ITRS Geneos vs OpenText Real User Monitoring comparison

ITRS and OpenText are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. ITRS is ranked #34 with an average rating of 5.0, while OpenText is ranked #45 with an average rating of 7.7. ITRS holds a 1.1% mindshare in APM, compared to OpenText’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of ITRS users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 58% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

ITRS Geneos

Read 57 ITRS Geneos reviews

3,901 Views
2,653 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

OpenText Real User Monitoring

Read 11 OpenText Real User Monitoring reviews

588 Views
541 Comparison Views

58% willing to recommend

ITRS Geneos

OpenText Real User Monitoring

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

OpenText Real User Monitoring and ITRS Geneos are competing products in the user monitoring space. Based on user feedback, ITRS Geneos is seen as superior due to its extensive functionalities, although OpenText Real User Monitoring is highly regarded for its seamless integration and real-time data.

What features are offered by OpenText Real User Monitoring in comparison to ITRS Geneos?

OpenText Real User Monitoring is known for its detailed real-time monitoring capabilities, ease of integration, and robust analytical tools. ITRS Geneos offers flexibility, extensive alerting features, and comprehensive monitoring across various platforms.

What areas of improvement can be found in OpenText Real User Monitoring in comparison to ITRS Geneos?

OpenText Real User Monitoring users point out the need for more intuitive configuration settings, expanded reporting features, and improved user-configurability. ITRS Geneos users suggest improved documentation, a more user-friendly setup process, and enhancements in deployment complexity.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of OpenText Real User Monitoring in comparison to ITRS Geneos?

OpenText Real User Monitoring receives favorable reviews for its simplistic deployment and responsive customer service, with users appreciating the straightforward setup. ITRS Geneos has a powerful deployment model but mixed reviews on deployment ease, and its customer service is noted as competent but not as praised as OpenText's support team.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with OpenText Real User Monitoring in comparison to ITRS Geneos?

OpenText Real User Monitoring is generally seen as cost-effective with reasonable setup costs and good ROI, making it worth the expense due to its capabilities. ITRS Geneos, while more expensive, is considered worth the high cost due to its comprehensive feature set and strong ROI according to user reviews.

To learn more, read our detailed ITRS Geneos vs. OpenText Real User Monitoring Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ITRS Geneos vs. OpenText Real User Monitoring

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,771 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ITRS Geneos

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

34th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (67th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (46th)

OpenText Real User Monitoring

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

45th

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of ITRS Geneos is 1.1%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Real User Monitoring is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
ITRS Geneos	1.1%
OpenText Real User Monitoring	0.4%
Other	98.5%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Sanket

Chief Manager at a marketing services firm with 501-1,000 employees

With the help of the solution, we can predict and prevent failures

Currently, the most valuable thing for an individual is a mobile device. Since that is where people are currently tracking everything, we have multiple applications or apps that are for various products. I would like ITRS Geneos to develop an app, where instead of going to specific login terminals or logging into laptops or desktops to check alerts, we can have visibility in the app itself. Using the ITRS Geneos app, we could see the error message during our travels or wherever we are. I would like to see the capacity of messages for forecasting increased. Since the NSE is the number one derivative stock exchange in the work for three consecutive years, the number of messages is important. We use the capacity planner in ITRS to forecast our data needs for the next two months. The planner is important because the volume of data we produce is becoming more and more volatile compared to when we first started using ITRS Geneos in 2014.

Read full review

Aphiwat Leetavorn.

CTO at Marco Technology

Offers back-end monitoring, so it can analyze user experience but when customers change the software or version, this tool is quite sensitive

Real User Monitoring tools help proactively identify problems before they become critical by monitoring thresholds. There is a threshold and an SOA threshold. For example, it starts to go yellow, and if it becomes red, the system will crash. When it starts to become yellow (Threshold Approaching), we have to resolve it. This is the same case where we'll know what happened before it's too late. So we can make an early decision to prevent it, maybe by kicking some users off the system before it crashes.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The NetProbe carries over 100 samplers which are capable of monitoring hardware, OS, and the application layer."

"One of the most valuable features is that it can be configured by non-developers. It doesn't require development expertise to configure it."

"Geneos automatically sends email notifications when any batch job fails, the database is down or the website is down. It is automatically monitoring everything and reduces manual effort."

"Ability to monitor logs for potential issues to prevent app outages before problems get a chance to arise. That's invaluable for our teams in a fast-paced trading environment."

"It's also easy to implement. The implementation of Geneos is very easy and interesting. It's not complicated. It's very quick to implement. The installation is very easy. There are many topics about ITRS Geneos that explain more about the features of the function of Geneos."

"It enables us to monitor application processes, to do log-monitoring on a 24/7 basis, to do server-level monitoring - all the hardware parameters - as well as monitor connectivity across applications to the interfaces."

"Real-time log monitoring with desktop alerts is valuable as it tells us immediately when there is an issue."

"The solution is used across the entire investment banking division, covering environments such as electronic trading, algo-trading, fixed income, FX, etc. It monitors that environment and enables a bank to significantly reduce down time. Although hard to measure, since implementation, we have probably seen some increased stability because of it and we have definitely seen teams a lot more aware of their environment. Consequently, we can be more proactive in challenging and improving previously undetected weaknesses."

More ITRS Geneos pros

"With the solution, you can easily access any issues in your infrastructure."

"The technical support is good at resolving issues."

"It offers near-real-time analytics, which is helpful."

"The Real User Monitor, with its transaction and synthetic transaction monitoring, is the typical classic in APM cases when the customer would like to do transaction monitoring. Micro Focus scores better where the underlying infrastructure management is also covered by Micro Focus tools."

"Real User Monitoring tools help proactively identify problems before they become critical by monitoring thresholds. There is a threshold and an SOA threshold."

"The reporting feature is good for us."

"Real User Monitor has improved our productivity."

"Very easy to implement."

More OpenText Real User Monitoring pros

Cons

"One area where there is room for improvement is the log file. I would like to be able to do a pre-run on the log files. When you are testing log files for regular expressions, it would be good to be able to do a quick check up front on that side of things before you release that into production."

"They have the Webslinger solution where you can see when something is alerting. It's a little bit cumbersome."

"ITRS Geneos is not on the cloud at a time when everyone is moving to the cloud."

"The deployment method for upgrading is a bit tricky. It takes a little bit of manual effort. If that could be a bit more automated, it would help us a lot."

"Mobile phone integration is probably not as rich as it could be."

"For the solution to stay relevant in the cloud-based monitoring environment Geneos needs more plug-ins with more features. Instead of offering clients workarounds, the solution should have a cloud-based out-of-the-box version."

"It needs to be easier to configure, especially with the JMX plugins."

"The dashboard feature is full of bugs. Grouping items results in a distorted dashboard."

More ITRS Geneos cons

"This technology is considered to be older."

"The product needs more R&D to make it easier and more compatible with other software."

"We would like to see support for non-Windows environments."

"One area to improve is the user interface, of course. The second one is their R&D has virtually stopped building a product roadmap."

"The solution's technical support presents a lot of issues with too many delays."

"The diagnostics perspective, particularly in terms of the root cause analysis of failures, should be improved."

"Everybody is moving away from traffic and installing agents on the application to do the job, but Micro Focus is using traditional ways to collect the traffic. They should change their architecture completely."

"Customer support needs to improve by bringing in more people who are knowledgeable about the tool, as there are very few left."

More OpenText Real User Monitoring cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing seems reasonable. We're happy enough with it."

"Based on feedback from colleagues and friends working in the financial sector, Geneos is relatively costly. Many companies have been switching from Geneos to Dynatrace, Sysdig, or other monitoring tools in the past two years because of the price."

"ITRS Geneos is not a cheap tool. It's a moderate price for the banking industry. The reason we are not able to add the ITRS monitoring tool for the non-banking industries, and non-finance industries, is that the pricing is too high."

"The product is priced quite high. There are pricing options for customers based on the size of the environment and plug-ins used by the monitoring system."

"Pricing is the touchy subject, even here. Upper management always wants us to find a cheaper solution. But we have so much integrated with ITRS... It's expensive, but it does its job very well. And you set it and go."

"The licensing cost may seem expensive upfront. However, the service is outstanding, the tool does things that no other tools can do, and the customizability more than makes up for the cost of licensing."

"I can say it's not that cheap because the licensing is a little bit costly"

"The market tools are on par with this solution, but if the solution included more features, then it would be well within the range for the cost."

More ITRS Geneos pricing and cost advice

"If I compare with other vendors, other vendors are more expensive"

"Not expensive."

"The price is approximately €30,000 ($35,500 USD) for the enterprise edition."

"Compared to other tools, OpenText Real User Monitoring is an expensive solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,771 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

72%

Computer Software Company

University

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Performing Arts

11%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	39

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ITRS Geneos?

The pricing is high. Licensing fees might be around 500$ per server monthly.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ITRS Geneos?

ITRS Geneos is a legacy system. It predicts or provides proactive measures once an issue is resolved. It doesn't offer any predictive capabilities or root cause analysis. They throw a lot of data i...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ITRS Geneos?

ITRS offers multiple products, including upgrades for synthetic monitoring and a SaaS platform. Geneos is used for infrastructure monitoring, covering KPIs such as CPU, memory, processes, network l...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Real User Monitor?

The diagnostics perspective, particularly in terms of the root cause analysis of failures, should be improved. There needs to be more development in this area, as the support and the number of peop...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Real User Monitor?

The use case is about user-level monitoring and the availability of a service for a user. It's about whether the service is available, its performance, and the type of errors a user is receiving, f...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Micro Focus Real User Monitor?

I rate the solution as nine. It is a good product. Everyone should have it as it is essential today, but choose the vendor accordingly. I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 23% of the time

Grafana vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 13% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 13% of the time

Datadog vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 8% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs ITRS Geneos

Compared 8% of the time

More ITRS Geneos Competitors

OpenText SiteScope vs OpenText Real User Monitoring

Compared 38% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs OpenText Real User Monitoring

Compared 33% of the time

New Relic vs OpenText Real User Monitoring

Compared 29% of the time

More OpenText Real User Monitoring Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ITRS Geneos

October 2025

Download ITRS Geneos product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Real User Monitoring

September 2025

Download OpenText Real User Monitoring product report

Also Known As

Geneos

Micro Focus Real User Monitor, Micro Focus RUM, HPE RUM

Overview

ITRS Geneos is a real-time monitoring tool designed for managing increasingly complex, hybrid and interconnected IT estates.

Built with financial services and trading organisations in mind, it collects a wide range of data relating to server performance, infrastructure, trading, connectivity and applications, and analyses it to provide relevant information and alerts in real time.

Geneos can give full stack visibility across highly dynamic environments and presents all the information through a single pane of glass and its configurable and customisable dashboards provide end-to-end visibility to both technical and business users.

For more information, please visit https://www.itrsgroup.com/products/geneos

ITRS

Real User Monitoring (RUM) an End user monitoring that gives you visibility into user behavior for fast, targeted problem resolution. It monitors the performance and availability of business-critical application services for all users at all locations all the time. It automatically discovers underlying infrastructure and classifies user actions - giving you instant visibility into session and whole service health over web, cloud, and mobile user experience. It allows you to trace user experience across tiers, capture live sessions, see where customers clicked, measure response times, and see pages that caused problems. And you can easily capture and replay user sessions to create test scripts that reflect real user behavior. All this data gives you new ability to analyze which application transactions your users are performing and what application response they are experiencing. RUM currently supports over 20 application protocols and applications such as SAP, Citrix, and native mobile application monitoring on Android.

OpenText

Sample Customers

ITRS Geneos is used by over 170 financial institutions, including JPMorgan, HSBC, RBS, Deutsche Bank and Goldman Sachs. Clients range from investment banks to exchanges and brokers.

Avea, Maccabi Healthcare Services, TEB

Buyer's Guide

ITRS Geneos vs. OpenText Real User Monitoring

September 2025

Free Report: ITRS Geneos vs. OpenText Real User Monitoring

Find out what your peers are saying about ITRS Geneos vs. OpenText Real User Monitoring and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,771 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ITRS Geneos vs. OpenText Real User Monitoring report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.