Splunk Observability Cloud and Cisco Intersight compete in the IT monitoring and management sector. Splunk appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive data integration and rapid log searching capabilities.
Features: Splunk Observability Cloud is known for comprehensive data integration, rapid log searching, and customizable dashboards providing end-to-end visibility, aiding in application performance troubleshooting. Cisco Intersight is favored for managing data centers with its strong integration capabilities with cloud and on-premise platforms, focusing more on orchestrated data center management.
Room for Improvement: Splunk Observability Cloud could benefit from reducing its high cost, improving seamless log data handling, and enhancing user-friendliness with dynamic log navigation and tutorials. Cisco Intersight needs improvement in hybrid cloud management, automation capabilities, and third-party tool integration. Both face criticism over pricing, indicating a need for enhancement.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Splunk Observability Cloud offers various deployment options, including on-premises, public, and hybrid cloud environments, with generally responsive customer service, though speed and efficiency in technical support could improve. Cisco Intersight is primarily used in public and hybrid cloud environments, also delivering effective customer support but could benefit from streamlined deployment processes and improved technical support availability.
Pricing and ROI: Splunk Observability Cloud is seen as costly, with debates over its long-term cost-effectiveness despite positive ROI from visibility and efficiency improvements, highlighting high initial and ongoing costs. Cisco Intersight competitive pricing is often seen as reasonable for its features, yet licensing costs can be high compared to AWS and Azure. Both solutions offer ROI through visibility and productivity, though pricing remains under scrutiny.
It simplifies the onboarding of new hardware, reducing time spent on manual installations and configurations.
For complex issues, it's challenging to get the right engineer quickly unless you have a specific contract like CX.
Cisco provides better support than anyone else.
Cisco technical support is helpful.
They often require multiple questions, with five or six emails to get a response.
They did respond to us, but they did not explicitly inform us about the feature's absence.
If any issues arise, we can raise a vendor case, and resolutions are provided in a timely and accurate manner.
I rate its scalability a ten out of ten due to its capability to manage multiple domains and automate service requests.
Cisco Intersight is scalable enough for our needs, allowing management in a multi-environment setup and working remotely while deploying servers.
We've used the solution across more than 250 people, including engineers.
I would rate its scalability an eight out of ten.
Some steps are not included in the official documentation, which can create challenges.
It is always accessible online, secure, and allows access from any location, following strict authentication standards.
I would rate its stability a nine out of ten.
We rarely have problems accessing the dashboard or the page.
There is a significant issue regarding migration from UCS Manager into Intersight without formatting the Fabric Interconnects (FI), which is problematic in a production environment.
It would be great to have a chat session mode AI so that when I am on standby and encountering issues, I could engage with it, much like ChatGPT.
When registering our devices and servers using tokens, auto-detection could make it easier by automatically identifying resources and adding them to the platform.
There is room for improvement in the alerting system, which is complicated and has less documentation available.
Customers sometimes need to create specific dashboards, particularly for applicative metrics such as Java and process terms.
It would be beneficial if server details could be retrieved directly in synthetic monitoring.
The pricing is fair and reasonable, particularly for enterprises.
Cisco Intersight's license cost is very high compared to AWS and Azure solutions, which have lower initiation costs.
The pricing mechanism sounds fair.
It appears to be expensive compared to competitors.
Splunk Observability Cloud is expensive.
This solution has provided time savings and required fewer people to operate this tool, rather than direct cost savings.
It provides visibility into other products and storage, and is beneficial for environments where Cisco and other vendors coexist, allowing full visibility of the entire infrastructure.
It also provides predictive analysis, predicting data leaks and making it easy to scale up servers remotely without requiring physical interference.
For troubleshooting, we can detect problems in seconds, which is particularly helpful for digital teams.
It offers unified visibility for logs, metrics, and traces.
Splunk APM provides a holistic view of the application.
Cisco Intersight is Cisco’s systems management platform that delivers intuitive computing through cloud-powered intelligence. This platform offers a more intelligent level of management that enables IT organizations to analyze, simplify, and automate their environments in ways that were not possible with prior generations of tools. This capability empowers organizations to achieve significant savings in Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) and to deliver applications faster, so they can support new business initiates. The advantages of the model-based management of the Cisco UCS platform plus Cisco Intersight are extended to Cisco UCS servers and Cisco HyperFlex and Cisco HyperFlex Edge systems. Cisco HyperFlex Edge is optimized for remote sites, branch offices, and edge environments.
Splunk Observability Cloud combines log search, data integration, and dashboards for seamless monitoring, enhancing infrastructure visibility and security. Its cloud integration and scalability support diverse environments, improving operational efficiency.
Splunk Observability Cloud offers comprehensive monitoring tools with user-friendly interfaces, enabling end-to-end infrastructure visibility. Its real-time alerting and predictive capabilities enhance security monitoring, while centralized dashboards provide cross-platform visibility. Users benefit from fast data integration and extensive insights into application performance. Despite its advantages, improvements could be made in integration with other tools, data reliability, scalability, and cost management. Users face challenges in configuration complexity and require better automation and endpoint protection features. Enhancing AI integration, alerts, and adaptation for high-throughput services could further improve usability.
What are the key features of Splunk Observability Cloud?In industries like finance and healthcare, Splunk Observability Cloud is implemented for application performance monitoring and infrastructure metrics. Its ability to track incidents and analyze machine data benefits network infrastructure, while distributed tracing and log analysis aid in tackling security threats. Organizations often integrate it for compliance and auditing purposes, enhancing visibility into network traffic and optimizing performance.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
