Top 10 OpenText Real User Monitoring Alternatives

3.3 out of 5

11 reviews
58% willing to recommend

Top OpenText Real User Monitoring Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to OpenText Real User Monitoring based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Dynatrace, Datadog, and New Relic. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

OpenText Real User Monitoring surpasses its competitors by offering real-time data analytics, user experience insights, and seamless integration with enterprise systems, ensuring optimal performance and providing actionable insights to improve application efficiency and user satisfaction.

OpenText Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with OpenText, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Dynatrace

4.4 out of 5

Dynatrace

4.4 out of 5

OpenText Real User Monitoring provides essential monitoring capabilities with competitive pricing and straightforward deployment, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, Dynatrace offers advanced features like AI-driven insights and detailed root-cause analysis, justifying its higher cost for those needing extensive functionality.

Download Dynatrace vs. OpenText Real User Monitoring Report

Pricing

OpenText Real User Monitoring has a lower setup cost, while Dynatrace requires a higher investment.

View comparison

Pricing

OpenText Real User Monitoring has a lower setup cost, while Dynatrace requires a higher investment.

Datadog

4.3 out of 5

Datadog

4.3 out of 5

OpenText Real User Monitoring is ideal for those prioritizing ease of navigation and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Datadog offers advanced analytics and extensive integrations, attracting those with complex requirements in monitoring. OpenText simplifies customer support, while Datadog caters to scalable deployment needs.

Download Datadog vs. OpenText Real User Monitoring Report

Pricing

OpenText Real User Monitoring requires a higher initial setup cost, while Datadog offers a more budget-friendly setup.

View comparison

Pricing

OpenText Real User Monitoring requires a higher initial setup cost, while Datadog offers a more budget-friendly setup.

New Relic

4.2 out of 5

New Relic

4.2 out of 5

OpenText Real User Monitoring offers detailed user experience insights and cost-effective real-time monitoring. In comparison, New Relic provides extensive integrations and advanced analytics. OpenText leads in affordability, while New Relic delivers substantial ROI with its rich feature set. Tech buyers benefit from both solutions based on specific needs.

Download New Relic vs. OpenText Real User Monitoring Report

Pricing

OpenText Real User Monitoring has a higher setup cost compared to New Relic, which offers a more cost-effective setup process.

View comparison

Pricing

OpenText Real User Monitoring has a higher setup cost compared to New Relic, which offers a more cost-effective setup process.

Splunk AppDynamics

4.1 out of 5

Splunk AppDynamics

4.1 out of 5

OpenText Real User Monitoring is appreciated for its competitive pricing and responsive customer service. In comparison, Splunk AppDynamics delivers a comprehensive feature set for extensive monitoring capabilities, making it ideal for large-scale deployments despite a higher price and more complex initial configuration.

Download OpenText Real User Monitoring vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report

Pricing

OpenText Real User Monitoring setup costs are high compared to Splunk AppDynamics, which offers more affordability. Splunk AppDynamics presents a cost-effective option, while OpenText may require a larger initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

VMware Aria Operations for Applications

4.0 out of 5

VMware Aria Operations for Applications

4.0 out of 5

OpenText Real User Monitoring offers detailed analysis and real-time monitoring. In comparison, VMware Aria Operations for Applications provides predictive analytics and deep integrations. OpenText requires improved user design, while VMware needs better documentation. OpenText is cost-effective initially, whereas VMware ensures long-term value.

Download OpenText Real User Monitoring vs. VMware Aria Operations for Applications Report

Pricing

OpenText Real User Monitoring users report lower setup costs, whereas VMware Aria Operations for Applications users experience higher initial expenses. Users highlight that OpenText offers a more budget-friendly setup option compared to VMware's higher upfront investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Honeycomb Enterprise

4.3 out of 5

Honeycomb Enterprise

4.3 out of 5

OpenText Real User Monitoring offers real-time tracking with competitive pricing, appealing to budget-conscious businesses. In comparison, Honeycomb Enterprise provides advanced analytics and deep insights, attracting those who prioritize detailed analysis and are willing to invest in comprehensive, long-term process improvement.

Download Honeycomb Enterprise vs. OpenText Real User Monitoring Report

Pricing

OpenText Real User Monitoring tends to have higher setup costs, while Honeycomb Enterprise offers a more affordable implementation, making it a cost-effective choice for budget-conscious businesses.

View comparison

Pricing

OpenText Real User Monitoring tends to have higher setup costs, while Honeycomb Enterprise offers a more affordable implementation, making it a cost-effective choice for budget-conscious businesses.

Instana Dynamic APM

3.8 out of 5

Instana Dynamic APM

3.8 out of 5

OpenText Real User Monitoring is favored for its cost-effectiveness and robust traffic analysis, making it ideal for those seeking budget-friendly monitoring solutions. In comparison, Instana Dynamic APM is valued for its advanced automation capabilities, appealing to users needing comprehensive monitoring and willing to invest more.

Download Instana Dynamic APM vs. OpenText Real User Monitoring Report

Pricing

OpenText Real User Monitoring has a higher initial setup cost, while Instana Dynamic APM offers a more budget-friendly setup. Instana's pricing advantage might appeal to cost-sensitive users.

View comparison

Pricing

OpenText Real User Monitoring has a higher initial setup cost, while Instana Dynamic APM offers a more budget-friendly setup. Instana's pricing advantage might appeal to cost-sensitive users.

Related categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Log Management

Mobile APM