New Relic vs OpenText Real User Monitoring comparison

Why PeerSpot?

New Relic and OpenText are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. New Relic is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.2, while OpenText is ranked #32 with an average rating of 9.0. New Relic holds a 3.7% mindshare in APM, compared to OpenText’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of New Relic users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 58% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

New Relic

Read 176 New Relic reviews

26,514 Views
17,499 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

OpenText Real User Monitoring

Read 11 OpenText Real User Monitoring reviews

4,177 Views
3,968 Comparison Views

58% willing to recommend

New Relic

OpenText Real User Monitoring

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

OpenText Real User Monitoring and New Relic compete in real user monitoring. OpenText has the advantage with pricing and customer support, while New Relic offers more features for a higher cost.

Features: OpenText Real User Monitoring enables real-time data analysis, robust analytics for user interactions, and detailed performance insights. New Relic offers broad integration capabilities, real-time monitoring of application performance, and customizable dashboards.

Room for Improvement: OpenText could enhance its integration options, expand advanced monitoring capabilities, and provide more detailed documentation. New Relic could improve its pricing structure, simplify deployment, and enhance customer support for less technical users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText offers an easier deployment process with responsive customer service. New Relic provides extensive documentation and training but requires a potentially steeper learning curve for its deployment model.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText offers a cost-effective solution with a strong ROI for budget-conscious businesses. New Relic, despite its higher costs, justifies the investment with its comprehensive features providing long-term ROI for dedicated performance monitoring.

To learn more, read our detailed New Relic vs. OpenText Real User Monitoring Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

New Relic vs. OpenText Real User Monitoring

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 914,394 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

New Relic

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

4th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

176

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (9th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (9th), IT Operations Analytics (3rd), Mobile APM (2nd), Cloud Monitoring Software (2nd), AIOps (5th)

OpenText Real User Monitoring

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

32nd

Average Rating

6.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of New Relic is 3.7%, down from 5.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Real User Monitoring is 1.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
New Relic	3.7%
OpenText Real User Monitoring	1.4%
Other	94.9%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

BasilJiji

System engineer at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

Real-time alerts have reduced server outage impact and support fast incident response

In the dashboard, if they could show a little more metrics regarding the application and related things, that would be how New Relic could be improved. Currently, there are things showing from the server level and application level, but it can be improved. That is what I felt. Regarding user interface, I do not feel much concern, but for some kind of issues when we are trying to get support from the New Relic team, their SLA seems to be long. They are taking seven to ten working days for resolving some kind of scenario or issue. That is a bit difficult for us. If they could improve the customer support by reducing their SLA within three to five days, if they could remediate everything, that will be so much helpful. When it comes to the customer support part, I felt they need to be a little more improved on that part. The support overall is good, but they can improve. That is the reason I have given it eight out of ten.

Read full review

Yasir Amin

Sr. Solution Architect, Project Manager at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees

User-level monitoring with near-real-time analytics boosts service availability

The use case is about user-level monitoring and the availability of a service for a user. It's about whether the service is available, its performance, and the type of errors a user is receiving, from a user perspective The functions that Real User Monitor is intended for, which is to provide the…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It gives us insight into several areas-- Where slowdowns are, Which of our customers is hitting us most, and If there’s an application issue on the database side, how long a query takes."

"We like the performance of the product; it's very good, very reliable, and all features are capable of responding to our requirements."

"It's given us the ability for anyone to know how our customers experience our application."

"Previously, without a monitoring solution, a developer could potentially spend a day working on a feature or a bug to try and resolve an issue, but now, with monitoring in place, we can understand if a customer is actually hitting this bug, how often they are hitting it, and how much frustration they are dealing with on a day-by-day basis, then reprioritize our tasks."

"We looked for a product that gives the data in a way that is easy to visualize, is reliable, and is simple."

"Using New Relic speeds up troubleshooting and resolution, giving us a clearer picture of where issues are, thus saving time and effort."

"The solution's most valuable aspects are that it tracks java better and operates very efficiently."

"Helped us pin point the exact piece causing the performance bottleneck by using the transaction trace view."

More New Relic pros

"It is a good product."

"If you have an old-fashioned infrastructure with data center servers then this is a good solution for you."

"The technical support is good at resolving issues."

"It offers near-real-time analytics, which is helpful."

"Real User Monitor has improved our productivity."

"The reporting feature is good for us."

"We use RUM and BSM and so far it has been really good at getting real user transactions from a real user monitor and then tying it to a BSM single view dashboard, where we get the whole realistic picture."

"Real User Monitor does its job, and that is why we have stayed with it for so many years."

More OpenText Real User Monitoring pros

Cons

"There are times when you restart the engines and the servers have a unique ID for the host and you need to remove the server. It is difficult because some are on-premise and others are production hosts. Having downtime is not very good when updating. However, it is not a constant issue."

"With APM, it’s a little difficult to fit into certain infrastructure components that are very service-based which take data from one area to another."

"New Relic APM can improve the information when we dig deeper to check a problem. There should be more detailed information provided."

"New Relic APM could improve error debugging and the correlation with the logs. We are receiving some alerts or alarms but we need to correlate with the error log, but it is difficult if it is more than seven months retention period, it is hard to trace. We need this especially for getting historical information."

"New Relic can be improved by incorporating an automated incident analysis solution."

"New Relic needs to improve is the user data schema."

"I'd like second-by-second monitoring, instead of a five-minute lag time."

"The solution needs to have staging."

More New Relic cons

"One final complaint I have is that the roadmap from the vendor is not clear, which makes it less attractive to some customers."

"Everybody is moving away from traffic and installing agents on the application to do the job, but Micro Focus is using traditional ways to collect the traffic. They should change their architecture completely."

"Customer support needs to improve by bringing in more people who are knowledgeable about the tool, as there are very few left."

"Most of the dashboards require a lot of configuration. We are not happy with the dashboard."

"Real User Monitor needs to cover more protocols to provide more in-depth information. It could also be better at monitoring voice-related traffic. There is currently no visibility in that channel."

"When we want to monitor our encrypted traffic, this product doesn't work because our cipher is not supported."

"The diagnostics perspective, particularly in terms of the root cause analysis of failures, should be improved."

"We would like to see support for non-Windows environments."

More OpenText Real User Monitoring cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"They gave us aggressive discounts when they were brought in for the first time, but they have also kept them for the year-on-year renewals, which has been absolutely fine."

"We feel it's a little bit pricey."

"Because of budget, we are not using the mobile app part of this tool."

"We deploy everything on AWS. Purchasing the product on AWS Marketplace made it easier for us."

"This solution required a license and it is better than some other competitors."

"I recommend using the free version of New Relic. If you like the free version and understand its importance for your company, you can move to the trial. Then, you can migrate to the paid version."

"Cost is significant with a lot of extras."

"The pricing and licensing are good if you have an account manager and a partner manager who are looking to help out."

More New Relic pricing and cost advice

"If I compare with other vendors, other vendors are more expensive"

"Compared to other tools, OpenText Real User Monitoring is an expensive solution."

"The price is approximately €30,000 ($35,500 USD) for the enterprise edition."

"Not expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

914,394 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Outsourcing Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Construction Company

18%

Outsourcing Company

14%

Comms Service Provider

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	65
Midsize Enterprise	52
Large Enterprise	79

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

Any advice about APM solutions?

There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems, the scope of implementation). Our goal was to consolidate APM and infra monitor...

See all answers

What needs improvement with New Relic Insights?

I find New Relic to be somewhat expensive. Our team shares logins, contrasting with other applications where individual team accounts are standard. Pricing is a primary concern since New Relic can ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for New Relic Insights?

As an Application Monitoring Engineer, my primary responsibilities include ensuring the uptime of services, managing infrastructure, and monitoring transactions. I use New Relic to set up incidents...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Real User Monitor?

The diagnostics perspective, particularly in terms of the root cause analysis of failures, should be improved. There needs to be more development in this area, as the support and the number of peop...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Real User Monitor?

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Micro Focus Real User Monitor?

I rate the solution as nine. It is a good product. Everyone should have it as it is essential today, but choose the vendor accordingly. I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.

See all answers

Comparisons

Datadog vs New Relic

Compared 5% of the time

Dynatrace vs New Relic

Compared 5% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs New Relic

Compared 4% of the time

Splunk Observability Cloud vs New Relic

Compared 2% of the time

Stackify vs New Relic

Compared 1% of the time

More New Relic Competitors

OmniPeek vs OpenText Real User Monitoring

Compared 6% of the time

Sematext Synthetics vs OpenText Real User Monitoring

Compared 6% of the time

Dynatrace vs OpenText Real User Monitoring

Compared 6% of the time

VMware Aria Operations for Applications vs OpenText Real User Monitoring

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText SiteScope vs OpenText Real User Monitoring

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText Real User Monitoring Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

New Relic

September 2026

Download New Relic product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Real User Monitoring

September 2026

Download OpenText Real User Monitoring product report

Also Known As

New Relic Browser, New Relic Applied Intelligence, New Relic Insights, New Relic Synthetics, New Relic Servers, New Relic APM

Micro Focus Real User Monitor, Micro Focus RUM, HPE RUM

Overview

New Relic offers real-time application monitoring and insight into performance bottlenecks. Its customizable dashboards and APM integration provide efficient operational support, while server performance alerts ensure quick issue detection.

New Relic provides comprehensive monitoring of application performance, tracking bottlenecks across databases and front-end components. Users employ it for server and infrastructure monitoring, as well as analyzing key metrics such as CPU and memory usage. The solution's ability to integrate with tools like PagerDuty enhances incident management capabilities. However, users have expressed a need for improvements in query language simplicity, more detailed historical insights, and better mobile app monitoring support.

What are New Relic's most important features?

Real-Time Monitoring: Provides instant visibility into application performance.
Detailed Transaction Tracing: Identifies specific transaction issues quickly.
Error Rate Tracking: Monitors and reports on error occurrences efficiently.
Customizable Dashboards: Tailors dashboard views for specific needs.
APM Integration: Seamlessly integrates with application performance management tools.

What benefits and ROI should be considered?

Operational Efficiency: Quick issue detection reduces downtime.
Improved Debugging: Enhanced error analysis supports rapid problem resolution.
Comprehensive Monitoring: Offers a holistic view of application performance and user behavior.
Incident Management: Integration with incident tools helps streamline responses.
Efficient Alerts: Rapid alert systems ensure timely notifications of issues.

In industries like e-commerce and financial services, New Relic supports application performance monitoring to enhance user experience and system reliability. Organizations leverage its insights for optimizing performance, particularly in server operations and infrastructure management. Its ability to monitor API failures through synthetic monitoring is crucial for maintaining high service levels.

New Relic

OpenText Real User Monitoring enables effective application performance tracking with end-to-end visibility. It features easy setup and helps organizations identify and resolve issues efficiently.

OpenText Real User Monitoring works by providing a single view dashboard that integrates seamlessly with BSM, facilitating application performance monitoring. It is valued for its proactive issue identification via monitoring thresholds and efficient incident resolution. Organizations can leverage its comprehensive tracking capabilities for mobile and website monitoring, yielding near-real-time analytics. However, they may face challenges like an outdated interface and limited support for non-Windows environments. Dependency on additional purchases and traditional data collection methods can be limitations. Modernizing architecture and enhancing protocol support are often desired.

What are the important features?

End-to-end application monitoring: Provides comprehensive insights and tracking.
Single view dashboard: Enables integrated monitoring experience with BSM.
Near-real-time analytics: Offers timely data on user interactions and performance.
Proactive issue identification: Utilizes monitoring thresholds to detect issues early.
Mobile and website monitoring: Extends tracking capabilities across multiple platforms.

What benefits should users look for?

Improved incident resolution: Leads to efficient problem-solving and maintenance.
Enhanced user experience: Ensures optimal application performance monitoring.
Business service agreements insights: Offers data to calculate business performance metrics.
Real-time transaction monitoring: Provides real-time data for network and performance analysis.
Comprehensive error identification: Helps pinpoint issues within application workflows.

Industries employing OpenText Real User Monitoring often use it for real-time and transaction monitoring by capturing network data to analyze performance from user perspectives. It is particularly useful for assessing availability and providing insights in environments where backend analysis and automation are essential.

OpenText

Sample Customers

World Fuel Services, Verizon, FootLocker, McDonald's, Trainline, Mondia Media, Confused, Costa Coffee, Ryanair, Marks & Spencer, William Hill, Delivery Hero, Skyscanner, BASF, DAZN, Veygo, Virtuo, movingimage, talabat, Australia Post, Tokopedia, Seven Network, Virgin Australia, Zomato, BigBasket, Mercado Libre, Lending Club

Avea, Maccabi Healthcare Services, TEB

Buyer's Guide

New Relic vs. OpenText Real User Monitoring

September 2026

Free Report: New Relic vs. OpenText Real User Monitoring

Find out what your peers are saying about New Relic vs. OpenText Real User Monitoring and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

914,394 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our New Relic vs. OpenText Real User Monitoring report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.