AuraQuantic vs Hyland OnBase comparison

AuraQuantic and Hyland are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. AuraQuantic is ranked #17 with an average rating of 10.0, while Hyland is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.1. AuraQuantic holds a 0.9% mindshare in BPM, compared to Hyland’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of AuraQuantic users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Hyland users who would recommend it.

AuraQuantic

Read 6 AuraQuantic reviews

3,334 Views
1,600 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Hyland OnBase

Read 16 Hyland OnBase reviews

7,827 Views
2,035 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

AuraQuantic

Hyland OnBase

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Hyland OnBase and AuraQuantic are two prominent solutions in the enterprise content management and low-code automation space. Hyland OnBase excels in support and pricing, while AuraQuantic is preferred for its robust features.

Features: Hyland OnBase offers comprehensive document management, workflow automation, and case management features. Users appreciate its scalability and integration capabilities. AuraQuantic stands out with extensive low-code development tools, advanced reporting options, and a superior rules engine. Users favor AuraQuantic for its customization and extensive feature set.

Room for Improvement: Hyland OnBase users seek a more intuitive design and faster processing speeds. They also desire improved mobile functionalities. AuraQuantic users report challenges with initial setup complexity and the learning curve associated with its advanced features. Both systems have areas requiring enhancement, but the focus differs significantly.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Hyland OnBase deployment is praised for being straightforward, with strong customer support backing. Its deployment model is flexible, supporting on-premises and cloud options. AuraQuantic users find its deployment more complex but appreciate detailed support and comprehensive documentation. Despite this, Hyland OnBase is noted for easier deployment.

Pricing and ROI: Hyland OnBase is seen as cost-effective with swift ROI due to its efficient implementation process. AuraQuantic, while initially perceived as more expensive, offers substantial ROI attributed to its expansive functionality and customization potential. Users find AuraQuantic worth the investment for its long-term benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed AuraQuantic vs. Hyland OnBase Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

AuraQuantic vs. Hyland OnBase

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

6.8

AuraQuantic enhances efficiency, speeds up tasks, optimizes resources, and boosts productivity and ROI through customization and automation.

Sentiment score

4.6

Hyland OnBase enhances efficiency and cost savings by streamlining processes, reducing paper use, and supporting remote work.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the AuraQuantic report

I have seen a return on investment with Hyland OnBase because it provides a very reliable ECM platform for my organization, helps to remove the dependency on paper files and file folders, saves real estate costs, and facilitates the ability to work from anywhere.

Abdul_Jabbar

Senior Software Engineer at Infosys

For more quotes and insights, download the Hyland OnBase report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

8.5

AuraQuantic's customer service is praised for its responsiveness, professionalism, and knowledgeable support team that assists with implementation and troubleshooting.

Sentiment score

5.8

Hyland OnBase offers responsive service, but support quality varies and may require premium packages for enhanced assistance.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the AuraQuantic report

Our vendor relationship facilitated integration with our system and offered additional service beyond the Hyland OnBase product.

reviewer2560407

Program Manager at a financial services firm with 11-50 employees

I find technical support from Hyland to be good.

reviewer1981395

Product owner at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Hyland OnBase report

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

9.0

AuraQuantic is highly scalable, accommodating both easy starts and rapid growth, making it ideal for large clients and expanding needs.

Sentiment score

6.5

Hyland OnBase is praised for scalability and adaptability, efficiently expanding to support growing business demands despite setup costs.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the AuraQuantic report

Transitioning to cloud-based services may reduce these costs in the future.

reviewer1981395

Product owner at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Hyland OnBase report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

8.7

AuraQuantic is highly stable, performs excellently on Microsoft Azure, and has no reported issues, earning a ten out of ten.

Sentiment score

8.2

Hyland OnBase is a stable, reliable platform with strong traceability, high performance, and minimal maintenance, akin to Windows.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the AuraQuantic report

Hyland OnBase was a stable solution that worked effectively for us.

reviewer2560407

Program Manager at a financial services firm with 11-50 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Hyland OnBase report

Room For Improvement

AuraQuantic needs better system integration, extensive documentation, intuitive training, easier customization, and more responsive technical support.

Hyland OnBase needs improved usability, integration, and support, with simplified management, enhanced features, and better documentation and pricing adjustments.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the AuraQuantic report

I find OnBase's monolithic architecture to be expensive, and adopting microservices could be beneficial.

reviewer1981395

Product owner at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

The application could potentially be more open-source, allowing integration with more solutions.

reviewer2560407

Program Manager at a financial services firm with 11-50 employees

If AI could be used more at an enterprise level, since we are purchasing at an enterprise level for the subscription of Hyland OnBase, I would say if those AI informations would stay within the enterprise and not go outside of our enterprise boundaries, it would be secure and maintain our privacy.

reviewer2867946

Business Analyst at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Hyland OnBase report

Setup Cost

AuraQuantic provides scalable, transparent pricing with various plans based on deployment options, usage requirements, and number of users.

Hyland OnBase offers modular enterprise solutions, with varied pricing and complex licensing, often seen as justified yet expensive.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the AuraQuantic report

I find pricing to be on the higher side due to its monolithic architecture.

reviewer1981395

Product owner at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees

We also paid for workflow licenses, which allowed up to 250 concurrent users.

reviewer2560407

Program Manager at a financial services firm with 11-50 employees

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it is very cost-effective and affordable.

Abdul_Jabbar

Senior Software Engineer at Infosys

For more quotes and insights, download the Hyland OnBase report

Valuable Features

AuraQuantic is a user-friendly, zero-code platform for automating and optimizing processes with quick implementation and reliable support.

Hyland OnBase excels in document management with scalable workflows, easy integration, customization, automation, and robust security features.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the AuraQuantic report

The impact of Hyland OnBase on our organization is that automating manual processes has had an incredible effect on our return on investment, and the man-hours saved by automating processes pays for the system, ranging from one to five hours.

Abdul_Jabbar

Senior Software Engineer at Infosys

It provided data security features, allowing restrictions on sensitive documents, such as who could view or modify them.

reviewer2560407

Program Manager at a financial services firm with 11-50 employees

It has increased the transparency of the processes and workflows. Every user who is involved in each of the steps is well aware. Even the manager gets an update.

reviewer2867946

Business Analyst at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Hyland OnBase report

Categories and Ranking

AuraQuantic

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

17th

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

21st

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (17th), No-Code Development Platforms (9th), Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) (15th), Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (22nd)

Hyland OnBase

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

15th

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

16th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Content Management (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of AuraQuantic is 0.9%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Hyland OnBase is 1.1%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Hyland OnBase	1.1%
AuraQuantic	0.9%
Other	98.0%

Business Process Management (BPM)

Q&A Highlights

Guillermo Perez

General Manager at XIMPLEX

Nov 01, 2019

Are Laserfiche and OnBase considered eBPMs? How do they compare to AuraPortal?

I am not familiar with LaserFiche or AuraPortal, but we employ OnBase here and I am familiar with IBM's ECM platform. Without splitting too many hairs, tools like these provide a "content-enabled" workflow and are often referred to as Enterprise Content Management (ECM) systems. That is, they don't do anything until a piece of content presents itself for processing. They are very good at automating/mechanizing a wide variety of business processes that have a form (paper or electronic) associated with them. Business Process Management packages are designed to be able to create workflows that do not depend on a piece of content to function properly. So, it depends on what problem you are trying to solve. If the business process that you are trying to automate has content (forms, faxes, etc) then ECM packages like OnBase, LaserFiche, etc. might fit your need. If you need to automate processes that do not require content, then a more traditional BPM system might be required.

See all answers

Featured Reviews

Emilio Valle

Programmer at Banco de Guatemala

Responsive support, easy to use, and reliable

It helped a lot when we started using it with more images. Before, it was basic. With images, it's more effective. Users consider it more animated and user-friendly. We can easily track a process and know exactly where a process is. It's a low-code application. The solution is very easy to use. It is stable and reliable. The solution scales well. Technical support is extremely responsive.

Read full review

Abdul_Jabbar

Senior Software Engineer at Infosys

Automated workflows have transformed document handling and support daily approvals and billing

The best features Hyland OnBase offers in my experience include being a robust storage solution that integrates well with the Epic solution, allows Unity Forms to be easy to create and use, and has Distribution Services for sending email notifications as reminders.Out of those features, the workflow engine has made the biggest difference for me because it is excellent for automating approval processes, and we use Hyland OnBase for legal requests, hardware requests, travel requests, corporate credit card requests, and file transfer requests. WorkView is an incredible module for gathering and displaying summary information, and we utilize it highly in our subsidiary to manage our legal contracts, their financial billing process, and their travel. We also use the Document Import Process coupled with Unity API for writing custom code to automate processes to send and receive data from other systems that are not yet API enabled. The impact of Hyland OnBase on our organization is that automating manual processes has had an incredible effect on our return on investment, and the man-hours saved by automating processes pays for the system, ranging from one to five hours. I measured the man-hours saved through the tracking of workflows and automation processes. Additionally, Hyland OnBase has allowed us to move away from moving paper around various departments, providing workflow management to keep approval inside the system and out of the email boxes, eliminating the need for paper storage, and saving storage costs with other vendors.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Answers from the Community

Guillermo Perez

General Manager at XIMPLEX

Nov 1, 2019

Are Laserfiche and OnBase considered eBPMs? How do they compare to AuraPortal?

See 2 answers

Phillip Downard

Account Executive / Business Partnerships at a healthcare company with 51-200 employees

Nov 1, 2019

Laserfiche and OnBase can both be classified as such. They both run very robust Business Process Management applications. I personally know that the Laserfiche application has grown enormously over the past few years and is classified by the Gartner Group as one of the leaders in the industry. If you would like more specifics I would gladly discuss with you but would require a few more details.

Read full answer

it_user1081452

Director Of Information Technology at a tech company with 51-200 employees

Nov 1, 2019

Read full answer

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Construction Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

Government

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	14

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Hyland OnBase?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it is very cost-effective and affordable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Hyland OnBase?

More training videos, if they are more findable, would improve documentation and training documentations from Hyland's side, because there is a lack of documentation and training materials from Hyl...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Hyland OnBase?

As a business analyst, while working on a recent project, I used Hyland OnBase as an enterprise-like document management tool. It was used for storing, organizing, and retrieving invoices regarding...

See all answers

Comparisons

Bizagi vs AuraQuantic

Compared 9% of the time

Pega Platform vs AuraQuantic

Compared 7% of the time

Bonita vs AuraQuantic

Compared 6% of the time

Fabasoft PROCECO vs AuraQuantic

Compared 5% of the time

AppSheet vs AuraQuantic

Compared 4% of the time

More AuraQuantic Competitors

OpenText Content Management vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 7% of the time

SharePoint vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 6% of the time

IBM FileNet vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 6% of the time

Alfresco vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 5% of the time

OpenText Documentum Content Management vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 3% of the time

More Hyland OnBase Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AuraQuantic

August 2026

Download AuraQuantic product report

Buyer's Guide

Hyland OnBase

August 2026

Download Hyland OnBase product report

Also Known As

No data available

OnBase

Overview

AuraQuantic is an advanced business process management solution designed to automate organizational processes, enhance operational efficiency, and foster innovation.

AuraQuantic provides a powerful, no-code platform that enables businesses to automate workflows, improve decision-making, and reduce operational costs. Its flexible design accommodates diverse business needs, providing a seamless integration of tasks and data to drive productivity and innovation.

What are the most important features of AuraQuantic?

Process Automation: Empowers users to automate complex workflows without extensive coding knowledge.
Integration Capability: Seamlessly connects with existing systems, ensuring data synchronization and efficient operation.
Analytics: Provides insightful analytics for better decision making and strategic planning.
User-Friendly: Easy to use interface that allows customization to fit specific business needs.
Scalability: Grows with the business, adapting to increasing demands and expanding requirements.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces operational costs through process optimization and automation.
Increased Productivity: Streamlines workflows, allowing employees to focus on higher-value tasks.
Improved Decision Making: Offers data-driven insights that enhance strategic planning and execution.
Flexibility and Adaptability: Adapts to evolving business landscapes, supporting continuous improvement.
Enhanced Customer Experience: Delivers faster and more efficient services to customers.

AuraQuantic has shown effectiveness across industries such as healthcare, manufacturing, and finance by offering industry-specific solutions to streamline operations and enhance customer interactions. Its versatile platform supports a wide range of applications, providing tailored solutions that improve business processes and drive innovation.

AuraQuantic

Hyland OnBase is acclaimed for its robust document management, automating workflows, and improving organizational efficiency across various industries. Praised for its ability to manage records compliantly, especially in regulated sectors like healthcare and finance, the tool also integrates smoothly with other enterprise systems. Users benefit significantly from streamlined processes, reduced manual tasks, and enhanced data accuracy, boosting productivity and customer satisfaction.

Hyland

Sample Customers

Nissan, RSA Chile, New Millennia Group Plc (UK), TOYOTA, ArcelorMittal Brasil, KPN, Farmacia Luis Corbi, Farmacia del Paseo, Frutas Bean, IncAE Business School, BDO Argentina, Refinery of the Pacific, Balfego Grup, Fundacion Seneca, Technological Institute Maranosa, Coprusa Group, Constructec, University of Deusto, Tenco Shopping Centers, Spanish Railways Foundation, Arbora & Ausonia.

Honda France Industries, Hill County Texas, Hylant Group, ING Lease France, State of South Carolina, Syracuse University, Swindon College, Rhode Island Department of Human Services, Rochester Institute of Technology, Moen, Odense University Hospital

Buyer's Guide

AuraQuantic vs. Hyland OnBase

August 2026

Free Report: AuraQuantic vs. Hyland OnBase

Find out what your peers are saying about AuraQuantic vs. Hyland OnBase and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AuraQuantic vs. Hyland OnBase report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors and best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.