Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Fortra's Intermapper based on the interviews we conducted with its users.
The top alternative solutions include Zabbix, SolarWinds NPM, and PRTG Network Monitor.
The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.
Fortra Alternatives Report
Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Fortra, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Zabbix offers a budget-friendly, open-source model with customizable monitoring, appealing to cost-conscious buyers. In comparison, Fortra's Intermapper provides advanced visual network mapping and quick troubleshooting, justifying its investment with a strong feature set for enhanced performance insights and reduced network downtime.
Zabbix offers a lower setup cost compared to Fortra's Intermapper, highlighting a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment. On the other hand, Fortra's Intermapper may include higher setup fees reflecting its additional features.
Zabbix offers a lower setup cost compared to Fortra's Intermapper, highlighting a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment. On the other hand, Fortra's Intermapper may include higher setup fees reflecting its additional features.
SolarWinds NPM offers real-time network monitoring and dynamic mapping, appealing to those prioritizing price and support. In comparison, Fortra's Intermapper provides live network maps and flexible alerts, attracting users focused on comprehensive features despite higher costs.
PRTG Network Monitor offers extensive sensors, providing an adaptable platform for diverse technology monitoring. In comparison, Intermapper's robust mapping and real-time monitoring deliver in-depth visualization. PRTG ensures quick setup; however, Intermapper requires more effort but complements this with reliable support.
Fortra's Intermapper offers real-time network mapping and automated alerts, appealing to cost-conscious buyers. In comparison, Auvik's extensive integrations and cloud-based management attract businesses seeking advanced features and scalability, justifying its higher costs with significant ROI potential.
Fortra's Intermapper offers competitive setup costs with minimal upfront expenses, while Auvik Network Management (ANM) tends to have higher initial investment, reflecting its comprehensive feature set tailored for detailed network oversight.
Fortra's Intermapper offers competitive setup costs with minimal upfront expenses, while Auvik Network Management (ANM) tends to have higher initial investment, reflecting its comprehensive feature set tailored for detailed network oversight.
LogicMonitor excels in scalability and integrations, appealing to businesses needing broad platform support. In comparison, Intermapper offers intuitive network mapping, beneficial for those requiring detailed insights. While LogicMonitor simplifies cloud deployments, Intermapper suits organizations preferring internal control with on-premise options.
WhatsUp Gold attracts with its reasonable pricing, outstanding customer support, intuitive interface, and efficient deployment process. In comparison, Fortra's Intermapper offers superior feature depth with strong network visualization and comprehensive mapping tools, appealing to those prioritizing advanced functionalities despite its slightly complex deployment and higher cost.
WhatsUp Gold has an affordable setup cost, making it a cost-effective choice for budget-conscious users, while Fortra's Intermapper, with a higher initial expense, might appeal to those prioritizing advanced features and comprehensive network capabilities.
WhatsUp Gold has an affordable setup cost, making it a cost-effective choice for budget-conscious users, while Fortra's Intermapper, with a higher initial expense, might appeal to those prioritizing advanced features and comprehensive network capabilities.
ManageEngine OpManager is cost-effective with broad monitoring features, suitable for diverse IT environments. In comparison, Fortra's Intermapper excels in visualization and mapping, offering detailed network visibility. ManageEngine's straightforward deployment contrasts with Intermapper’s complexity but includes thorough support.
Fortra Intermapper offers customizability with visual network maps suitable for in-depth monitoring. In comparison, Meraki Dashboard provides centralized cloud management for scalable solutions. A tech buyer might prefer Intermapper for control or Meraki for efficiency and streamlined deployments.
Nmap attracts tech buyers with its open-source model and powerful network security features. In comparison, Fortra's Intermapper provides detailed network visualization and real-time alerts, ideal for comprehensive network oversight, appealing to those valuing enhanced support and streamlined network management despite higher costs.
Real-time WAN monitoring Troubleshoot VoIP call quality problems Visual VoIP call path trace Cisco VoIP gateway and PRI trunk monitoring Cisco SIP and CUBE trunk monitoring Simplify IP SLA setup
