Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo

Top 10 Splunk Observability Cloud Alternatives

Vendor: Splunk
4.2 out of 5
1,062 followers
Start review

Top Splunk Observability Cloud Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Splunk Observability Cloud based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Veeam Data Platform, Dynatrace, and Datadog. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Splunk Observability Cloud surpasses its competitors by offering real-time insights, advanced AI-driven analytics, and seamless integration across cloud environments, empowering organizations to boost performance, ensure reliability, and enhance user experience with unparalleled data observability.

Splunk Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Splunk, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Veeam Data Platform
4.3 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud offers real-time performance analysis and security monitoring, making it ideal for comprehensive cloud visibility. In comparison, Veeam Data Platform excels in backup and recovery, emphasizing simple installation and robust data protection for reliable on-premises and cloud data safeguarding.
Download Splunk Observability Cloud vs. Veeam Data Platform Report
Splunk Observability Cloud has a higher setup cost compared to Veeam Data Platform's more affordable initial expense. Users may find Veeam's pricing advantageous for smaller budgets while Splunk provides extensive features justifying its higher cost.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud has a higher setup cost compared to Veeam Data Platform's more affordable initial expense. Users may find Veeam's pricing advantageous for smaller budgets while Splunk provides extensive features justifying its higher cost.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Dynatrace
4.4 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Dynatrace
4.4 out of 5
Dynatrace offers comprehensive monitoring with advanced features like PurePath and AI, making it ideal for detailed user experience analytics. In comparison, Splunk Observability Cloud excels in infrastructure monitoring and log analysis, appealing to those needing robust real-time data processing and visualization capabilities.
Download Dynatrace vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Dynatrace involves a more straightforward setup process with lower initial costs while Splunk Observability Cloud has a more complex setup that may require more resources.
View comparison
Pricing
Dynatrace involves a more straightforward setup process with lower initial costs while Splunk Observability Cloud has a more complex setup that may require more resources.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Datadog
4.3 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Datadog
4.3 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud excels in integration and customizable alerts with vibrant dashboards. In comparison, Datadog shines with sharable dashboards and anomaly detection. Splunk suits enterprises needing flexible licensing, while Datadog offers efficiency for users who handle its complex pricing structure.
Download Datadog vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Datadog's setup cost is competitive and straightforward, whereas Splunk Observability Cloud involves higher upfront expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog's setup cost is competitive and straightforward, whereas Splunk Observability Cloud involves higher upfront expenses.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Zabbix
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Zabbix
4.2 out of 5
Zabbix, as an open-source solution, offers extensive customization without added costs. In comparison, Splunk Observability Cloud provides comprehensive analytics and monitoring, though it is costly. Zabbix suits organizations minimizing expenses, while Splunk is ideal for those prioritizing end-to-end visibility and analytics.
Download Splunk Observability Cloud vs. Zabbix Report
Zabbix offers a competitively low setup cost, while Splunk Observability Cloud has a significantly higher initial expense, reflecting their differences in pricing models and features.
View comparison
Pricing
Zabbix offers a competitively low setup cost, while Splunk Observability Cloud has a significantly higher initial expense, reflecting their differences in pricing models and features.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
New Relic
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
New Relic
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud provides robust data integration and customizable dashboards, making it ideal for monitoring complex environments. In comparison, New Relic excels in application performance monitoring with real-time statistics, appealing to those prioritizing application-centric tracking. Both cater to different technical needs effectively.
Download New Relic vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud offers a lower setup cost compared to New Relic, highlighting a distinct pricing advantage for businesses considering initial deployment expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud offers a lower setup cost compared to New Relic, highlighting a distinct pricing advantage for businesses considering initial deployment expenses.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Azure Monitor
3.9 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Azure Monitor
3.9 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud excels in adaptable data ingestion and customizable dashboards, providing robust performance monitoring. In comparison, Azure Monitor offers strong real-time insights and seamless Microsoft integration, ideal for centralized monitoring. Splunk suits those valuing detailed analytics, while Azure benefits existing Microsoft users.
Download Azure Monitor vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud's setup cost is generally higher, focusing on extensive features, while Azure Monitor is more cost-effective, catering to users with basic monitoring needs. The pricing reflects the depth of functionalities each platform provides.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud's setup cost is generally higher, focusing on extensive features, while Azure Monitor is more cost-effective, catering to users with basic monitoring needs. The pricing reflects the depth of functionalities each platform provides.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Grafana
3.9 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Grafana
3.9 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud emphasizes stability and real-time monitoring through robust log analysis and data integration, making it appealing for comprehensive monitoring needs. In comparison, Grafana prioritizes customization and visualization, offering a cost-effective open-source solution with strong data integration and visualization capabilities.
Download Grafana vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud entails a significant setup cost, contrasting with Grafana's minimal setup cost requirement. This disparity highlights Splunk's focus on comprehensive enterprise solutions, while Grafana remains accessible for those seeking cost-effective observability tools.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud entails a significant setup cost, contrasting with Grafana's minimal setup cost requirement. This disparity highlights Splunk's focus on comprehensive enterprise solutions, while Grafana remains accessible for those seeking cost-effective observability tools.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Elastic Observability
4.0 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud offers robust dashboards, quick log searching, and data integration for real-time insights and predictive tools. In comparison, Elastic Observability is favored for flexible log handling, cost-effective integration, and strong application performance monitoring. Each appeals to different deployment preferences and budgets.
Download Elastic Observability vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud offers a straightforward setup experience while Elastic Observability has a more cost-effective implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud offers a straightforward setup experience while Elastic Observability has a more cost-effective implementation.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Sentry
4.3 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Sentry
4.3 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud excels in integrating diverse data and creating custom dashboards for comprehensive monitoring. In comparison, Sentry specializes in real-time error tracking with seamless tool integration, appealing to those focusing on quick error detection and effective resolution.
Download Sentry vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud has a moderate setup cost, while Sentry offers a lower initial investment. The cost difference highlights Splunk's premium positioning compared to Sentry's more economical approach.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud has a moderate setup cost, while Sentry offers a lower initial investment. The cost difference highlights Splunk's premium positioning compared to Sentry's more economical approach.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
SolarWinds NPM
4.1 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
SolarWinds NPM
4.1 out of 5
SolarWinds NPM offers extensive network fault management and flexible monitoring capabilities with room for better network discovery accuracy. In comparison, Splunk Observability Cloud provides superior data integration and visualization, though it could enhance its interface and improve machine learning features.
Download SolarWinds NPM vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
SolarWinds NPM offers straightforward setup costs, appealing to users seeking simplicity, while Splunk Observability Cloud may involve higher initial expenses, reflecting its robust feature set.
View comparison
Pricing
SolarWinds NPM offers straightforward setup costs, appealing to users seeking simplicity, while Splunk Observability Cloud may involve higher initial expenses, reflecting its robust feature set.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
PRTG Network Monitor
4.0 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor offers rapid deployment and user-friendliness suited for diverse infrastructures. In comparison, Splunk Observability Cloud excels in log searching and scalability. PRTG is cost-effective with perpetual licensing, while Splunk provides in-depth insights despite its higher cost.
Download PRTG Network Monitor vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
PRTG Network Monitor offers a low initial setup cost, while Splunk Observability Cloud presents a higher setup investment. This significant difference influences budget considerations for users evaluating network monitoring solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor offers a low initial setup cost, while Splunk Observability Cloud presents a higher setup investment. This significant difference influences budget considerations for users evaluating network monitoring solutions.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
ThousandEyes
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
ThousandEyes
4.2 out of 5
ThousandEyes offers robust network path monitoring and Cisco integration, ideal for cloud and ISP insights. In comparison, Splunk Observability Cloud excels with real-time monitoring and data ingestion, suited for comprehensive performance tracking with flexible deployment across public and private cloud environments.
Download Splunk Observability Cloud vs. ThousandEyes Report
ThousandEyes has a lower initial setup cost compared to Splunk Observability Cloud, which tends to be more expensive to implement.
View comparison
Pricing
ThousandEyes has a lower initial setup cost compared to Splunk Observability Cloud, which tends to be more expensive to implement.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
AWS X-Ray
3.9 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
AWS X-Ray
3.9 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud excels with real-time alerting and advanced machine learning, offering robust analytics. In comparison, AWS X-Ray provides seamless AWS integration and cost-effective tracing, making it ideal for businesses within the AWS ecosystem. Splunk offers detailed insights; AWS X-Ray enhances AWS infrastructure integration.
Download AWS X-Ray vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud offers a straightforward setup with well-suited cost options, while AWS X-Ray provides a competitive lower-cost setup. The difference in initial pricing reflects their tailored approaches to deployment and cost-efficiency.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud offers a straightforward setup with well-suited cost options, while AWS X-Ray provides a competitive lower-cost setup. The difference in initial pricing reflects their tailored approaches to deployment and cost-efficiency.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Nagios XI
4.0 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Nagios XI
4.0 out of 5
Nagios XI is ideal for budget-conscious buyers needing customizable network monitoring via plugins. In comparison, Splunk Observability Cloud offers real-time data integration with strong dashboards but comes at a higher cost, appealing to those needing comprehensive monitoring and robust support services.
Download Nagios XI vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Nagios XI typically incurs a lower initial setup cost compared to Splunk Observability Cloud, which generally involves higher upfront investment. The difference in setup costs reflects the contrasting scopes and functionalities of the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Nagios XI typically incurs a lower initial setup cost compared to Splunk Observability Cloud, which generally involves higher upfront investment. The difference in setup costs reflects the contrasting scopes and functionalities of the two solutions.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
ServiceNow IT Operations Management
4.1 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud offers advanced log searching, data integration, and real-time monitoring, appealing to users requiring detailed analytics and scalability. In comparison, ServiceNow IT Operations Management excels in asset management and process consolidation, enhancing operational efficiencies with robust AI integration and service mapping.
Download ServiceNow IT Operations Management vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud setup costs are minimal with clear pricing, whereas ServiceNow IT Operations Management involves higher initial investment due to complex configurations.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud setup costs are minimal with clear pricing, whereas ServiceNow IT Operations Management involves higher initial investment due to complex configurations.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
LogicMonitor
4.5 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
LogicMonitor
4.5 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud excels in log analytics with custom dashboards, powerful data management, and strong APM capabilities. In comparison, LogicMonitor offers customizable dashboards, quick data visualization, and flexibility, appealing to those needing cost-effective, granular monitoring solutions for diverse environments.
Download LogicMonitor vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud is noted for its competitive setup cost, while LogicMonitor offers a straightforward and transparent pricing model.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud is noted for its competitive setup cost, while LogicMonitor offers a straightforward and transparent pricing model.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Icinga
3.8 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Icinga
3.8 out of 5
Icinga offers flexibility and open-source customization for budget-conscious users. In comparison, Splunk Observability Cloud appeals to larger enterprises with robust features and scalability, justifying higher costs for comprehensive system insights and advanced analytics. Icinga suits customization, while Splunk excels in data visualization and professional support.
Download Icinga vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Icinga offers a lower setup cost compared to Splunk Observability Cloud, which tends to be higher due to its comprehensive features. This makes Icinga potentially more suitable for businesses with tighter budget constraints.
View comparison
Pricing
Icinga offers a lower setup cost compared to Splunk Observability Cloud, which tends to be higher due to its comprehensive features. This makes Icinga potentially more suitable for businesses with tighter budget constraints.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Amazon CloudWatch
4.0 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Amazon CloudWatch
4.0 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud offers extensive customization and data integration ideal for detailed analytics. In comparison, Amazon CloudWatch provides efficient AWS ecosystem integration for cost-effective monitoring. Splunk suits enterprises seeking advanced insights; CloudWatch benefits AWS users prioritizing seamless infrastructure integration.
Download Amazon CloudWatch vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud has higher setup costs than Amazon CloudWatch, which provides a more budget-friendly initial installation, highlighting a significant cost difference in their pricing structures.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud has higher setup costs than Amazon CloudWatch, which provides a more budget-friendly initial installation, highlighting a significant cost difference in their pricing structures.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
OpsRamp
4.0 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
OpsRamp
4.0 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud provides extensive features suited for users needing advanced tools and comprehensive dashboards. In comparison, OpsRamp emphasizes cost-efficiency and seamless integration, catering to those prioritizing budget-friendly solutions with effective infrastructure monitoring.
Download OpsRamp vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud may have a significant initial setup cost, while OpsRamp is praised for its relatively lower setup expense.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud may have a significant initial setup cost, while OpsRamp is praised for its relatively lower setup expense.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Cisco Intersight
4.0 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Cisco Intersight
4.0 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud excels in data integration and visualization, enhancing monitoring and alerting processes. In comparison, Cisco Intersight focuses on cloud integration and hybrid management with automation features, appealing to those needing comprehensive analytics and orchestration.
Download Cisco Intersight vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud involves a higher initial setup cost, while Cisco Intersight benefits from a lower entry expense, highlighting a cost differential that may appeal to users with budget constraints.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud involves a higher initial setup cost, while Cisco Intersight benefits from a lower entry expense, highlighting a cost differential that may appeal to users with budget constraints.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Rancher Labs
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Rancher Labs
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud excels in data collection and monitoring with customizable dashboards. In comparison, Rancher Labs offers ease in Kubernetes management and scalability. Splunk's cost is high while Rancher provides a cost-effective, open-source alternative suitable for flexible resource management.
Download Rancher Labs vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud incurs higher setup costs, while Rancher Labs offers a more cost-effective initial deployment, highlighting a significant difference in initial expense for these solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud incurs higher setup costs, while Rancher Labs offers a more cost-effective initial deployment, highlighting a significant difference in initial expense for these solutions.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
ITRS Geneos
4.1 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
ITRS Geneos
4.1 out of 5
ITRS Geneos offers extensive real-time monitoring ideal for financial institutions, favoring customization but challenging deployment. In comparison, Splunk Observability Cloud excels in diverse infrastructures with comprehensive dashboards, though it presents higher costs and complex configurations. Each has strengths depending on user priorities.
Download ITRS Geneos vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
ITRS Geneos involves substantial costs for initial setup, while Splunk Observability Cloud offers more budget-friendly setup options.
View comparison
Pricing
ITRS Geneos involves substantial costs for initial setup, while Splunk Observability Cloud offers more budget-friendly setup options.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
BMC TrueSight Operations Management
4.1 out of 5
BMC TrueSight Operations Management focuses on event management and integration, excelling in consolidated asset monitoring. In comparison, Splunk Observability Cloud offers superior customization and real-time visibility, with powerful log analytics and extensive cloud integrations, appealing to those needing flexible deployments and detailed analytics.
Download BMC TrueSight Operations Management vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
BMC TrueSight Operations Management offers a lower setup cost, focusing on value and affordability, while Splunk Observability Cloud presents a higher setup cost, reflecting its feature-rich capabilities and premium pricing structure.
View comparison
Pricing
BMC TrueSight Operations Management offers a lower setup cost, focusing on value and affordability, while Splunk Observability Cloud presents a higher setup cost, reflecting its feature-rich capabilities and premium pricing structure.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
InfluxDB
4.1 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
InfluxDB
4.1 out of 5
InfluxDB offers efficient real-time data storage and analysis ideal for developers needing simplicity. In comparison, Splunk Observability Cloud provides extensive analytics tools and integrations for enterprise environments requiring a comprehensive feature set. Each solution provides distinct benefits depending on the user’s specific needs.
Download InfluxDB vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
InfluxDB has low setup costs, making it budget-friendly, whereas Splunk Observability Cloud requires a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
InfluxDB has low setup costs, making it budget-friendly, whereas Splunk Observability Cloud requires a higher initial investment.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)
4.0 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud excels in advanced monitoring and deep data analytics with customized dashboards. In comparison, Google Cloud's Operations Suite offers seamless integration with Google Cloud services, providing a straightforward experience for cloud environments and cost-effective cloud logging and tracing solutions.
Download Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud exhibits a higher setup cost compared to the moderate setup cost of Google Cloud's operations suite, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment between these two platforms.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud exhibits a higher setup cost compared to the moderate setup cost of Google Cloud's operations suite, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment between these two platforms.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Honeycomb.io
4.3 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Honeycomb.io
4.3 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud excels in comprehensive dashboarding and alerting, ideal for complex integrations and enterprises. In comparison, Honeycomb.io offers granular tracing and real-time analytics with a focus on cloud-native simplicity, appealing to smaller, agile teams seeking detailed event analysis.
Download Honeycomb.io vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud typically involves significant setup costs, whereas Honeycomb.io offers a more budget-friendly initial expense, highlighting a key difference in affordability and cost management between these monitoring solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud typically involves significant setup costs, whereas Honeycomb.io offers a more budget-friendly initial expense, highlighting a key difference in affordability and cost management between these monitoring solutions.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
VMware Aria Operations for Applications
4.0 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud provides intuitive dashboards and fast log searching, ideal for real-time visibility. In comparison, VMware Aria Operations excels in integrating with Kubernetes, essential for container management. Splunk suits those needing end-to-end monitoring, while VMware appeals to Kubernetes-focused environments.
Download Splunk Observability Cloud vs. VMware Aria Operations for Applications Report
Splunk Observability Cloud involves zero initial setup costs, while VMware Aria Operations for Applications has moderate setup expenses, highlighting a clear difference in upfront investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud involves zero initial setup costs, while VMware Aria Operations for Applications has moderate setup expenses, highlighting a clear difference in upfront investment.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)
4.2 out of 5
IBM SevOne Network Performance Management excels in comprehensive infrastructure visibility and scalability, offering extensive data monitoring. In comparison, Splunk Observability Cloud excels in real-time analytics and anomaly detection, catering to cloud-based environments. Each solution appeals to distinct needs in network and cloud performance management.
Download IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
IBM SevOne NPM incurs steep setup costs, contrasting with Splunk Observability Cloud's flexible pricing options. Splunk's approach allows for potentially lower initial expenses, distinguishing it from the more traditional pricing of IBM SevOne.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM SevOne NPM incurs steep setup costs, contrasting with Splunk Observability Cloud's flexible pricing options. Splunk's approach allows for potentially lower initial expenses, distinguishing it from the more traditional pricing of IBM SevOne.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Amazon OpenSearch Service
3.9 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud excels in real-time monitoring and integrates well across cloud environments, ideal for dynamic infrastructures. In comparison, Amazon OpenSearch Service offers advanced indexing and seamless AWS integration, catering to users needing extensive data analytics within a scalable ecosystem.
Download Amazon OpenSearch Service vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud involves higher setup costs, contrasting with the more cost-effective setup of Amazon OpenSearch Service. This highlights a notable difference in their initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud involves higher setup costs, contrasting with the more cost-effective setup of Amazon OpenSearch Service. This highlights a notable difference in their initial expenses.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
ControlUp
4.3 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
ControlUp
4.3 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud excels in data aggregation and visual representation, appealing to those needing comprehensive log searching and monitoring. In comparison, ControlUp is favored for action automation and real-time monitoring, attracting buyers seeking detailed performance insights and endpoint monitoring solutions.
Download ControlUp vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud has a straightforward setup cost, whereas ControlUp involves a more complex and potentially higher setup cost.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud has a straightforward setup cost, whereas ControlUp involves a more complex and potentially higher setup cost.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Huawei eSight
3.7 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Huawei eSight
3.7 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud excels in diverse features, fast search indexing, and large-scale data handling. In comparison, Huawei eSight offers efficient alarm management and device health visualization. Splunk fits hybrid environments while Huawei suits those relying on Huawei's ecosystem.
Download Huawei eSight vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud involves a higher initial setup cost compared to Huawei eSight, which offers a more cost-effective setup option for users.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud involves a higher initial setup cost compared to Huawei eSight, which offers a more cost-effective setup option for users.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
LiveAction LiveNX
3.4 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
LiveAction LiveNX
3.4 out of 5
LiveAction LiveNX delivers detailed network visualization and traffic analysis ideal for network performance optimization. In comparison, Splunk Observability Cloud emphasizes robust full-stack monitoring with data integration and real-time analytics, catering to organizations focusing on comprehensive data insights despite higher costs.
Download LiveAction LiveNX vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
LiveAction LiveNX has a higher setup cost compared to Splunk Observability Cloud, making it a more expensive option upfront. Splunk is typically viewed as a more cost-effective choice for initial deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
LiveAction LiveNX has a higher setup cost compared to Splunk Observability Cloud, making it a more expensive option upfront. Splunk is typically viewed as a more cost-effective choice for initial deployment.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Dell CloudIQ
4.1 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Dell CloudIQ
4.1 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud excels in data integration, log searching, and cloud monitoring, offering application performance and predictive analytics. In comparison, Dell CloudIQ focuses on storage and server monitoring within Dell environments, with strengths in compatibility and cost-effectiveness integrated with Dell solutions.
Download Dell CloudIQ vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud charges a higher setup cost compared to Dell CloudIQ, highlighting a key difference in initial expenses for users evaluating these cloud solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud charges a higher setup cost compared to Dell CloudIQ, highlighting a key difference in initial expenses for users evaluating these cloud solutions.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Pandora FMS
4.6 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Pandora FMS
4.6 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud excels in real-time analytics and integrates easily with third-party tools. In comparison, Pandora FMS offers simplicity and comprehensive monitoring capabilities. Both solutions appeal to tech buyers for their specific strengths, offering tailored options based on organizational needs.
Download Pandora FMS vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud setup costs can be high upfront, while Pandora FMS offers a more cost-effective initial setup, highlighting significant differences in pricing approaches between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud setup costs can be high upfront, while Pandora FMS offers a more cost-effective initial setup, highlighting significant differences in pricing approaches between the two solutions.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Observe
1 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Observe
1 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud excels in real-time data analysis, offering customization and strong analytics. In comparison, Observe focuses on streamlined data integration with simplified ingestion and efficient querying, appealing to buyers prioritizing ease of setup and competitive pricing.
Splunk Observability Cloud reviews highlight a significant setup cost, whereas Observe is praised for its cost-effective setup. Users notice distinct differences regarding initial expenses between these two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud reviews highlight a significant setup cost, whereas Observe is praised for its cost-effective setup. Users notice distinct differences regarding initial expenses between these two solutions.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
OP5 Monitor
4.3 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
OP5 Monitor
4.3 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud offers advanced analytics suitable for complex enterprises. In comparison, OP5 Monitor excels in network monitoring, ideal for infrastructure-focused businesses. Splunk's cloud model ensures easy scaling, while OP5's on-premises setup provides tailored control for specific IT needs.
Download OP5 Monitor vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud offers an easy setup with no specific hardware requirements, while OP5 Monitor requires substantial initial configuration efforts.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud offers an easy setup with no specific hardware requirements, while OP5 Monitor requires substantial initial configuration efforts.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
DX Unified Infrastructure Management
4.1 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud excels with application monitoring and cloud integration, appealing to those needing agile cloud adaptability. In comparison, DX Unified Infrastructure Management offers scalability and multi-platform monitoring, attracting enterprises seeking widespread infrastructure coverage. Pricing is a consideration for both solutions.
Download DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
DX Unified Infrastructure Management offers low setup costs, while Splunk Observability Cloud requires a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
DX Unified Infrastructure Management offers low setup costs, while Splunk Observability Cloud requires a higher initial investment.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
NetApp Cloud Insights
4.3 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud enhances real-time problem-solving with rapid deployment and customizable dashboards. In comparison, NetApp Cloud Insights offers holistic infrastructure monitoring with advanced analytics. Splunk focuses on cloud-native application performance, while NetApp excels in resource utilization visibility for hybrid environments.
Download NetApp Cloud Insights vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud's setup cost is perceived as high, while NetApp Cloud Insights offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud's setup cost is perceived as high, while NetApp Cloud Insights offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Akamai mPulse
3.3 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Akamai mPulse
3.3 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud attracts tech buyers with real-time analytics and smooth integration. In comparison, Akamai mPulse appeals with advanced web performance insights despite a higher cost. Splunk ensures quick deployment, while Akamai offers comprehensive support for complex setups.
Download Akamai mPulse vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud incurs higher setup costs, while Akamai mPulse offers more economical onboarding, presenting a significant difference in initial investment between the solutions. Splunk's pricing may reflect extensive features not found in Akamai mPulse.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud incurs higher setup costs, while Akamai mPulse offers more economical onboarding, presenting a significant difference in initial investment between the solutions. Splunk's pricing may reflect extensive features not found in Akamai mPulse.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
ServiceNow Cloud Observability
3.8 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud excels in advanced data analytics and real-time monitoring, appealing to businesses seeking fast ROI. In comparison, ServiceNow Cloud Observability offers extensive integration and service management features, attracting those interested in long-term sustainable value despite higher initial costs.
Download ServiceNow Cloud Observability vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud requires a moderate setup cost while ServiceNow Cloud Observability offers a cost-effective option.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud requires a moderate setup cost while ServiceNow Cloud Observability offers a cost-effective option.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Chronosphere
4.5 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Chronosphere
4.5 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud is ideal for teams seeking straightforward deployment and robust support, catering to varying expertise levels. In comparison, Chronosphere offers superior real-time data handling and scalability, appealing to users needing advanced customization and performance for large-scale environments.
Splunk Observability Cloud setup costs are minimal, while Chronosphere involves a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud setup costs are minimal, while Chronosphere involves a higher initial investment.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Instana Infrastructure Monitoring
4.8 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud excels in data correlation and alerting features appealing for environments needing advanced analytics. In comparison, Instana Infrastructure Monitoring's automated deployment and AI-driven insights provide streamlined setup, ideal for users prioritizing quick installation and comprehensive monitoring despite higher initial costs.
Download Instana Infrastructure Monitoring vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud features a lower setup cost, while Instana Infrastructure Monitoring requires a higher upfront investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud features a lower setup cost, while Instana Infrastructure Monitoring requires a higher upfront investment.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
IBM Instana Observability
4.0 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud offers extensive monitoring and customizable dashboards appealing to diverse needs, while IBM Instana Observability attracts with AI-driven automation and real-time insights. In comparison, Splunk's feature set supports scalability, whereas Instana emphasizes intuitive deployment and strong analytics for efficient operations.
Download IBM Instana Observability vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud has a high setup cost, while IBM Instana Observability offers a more budget-friendly setup. Users may prefer Instana for its affordable initial investment compared to Splunk's higher setup expense.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud has a high setup cost, while IBM Instana Observability offers a more budget-friendly setup. Users may prefer Instana for its affordable initial investment compared to Splunk's higher setup expense.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Loom Systems
4.0 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Loom Systems
4.0 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud offers robust monitoring and extensive analytics for complex IT environments. In comparison, Loom Systems delivers AI-powered anomaly detection and predictive insights. Splunk’s integration versatility attracts large enterprises, while Loom's cost-effective setup and predictive intelligence appeal to budget-conscious organizations.
Download Loom Systems vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud has a higher setup cost compared to Loom Systems, highlighting a significant price difference.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud has a higher setup cost compared to Loom Systems, highlighting a significant price difference.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Fortra's Network Server Suite
1 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud excels with integration and real-time analytics, ideal for users prioritizing fast ROI and ease of deployment. In comparison, Fortra's Network Server Suite offers robust network management features, appealing to those needing comprehensive solutions despite a steeper learning curve and higher initial investment.
Splunk Observability Cloud has a higher setup cost compared to Fortra's Network Server Suite, which offers a more budget-friendly option for businesses looking to minimize initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud has a higher setup cost compared to Fortra's Network Server Suite, which offers a more budget-friendly option for businesses looking to minimize initial expenses.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
StackState
1 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
StackState
1 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud offers robust analytics and visualization for complex environments, appealing to those needing flexible data handling. In comparison, StackState's focus on real-time, topology-based insights and advanced mapping makes it ideal for dynamic environments requiring detailed, multi-layered data correlation.
Splunk Observability Cloud offers a straightforward setup with clear pricing, while StackState features a more complex pricing structure with potential additional costs.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud offers a straightforward setup with clear pricing, while StackState features a more complex pricing structure with potential additional costs.

Related categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
Cloud Monitoring Software