Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo

Top 10 Splunk Observability Cloud Alternatives

Vendor: Splunk
4.2 out of 5
Leave a review

Top Splunk Observability Cloud Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Splunk Observability Cloud based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Veeam Data Platform, Dynatrace, and Datadog. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Splunk Observability Cloud surpasses its competitors by delivering real-time, AI-driven insights with unmatched scalability and comprehensive dashboards, enabling organizations to monitor, troubleshoot, and optimize their full stack applications effectively with faster incident resolution and improved performance.

Splunk Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Splunk, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Veeam Data Platform
4.3 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud excels in data monitoring with real-time insights, appealing to enterprises needing advanced dashboards. In comparison, Veeam Data Platform is ideal for robust backup, offering efficient storage solutions and reliable recovery, appealing to those prioritizing cost-effective backup strategies with strong data protection.
Download Splunk Observability Cloud vs. Veeam Data Platform Report
Splunk Observability Cloud incurs a high setup cost, whereas Veeam Data Platform offers a more affordable initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud incurs a high setup cost, whereas Veeam Data Platform offers a more affordable initial investment.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Dynatrace
4.4 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Dynatrace
4.4 out of 5
Dynatrace offers real-time monitoring and AI capabilities, providing robust user behavior tracking. In comparison, Splunk Observability Cloud excels in log analysis and cloud integration. Each solution has unique strengths, making them suitable for different priorities in tech infrastructure management.
Download Dynatrace vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Dynatrace's setup cost is perceived as high yet justified by its robust capabilities, while Splunk Observability Cloud offers a lower setup cost, appealing to budget-conscious users.
View comparison
Pricing
Dynatrace's setup cost is perceived as high yet justified by its robust capabilities, while Splunk Observability Cloud offers a lower setup cost, appealing to budget-conscious users.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Datadog
4.3 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Datadog
4.3 out of 5
Datadog offers comprehensive error reporting, log centralization, and cloud integration. In comparison, Splunk benefits users focused on integrating DevOps tools with flexible dashboards. Datadog's complex pricing contrasts with Splunk's concerns over long-term affordability, influencing tech buyers' decisions differently.
Download Datadog vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Datadog features lower setup costs, while Splunk Observability Cloud incurs higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog features lower setup costs, while Splunk Observability Cloud incurs higher initial expenses.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Zabbix
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Zabbix
4.2 out of 5
Zabbix offers open-source, cost-effective flexibility for monitor scalability and customization. In comparison, Splunk Observability Cloud provides feature-rich, robust analysis capabilities. Zabbix suits budget-conscious users, while Splunk attracts those valuing extensive features, justifying its higher cost.
Download Splunk Observability Cloud vs. Zabbix Report
Zabbix offers a cost-effective setup, while Splunk Observability Cloud requires higher initial investment but provides extensive analytics capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Zabbix offers a cost-effective setup, while Splunk Observability Cloud requires higher initial investment but provides extensive analytics capabilities.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
New Relic
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
New Relic
4.2 out of 5
Splunk offers robust log searching and analytics with comprehensive dashboards. In comparison, New Relic is preferred for real-time performance insights and ease of use. Splunk provides high ROI with strong monitoring, while New Relic is valued for its efficient resource management.
Download New Relic vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud involves an easy setup with transparent costs, efficient for budget management, while New Relic provides a lower initial setup cost, suitable for cost-conscious users.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud involves an easy setup with transparent costs, efficient for budget management, while New Relic provides a lower initial setup cost, suitable for cost-conscious users.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Azure Monitor
3.8 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Azure Monitor
3.8 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud excels in dashboard flexibility and machine learning capabilities for effective troubleshooting and customization. In comparison, Azure Monitor seamlessly integrates with Azure services, providing solid monitoring solutions with cost-effective pay-as-you-go models for organizations already in the Microsoft ecosystem.
Download Azure Monitor vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud involves a detailed setup cost, whereas Azure Monitor offers a more streamlined setup approach. The distinctions in setup complexity highlight different priorities between comprehensive capabilities and simplicity.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud involves a detailed setup cost, whereas Azure Monitor offers a more streamlined setup approach. The distinctions in setup complexity highlight different priorities between comprehensive capabilities and simplicity.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Grafana
3.9 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Grafana
3.9 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud provides robust log searching and seamless integration with cloud platforms. In comparison, Grafana's flexibility and extensive plugin ecosystem make it highly customizable. Splunk's deployment costs favor comprehensive solutions, while Grafana's open-source model offers cost-effective monitoring with significant customization.
Download Grafana vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud has higher setup costs than Grafana, emphasizing its focus on robust data features. Grafana offers a more cost-effective setup, appealing to users seeking a budget-friendly solution.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud has higher setup costs than Grafana, emphasizing its focus on robust data features. Grafana offers a more cost-effective setup, appealing to users seeking a budget-friendly solution.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Elastic Observability
4.0 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud appeals with customizable dashboards and machine learning features, making it attractive for deep insights into microservices. In comparison, Elastic Observability offers cost-effective log analytics and flexibility, suited for smaller enterprises seeking affordability and scalability with Elastic's open-source foundation.
Download Elastic Observability vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud has a higher setup cost compared to Elastic Observability, offering comprehensive real-time monitoring features while Elastic provides a more cost-effective solution tailored for basic observability needs.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud has a higher setup cost compared to Elastic Observability, offering comprehensive real-time monitoring features while Elastic provides a more cost-effective solution tailored for basic observability needs.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Sentry
4.3 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Sentry
4.3 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud offers vast capabilities including detailed log analytics for comprehensive infrastructure oversight. In comparison, Sentry excels in real-time error tracking and integration capabilities, ideal for pinpointing application errors quickly, appealing to teams focused on rapid error identification and resolution.
Download Sentry vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud offers a competitive setup cost, while Sentry provides a straightforward setup process. Each product targets specific pricing and setup preferences, making them distinct choices for users.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud offers a competitive setup cost, while Sentry provides a straightforward setup process. Each product targets specific pricing and setup preferences, making them distinct choices for users.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
SolarWinds NPM
4.1 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
SolarWinds NPM
4.1 out of 5
SolarWinds NPM offers strong network monitoring and alerting with modular pricing, suiting cost-conscious buyers. In comparison, Splunk Observability Cloud provides exceptional real-time data analysis and visualization. Both solutions cater to different needs with unique strengths in network and application performance, respectively.
Download SolarWinds NPM vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
SolarWinds NPM is praised for its lower setup costs, whereas Splunk Observability Cloud is noted for its higher initial expenses, highlighting a clear difference in startup investment.
View comparison
Pricing
SolarWinds NPM is praised for its lower setup costs, whereas Splunk Observability Cloud is noted for its higher initial expenses, highlighting a clear difference in startup investment.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
PRTG Network Monitor
4.0 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor is ideal for rapid deployment, scalability, and affordability. In comparison, Splunk Observability Cloud offers advanced visualization and robust log management. Tech buyers may choose PRTG for cost-effectiveness or Splunk for extensive features and AI-enhanced analysis.
Download PRTG Network Monitor vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
PRTG Network Monitor has a moderate setup cost, while Splunk Observability Cloud involves higher setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor has a moderate setup cost, while Splunk Observability Cloud involves higher setup expenses.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
ThousandEyes
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
ThousandEyes
4.2 out of 5
ThousandEyes delivers extensive network monitoring and visibility, ideal for businesses prioritizing cloud and ISP insights. In comparison, Splunk Observability Cloud offers advanced application performance monitoring, appealing to organizations focused on real-time data analysis and comprehensive performance metrics.
Download Splunk Observability Cloud vs. ThousandEyes Report
ThousandEyes offers competitive setup costs with straightforward implementation, while Splunk Observability Cloud requires a higher initial investment, reflecting its comprehensive features.
View comparison
Pricing
ThousandEyes offers competitive setup costs with straightforward implementation, while Splunk Observability Cloud requires a higher initial investment, reflecting its comprehensive features.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Prometheus Group
4.1 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Prometheus Group
4.1 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud is ideal for users prioritizing integration, log analysis, and usability. In comparison, Prometheus Group offers open-source flexibility and scalability, catering to developers seeking customization and cost efficiency. Splunk is suitable for advanced monitoring; Prometheus excels in metric collection.
Download Prometheus Group vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud requires a higher initial setup cost compared to Prometheus Group, offering advanced features, while Prometheus provides a cost-effective setup with essential monitoring capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud requires a higher initial setup cost compared to Prometheus Group, offering advanced features, while Prometheus provides a cost-effective setup with essential monitoring capabilities.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Nagios XI
4.0 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Nagios XI
4.0 out of 5
Nagios XI offers open-source flexibility, ideal for on-premises environments with low costs. In comparison, Splunk Observability Cloud provides advanced features for cloud-native monitoring, suiting tech buyers needing expansive capabilities despite higher upfront expenses.
Download Nagios XI vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Nagios XI has varied setup costs influenced by deployment factors, while Splunk Observability Cloud offers more straightforward pricing due to its cloud-based nature.
View comparison
Pricing
Nagios XI has varied setup costs influenced by deployment factors, while Splunk Observability Cloud offers more straightforward pricing due to its cloud-based nature.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
AWS X-Ray
3.9 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
AWS X-Ray
3.9 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud offers extensive customization and integration, ideal for complex environments requiring deep analytics. In comparison, AWS X-Ray offers efficient trace analysis and cost-effective scaling, catering to enterprises focused on straightforward deployment and cost efficiency in larger environments.
Download AWS X-Ray vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud offers competitive setup costs, whereas AWS X-Ray is recognized for its cost-efficiency and straightforward integration. The setup differences highlight Splunk’s comprehensive capabilities against AWS X-Ray's streamlined approach.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud offers competitive setup costs, whereas AWS X-Ray is recognized for its cost-efficiency and straightforward integration. The setup differences highlight Splunk’s comprehensive capabilities against AWS X-Ray's streamlined approach.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
SCOM
3.9 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
SCOM
3.9 out of 5
SCOM excels in monitoring Microsoft environments with deep integration and customizable dashboards. In comparison, Splunk Observability Cloud focuses on cloud-native solutions with advanced troubleshooting and real-time alerts, ideal for hybrid environments despite higher costs driven by data volume.
Download SCOM vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
SCOM setup costs are lower, while Splunk Observability Cloud involves higher initial expense. Splunk offers more comprehensive features, justifying its setup cost difference.
View comparison
Pricing
SCOM setup costs are lower, while Splunk Observability Cloud involves higher initial expense. Splunk offers more comprehensive features, justifying its setup cost difference.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
ServiceNow IT Operations Management
4.1 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud excels in monitoring, real-time visibility, and customization for analytics-focused needs. In comparison, ServiceNow IT Operations Management provides comprehensive event management and service mapping for organizations prioritizing asset management and operational intelligence. Each solution offers distinct strengths based on specific operational goals.
Download ServiceNow IT Operations Management vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud involves higher setup costs, while ServiceNow IT Operations Management offers more budget-friendly initial expenses, highlighting a notable cost difference between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud involves higher setup costs, while ServiceNow IT Operations Management offers more budget-friendly initial expenses, highlighting a notable cost difference between the two solutions.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Auvik Network Management (ANM)
4.4 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud provides real-time analytics and comprehensive data integration for large enterprises. In comparison, Auvik Network Management focuses on network visualization and inventory management, offering automatic network mapping, making it ideal for those managing complex network environments.
Download Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud offers straightforward setup with potential upfront costs, while Auvik Network Management provides a flexible installation but involves initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud offers straightforward setup with potential upfront costs, while Auvik Network Management provides a flexible installation but involves initial investment.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Checkmk
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Checkmk
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud offers advanced data processing and integration, ideal for extensive analytics and dashboards. In comparison, Checkmk focuses on resource monitoring and affordability, attracting organizations needing effective performance monitoring with budget constraints.
Download Checkmk vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud has a higher setup cost, while Checkmk offers a more affordable initial setup. Splunk provides extensive features for monitoring, whereas Checkmk focuses on simplicity and efficiency in its offerings.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud has a higher setup cost, while Checkmk offers a more affordable initial setup. Splunk provides extensive features for monitoring, whereas Checkmk focuses on simplicity and efficiency in its offerings.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
LogicMonitor
4.5 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
LogicMonitor
4.5 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud offers extensive dashboards and swift indexing, ideal for thorough security and rapid deployment in SaaS settings. In comparison, LogicMonitor excels with its Google Maps widget, single pane of glass monitoring, and scalability, appealing for detailed infrastructure visualization and flexible licensing.
Download LogicMonitor vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud's setup costs are significant, reflecting its robust features, while LogicMonitor offers a more budget-friendly setup cost, making it an economical choice for those prioritizing affordability.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud's setup costs are significant, reflecting its robust features, while LogicMonitor offers a more budget-friendly setup cost, making it an economical choice for those prioritizing affordability.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Nagios Core
4.1 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Nagios Core
4.1 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud excels in data integration, log searching, and dashboard creation for deep insights into IT environments. In comparison, Nagios Core offers reliability and flexibility with extensive plugin support for endpoint monitoring, though configuration may be more complex than Splunk's setup.
Download Nagios Core vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud has high initial setup costs, while Nagios Core offers a more affordable entry with its open-source model. This contrast in setup expenses underlines the differing positioning and budget considerations for each platform.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud has high initial setup costs, while Nagios Core offers a more affordable entry with its open-source model. This contrast in setup expenses underlines the differing positioning and budget considerations for each platform.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Centreon
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Centreon
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud excels in data integration and efficient dashboards for complex environments. In comparison, Centreon offers straightforward monitoring and customization, appealing to organizations needing simplified solutions. Splunk provides advanced analytics, while Centreon is cost-effective and flexible with extensive plugin support.
Download Centreon vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud reviews highlight a smooth setup process, while Centreon reviews indicate more complexity during installation. The differing setup costs reflect varying user experiences and levels of support needed for initial deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud reviews highlight a smooth setup process, while Centreon reviews indicate more complexity during installation. The differing setup costs reflect varying user experiences and levels of support needed for initial deployment.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Amazon CloudWatch
4.0 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Amazon CloudWatch
4.0 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud is favored for customizable dashboards and enhanced integration, ideal for advanced visualizations. In comparison, Amazon CloudWatch offers strong AWS ecosystem integration, making it suitable for AWS infrastructure monitoring. Splunk excels in flexibility, while CloudWatch provides a manageable pay-as-you-go pricing model.
Download Amazon CloudWatch vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud incurs a moderate setup cost, whereas Amazon CloudWatch offers a more budget-friendly initial setup, highlighting a key cost difference between the two monitoring solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud incurs a moderate setup cost, whereas Amazon CloudWatch offers a more budget-friendly initial setup, highlighting a key cost difference between the two monitoring solutions.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Icinga
3.8 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Icinga
3.8 out of 5
Icinga excels in flexibility and customization, attracting tech buyers seeking cost-effective monitoring solutions. In comparison, Splunk Observability Cloud offers advanced analytics and robust integrations, appealing to those valuing comprehensive operational insights despite its higher cost.
Download Icinga vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Icinga offers a more cost-effective setup in comparison to Splunk Observability Cloud, which has higher initial setup expenses, making Icinga a budget-friendly alternative for users prioritizing lower setup costs.
View comparison
Pricing
Icinga offers a more cost-effective setup in comparison to Splunk Observability Cloud, which has higher initial setup expenses, making Icinga a budget-friendly alternative for users prioritizing lower setup costs.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
OpsRamp
3.9 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
OpsRamp
3.9 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud offers comprehensive monitoring and reporting with effective cloud-native application oversight and custom dashboards. In comparison, OpsRamp provides robust ITSM tools and cost-effective licensing, making it appealing for organizations with hybrid infrastructure needs and budget constraints.
Download OpsRamp vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
The Splunk Observability Cloud has a straightforward setup with manageable upfront costs, while OpsRamp offers a more complex setup that might require higher initial investment, highlighting a key difference in setup cost structures.
View comparison
Pricing
The Splunk Observability Cloud has a straightforward setup with manageable upfront costs, while OpsRamp offers a more complex setup that might require higher initial investment, highlighting a key difference in setup cost structures.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
ScienceLogic
4.3 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
ScienceLogic
4.3 out of 5
ScienceLogic excels in event management and integration options, suitable for diverse infrastructures. In comparison, Splunk Observability Cloud offers real-time monitoring with visual dashboards. ScienceLogic's granular controls benefit enterprises, while Splunk's adaptability appeals to those needing comprehensive real-time analytics.
Download ScienceLogic vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
ScienceLogic has a straightforward setup cost, whereas Splunk Observability Cloud requires significant initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
ScienceLogic has a straightforward setup cost, whereas Splunk Observability Cloud requires significant initial investment.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Cribl
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Cribl
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud excels in fast log searching and data visualization, appealing to users seeking robust application performance monitoring. In comparison, Cribl attracts buyers with real-time data transformation and affordability, suiting those focused on cost-effective data routing and processing solutions.
Download Cribl vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud offers competitive setup costs, while Cribl provides a distinct pricing structure tailored for flexibility, highlighting a contrast in setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud offers competitive setup costs, while Cribl provides a distinct pricing structure tailored for flexibility, highlighting a contrast in setup expenses.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Cisco Intersight
4.0 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Cisco Intersight
4.0 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud excels in data integration and rapid log searching, benefiting tech buyers seeking advanced analytics. In comparison, Cisco Intersight offers strong hybrid cloud management, appealing to those focused on integration and data center visibility.
Download Cisco Intersight vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud's setup cost is competitive, whereas Cisco Intersight offers a more budget-friendly option.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud's setup cost is competitive, whereas Cisco Intersight offers a more budget-friendly option.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
ITRS Geneos
4.1 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
ITRS Geneos
4.1 out of 5
ITRS Geneos offers real-time monitoring with customizable dashboards, ideal for financial sectors requiring high uptime. In comparison, Splunk Observability Cloud provides seamless integrations and AI-driven insights, particularly advantageous for those needing comprehensive observability across cloud-native applications.
Download ITRS Geneos vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
ITRS Geneos features a lower initial setup cost, while Splunk Observability Cloud offers a more comprehensive setup but at a higher price point.
View comparison
Pricing
ITRS Geneos features a lower initial setup cost, while Splunk Observability Cloud offers a more comprehensive setup but at a higher price point.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Rancher Labs
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Rancher Labs
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud offers powerful log processing and real-time monitoring, enhancing detailed reporting. In comparison, Rancher Labs excels in container management within Kubernetes, providing cost-effective deployment options. Rancher Labs' open-source model is appealing for flexible, scalable solutions.
Download Rancher Labs vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud boasts a straightforward setup cost structure, whereas Rancher Labs involves a more flexible pricing model that may suit varying deployments. Choose based on specific cost requirements and deployment flexibility needs.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud boasts a straightforward setup cost structure, whereas Rancher Labs involves a more flexible pricing model that may suit varying deployments. Choose based on specific cost requirements and deployment flexibility needs.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Amazon OpenSearch Service
3.6 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud provides dynamic dashboards and real-time insights for versatile monitoring. In comparison, Amazon OpenSearch Service offers powerful search capabilities and efficient data handling. Splunk's comprehensive functionality and Amazon's integration strengths attract tech buyers seeking diverse monitoring and search solutions.
Download Amazon OpenSearch Service vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud has a higher setup cost compared to Amazon OpenSearch Service, which offers a more budget-friendly initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud has a higher setup cost compared to Amazon OpenSearch Service, which offers a more budget-friendly initial setup.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
BMC TrueSight Operations Management
4.1 out of 5
BMC TrueSight Operations Management offers extensive customizability and comprehensive IT infrastructure monitoring. In comparison, Splunk Observability Cloud provides a streamlined service map and customizable dashboards. BMC is resource-intensive, while Splunk excels in flexibility with its variety of deployment models.
Download BMC TrueSight Operations Management vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
BMC TrueSight Operations Management involves a lower setup cost, while Splunk Observability Cloud has a more complex initial investment. The distinction in initial expenses highlights the differing approaches of the two platforms in their cost structures.
View comparison
Pricing
BMC TrueSight Operations Management involves a lower setup cost, while Splunk Observability Cloud has a more complex initial investment. The distinction in initial expenses highlights the differing approaches of the two platforms in their cost structures.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
InfluxDB
4.1 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
InfluxDB
4.1 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud offers extensive analytics and integration, appealing to complex environments. In comparison, InfluxDB attracts with high-speed data processing and competitive pricing for budget-conscious buyers seeking rapid deployment without needing extensive support. Both cater to different needs within their advanced monitoring capabilities.
Download InfluxDB vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
InfluxDB's setup cost is lower, making it more budget-friendly, while Splunk Observability Cloud offers a more comprehensive set of features with a higher setup cost.
View comparison
Pricing
InfluxDB's setup cost is lower, making it more budget-friendly, while Splunk Observability Cloud offers a more comprehensive set of features with a higher setup cost.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)
4.0 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud offers robust monitoring features, ideal for cloud-native environments, while Google Cloud's operations suite excels in scalability and reliable logging. In comparison, Google Cloud provides cost-effective solutions, whereas Splunk achieves strong ROI despite higher costs.
Download Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud often includes a detailed setup process, while Google Cloud's operations suite typically offers a more streamlined setup with fewer initial costs.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud often includes a detailed setup process, while Google Cloud's operations suite typically offers a more streamlined setup with fewer initial costs.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)
4.2 out of 5
IBM SevOne NPM provides agentless monitoring with benefits like one-minute polling and scalability, ideal for flexible growth and high ROI. In comparison, Splunk Observability Cloud offers user-friendly dashboards and real-time problem-solving but faces challenges with deployment complexity and high costs.
Download IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) often involves higher initial setup costs compared to Splunk Observability Cloud, which typically offers a more straightforward and cost-effective setup, highlighting their distinctive approaches to onboarding.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) often involves higher initial setup costs compared to Splunk Observability Cloud, which typically offers a more straightforward and cost-effective setup, highlighting their distinctive approaches to onboarding.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
VMware Aria Operations for Applications
4.0 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud offers rapid deployment, robust log searching, and machine learning capabilities for real-time problem-solving. In comparison, VMware Aria Operations for Applications provides detailed application monitoring and resource planning, focusing on proactive capacity management and real-time statistics for enhanced performance analysis.
Download Splunk Observability Cloud vs. VMware Aria Operations for Applications Report
Splunk Observability Cloud has a higher setup cost compared to VMware Aria Operations for Applications, which offers a more budget-friendly setup for organizations. Users seeking lower initial investment might prefer VMware's approach.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud has a higher setup cost compared to VMware Aria Operations for Applications, which offers a more budget-friendly setup for organizations. Users seeking lower initial investment might prefer VMware's approach.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Honeycomb.io
4.3 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Honeycomb.io
4.3 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud offers comprehensive data analysis and real-time analytics, ideal for enterprises with extensive monitoring needs. In comparison, Honeycomb.io provides intuitive tracing and debugging aimed at microservices, appealing to those seeking in-depth insights and streamlined deployment for complex systems.
Download Honeycomb.io vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud offers a higher setup cost compared to Honeycomb.io, which provides a more budget-friendly initial setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud offers a higher setup cost compared to Honeycomb.io, which provides a more budget-friendly initial setup option.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
WhatsUp Gold
3.9 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
WhatsUp Gold
3.9 out of 5
WhatsUp Gold excels in network monitoring with real-time capabilities and user-friendly deployment. In comparison, Splunk Observability Cloud offers advanced analytics and AI-driven insights, justifying its higher cost. Both solutions provide substantial ROI; choice depends on budget and desired feature set.
Download Splunk Observability Cloud vs. WhatsUp Gold Report
WhatsUp Gold offers a simpler setup with potentially lower initial costs, while Splunk Observability Cloud provides advanced features justifying a potentially higher setup expense.
View comparison
Pricing
WhatsUp Gold offers a simpler setup with potentially lower initial costs, while Splunk Observability Cloud provides advanced features justifying a potentially higher setup expense.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
ControlUp
4.3 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
ControlUp
4.3 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud emphasizes robust data integration and log analytics, offering real-time visibility and rapid deployment, appealing for infrastructure monitoring. In comparison, ControlUp provides comprehensive IT estate views with seamless endpoint integration, valued for its extensive automation capabilities and intuitive interface.
Download ControlUp vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud involves a significant setup cost, whereas ControlUp offers a more cost-effective initial setup. Both solutions provide distinctive features and pricing models that cater to different business needs.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud involves a significant setup cost, whereas ControlUp offers a more cost-effective initial setup. Both solutions provide distinctive features and pricing models that cater to different business needs.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Huawei eSight
3.7 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Huawei eSight
3.7 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud excels in flexible data integration and detailed analysis across environments, attracting those needing comprehensive monitoring. In comparison, Huawei eSight offers cost-effective simplicity for Huawei networks, appealing to organizations valuing straightforward device management within Huawei environments.
Download Huawei eSight vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud incurs a higher setup cost, while Huawei eSight offers a more cost-effective setup solution.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud incurs a higher setup cost, while Huawei eSight offers a more cost-effective setup solution.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance
4.4 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud offers versatile data handling, allowing efficient log analysis and adaptable visualizations. In comparison, Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance emphasizes network performance analytics with strong packet analysis for real-time diagnostics. Each solution serves distinct needs based on data integration or network monitoring focus.
Download Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud offers a straightforward setup process, while Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance's setup can be more complex and demanding.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud offers a straightforward setup process, while Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance's setup can be more complex and demanding.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
LiveAction LiveNX
3.6 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
LiveAction LiveNX
3.6 out of 5
LiveAction LiveNX excels in ease of setup and responsive support, appealing to users needing intuitive visualizations and cost-effective solutions. In comparison, Splunk Observability Cloud provides advanced analytics and AI-driven insights, attracting organizations focused on comprehensive performance and long-term value.
Download LiveAction LiveNX vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
LiveAction LiveNX offers clear setup cost details, whereas Splunk Observability Cloud's setup expenses vary.
View comparison
Pricing
LiveAction LiveNX offers clear setup cost details, whereas Splunk Observability Cloud's setup expenses vary.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
AppNeta by Broadcom
4.3 out of 5
AppNeta by Broadcom offers effective network insights at a lower cost, appealing to cost-conscious buyers seeking straightforward deployment. In comparison, Splunk Observability Cloud, with its advanced analytics, suits complex environments requiring detailed application performance analysis and justifies higher costs with strong ROI potential.
Download AppNeta by Broadcom vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
AppNeta by Broadcom offers a more affordable setup cost, while Splunk Observability Cloud tends to have higher initial investment requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
AppNeta by Broadcom offers a more affordable setup cost, while Splunk Observability Cloud tends to have higher initial investment requirements.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Observe
1 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Observe
1 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud appeals to tech buyers seeking seamless integration, real-time alerts, and competitive pricing. In comparison, Observe's innovative data-centric approach and unique visualizations offer deep insights. While Splunk streamlines deployment and support, Observe excels in customized, flexible deployments for complex environments.
Splunk Observability Cloud has a higher initial setup cost compared to Observe, offering distinct advantages in terms of feature depth and integration. Observe is more cost-effective, but may lack some advanced functionalities present in Splunk.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud has a higher initial setup cost compared to Observe, offering distinct advantages in terms of feature depth and integration. Observe is more cost-effective, but may lack some advanced functionalities present in Splunk.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Dell CloudIQ
4.1 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Dell CloudIQ
4.1 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud excels in adaptability to diverse data, offering extensive monitoring and analytics. In comparison, CloudIQ focuses on Dell ecosystem health alerts, offering straightforward deployment and cost advantages for Dell users, with predictive capabilities enhancing storage efficiency.
Download Dell CloudIQ vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud's setup cost is known for being lower compared to Dell CloudIQ, which can be perceived as more substantial.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud's setup cost is known for being lower compared to Dell CloudIQ, which can be perceived as more substantial.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Catchpoint
4.1 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Catchpoint
4.1 out of 5
Catchpoint offers cost-effective monitoring with real-time analysis, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, Splunk Observability Cloud's advanced analytics suit those needing deep insights. Catchpoint's easy deployment and support attract smaller teams, while Splunk caters to complex needs with extensive resources.
Download Catchpoint vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Catchpoint incurs a higher setup cost compared to Splunk Observability Cloud, which offers a more cost-effective start.
View comparison
Pricing
Catchpoint incurs a higher setup cost compared to Splunk Observability Cloud, which offers a more cost-effective start.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Pandora FMS
4.6 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Pandora FMS
4.6 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud offers advanced capabilities for complex environments with robust dashboards and alert systems, excelling in real-time analytics and infrastructure monitoring. In comparison, Pandora FMS stands out for simplicity and ease of integration, providing extensive monitoring with a user-friendly management approach.
Download Pandora FMS vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud requires a higher setup cost compared to Pandora FMS, highlighting a key difference in initial investment between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud requires a higher setup cost compared to Pandora FMS, highlighting a key difference in initial investment between the two solutions.
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
FortiMonitor
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
FortiMonitor
4.2 out of 5
FortiMonitor offers integration flexibility for network-heavy businesses, while Splunk Observability Cloud excels in real-time analytics for data-driven insights. In comparison, FortiMonitor provides a straightforward setup and affordability, contrasting Splunk's complex deployment but delivering high ROI through advanced analytical features.
Download FortiMonitor vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Splunk Observability Cloud offers a simple setup with limited costs, while FortiMonitor provides a more detailed initial setup that may be time-intensive, highlighting significant differences in implementation approaches.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Observability Cloud offers a simple setup with limited costs, while FortiMonitor provides a more detailed initial setup that may be time-intensive, highlighting significant differences in implementation approaches.

Related categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
Network Monitoring Software
IT Infrastructure Monitoring