ADONIS vs Hyland OnBase comparison

BOC Group and Hyland are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. BOC Group is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.5, while Hyland is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.0. BOC Group holds a 1.4% mindshare in BPM, compared to Hyland’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of BOC Group users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Hyland users who would recommend it.

ADONIS

Read 8 ADONIS reviews

3,009 Views
2,919 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Hyland OnBase

Read 16 Hyland OnBase reviews

7,332 Views
1,906 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ADONIS

Hyland OnBase

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Hyland OnBase and ADONIS compete in enterprise content management and business process management, respectively. Hyland OnBase excels in pricing and support, while ADONIS is often chosen for its advanced feature set.

Features: Hyland OnBase offers comprehensive document management and workflow automation that appeal to industries with stringent compliance requirements. It provides secure audit trails and a robust retention module for document-lifecycle management. ADONIS offers advanced business process modeling, simulation, and optimization tools vital for process-focused environments, alongside BPMN support and intuitive drag-and-drop functionality.

Room for Improvement: Hyland OnBase can be complex regarding keyword usage, which might lead to performance issues. Additionally, users may need to leverage additional modules for certain features. Improvements in the user interface could enhance usability. ADONIS may benefit from streamlined deployment features to reduce setup complexity, more simplified user training options, and enhanced integration capabilities with other systems to improve operational efficiency.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Hyland OnBase is known for a straightforward deployment process and robust technical support, aiding in efficient system implementation. ADONIS requires more effort during deployment due to its complex feature set but compensates with comprehensive training resources and outstanding customer support to guide users through the process.

Pricing and ROI: Hyland OnBase generally offers a more affordable initial setup cost, providing an attractive ROI for document-driven industries focused on cost-efficiency. Though ADONIS comes with higher upfront costs, it delivers significant ROI through extensive process optimization, proving valuable for organizations deeply invested in business process enhancement.

To learn more, read our detailed ADONIS vs. Hyland OnBase Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

ADONIS vs. Hyland OnBase

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 902,988 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ADONIS

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

18th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Hyland OnBase

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

14th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Content Management (6th), Low-Code Development Platforms (15th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of ADONIS is 1.4%, down from 3.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Hyland OnBase is 1.1%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Hyland OnBase	1.1%
ADONIS	1.4%
Other	97.5%

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

Teguh Surya

AVP B2B Business Process Excellence at PT. Indosat Tbk

Process capabilities impress while user setup requires streamlining

I stopped using ADONIS because it is not capable of integrating and automating business processes for the POC. I see that Camunda is more capable for our POC project to orchestrate business processes. We also plan to integrate with UiPath because currently, we are focusing on task automations, not process orchestrations. In the future, we plan to implement process orchestrations. I see that Camunda can integrate UiPath into the process, process model, and process integrations. ADONIS needs improvement mainly in user-friendliness, setup, and installations. As an administrator at that time, I found it quite difficult to manage users because I needed to open specific software, possibly Java-based, which is not web-based and should be installed first to manage the users.

Read full review

Abdul_Jabbar

Senior Software Engineer at Infosys

Automated workflows have transformed document handling and support daily approvals and billing

The best features Hyland OnBase offers in my experience include being a robust storage solution that integrates well with the Epic solution, allows Unity Forms to be easy to create and use, and has Distribution Services for sending email notifications as reminders.Out of those features, the workflow engine has made the biggest difference for me because it is excellent for automating approval processes, and we use Hyland OnBase for legal requests, hardware requests, travel requests, corporate credit card requests, and file transfer requests. WorkView is an incredible module for gathering and displaying summary information, and we utilize it highly in our subsidiary to manage our legal contracts, their financial billing process, and their travel. We also use the Document Import Process coupled with Unity API for writing custom code to automate processes to send and receive data from other systems that are not yet API enabled. The impact of Hyland OnBase on our organization is that automating manual processes has had an incredible effect on our return on investment, and the man-hours saved by automating processes pays for the system, ranging from one to five hours. I measured the man-hours saved through the tracking of workflows and automation processes. Additionally, Hyland OnBase has allowed us to move away from moving paper around various departments, providing workflow management to keep approval inside the system and out of the email boxes, eliminating the need for paper storage, and saving storage costs with other vendors.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This is a good solution for consulting firms and universities and is one of the best systems for analytics of business processes."

"It seems that the process mapping and modeling features are well and thoroughly covered."

"The support is fantastic and we have really good contact with them, it's very easy to use."

"The product is useful for designing business processes and for repositories."

"We haven't ever needed to take service breaks and we can scale it throughout our company without any problem."

"ADONIS supports the project hierarchy and allows collaboration through methodological reviews and comments, enhancing decision-making."

"The best features of the system include good analytics for business processes including the calculation of time and cost."

"It's easy to handle the solution thanks to being drag and drop"

More ADONIS pros

"OnBase is a remarkable tool. It is a well-done product. Hyland has a lot of experience in building it and looking for new things for clients in terms of functionalities. It has amazing stability, and it can grow horizontally and vertically. It is built for growth. Their technical support is also quite good and available throughout the year."

"This solution is easy to implement and easy to use as long as you know what your business requirement are or the specifications are straightforward."

"It provided data security features, allowing restrictions on sensitive documents, such as who could view or modify them."

"Hyland OnBase has had a positive impact on my organization by reducing manual processes and approval times since the documents are centralized and digitized."

"The solution is very developed and we are not taking full advantage of its functionalities."

"With Hyland OnBase, every document is unique, and access can be restricted and audited depending on user permission, allowing a company to take control of their information and be more productive."

"OnBase provides high-value solutions for organizations with much less cost in comparison to other ECM solutions."

"The solution's most valuable features are integration and flexibility."

More Hyland OnBase pros

Cons

"This solution would be improved if 24/7 support were available."

"One of the weak points is that you can't just export so I'd like to see an improvement in exporting features."

"Rearranging things to get information from the objects and the model together to get a report out of them could be done better."

"If there's no WiFi connection, you can't access ADONIS."

"ADONIS needs improvement in its user interface functionality."

"We have to use a different solution to automate our business processes."

"The solution is in English and we have added certain parts in Russian as this is easier for our students. It would be useful to have the system in Russian."

"ADONIS needs improvement mainly in user-friendliness, setup, and installations. As an administrator at that time, I found it quite difficult to manage users because I needed to open specific software, possibly Java-based, which is not web-based and should be installed first to manage the users."

More ADONIS cons

"I find OnBase's monolithic architecture to be expensive, and adopting microservices could be beneficial."

"We are struggling with duplicates and would like to have OCR functionality when using this solution."

"The solution’s initial setup is a little difficult."

"For user experience, they would have to do more with the interface. It is not easy to work with and is a little messy. It is getting better, but it is not yet good enough. Other products are comparatively doing better in terms of the user interface. I have been hearing about Box, which is very easy to use and learn for the users. OnBase has to work on this aspect. It should have BPM capabilities. We compete with tools that provide the BPM feature and support those standards. They can do better in terms of the pricing model. It is a really expensive tool in Latin America. They should have different prices for different regions."

"The application could potentially be more open-source, allowing integration with more solutions."

"Software malfunctioning usually occurs when we receive documents from external sources."

"We need to troubleshoot why our reports didn't get downloaded in a day. There is a workflow feature which powerful but also complicated."

"I believe Hyland OnBase could improve by making its user interface more user-friendly."

More Hyland OnBase cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product’s price is quite competitive."

"The product's pricing is medium, so I rate it a five out of ten."

"OnBase is reasonably priced."

"The tool's price is high."

"There are a number of different types of licenses. There are concurrent licenses, individual licenses and imaging licenses."

"The solution costs around $6,000 per month."

"They can do better in terms of the pricing model. It is a really expensive tool in Latin America. They should have different prices for different regions."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

University

10%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

11%

Government

11%

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	13

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with ADONIS?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ADONIS?

We are using Camunda for process modeling, some collaborations for process development, and for the process documentation repository, we use SharePoint. We have used ADONIS process modeler, not jus...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering ADONIS?

I have not integrated it with other products in my system because we are just using the free version. I am planning to purchase the Team version or Business plan for the initial proof of concept pr...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Hyland OnBase?

The main factors that influenced my decision to choose Hyland OnBase over other options available on the market were the cost compared to others and the high document-handling capacity that Hyland ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Hyland OnBase?

I believe Hyland OnBase could improve by making its user interface more user-friendly.I am referring to the learning curve, and I can tell you that the experience with the platform's learning curve...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Hyland OnBase?

Hyland OnBase serves as the primary document management solution for all of my company's documents.A concrete example of how I use Hyland OnBase for document management within my organization is th...

See all answers

Comparisons

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs ADONIS

Compared 18% of the time

ARIS BPA vs ADONIS

Compared 13% of the time

ARIS Process Governance vs ADONIS

Compared 9% of the time

Camunda vs ADONIS

Compared 8% of the time

Bizagi vs ADONIS

Compared 6% of the time

More ADONIS Competitors

OpenText Content Management vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 7% of the time

IBM FileNet vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 6% of the time

SharePoint vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 6% of the time

Alfresco vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 5% of the time

Laserfiche vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 3% of the time

More Hyland OnBase Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

June 2026

Download ADONIS product report

Buyer's Guide

Hyland OnBase

June 2026

Download Hyland OnBase product report

Also Known As

No data available

OnBase

Overview

ADONIS is a stable, scalable platform supporting business process management with features for modeling, process accessibility, and decision-making. Known for its comprehensive nature, it aids in clear process documentation and robust support.

ADONIS provides a versatile BPM suite that empowers organizations in process mapping and modeling. It supports collaboration and offers user-friendly simulations, aiding decision-making with insights for automation. Despite lacking 24/7 support and limited export features, ADONIS is integral for creating documentation and conducting workshops. Challenges include complex setup and administrator management, but its comprehensive features support learning in academic settings and deployment by consultants.

What are the key features of ADONIS?

Personalized View: Provides easy access to processes.
Drag-and-Drop Modeling: Simplifies process modeling.
Robust Analytics: Offers strong insights into business processes.
Collaboration Tools: Facilitates teamwork across platforms.
Simulation Features: Aids in user-friendly process simulations.
Documentation Support: Includes features for risks and KPIs.

What benefits can users expect from ADONIS reviews?

Ease of Use: Consistently highlighted for its straightforward interface.
Comprehensive Nature: Surpasses alternatives in process documentation.
Scalability: Supports growing business needs.
Robust Support: Reliable customer support services.

In specific industries, ADONIS is used for versatile purposes like business process management, modeling, academic learning, and consultancy deployment. Organizations engage with ADONIS in both active and read-only modes, highlighting its adaptability in diverse settings.

BOC Group

Hyland OnBase is acclaimed for its robust document management, automating workflows, and improving organizational efficiency across various industries. Praised for its ability to manage records compliantly, especially in regulated sectors like healthcare and finance, the tool also integrates smoothly with other enterprise systems. Users benefit significantly from streamlined processes, reduced manual tasks, and enhanced data accuracy, boosting productivity and customer satisfaction.

Hyland

Sample Customers

Trusted by small to large enterprises worldwide: ABB, Allianz, Comcast, ERGO, Emerson, Glencore, Lincoln Financial Group, Marel, Raiffeisen bank, Schroders, Southern Water, Stadt Wien, UNIQA, VAUDE, Voestalpine, Volksbank, Vorwerk

Honda France Industries, Hill County Texas, Hylant Group, ING Lease France, State of South Carolina, Syracuse University, Swindon College, Rhode Island Department of Human Services, Rochester Institute of Technology, Moen, Odense University Hospital

Buyer's Guide

ADONIS vs. Hyland OnBase

June 2026

Free Report: ADONIS vs. Hyland OnBase

Find out what your peers are saying about ADONIS vs. Hyland OnBase and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ADONIS vs. Hyland OnBase report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.