Boomi AtomSphere Flow vs Hyland OnBase comparison

Boomi and Hyland are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Boomi is ranked #15 with an average rating of 7.8, while Hyland is ranked #16 with an average rating of 7.7. Boomi holds a 0.8% mindshare in BPM, compared to Hyland’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Boomi users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Hyland users who would recommend it.

Boomi AtomSphere Flow

Read 6 Boomi AtomSphere Flow reviews

673 Views
485 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Hyland OnBase

Read 13 Hyland OnBase reviews

3,322 Views
465 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Boomi AtomSphere Flow

Hyland OnBase

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Hyland OnBase and Boomi AtomSphere Flow are enterprise content management platforms with distinct features, deployment models, and user feedback. Boomi AtomSphere Flow seems to have the upper hand due to its strong integration capabilities and responsive customer service.

Features: Hyland OnBase is praised for its robust document management, workflow automation, and secure storage. Boomi AtomSphere Flow is noted for its strong integration capabilities, flexibility, and comprehensive feature set.

Room for Improvement: Hyland OnBase could improve its reporting features, scalability, and user interface. Boomi AtomSphere Flow users mention the need for enhanced documentation, better customization options, and improved user onboarding.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Hyland OnBase offers a straightforward deployment model but has mixed customer service feedback. Boomi AtomSphere Flow is highlighted for its seamless deployment and responsive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Hyland OnBase users feel the initial setup cost is justified by its return on investment. Boomi AtomSphere Flow users also see value in their investment despite higher upfront costs.

To learn more, read our detailed Boomi AtomSphere Flow vs. Hyland OnBase Report (Updated: August 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Boomi AtomSphere Flow vs. Hyland OnBase

August 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,164 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Boomi AtomSphere Flow

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

15th

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

11th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Hyland OnBase

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

16th

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

12th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Content Management (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Boomi AtomSphere Flow is 0.8%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Hyland OnBase is 0.7%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

NarendraThota

Vice President of Technology Services at SAge IT inc

A tool that helps save money in the long run with a need to offer users the ability to deal with large datasets

From an improvement perspective, Boomi AtomSphere Flow should come up with the ability to deal with large datasets. The data integration part is a concern when you try to connect to an on-premises environment since the latency is high, making it an aspect where improvements are required to reduce the latency. Whenever Boomi AtomSphere Flow gets integrated with applications like SAP, it is important to ensure that what you develop is user-friendly, which is a process that takes time, especially when compared with webMethods.io or TIBCO. The development effort with Boomi AtomSphere Flow is more when you compare it with other tools, which is a drawback and an area of improvement.

Read full review

Srinivas Rao Kagitha

Senior Onbase Developer & Administrator at HTC Global Services (INDIA) Private

Offers good dashboards and reports but fails to offer better migration features

The migration is a bit difficult in the tool. Whenever we make certain changes to workflow or other stuff, migrating the code from one environment to another is a bit tedious. The tool has an option for export and import, which is not robust. Most of the time, we need to do things stuff manually. For example, if we make any changes in the existing life cycle or any queues, we have to move those changes manually. There is no robust way to migrate code from one environment to a lower environment, like prod. When it comes to the product's technical support, the turnaround time is a bit longer than expected. The issue may be because there are a number of issues or a large number of customers who are reaching out to the support team for help. I believe that the solution's technical team can provide a solution more quickly.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Boomi AtomSphere Flow gives us flexibility."

"Boomi enhances application integration with scalability, reliability, and security."

"In the long run, if you have a good team, solution architect, and an architect from Boomi's side, then it is a good tool from an ROI perspective since it can help save money."

"The most valuable features include the ease of designing Boomi flows and the significant cost savings and reduced time to market they offer our clients."

"The solution's most valuable feature is its core integration with Boomi AtomSphere because it's extremely easy to tap into any informational system of a company."

"Boomi AtomSphere Flow is integrated through APIs, it exposes the API and any product can call the APIs in the queue. Additionally, it is secure."

"Boomi AtomSphere Flow is very easy to develop and maintain compared to other tools like SAP HANA Cloud Integration or Cloud Platform."

"It provided data security features, allowing restrictions on sensitive documents, such as who could view or modify them."

"The solution is very developed and we are not taking full advantage of its functionalities."

"Its most valuable aspect is its flexibility"

"We found the setup process to be okay since they do offer a troubleshooting guide."

"The product's initial setup phase is not difficult."

"The solution's most valuable features are integration and flexibility."

"The retention module is one of the most valuable features. Whatever we scan onto the system can be identified and we are notified when the records are due to be disposed."

"I like the cloud and its integrability."

More Hyland OnBase pros

Cons

"The solution could improve by being more user-friendly. The whole solution is used through an interface and it could always be improved."

"Boomi is not as flexible compared to other integration products like IBM's. For complex integration scenarios, Boomi could improve its flexibility."

"The development effort with Boomi AtomSphere Flow is more when you compare it with other tools, which is a drawback and an area of improvement."

"The technical support is rated around 6.5 to seven out of ten. It lacks clarity on how to reach out, write emails, or understand responsiveness."

"Its stability could be improved."

"There is room for improvement in Boomi's AI capabilities."

"The solution's user interface building needs improvement."

"We are struggling with duplicates and would like to have OCR functionality when using this solution."

"For user experience, they would have to do more with the interface. It is not easy to work with and is a little messy. It is getting better, but it is not yet good enough. Other products are comparatively doing better in terms of the user interface. I have been hearing about Box, which is very easy to use and learn for the users. OnBase has to work on this aspect. It should have BPM capabilities. We compete with tools that provide the BPM feature and support those standards. They can do better in terms of the pricing model. It is a really expensive tool in Latin America. They should have different prices for different regions."

"Software malfunctioning usually occurs when we receive documents from external sources."

"The look and feel could be better. The integration with the user could be better. It could also be more user-friendly."

"An area for improvement would be the training - getting our people up to speed on how to use it required more training than we expected due to the complexity of the solution."

"We need to troubleshoot why our reports didn't get downloaded in a day. There is a workflow feature which powerful but also complicated."

"I find OnBase's monolithic architecture to be expensive, and adopting microservices could be beneficial."

"The application could potentially be more open-source, allowing integration with more solutions."

More Hyland OnBase cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"When you use Boomi AtomSphere Flow in production, you have to pay for licenses. The solution is not expensive but it could be cheaper."

"Since its pricing positioning has a different construction with respect to its competitors, the solution is sometimes way more expensive and sometimes less expensive."

"The tool's price is high."

"OnBase is reasonably priced."

"They can do better in terms of the pricing model. It is a really expensive tool in Latin America. They should have different prices for different regions."

"The solution costs around $6,000 per month."

"There are a number of different types of licenses. There are concurrent licenses, individual licenses and imaging licenses."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Educational Organization

Government

14%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Boomi AtomSphere Flow?

The solution's most valuable feature is its core integration with Boomi AtomSphere because it's extremely easy to tap into any informational system of a company.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Boomi AtomSphere Flow?

The pricing is good for a small-scale company like ours, and the licensing cost is reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Boomi AtomSphere Flow?

Boomi is not as flexible compared to other integration products like IBM's. For complex integration scenarios, Boomi could improve its flexibility. Moreover, it lacks features like the ESQL scripti...

See all answers

What do you like most about Hyland OnBase?

The solution is very developed and we are not taking full advantage of its functionalities.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Hyland OnBase?

I find pricing to be on the higher side due to its monolithic architecture. I would rate it six out of ten. Transitioning to microservices, allowing users to pay for only what they use, could reduc...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Hyland OnBase?

I believe the reporting features need improvement, as other competitors in the market provide better analytics. Hyland is working on a new platform (HXP) to integrate features from all products, ad...

See all answers

Comparisons

Camunda vs Boomi AtomSphere Flow

Compared 26% of the time

Apache Airflow vs Boomi AtomSphere Flow

Compared 20% of the time

Appian vs Boomi AtomSphere Flow

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Power Apps vs Boomi AtomSphere Flow

Compared 10% of the time

Pega Platform vs Boomi AtomSphere Flow

Compared 7% of the time

More Boomi AtomSphere Flow Competitors

Alfresco vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 14% of the time

OpenText Documentum Content Management vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 11% of the time

SharePoint vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 10% of the time

OpenText Content Management vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 8% of the time

IBM FileNet vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 8% of the time

More Hyland OnBase Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

July 2025

Download Boomi AtomSphere Flow product report

Buyer's Guide

Hyland OnBase

August 2025

Download Hyland OnBase product report

Also Known As

Boomi Flow

OnBase

Overview

Boomi Flow is a modern, cloud-native service for creating customer journeys and automating simple and sophisticated workflows that accelerate your business outcomes.

Boomi

Hyland OnBase is acclaimed for its robust document management, automating workflows, and improving organizational efficiency across various industries. Praised for its ability to manage records compliantly, especially in regulated sectors like healthcare and finance, the tool also integrates smoothly with other enterprise systems. Users benefit significantly from streamlined processes, reduced manual tasks, and enhanced data accuracy, boosting productivity and customer satisfaction.

Hyland

Sample Customers

bioventus, AM Transport Services

Honda France Industries, Hill County Texas, Hylant Group, ING Lease France, State of South Carolina, Syracuse University, Swindon College, Rhode Island Department of Human Services, Rochester Institute of Technology, Moen, Odense University Hospital

Buyer's Guide

Boomi AtomSphere Flow vs. Hyland OnBase

August 2025

Free Report: Boomi AtomSphere Flow vs. Hyland OnBase

Find out what your peers are saying about Boomi AtomSphere Flow vs. Hyland OnBase and other solutions. Updated: August 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Boomi AtomSphere Flow vs. Hyland OnBase report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors and best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.