ScienceLogic and Splunk Observability Cloud are key players in the infrastructure monitoring space. ScienceLogic seems to have an advantage due to its extensive customization and multi-tenant capabilities, albeit at a higher complexity in setup compared to Splunk's straightforward log analysis and application monitoring strengths.
Features: ScienceLogic offers enhanced customization for dashboards and monitoring templates, allowing for deep visibility into clients' environments. Its multi-tenant capability is advantageous for managing various customers on a single platform. Users also note its flexibility and integration possibilities as significant contributors to infrastructure monitoring success. Splunk Observability Cloud is strong in performance monitoring and log analysis, providing efficient dashboard creation for monitoring applications and services. Its ability to visualize data across cloud environments is a notable feature, though its customization is less extensive than ScienceLogic.
Room for Improvement: ScienceLogic could enhance its reporting and API capabilities and simplify its interface for better usability. Users experience challenges in setup monitoring and event management, indicating a demand for improved functionalities. Adding more straightforward integration processes and refined support for network and SNMP trap processing would be beneficial. Splunk Observability Cloud faces criticism for its high pricing. Improving microservices scaling, resource correlation, and user interface customization is necessary. Users also suggest streamlining deployment and enhancing documentation to make the tool's features more accessible.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ScienceLogic is recognized for flexible on-premises and hybrid deployments. It is well-regarded for robust customer service and technical support, although deployment complexity is acknowledged but manageable. Customers appreciate the personalized and proactive support. Splunk Observability Cloud supports diverse environments, including public clouds, and is praised for effective support across its cloud and on-premises operations. Yet, deployment complexities and premium pricing are noted concerns, despite commendable cloud compatibility.
Pricing and ROI: ScienceLogic offers variable pricing models but can become costly with increasing device counts. However, its comprehensive functionality is deemed worth the investment by many users who report solid ROI, though it may be out of reach for some medium-sized businesses. Splunk Observability Cloud is considered expensive, with a pricing model based on data volume rather than device count, affecting cost efficiency but justifiable for handling significant data volumes. Both platforms promise potential ROI through efficient issue resolution and enhanced infrastructure visibility, positioning pricing as a pivotal differentiator.
The return on investment is fair but often challenged by medium-sized businesses who may question its adequacy.
I received excellent support from ScienceLogic.
Problems with Skylar may require longer wait times due to limited resource expertise.
They often require multiple questions, with five or six emails to get a response.
If any issues arise, we can raise a vendor case, and resolutions are provided in a timely and accurate manner.
They did not have a clear answer.
We've used the solution across more than 250 people, including engineers.
I would rate its scalability an eight out of ten.
The stability rating is nine out of ten, acknowledging some bugs, but indicating these are minor issues.
We rarely have problems accessing the dashboard or the page.
I would rate its stability a nine out of ten.
While some other companies have easier APIs, using this solution demands significant expertise.
If the knowledge for implementation could be spread through articles, it would reduce this dependency.
Integrating observability and APM monitoring into the overall portfolio would be beneficial.
It would be beneficial if server details could be retrieved directly in synthetic monitoring.
Customers sometimes need to create specific dashboards, particularly for applicative metrics such as Java and process terms.
There is room for improvement in the alerting system, which is complicated and has less documentation available.
ScienceLogic is not that expensive and is cost-effective overall.
It could be cheaper.
Splunk Observability Cloud is expensive.
It appears to be expensive compared to competitors.
Notably, its automation features, such as Runbook action, enable domain experts like me to execute one-click automation solutions, which contributes significantly to reducing MTTR.
The solution excels in three areas: application monitoring, server monitoring, and network performance monitoring.
The CMDB update and the automatic CMDB update are valuable.
It offers unified visibility for logs, metrics, and traces.
Saving time with automation can save us weeks. It's improving our resilience.
Unlike other APMs, Splunk's service map is quite effective.
ScienceLogic is a comprehensive IT infrastructure monitoring solution that supports networks, servers, cloud environments, and applications, suitable for private cloud and on-premises deployments.
Organizations leverage ScienceLogic for its robust capabilities in monitoring IT infrastructures of all sizes. It offers granular discovery, integration with CMDB, and ticketing systems. Valued for its flexibility, incident automation, remediation, and real-time relationship mapping, it supports hybrid environments with scalable and efficient monitoring functionalities. AI and machine learning enhance its feature set, while ease of deployment and strong support are crucial benefits.
What are ScienceLogic's most important features?ScienceLogic is implemented across multiple industries, including large enterprises, for its capability to handle complex IT ecosystems. Its integration with CMDB and ticketing systems ensures it fits within existing workflows. Organizations use it to monitor diverse infrastructure landscapes, ensuring seamless performance and quick incident resolution.
Splunk Observability Cloud combines log search, data integration, and dashboards for seamless monitoring, enhancing infrastructure visibility and security. Its cloud integration and scalability support diverse environments, improving operational efficiency.
Splunk Observability Cloud offers comprehensive monitoring tools with user-friendly interfaces, enabling end-to-end infrastructure visibility. Its real-time alerting and predictive capabilities enhance security monitoring, while centralized dashboards provide cross-platform visibility. Users benefit from fast data integration and extensive insights into application performance. Despite its advantages, improvements could be made in integration with other tools, data reliability, scalability, and cost management. Users face challenges in configuration complexity and require better automation and endpoint protection features. Enhancing AI integration, alerts, and adaptation for high-throughput services could further improve usability.
What are the key features of Splunk Observability Cloud?In industries like finance and healthcare, Splunk Observability Cloud is implemented for application performance monitoring and infrastructure metrics. Its ability to track incidents and analyze machine data benefits network infrastructure, while distributed tracing and log analysis aid in tackling security threats. Organizations often integrate it for compliance and auditing purposes, enhancing visibility into network traffic and optimizing performance.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.