Hyland OnBase vs Kiteworks comparison

Read 13 Kiteworks reviews

6,564 Views
1,116 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Hyland OnBase

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

Kiteworks and Hyland OnBase are competing in secure data management and enterprise content services. Kiteworks has the advantage in pricing and support, while Hyland OnBase is favored for its feature richness, appealing to those who prioritize functionality.

Features: Kiteworks offers secure data management with a focus on privacy, compliance, and seamless file transfer capabilities for large files. Its platform supports robust API integrations and provides a secure environment with two-factor authentication. Hyland OnBase offers document management and workflow automation, providing an integrated approach to enterprise content management. Its platform supports low-code development and offers extensive dashboards and reporting tools.

Room for Improvement: Kiteworks could enhance integration capabilities and expand its feature set for broader enterprise use. There is also potential for improved customization options and advanced analytics. Hyland OnBase could simplify deployment and improve user interface accessibility. Enhancing the mobile experience and reducing the complexity of workflow setups could benefit users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Kiteworks is praised for its straightforward deployment and accessible customer service, making implementation smoother with good support satisfaction. Hyland OnBase, while requiring a more intricate deployment process, offers comprehensive customer service with extensive resources for navigating complex setups, catering well to diverse business needs.

Pricing and ROI: Kiteworks appeals to budget-sensitive organizations due to its cost-effective setup and quick ROI. It's ideal for those seeking straightforward investment recovery. Hyland OnBase, with higher initial costs, promises significant ROI through its extensive feature set, offering valuable long-term benefits for strategic content management.

To learn more, read our detailed Hyland OnBase vs. Kiteworks Report (Updated: November 2026).

Hyland OnBase vs. Kiteworks

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 921,523 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Hyland OnBase

Ranking in Enterprise Content Management

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (13th), Low-Code Development Platforms (16th)

Kiteworks

Ranking in Enterprise Content Management

15th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Email Security (27th), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (7th), Content Collaboration Platforms (14th), Secure Email Gateway (SEG) (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Enterprise Content Management category, the mindshare of Hyland OnBase is 4.3%, down from 6.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Kiteworks is 1.4%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Content Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Hyland OnBase	4.3%
Kiteworks	1.4%
Other	94.3%

Enterprise Content Management

Featured Reviews

Joao Santiago

Analista at a consultancy with 201-500 employees

Digital workflows have transformed meeting minutes and document tracking across departments

There are some particular aspects of Hyland OnBase, such as layouts or some modules that have just been built, that are not designed with the end user in mind. That's something they need to improve. However, even if it's not adequate for the end user, you can still take that and, with custom development, use those modules and APIs in a user-friendly way. They need to improve the interface and usability of Unity and think more about usability. In terms of tool usability, sometimes there are too many clicks to perform an action, which, if you developed it yourself, you could do in two clicks, whereas within Unity you need four or five clicks to do the same process.

Read full review

KishoreT-Review

Associate Consultant at a tech consulting company with 10,001+ employees

Streamlined global file sharing with user-friendly interface and self-service capabilities

I'm not a network expert, however, there must be some room for improvement. Perhaps there could be a notification to users about their bandwidth or network packet loss. If users receive such notifications, they can understand any disruptions are due to issues with their network or bandwidth rather than the site or Kiteworks. Additionally, I work from offshore India, and I told my client manager to communicate with the Kiteworks forum salesman regarding one feature. I noticed the Kiteworks login UI is very basic, lacking customization. Allowing more HTML tags to add hyperlinks or user-friendly information on the home page would be very useful.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The retention module is one of the most valuable features. Whatever we scan onto the system can be identified and we are notified when the records are due to be disposed."

"I like the cloud and its integrability."

"The product's initial setup phase is not difficult."

"Hyland OnBase is valued for its security, especially for those in the finance domain who require data confidentiality."

"A single platform with multiple capabilities to orchestrate processes, complex business rules and all types of business content."

"The solution is very developed and we are not taking full advantage of its functionalities."

"Integrating Hyland OnBase with our systems enabled us to automate document designs and templates, which was extremely helpful in the finance and banking industry."

"The impact of Hyland OnBase on our organization is that automating manual processes has had an incredible effect on our return on investment, and the man-hours saved by automating processes pays for the system, ranging from one to five hours."

More Hyland OnBase pros

"The most valuable feature is the ability to send a large file of 30 GB in size and more. In Outlook and other email applications, you cannot send files that are larger than 20 MB. But with Kiteworks, 30 GB is transferable by default and, with the proper approval, a file of up to 100 GB can be sent. It makes file transfer very easy and smooth."

"As a file-sharing application, it's an absolute 10 out of 10."

"The top two features are the two-factor authentication, which is pretty good. It's easily understood by the users. And their API is rather robust. We have numerous integrations that work off the API."

"The solution can be used remotely, including from mobiles, and it's easy to upload and share files."

"The best part of this solution is that we can generate multiple reports about how the data is transferred and about user information or IP."

"The most useful feature of this solution is to share files with external parties and we can use this functionality to share files internally too."

"Scalability is impressive."

"It’s a great product that you should seriously consider and take the first step by training."

More Kiteworks pros

Cons

"For user experience, they would have to do more with the interface. It is not easy to work with and is a little messy."

"Hyland OnBase can be improved because Report Services is an additional license and should be included with the base product."

"For user experience, they would have to do more with the interface. It is not easy to work with and is a little messy. It is getting better, but it is not yet good enough. Other products are comparatively doing better in terms of the user interface. I have been hearing about Box, which is very easy to use and learn for the users. OnBase has to work on this aspect. It should have BPM capabilities. We compete with tools that provide the BPM feature and support those standards. They can do better in terms of the pricing model. It is a really expensive tool in Latin America. They should have different prices for different regions."

"We are struggling with duplicates and would like to have OCR functionality when using this solution."

"Software malfunctioning usually occurs when we receive documents from external sources."

"I find OnBase's monolithic architecture to be expensive, and adopting microservices could be beneficial."

"The solution’s initial setup is a little difficult."

"We need to troubleshoot why our reports didn't get downloaded in a day. There is a workflow feature which powerful but also complicated."

More Hyland OnBase cons

"I noticed the Kiteworks login UI is very basic, lacking customization. Allowing more HTML tags to add hyperlinks or user-friendly information on the home page would be very useful."

"It could be more stable. In the next release, it would be better if it was more stable with improved performance."

"There is no offboarding process for end-users in Kiteworks. It's a manual process. There is no automated syncing with LDAP and checking to see if the account is still active. It's a manual process to get people out of here, which isn't the best way."

"The system is extremely stable, but because it is a "COTS" system access is restricted and you must use the solution's support to make even simple changes, which increases the downtime."

"We mainly had stability issues with kiteworks, where we were pushing the limits of its capability."

"We have experienced some issues with stability due to bugs."

"In my experience, their technical support can be a little slow."

"There is one particular thing that is a nuisance."

More Kiteworks cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"They can do better in terms of the pricing model. It is a really expensive tool in Latin America. They should have different prices for different regions."

"The tool's price is high."

"There are a number of different types of licenses. There are concurrent licenses, individual licenses and imaging licenses."

"The solution costs around $6,000 per month."

"OnBase is reasonably priced."

"The solution is very expensive because we are buying with Malaysian Ringgit and it's sold in US dollars."

"It is not really expensive. I mean, to me it's obviously expensive, but it's worth it."

"They changed it midstream. We were being charged a certain flat rate for SFTP traffic. For whatever reason, at the beginning of the year, our pricing changed, and we are now being charged more for using a feature of the product than we were when we first bought it. That has been our experience with billing. It turned out to be more expensive than when we started with it."

"The price of Kiteworks is reasonable."

"I believe it's a little costly, but given the faith that we put into it from a security perspective to maintain the integrity of our patient information that is being transferred through this system, that's a small price to pay. So, on the surface, it might look like a lot of money, but depending on the need for security, which is where we feel it shines, it's okay price-wise."

"The license management is changing and confusing. If I could make one change to it, it would be better license management through the API."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

Government

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

12%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	16

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Large Enterprise	11

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Hyland OnBase?

My experience with pricing, setup costs, and licensing highlights that one of the significant challenges for the commercial team in selling Hyland OnBase involves its high pricing, particularly in ...

What needs improvement with Hyland OnBase?

I believe Hyland OnBase can improve its cost structure as a platform or software as a service because currently they only sell a few packages that come bundled with many modules likely not used by ...

What is your primary use case for Hyland OnBase?

My main use case for Hyland OnBase is that companies in Colombia use it for document retention projects, handling all document retention tables for all the data they use. They search for software o...

What is Kiteworks?

Kiteworks is a secured file sharing platform that enables users to collaborate with different parties across a robust offering of secured protected channels. Users have the option of virtual privat...

What needs improvement with Kiteworks?

I'm not a network expert, however, there must be some room for improvement. Perhaps there could be a notification to users about their bandwidth or network packet loss. If users receive such no...

What advice do you have for others considering Kiteworks?

Scalability is impressive. It can be highly available, resilient, and scalable infrastructure. I can confidently give it a nine. It suits any level of organization, whether a small setup with two a...

SharePoint vs Hyland OnBase

Comparisons

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Content Management vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 5% of the time

IBM FileNet vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 5% of the time

Alfresco vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 4% of the time

OpenText Documentum Content Management vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 4% of the time

More Hyland OnBase Competitors

SharePoint vs Kiteworks

Compared 5% of the time

GoAnywhere MFT vs Kiteworks

Compared 5% of the time

Varonis Platform vs Kiteworks

Compared 5% of the time

Hygraph vs Kiteworks

Compared 4% of the time

Seclore Email Encryption vs Kiteworks

Compared 4% of the time

More Kiteworks Competitors

Product Reports

Download Hyland OnBase product report

Hyland OnBase

October 2026

Download Kiteworks product report

October 2026

Also Known As

OnBase

Accellion

Overview

Hyland OnBase is acclaimed for its robust document management, automating workflows, and improving organizational efficiency across various industries. Praised for its ability to manage records compliantly, especially in regulated sectors like healthcare and finance, the tool also integrates smoothly with other enterprise systems. Users benefit significantly from streamlined processes, reduced manual tasks, and enhanced data accuracy, boosting productivity and customer satisfaction.

Hyland

Kiteworks provides secure enterprise file sharing with mobile access and collaboration tools, supporting up to 100 GB transfers. It ensures data safety with encryption and offers a smooth interface for independent data management.

Kiteworks is tailored for effective large-scale data transfers using SFTP, email, and web. It supports two-factor authentication, antivirus scanning, and seamless integration with SSO to minimize administrative tasks. Users benefit from a centralized platform that offers visibility and control over data exchanges, receiving activity notifications and managing encryption keys independently. Despite its strengths, technical support and interface stability need improvement, along with the introduction of automated LDAP syncing and expanded knowledge resources.

What features make Kiteworks stand out?

Mobile Access: Facilitates secure data handling on-the-go.
Enterprise File Sharing: Enables large file transfers with up to 100 GB limit.
Collaboration Tools: Streamlines team efforts and file sharing.
Enhanced Security: Includes two-factor authentication and antivirus scanning.
SSO Integration: Reduces administrative tasks for efficient user management.

What ROI benefits should users seek in reviews?

Data Security: High level of encryption ensures sensitive data protection.
Efficient Management: Independent data handling and activity alerts improve workflow.
Administrative Ease: SSO and centralized logs simplify oversight and reduce complexity.

Organizations in sectors like healthcare and finance utilize Kiteworks to securely share and transfer sensitive data, from medical records to credit card information, ensuring compliance and data integrity. Industries benefit from its automated data transfer and secure communication capabilities, critical for operations ranging from air quality monitoring to banking transactions.

Sample Customers

Honda France Industries, Hill County Texas, Hylant Group, ING Lease France, State of South Carolina, Syracuse University, Swindon College, Rhode Island Department of Human Services, Rochester Institute of Technology, Moen, Odense University Hospital

United States Securities and Exchange Commission, National Health Service, Husch Blackwell LLP, NYC Health + Hospitals, Viatris, MITRE Corporation, Chubb, Kraft Heinz, KPMG, Kohler, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Purdue Pharma, AVL