Blueriq vs Hyland OnBase comparison

Blueriq and Hyland are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Blueriq is ranked #34 with an average rating of 8.0, while Hyland is ranked #17 with an average rating of 7.7. Blueriq holds a 0.3% mindshare in BPM, compared to Hyland’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Blueriq users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Hyland users who would recommend it.

Blueriq

Read 2 Blueriq reviews

230 Views
102 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Hyland OnBase

Read 13 Hyland OnBase reviews

339 Views
165 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Blueriq

Hyland OnBase

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 1, 2025

Blueriq and Hyland OnBase compete in enterprise content management. Hyland OnBase seems to have the upper hand due to its superior feature set.

Features: Blueriq offers highly adaptable workflow management, seamless integration capabilities, and personalized content management. Hyland OnBase provides comprehensive document management, business process automation, and case management.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Blueriq features flexible deployment options and responsive customer support. Hyland OnBase offers strong support but requires careful planning for its more complex deployment process, complemented by extensive documentation.

Pricing and ROI: Blueriq's initial setup costs are lower, suiting budget-conscious companies. Hyland OnBase has higher upfront costs but delivers a more substantial long-term ROI with its complete suite of features supporting broad operational needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Business Process Management (BPM) Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,168 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Blueriq

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

34th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Hyland OnBase

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

17th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Content Management (5th), Low-Code Development Platforms (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Blueriq is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Hyland OnBase is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

ChrisBiemans

Business Consultant at Ziggo Services B.V.

Stable platform with valuable case management capabilities

We use Everest Blueriq for a food safety organization, that revolves around automating and managing complex processes critical to ensuring food safety and compliance. It involves monitoring containers for pests and diseases before allowing entry into the EU. The platform plays a vital role in…

Read full review

Srinivas Rao Kagitha

Senior Onbase Developer & Administrator at HTC Global Services (INDIA) Private

Offers good dashboards and reports but fails to offer better migration features

The migration is a bit difficult in the tool. Whenever we make certain changes to workflow or other stuff, migrating the code from one environment to another is a bit tedious. The tool has an option for export and import, which is not robust. Most of the time, we need to do things stuff manually. For example, if we make any changes in the existing life cycle or any queues, we have to move those changes manually. There is no robust way to migrate code from one environment to a lower environment, like prod. When it comes to the product's technical support, the turnaround time is a bit longer than expected. The issue may be because there are a number of issues or a large number of customers who are reaching out to the support team for help. I believe that the solution's technical team can provide a solution more quickly.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The biggest benefit of using the product is identifying the issues, enabling a more flexible working method."

"The most valuable features are that it's very secure and provides audit trails for our documents."

"Its most valuable aspect is its flexibility"

"I like the cloud and its integrability."

"We found the setup process to be okay since they do offer a troubleshooting guide."

"The product's initial setup phase is not difficult."

"The solution's most valuable features are integration and flexibility."

"The solution is very developed and we are not taking full advantage of its functionalities."

"The retention module is one of the most valuable features. Whatever we scan onto the system can be identified and we are notified when the records are due to be disposed."

More Hyland OnBase pros

Cons

"The platform's initial setup process could be better."

"The solution’s initial setup is a little difficult."

"Software malfunctioning usually occurs when we receive documents from external sources."

"The application could potentially be more open-source, allowing integration with more solutions."

"The dashboards do have some room for improvement as compared to the other vendors which are there in the market."

"The look and feel could be better. The integration with the user could be better. It could also be more user-friendly."

"The migration is a bit difficult in the tool."

"We are struggling with duplicates and would like to have OCR functionality when using this solution."

"For user experience, they would have to do more with the interface. It is not easy to work with and is a little messy. It is getting better, but it is not yet good enough. Other products are comparatively doing better in terms of the user interface. I have been hearing about Box, which is very easy to use and learn for the users. OnBase has to work on this aspect. It should have BPM capabilities. We compete with tools that provide the BPM feature and support those standards. They can do better in terms of the pricing model. It is a really expensive tool in Latin America. They should have different prices for different regions."

More Hyland OnBase cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"OnBase is reasonably priced."

"There are a number of different types of licenses. There are concurrent licenses, individual licenses and imaging licenses."

"The solution costs around $6,000 per month."

"They can do better in terms of the pricing model. It is a really expensive tool in Latin America. They should have different prices for different regions."

"The tool's price is high."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Government

15%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

11%

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Everest Blueriq?

The biggest benefit of using the product is identifying the issues, enabling a more flexible working method.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Everest Blueriq?

The platform's initial setup process could be better.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Everest Blueriq?

See all answers

What do you like most about Hyland OnBase?

The solution is very developed and we are not taking full advantage of its functionalities.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Hyland OnBase?

I find pricing to be on the higher side due to its monolithic architecture. I would rate it six out of ten. Transitioning to microservices, allowing users to pay for only what they use, could reduc...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Hyland OnBase?

I believe the reporting features need improvement, as other competitors in the market provide better analytics. Hyland is working on a new platform (HXP) to integrate features from all products, ad...

See all answers

Comparisons

Pega Platform vs Blueriq

Compared 100% of the time

More Blueriq Competitors

Alfresco vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 18% of the time

OpenText Documentum Content Management vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 14% of the time

SharePoint vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 12% of the time

IBM FileNet vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 9% of the time

OpenText Content Management vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 9% of the time

More Hyland OnBase Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

June 2025

Download Blueriq product report

Buyer's Guide

Hyland OnBase

June 2025

Download Hyland OnBase product report

Also Known As

Blueriq, Aquima

OnBase

Overview

Blueriq offers a sophisticated platform designed for creating adaptive applications with a focus on improving business processes across sectors. It empowers developers to generate solutions that align closely with business needs.

Blueriq stands out by enabling stakeholders to collaboratively innovate through model-driven development. Its platform supports rapid iteration and deployment of applications, allowing for seamless adaptation to changing business workflows. This dynamic tool enhances engagement and operational efficiency, catering specifically to sectors looking for robust process automation and optimization capabilities.

What are Blueriq's most crucial features?

Model-driven development: Enables collaborative application creation using a visual approach.
Rule Engine: Offers efficiency with powerful business logic integration.
Case Management: Enhances workflow automation focused on case-based methods.
Integration Capabilities: Connects seamlessly with existing technologies to enhance functionality.

What benefits or ROI can users expect?

Increased Efficiency: Streamlines operations, reducing time and resource expenditures.
Flexibility: Easily adapts to process changes for optimal alignment with business advancements.
Scalability: Grows with business needs, ensuring long-term viability.
Cost-Effectiveness: Decreases dependency on custom development, lowering expenses.

Blueriq is implemented across industries such as finance and healthcare, where it drives digitization of processes and enhances case management efficiency. These sectors benefit from its capability to swiftly adapt applications to meet industry-specific regulations and demands, ensuring compliance and competitive advantage.

Blueriq

Hyland OnBase is acclaimed for its robust document management, automating workflows, and improving organizational efficiency across various industries. Praised for its ability to manage records compliantly, especially in regulated sectors like healthcare and finance, the tool also integrates smoothly with other enterprise systems. Users benefit significantly from streamlined processes, reduced manual tasks, and enhanced data accuracy, boosting productivity and customer satisfaction.

Hyland

Sample Customers

Abn Amro, Aegon, duo, City of Tilburg

Honda France Industries, Hill County Texas, Hylant Group, ING Lease France, State of South Carolina, Syracuse University, Swindon College, Rhode Island Department of Human Services, Rochester Institute of Technology, Moen, Odense University Hospital

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

June 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Automation Anywhere, Apache and others in Business Process Management (BPM). Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.