Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Azure Monitor vs Splunk Observability Cloud comparison

Microsoft and Splunk are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Microsoft is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.7, while Splunk is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.4. Microsoft holds a 4.9% mindshare in APM, compared to Splunk’s 2.0% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Splunk users who would recommend it.
Azure Monitor
Read 55 Azure Monitor reviews
  • 11,124 Views
  • 9,900 Comparison Views
90% willing to recommend
Splunk Observability Cloud
Read 70 Splunk Observability Cloud reviews
  • 5,846 Views
  • 3,391 Comparison Views
95% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 21, 2025

Splunk Observability Cloud and Azure Monitor are prominent competitors in observability tools. Splunk often holds an advantage due to its robust data integration and dashboard customization, favored notably by security-focused users.

Features: Splunk Observability Cloud provides fast log searching, customizable dashboards, and advanced data integration capabilities, making it suitable for comprehensive security monitoring. Users appreciate its detailed reporting and visualization options. Azure Monitor offers solid application insights, real-time telemetry, and customizable alert systems, effectively monitoring resources across subscriptions and providing development-friendly integrations.

Room for Improvement: Splunk may improve in areas like pricing, scalability, and third-party integration; automation and user documentation could also be enhanced. Users report the need for more intuitive configuration and clearer user guides. Azure Monitor could strengthen its visualization, cross-cloud support, and improve response times in its alerting system. Enhanced real-time monitoring and out-of-the-box functionalities are also desired.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Splunk supports deployments across on-premises, hybrid, and public cloud environments. Customer service is reliable but sometimes slow in responsiveness, while technical support is stretched but generally helpful. Azure Monitor focuses on the public cloud with strong integration with Azure services, easing deployment. Its customer support is responsive and proactive, though, within Microsoft’s broader ecosystem, direct support can be complicated.

Pricing and ROI: Splunk is seen as costly due to its data ingestion-based pricing, although it offers high ROI through enhanced visibility and reduced downtime. Many users consider it worth the investment for its comprehensive capabilities. Azure Monitor, with its pay-as-you-go model, is typically more affordable, especially when integrated within existing Azure setups. Its ROI is praised for cost efficiency, despite potential cost escalation with increased log and resource monitoring.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Azure Monitor vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report (Updated: September 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Azure Monitor vs. Splunk Observability Cloud
September 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 868,706 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.9
Azure Monitor offers cost-effectiveness and proactive visibility, with pay-as-you-go flexibility and potential savings despite mixed ROI feedback.
Sentiment score
7.0
Splunk Observability Cloud boosts productivity, efficiency, and ROI by simplifying problem detection and improving KPI management and collaboration.
Azure Monitor helps prevent impacts on their system.
For more quotes and insights, download the Azure Monitor report
Using Splunk has saved my organization about 30% of our budget compared to using multiple different monitoring products.
Anyone working in front-end management should recognize the market price to see the true value of end-user monitoring.
I have definitely seen a return on investment with Splunk Observability Cloud, particularly through how fast it has grown and how comfortable other teams are in relying on its outputs for monitoring and observability.
For more quotes and insights, download the Splunk Observability Cloud report
Karthic Mohan - PeerSpot reviewerSathis-Kumar - PeerSpot reviewer
ES
Taiwo Ige - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.2
Azure Monitor support is generally positive, with high-priority users obtaining quicker responses, while others report variable experiences.
Sentiment score
6.9
Splunk Observability Cloud support is generally responsive but can be slow, with improvement needed, especially in the APAC region.
However, the second-line support is good.
Users end up getting no resolution from their team because they're outsourced vendors, and they don't have deeper expertise over any of the products they are referring to.
I would rate the support for Azure Monitor as a seven.
For more quotes and insights, download the Azure Monitor report
On a scale of 1 to 10, the customer service and technical support deserve a 10.
They have consistently helped us resolve any issues we've encountered.
They often require multiple questions, with five or six emails to get a response.
For more quotes and insights, download the Splunk Observability Cloud report
Syed Abid - PeerSpot reviewerMuhammad Usman Khawar - PeerSpot reviewerKarthic Mohan - PeerSpot reviewerreviewer2755917 - PeerSpot reviewer
JB
AL
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
Azure Monitor efficiently scales across industries, integrating well with services, and reliably supports growing infrastructure and application needs.
Sentiment score
7.5
Splunk Observability Cloud is scalable and flexible but can be costly, with challenges in data ingestion and implementation.
Azure Monitor is very scalable; there are no issues with scalability for different kinds of businesses.
For more quotes and insights, download the Azure Monitor report
We've used the solution across more than 250 people, including engineers.
As we are a growing company transitioning all our applications to the cloud, and with the increasing number of cloud-native applications, Splunk Observability Cloud will help us achieve digital resiliency and reduce our mean time to resolution.
I would rate its scalability a nine out of ten.
For more quotes and insights, download the Splunk Observability Cloud report
Karthic Mohan - PeerSpot reviewer
AL
Lalatendu Swain - PeerSpot reviewerSathis-Kumar - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.3
Azure Monitor is stable and reliable with high ratings, but could improve in alerting compared to competitors.
Sentiment score
7.6
Splunk Observability Cloud is highly stable, rated 8-10/10 for reliability, with minor issues usually from user configurations.
Azure Monitor is working fine, yet I face a costing issue as if there are a lot of logs collected in the workspace or in the center, it becomes very costly.
For more quotes and insights, download the Azure Monitor report
I would rate its stability a nine out of ten.
We rarely have problems accessing the dashboard or the page.
Unlike NetScout or regular agents for APM, RUM has many problems during the POC phase because customer environments vary widely.
For more quotes and insights, download the Splunk Observability Cloud report
Syed Abid - PeerSpot reviewer
MM
AL
ES
 

Room For Improvement

Azure Monitor requires better integration, user experience, automation, alerting, support, cost clarity, and improved interface and performance monitoring.
Splunk Observability Cloud needs integration, automation, performance, pricing improvements, and enhanced UI, documentation, AI, and support services.
If Azure Monitor can independently add one gigabyte, two gigabytes, or five gigabytes at least to log storage, I can fix the logs without syncing with Log Analytics Workspace and Sentinel.
The cost skyrockets once you start using it, and there are complaints that the actual cost of the Kubernetes cluster was less than the cost they were incurring for Azure Monitor.
The challenges with Azure Monitor are that it's initially complex to set up because you need multiple components.
For more quotes and insights, download the Azure Monitor report
The out-of-the-box customizable dashboards in Splunk Observability Cloud are very effective in showcasing IT performance to business leaders.
The next release of Splunk Observability Cloud should include a feature that makes it so that when looking at charts and dashboards, and also looking at one environment regardless of the product feature that you're in, APM, infrastructure, RUM, the environment that is chosen in the first location when you sign into Splunk Observability Cloud needs to stay persistent all the way through.
There is room for improvement in the alerting system, which is complicated and has less documentation available.
For more quotes and insights, download the Splunk Observability Cloud report
Syed Abid - PeerSpot reviewerMuhammad Usman Khawar - PeerSpot reviewerKarthic Mohan - PeerSpot reviewerTaiwo Ige - PeerSpot reviewerSarah Van Zee - PeerSpot reviewer
MM
 

Setup Cost

Azure Monitor's flexible pricing is generally competitive, but costs can rise due to storage and integration needs.
Splunk Observability Cloud offers advanced features but can become costly as data volume and infrastructure needs grow.
When I export logs into the application, workspace, log analytic workspace, and into Sentinel to read reports, I need to add storage, which increases the cost.
For more quotes and insights, download the Azure Monitor report
Splunk is a bit expensive since it charges based on the indexing rate of data.
It is expensive, especially when there are other vendors that offer something similar for much cheaper.
It appears to be expensive compared to competitors.
For more quotes and insights, download the Splunk Observability Cloud report
Syed Abid - PeerSpot reviewerSathis-Kumar - PeerSpot reviewerErnesto Gutierrez - PeerSpot reviewer
MM
 

Valuable Features

Azure Monitor provides seamless integration, robust security, dynamic alerting, and efficient reporting, enhancing user satisfaction with scalability and cost-effectiveness.
Splunk Observability Cloud offers seamless data integration, real-time insights, and efficient monitoring, enhancing performance visibility across diverse environments.
The alerting features definitely help in reducing operational downtime for my customers by allowing us to get notifications in advance and take active actions.
Resource monitoring is essential.
The ease of access in Azure is significant because it's native to the platform and easy to integrate.
For more quotes and insights, download the Azure Monitor report
Splunk provides advanced notifications of roadblocks in the application, which helps us to improve and avoid impacts during high-volume days.
For troubleshooting, we can detect problems in seconds, which is particularly helpful for digital teams.
It offers unified visibility for logs, metrics, and traces.
For more quotes and insights, download the Splunk Observability Cloud report
Karthic Mohan - PeerSpot reviewerSyed Abid - PeerSpot reviewerMuhammad Usman Khawar - PeerSpot reviewerSathis-Kumar - PeerSpot reviewer
AL
MV
 

Categories and Ranking

Azure Monitor
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
6th
Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software
3rd
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
55
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Splunk Observability Cloud
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
8th
Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software
8th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
70
Ranking in other categories
Network Monitoring Software (6th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (7th), Container Management (6th), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Azure Monitor is 4.9%, down from 8.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Splunk Observability Cloud is 2.0%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Azure Monitor4.9%
Splunk Observability Cloud2.0%
Other93.1%
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
 

Featured Reviews

Muhammad Usman Khawar - PeerSpot reviewer
Native integration simplifies monitoring but documentation and cost improvements are needed
The ease of access in Azure is significant since it's native to the platform and easy to integrate. It has no maintenance overhead, and users don't have to navigate to another portal to get their desired result. It's the handiness that it has, rather than the features. The interpretation from the logs and injection requires custom runbooks. While it's complex, many services provide native insights and workbooks. It does the basic job quite efficiently. They added new kinds of metrics with more integrations to send out metrics. They have even added support for third-party tools that can be integrated. Azure Monitor is working on improvements and becoming more mature. Azure Monitor is stable and scalable. Azure Monitor is evolving with new workbooks and dashboards.
Read full review
Taiwo Ige - PeerSpot reviewer
Alerting improves incident response across teams and enables faster awareness before customer impact
Splunk Observability Cloud could be improved in terms of integrations with more technical add-ons, such as Zoom. Although they have one with Zoom, it's not available in the cloud, so having that feature would be beneficial. Essentially, Splunk should continue expanding to create easier ways to ingest logs from different products. The out-of-the-box customizable dashboards in Splunk Observability Cloud are very effective in showcasing IT performance to business leaders. However, there are aspects that could be improved, such as linking dashboards to one another. While IT leaders may not drill down, it's crucial to create levels of dashboards for technical users to find root causes, making it effective for stakeholders.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
868,706 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
6%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
13%
Retailer
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business23
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise29
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business20
Midsize Enterprise10
Large Enterprise43
 

Questions from the Community

How does Splunk compare with Azure Monitor?
Splunk handles a high amount of data very well. We use Splunk to capture information and as an aggregator for monitoring information from different sources. Splunk is very good at alerting us if we...
See all answers
What do you like most about Azure Monitor?
Azure Monitor is a very easy-to-use product in the cloud environment.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Azure Monitor?
The challenges with Azure Monitor are that it's initially complex to set up because you need multiple components. Azure Monitor is one thing, but within Azure Monitor, you need to bring Log Analyti...
See all answers
What do you like most about SignalFx?
The most valuable feature is dashboard creation.
See all answers
What needs improvement with SignalFx?
Regarding dashboard customization, while Splunk has many dashboard building options, customers sometimes need to create specific dashboards, particularly for applicative metrics such as Java and pr...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for SignalFx?
The solution involves observability in general, such as Application Performance Monitoring, and generally addresses digital applications, web applications, sites, and mobile applications. I worked ...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Datadog vs Azure Monitor Logo
Datadog vs Azure Monitor
Compared 19% of the time
Sentry vs Azure Monitor Logo
Sentry vs Azure Monitor
Compared 14% of the time
Dynatrace vs Azure Monitor Logo
Dynatrace vs Azure Monitor
Compared 13% of the time
Grafana vs Azure Monitor Logo
Grafana vs Azure Monitor
Compared 9% of the time
New Relic vs Azure Monitor Logo
New Relic vs Azure Monitor
Compared 6% of the time
More Azure Monitor Competitors
Sentry vs Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Sentry vs Splunk Observability Cloud
Compared 7% of the time
Observe vs Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Observe vs Splunk Observability Cloud
Compared 6% of the time
SigNoz vs Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
SigNoz vs Splunk Observability Cloud
Compared 5% of the time
Cribl vs Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Cribl vs Splunk Observability Cloud
Compared 5% of the time
Honeycomb Enterprise vs Splunk Observability Cloud Logo
Honeycomb Enterprise vs Splunk Observability Cloud
Compared 4% of the time
More Splunk Observability Cloud Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Azure Monitor
September 2025
Azure Monitor reportDownload Azure Monitor product report
Buyer's Guide
Splunk Observability Cloud
September 2025
Splunk Observability Cloud reportDownload Splunk Observability Cloud product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring, Splunk Real User Monitoring (RUM), Splunk Synthetic Monitoring
 

Overview

Azure Monitor is a comprehensive monitoring solution offered by Microsoft Azure. It provides a centralized platform for monitoring the performance and health of various Azure resources, applications, and infrastructure. 

With Azure Monitor, users can gain insights into the availability, performance, and usage of their applications and infrastructure. The key features of Azure Monitor include metrics, logs, alerts, and dashboards. Metrics allow users to collect and analyze performance data from various Azure resources, such as virtual machines, databases, and storage accounts. 

Logs enable users to collect and analyze log data from different sources, including Azure resources, applications, and operating systems. Azure Monitor also provides a robust alerting mechanism that allows users to set up alerts based on specific conditions or thresholds. These alerts can be configured to notify users via email, SMS, or other notification channels. Additionally, Azure Monitor offers customizable dashboards that allow users to visualize and analyze their monitoring data in a personalized and intuitive manner.  

Azure Monitor integrates seamlessly with other Azure services, such as Azure Automation and Azure Logic Apps, enabling users to automate actions based on monitoring data. It also supports integration with third-party monitoring tools and services, providing flexibility and extensibility. 

Overall, Azure Monitor is a powerful and versatile monitoring solution that helps users gain deep insights into the performance and health of their Azure resources and applications. It offers a wide range of features and integrations, making it a comprehensive solution for monitoring and managing Azure environments.

Microsoft

Splunk Observability Cloud offers sophisticated log searching, data integration, and customizable dashboards. With rapid deployment and ease of use, this cloud service enhances monitoring capabilities across IT infrastructures for comprehensive end-to-end visibility.

Focused on enhancing performance management and security, Splunk Observability Cloud supports environments through its data visualization and analysis tools. Users appreciate its robust application performance monitoring and troubleshooting insights. However, improvements in integrations, interface customization, scalability, and automation are needed. Users find value in its capabilities for infrastructure and network monitoring, as well as log analytics, albeit cost considerations and better documentation are desired. Enhancements in real-time monitoring and network protection are also noted as areas for development.

What are the key features?
  • Log Searching: Efficiently search and analyze logs from various sources.
  • Data Integration: Seamlessly integrate with multiple environments.
  • Dashboard Customization: Tailor dashboards to specific monitoring needs.
  • Monitoring Capabilities: Provides comprehensive insights into application performance.
  • Security Features: Analyze and address security threats across systems.
  • Visualization Tools: Enhance data analysis and system performance optimization.
Why consider this for ROI?
  • Comprehensive Visibility: Gain complete insights into IT infrastructure.
  • Performance Optimization: Improve overall system performance and efficiency.
  • Rapid Deployment: Quick setup to meet organization demands swiftly.
  • Enhanced Security: Strengthen security measures through detailed analytics.

In industries, Splunk Observability Cloud is implemented for security management by analyzing logs from detection systems, offering real-time alerts and troubleshooting for cloud-native applications. It is leveraged for machine data analysis, improving infrastructure visibility and supporting network and application performance management efforts.

Splunk
 

Sample Customers

Rackspace, First Gas, Allscripts, ABB Group
Sunrun, Yelp, Onshape, Tapjoy, Symphony Commerce, Chairish, Clever, Grovo, Bazaar Voice, Zenefits, Avalara
Buyer's Guide
Azure Monitor vs. Splunk Observability Cloud
September 2025
Free Report: Azure Monitor vs. Splunk Observability Cloud
Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Monitor vs. Splunk Observability Cloud and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
868,706 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Azure Monitor vs. Splunk Observability Cloud report.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.