"It provided data security features, allowing restrictions on sensitive documents, such as who could view or modify them."
"The retention module is one of the most valuable features. Whatever we scan onto the system can be identified and we are notified when the records are due to be disposed."
"The solution's most valuable features are integration and flexibility."
"The product's initial setup phase is not difficult."
"OnBase is a remarkable tool. It is a well-done product. Hyland has a lot of experience in building it and looking for new things for clients in terms of functionalities. It has amazing stability, and it can grow horizontally and vertically. It is built for growth. Their technical support is also quite good and available throughout the year."
"We found the setup process to be okay since they do offer a troubleshooting guide."
"The most valuable features are that it's very secure and provides audit trails for our documents."
"I like the cloud and its integrability."
More Hyland OnBase pros
 

Cons

"If there's no WiFi connection, you can't access ADONIS."
"ADONIS needs improvement in its user interface functionality."
"We have to use a different solution to automate our business processes."
"There is a function to check if the model BPMN is being used correctly, but the report from the check is not always very clear."
"ADONIS needs improvement mainly in user-friendliness, setup, and installations. As an administrator at that time, I found it quite difficult to manage users because I needed to open specific software, possibly Java-based, which is not web-based and should be installed first to manage the users."
"Rearranging things to get information from the objects and the model together to get a report out of them could be done better."
"This solution would be improved if 24/7 support were available."
"The solution is in English and we have added certain parts in Russian as this is easier for our students. It would be useful to have the system in Russian."
"An area for improvement would be the training - getting our people up to speed on how to use it required more training than we expected due to the complexity of the solution."
"We are struggling with duplicates and would like to have OCR functionality when using this solution."
"The look and feel could be better. The integration with the user could be better. It could also be more user-friendly."
"The dashboards do have some room for improvement as compared to the other vendors which are there in the market."
"I find OnBase's monolithic architecture to be expensive, and adopting microservices could be beneficial."
"For user experience, they would have to do more with the interface. It is not easy to work with and is a little messy. It is getting better, but it is not yet good enough. Other products are comparatively doing better in terms of the user interface. I have been hearing about Box, which is very easy to use and learn for the users. OnBase has to work on this aspect. It should have BPM capabilities. We compete with tools that provide the BPM feature and support those standards. They can do better in terms of the pricing model. It is a really expensive tool in Latin America. They should have different prices for different regions."
"The solution’s initial setup is a little difficult."
"The application could potentially be more open-source, allowing integration with more solutions."
More Hyland OnBase cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product's pricing is medium, so I rate it a five out of ten."
"The product’s price is quite competitive."
"OnBase is reasonably priced."
"The solution costs around $6,000 per month."
"There are a number of different types of licenses. There are concurrent licenses, individual licenses and imaging licenses."
"The tool's price is high."
"They can do better in terms of the pricing model. It is a really expensive tool in Latin America. They should have different prices for different regions."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
9%
University
9%
Energy/Utilities Company
8%
Government
14%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Computer Software Company
10%
Insurance Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ADONIS?
It's easy to handle the solution thanks to being drag and drop
See all answers
What needs improvement with ADONIS?
ADONIS needs improvement in its user interface functionality. The tooltips can appear overcrowded when delving into specific tool selections. They are quite adequate for nowadays but there are some...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for ADONIS?
In my case, ADONIS was used for modeling academic projects, specifically for learning business process modeling. I primarily focused on modeling different business processes within my university pr...
See all answers
What do you like most about Hyland OnBase?
The solution is very developed and we are not taking full advantage of its functionalities.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Hyland OnBase?
I find pricing to be on the higher side due to its monolithic architecture. I would rate it six out of ten. Transitioning to microservices, allowing users to pay for only what they use, could reduc...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Hyland OnBase?
I believe the reporting features need improvement, as other competitors in the market provide better analytics. Hyland is working on a new platform (HXP) to integrate features from all products, ad...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs ADONIS Logo
SAP Signavio Process Manager vs ADONIS
Compared 26% of the time
ARIS BPA vs ADONIS Logo
ARIS BPA vs ADONIS
Compared 23% of the time
Camunda vs ADONIS Logo
Camunda vs ADONIS
Compared 19% of the time
Bizagi vs ADONIS Logo
Bizagi vs ADONIS
Compared 9% of the time
MEGA HOPEX vs ADONIS Logo
MEGA HOPEX vs ADONIS
Compared 5% of the time
More ADONIS Competitors
Alfresco vs Hyland OnBase Logo
Alfresco vs Hyland OnBase
Compared 17% of the time
OpenText Documentum Content Management vs Hyland OnBase Logo
OpenText Documentum Content Management vs Hyland OnBase
Compared 14% of the time
SharePoint vs Hyland OnBase Logo
SharePoint vs Hyland OnBase
Compared 12% of the time
IBM FileNet vs Hyland OnBase Logo
IBM FileNet vs Hyland OnBase
Compared 10% of the time
OpenText Content Management vs Hyland OnBase Logo
OpenText Content Management vs Hyland OnBase
Compared 9% of the time
More Hyland OnBase Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Business Process Management (BPM)
June 2025
ADONIS reportDownload ADONIS product report
Buyer's Guide
Hyland OnBase
July 2025
Hyland OnBase reportDownload Hyland OnBase product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
OnBase
 

Overview

ADONIS BPM suite is users' best-rated tool for process management, analysis and optimization, trusted by SMEs and large corporations worldwide. It helps you transform your business and create competitive advantage by streamlining processes, enhancing operational efficiency, boosting transparency and creating a customer-centric organization. You can start creating your digital twin with ADONIS already today, as the cloud-based ADONIS:Community Edition is available for free. For more information please visit www.boc-group.com/en/adonis/.

BOC Group

Hyland OnBase is acclaimed for its robust document management, automating workflows, and improving organizational efficiency across various industries. Praised for its ability to manage records compliantly, especially in regulated sectors like healthcare and finance, the tool also integrates smoothly with other enterprise systems. Users benefit significantly from streamlined processes, reduced manual tasks, and enhanced data accuracy, boosting productivity and customer satisfaction.

Hyland
 

Sample Customers

Trusted by small to large enterprises worldwide: ABB, Allianz, Comcast, ERGO, Emerson, Glencore, Lincoln Financial Group, Marel, Raiffeisen bank, Schroders, Southern Water, Stadt Wien, UNIQA, VAUDE, Voestalpine, Volksbank, Vorwerk
Honda France Industries, Hill County Texas, Hylant Group, ING Lease France, State of South Carolina, Syracuse University, Swindon College, Rhode Island Department of Human Services, Rochester Institute of Technology, Moen, Odense University Hospital
Buyer's Guide
ADONIS vs. Hyland OnBase
July 2025
Free Report: ADONIS vs. Hyland OnBase
Find out what your peers are saying about ADONIS vs. Hyland OnBase and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our ADONIS vs. Hyland OnBase report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.