OpenText Real User Monitoring vs SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor comparison

OpenText and SolarWinds are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. OpenText is ranked #45 with an average rating of 7.7, while SolarWinds is ranked #20 with an average rating of 7.4. OpenText holds a 0.2% mindshare in APM, compared to SolarWinds’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 58% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of SolarWinds users who would recommend it.

OpenText Real User Monitoring

Read 11 OpenText Real User Monitoring reviews

465 Views
419 Comparison Views

58% willing to recommend

SolarWinds Server and Appli...

Read 42 SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor reviews

3,787 Views
2,727 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

OpenText Real User Monitoring

SolarWinds Server and Appli...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

OpenText Real User Monitoring and SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor both offer robust monitoring solutions. User reviews suggest that OpenText has the upper hand in performance and scalability, while SolarWinds is often praised for its comprehensive features.

What features are offered by OpenText Real User Monitoring in comparison to SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor?

OpenText Real User Monitoring provides real-time insights, effective alerting, and strong performance metrics. It is also noted for its ease of integration. SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor offers extensive monitoring capabilities, detailed reporting features, and an extensive range of features. While SolarWinds provides more comprehensive monitoring features, it can be overwhelming for some users.

What areas of improvement can be found in OpenText Real User Monitoring in comparison to SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor?

OpenText users suggest enhancements in analytical capabilities, more intuitive dashboards, and easier configuration. SolarWinds users point out the need for a more user-friendly experience, improved automation features, and simplification of the interface and usability.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of OpenText Real User Monitoring in comparison to SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor?

OpenText Real User Monitoring has a straightforward deployment process but could improve its customer support responsiveness. SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor, while rich in features, has a more complex deployment process. Users find SolarWinds' customer service more responsive and helpful. SolarWinds has an edge in customer support, but OpenText is easier to deploy.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with OpenText Real User Monitoring in comparison to SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor?

OpenText Real User Monitoring is often seen as higher in cost, with users expressing mixed feelings about its ROI. SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor is perceived as offering better value for money with a balance of cost and features. Users feel SolarWinds provides better ROI due to its extensive capabilities despite higher initial setup costs.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Real User Monitoring vs. SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Real User Monitoring vs. SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Real User Monitoring

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

45th

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SolarWinds Server and Appli...

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

20th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Server Monitoring (11th), Active Directory Management (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of OpenText Real User Monitoring is 0.2%, down from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor is 1.5%, down from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Aphiwat Leetavorn.

CTO at Marco Technology

Offers back-end monitoring, so it can analyze user experience but when customers change the software or version, this tool is quite sensitive

Real User Monitoring tools help proactively identify problems before they become critical by monitoring thresholds. There is a threshold and an SOA threshold. For example, it starts to go yellow, and if it becomes red, the system will crash. When it starts to become yellow (Threshold Approaching), we have to resolve it. This is the same case where we'll know what happened before it's too late. So we can make an early decision to prevent it, maybe by kicking some users off the system before it crashes.

Read full review

VIVEK PATHAK

Solutions Architect at Airtel

Offering reasonably good dashboarding features but needs to improve the application performance monitoring

My company uses Riverbed for application performance monitoring. I was doing research so that I could understand if SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor provide APM capabilities similar to Riverbed, which allows our company to get a packet capture of an entire session, and on the basis of it, we look at the application performance monitoring part. With SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor, my company does SNMP polling, so it can drag an entire session, but it focuses more on availability, CPU memory, and server connection status. In Riverbed, my company catches an entire system, so when we deal with two applications, we have end-to-end app visibility. All the application monitoring happens through Riverbed. Our company's main problem is that, as of now, we have two different products in our organization, and we don't want to continue with the multiple products currently. I wanted to understand if SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor already have capabilities like Riverbed, and if they do, then I wanted to figure out why our company should not go with SolarWinds and why we are using products from multiple vendors. My company needs to continue with either Riverbed or SolarWinds. I wanted to see which products are good for the organization and how much I want to continue with Riverbed.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a good product."

"Real User Monitoring tools help proactively identify problems before they become critical by monitoring thresholds. There is a threshold and an SOA threshold."

"It offers near-real-time analytics, which is helpful."

"The reporting feature is good for us."

"The Real User Monitor, with its transaction and synthetic transaction monitoring, is the typical classic in APM cases when the customer would like to do transaction monitoring. Micro Focus scores better where the underlying infrastructure management is also covered by Micro Focus tools."

"Very easy to implement."

"The most valuable feature is application performance monitoring."

"The most useful feature of this solution is tracking. When the application's traffic has been monitored it is taken from that particular application and analyzed. It is then given a live session of that particular user. For example, if you are using your bank application to do some kind of transaction, everything that you do can be tracked by that application."

More OpenText Real User Monitoring pros

"One of the most valuable features are the reports. They're pretty good. Also, the ease of installation and customization for the client is another feature that we value. SolarWinds has a lot of features but these are the ones I like the most. We also like that the KPIs have the ability to be preset."

"The most valuable feature is the Access Rights Manager."

"SolarWinds SAM has significantly improved our workflow by allowing us to develop a comprehensive knowledge base of known errors and automate responses to specific alerts."

"AppInsight. Provides a simple way to get very in-depth monitoring configured for our most popular applications. Exchange, SQL, and SharePoint."

"The solution is end-to-end from the network and the application to the processes. Everything about the enterprise infrastructure is being covered by the solution. It's easy to use and easy to navigate and one of the leaders among monitoring solutions."

"We use the solution as a central monitoring tool. We use it to monitor every transaction that has a relation to the organization’s infrastructure."

"I find it to be a strong product suite, particularly when you need a comprehensive monitoring tool."

"Hardware health: It allows for proactive monitoring of the hardware health and is a game changer."

More SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor pros

Cons

"The product needs more R&D to make it easier and more compatible with other software."

"This technology is considered to be older."

"Customer support needs to improve by bringing in more people who are knowledgeable about the tool, as there are very few left."

"One area to improve is the user interface, of course. The second one is their R&D has virtually stopped building a product roadmap."

"Some issues with login errors."

"Real User Monitor needs to cover more protocols to provide more in-depth information. It could also be better at monitoring voice-related traffic. There is currently no visibility in that channel."

"The solution's technical support presents a lot of issues with too many delays."

"Everybody is moving away from traffic and installing agents on the application to do the job, but Micro Focus is using traditional ways to collect the traffic. They should change their architecture completely."

More OpenText Real User Monitoring cons

"One area that could benefit from improvement is its performance"

"The major concern in the product revolves around application performance monitoring since end-to-end application monitoring is not possible with the tool."

"Some custom applications cannot be monitored, and a lot more applications need to be included."

"Currently SolarWinds SAM offers AppInsight for modern versions of: IIS, Exchange, SQL Server. They have shown to be powerful and insightful tools. However, AppInsight needs to be offered for more applications: Citrix, SharePoint, AX, etc."

"I think they need to make reporting easier and more simple & dynamic."

"SAM's software-defined network monitoring capability is also low and could be improved."

"Solarwinds should come up the same monitoring system for other certificate expiration alert apart from SSL."

"It lacks a user experience for measuring things like the end-to-end time for which a user waits for a specific response in the system. In the application layer, it has some very basic stuff. You have to build your own with manuscripts and things like that."

More SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price is approximately €30,000 ($35,500 USD) for the enterprise edition."

"If I compare with other vendors, other vendors are more expensive"

"Not expensive."

"Compared to other tools, OpenText Real User Monitoring is an expensive solution."

"Nagios XI, WhatsUpGold, Uptime Software, PRTG, Manage Engine, and SpiceWorks are the other tools that have lower pricing and licensing costs. However, they can't compete with SolarWinds when it comes to the features and functionality that SolarWinds can provide."

"The solution is overpriced in terms of application management."

"When compared to other licensed models in the market, it stands out as one of the more cost-effective options."

"The tool is available for my company at a good price point."

"The licenses start from USD 3000.00 and go up to USD 20,000.00 for the year. It's a perpetual license. Nothing is free in SolarWinds, anything that you need is an additional cost."

"We are on an annual license to use the solution. The price of the solution is expensive. The price is based on a bunch of factors, such as the number of engines and elements."

"The product might cost you $30,000 USD to buy, but scaling this solution requires the purchase of additional polling engines at $20,000 USD each."

"Pricing is inexpensive, starting at 2440 euros. For that, you get the ability to monitor a couple of nodes and one year of maintenance and support."

More SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Performing Arts

Energy/Utilities Company

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Real User Monitor?

The diagnostics perspective, particularly in terms of the root cause analysis of failures, should be improved. There needs to be more development in this area, as the support and the number of peop...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Real User Monitor?

The use case is about user-level monitoring and the availability of a service for a user. It's about whether the service is available, its performance, and the type of errors a user is receiving, f...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Micro Focus Real User Monitor?

I rate the solution as nine. It is a good product. Everyone should have it as it is essential today, but choose the vendor accordingly. I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.

See all answers

What do you like most about SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor?

Identifying the problem statement is easy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor?

The initial cost is quite high, but the renewal cost is reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor?

There are no specific features or functionality I would like to see improved or enhanced in SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor at this time. I have not encountered any missing features or fu...

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText SiteScope vs OpenText Real User Monitoring

Compared 30% of the time

New Relic vs OpenText Real User Monitoring

Compared 21% of the time

Dynatrace vs OpenText Real User Monitoring

Compared 16% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs OpenText Real User Monitoring

Compared 16% of the time

Datadog vs OpenText Real User Monitoring

Compared 16% of the time

More OpenText Real User Monitoring Competitors

Dynatrace vs SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor

Compared 17% of the time

Azure Monitor vs SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor

Compared 16% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor

Compared 10% of the time

Prometheus Group vs SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor

Compared 7% of the time

Zabbix vs SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor

Compared 5% of the time

More SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Real User Monitoring

August 2025

Download OpenText Real User Monitoring product report

Buyer's Guide

SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor

July 2025

SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor report

Download SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Real User Monitor, Micro Focus RUM, HPE RUM

SolarWinds SAM

Overview

Real User Monitoring (RUM) an End user monitoring that gives you visibility into user behavior for fast, targeted problem resolution. It monitors the performance and availability of business-critical application services for all users at all locations all the time. It automatically discovers underlying infrastructure and classifies user actions - giving you instant visibility into session and whole service health over web, cloud, and mobile user experience. It allows you to trace user experience across tiers, capture live sessions, see where customers clicked, measure response times, and see pages that caused problems. And you can easily capture and replay user sessions to create test scripts that reflect real user behavior. All this data gives you new ability to analyze which application transactions your users are performing and what application response they are experiencing. RUM currently supports over 20 application protocols and applications such as SAP, Citrix, and native mobile application monitoring on Android.

OpenText

SolarWinds Server & Application Monitor (SAM) delivers powerful application and server monitoring capabilities for IT pros, enabling them to diagnose and troubleshoot performance issues faster. Do not let slow applications and downtime impact your end-users and business services. Pinpoint the root cause of application issues across various layers of the IT stack. SolarWinds SAM is affordable and easy to deploy, use, and customize. You can automatically discover your system's environment and start monitoring in about an hour. No professional services or consultation needed.

SolarWinds

Sample Customers

Avea, Maccabi Healthcare Services, TEB

Andr. L. Riis AS, NetSuite

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Real User Monitoring vs. SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor

July 2025

Free Report: OpenText Real User Monitoring vs. SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Real User Monitoring vs. SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Real User Monitoring vs. SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.