Fortra's Intermapper vs LiveNX comparison

Fortra and BlueCat are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Fortra is ranked #84, while BlueCat is ranked #35 with an average rating of 8.3. Fortra holds a 0.4% mindshare in NMS, compared to BlueCat’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Fortra users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 81% of BlueCat users who would recommend it.

Fortra's Intermapper

Read 4 Fortra's Intermapper reviews

751 Views
706 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

LiveNX

Read 10 LiveNX reviews

2,414 Views
1,762 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Fortra's Intermapper

LiveNX

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 26, 2025

LiveNX and Fortra's Intermapper are competing network monitoring tools. Based on user feedback, Intermapper is favored for its pricing and customer service, while LiveNX stands out with its comprehensive features for extensive network insights.

Features: LiveNX provides advanced analytics, real-time insights, and extensive reporting capabilities, giving deep visibility into network performance. It allows organizations to monitor application performance, troubleshoot issues efficiently, and manage QoS with detailed reports and alerts. Fortra's Intermapper is noted for its intuitive network mapping and straightforward real-time monitoring. It is effective for monitoring diverse networks using SNMP, featuring a user-friendly interface with detailed graphical representations and bundled probes that aid in quick troubleshooting. It also includes mobile compatibility and alerts via email and SMS.

Room for Improvement: LiveNX might benefit from a less complex deployment process to match its detailed feature set, reducing the steep learning curve for new users. Additionally, increasing integration options beyond Cisco products could enhance versatility. Fortra's Intermapper could improve by expanding its feature set to offer deeper network analytics, possibly offering advanced QoS management and detailed traffic analysis. Greater customization options and enhanced reporting capabilities might further strengthen its value proposition.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Fortra's Intermapper is praised for its user-friendly deployment process supported by excellent customer service, facilitating a smooth implementation. LiveNX, with its powerful capabilities, might involve a more complex setup requiring additional guidance. This complexity can extend the implementation timeline but is supported by commendable customer service to assist users through the process.

Pricing and ROI: LiveNX generally has a higher setup cost due to its full-feature offering, which could enhance ROI for enterprises leveraging its in-depth analytics. Fortra's Intermapper, offering cost-effective pricing, attracts organizations needing budget-friendly solutions while maintaining essential monitoring functionalities. This pricing strategy provides quicker financial returns, making it appealing to small to medium-sized enterprises.

To learn more, read our detailed Fortra's Intermapper vs. LiveNX Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Fortra's Intermapper vs. LiveNX

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,176 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fortra's Intermapper

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

84th

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

LiveNX

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

35th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

IT Infrastructure Monitoring (39th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Fortra's Intermapper is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of LiveNX is 0.9%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
LiveNX	0.9%
Fortra's Intermapper	0.4%
Other	98.7%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Andrian Lubimov

SVP of Networking and Operations at Skywire Networks

It tremendously cuts down our troubleshooting timeframe, but needs advanced SLA monitoring and reporting

They can do a better job with SLA reporting. It does some basic reporting, but it really doesn't offer the ability to monitor devices by groups, customers, or carrier to give an overall health performance of specifically-defined environments. That's where HelpSystems Intermapper could have done a better job. I would love to see advanced SLA monitoring and reporting in this solution. They already have a lot of ingredients. They already have SNMP polling. It is really about what people are looking for from SLA monitoring, especially someone who looks at the network topology. You want to see your endpoints. You want to see half of your endpoints by simply analyzing ICMP or SNMP-based availability of your endpoints. Having an ability to define your group and how you bring devices into your group would be a huge benefit.

Read full review

Ashwani Bansal

Senior Solution Consultant at Orange

Network management and diagnostics improved through effective monitoring and reporting capabilities

The solution is handy. I have not used that particular feature. Maintenance is required for the system. If you want to use something on the endpoints or end-user devices, then using LiveAction LiveNX in place of other tools would be quite beneficial. The solution impacts operational costs and resources. On a scale of 1-10, I rate LiveAction LiveNX a nine.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features are its: log history, real-time monitoring capabilities, accuracy - the number of false positives is very low, and the mapping features."

"What is really cool about HelpSystems InterMapper is that because of its SNMP base, you can integrate all different makes and models on the same map. You, of course, can have more than one map, but you have an option to have visibility into the entire network from one centralized system. You can monitor IPs, routers, radios, DC power plants, and UPS. You can do it all from one network management and monitoring solution. That's what really makes HelpSystems Intermapper great. Another great thing about HelpSystems InterMapper is that you can really bundle different probes under one device. You can have a bundled device. You can monitor the physical status of a host based on the IP availability. You can also monitor services and actually see if anything happens. You can quickly determine whether it is the application layer, host layer, or network layer. HelpSystems Intermapper gives such a unique representation of a network. Ever since we started using HelpSystems InterMapper, we don't have to document everything in a detailed format and store it somewhere. Right now, it is really a combination of network topology, network monitoring, and network analyzing. So, in my opinion, it is awesome. When you have your SNMP topology defined, you don't require a dedicated NMS engineer to manage your system, which is another great thing about HelpSystems InterMapper. I see how our operators get so excited by having the ability to map a device or interface and connect interfaces together. HelpSystems InterMapper is also very operator friendly; not just user friendly, but also operator friendly. This is a unique feature, and it works really great."

"It's a nice graphical interface, a nice map, that relates Layer 1 to Layer 3, virtually instantly, to the Helpdesk support staff. It provides a default place to get critical information so we can deploy our staff."

"It's all today portal-based which is a good feature for us."

"We don't have any complaints about the software. According to my team, it's a very good tool that's very intuitive."

"Its analytical capability is really good."

"One of the valuable features is the ability to create CLI scripts on the fly to fix any issues. We were using it for QoS modeling to ensure that we were properly modeling QoS, and it basically said here is what you need to fix to get this QoS done, whether it is ACL or something else. It would either push or recommend. If you have the right credentials, you could also push. It is very good if you are a Cisco shop. It gives you reporting, latency, and bandwidth utilization for your applications, so you can do good capacity management planning. There are a lot of pieces that LiveNX can give you. It is a total NPM solution for SD-WAN."

"All in all, LiveAction LiveNX has become an indispensable tool for maintaining and improving our network's reliability and performance, ultimately supporting our organization's goal of providing timely and dependable delivery services."

"On a scale of 1-10, I rate LiveAction LiveNX a nine."

"The intention and the idea of the filter is great."

"We provide a tool for our customers to manage their reports. It's an extremely highly featured platform capable of producing a lot of data. We spent quite a long time working with customers and LiveAction to create template reports, and they're very good and configurable. You get a lot of data if you don't configure them."

"The product has a very good graphical interface."

More LiveNX pros

Cons

"I'd love to see more of the network management side of it coming back into it. If we were able to run scripts to bounce ports on switches, that would be great. It's asking a lot, but it's actually very doable because I do it through scripting into other products. If we could incorporate that directly into Intermapper, that would be fantastic."

"It's a smaller solution so tools are not as advanced as you would find in a larger solution"

"They can do a better job with SLA reporting. It does some basic reporting, but it really doesn't offer the ability to monitor devices by groups, customers, or carrier to give an overall health performance of specifically-defined environments. That's where HelpSystems Intermapper could have done a better job. I would love to see advanced SLA monitoring and reporting in this solution. They already have a lot of ingredients. They already have SNMP polling. It is really about what people are looking for from SLA monitoring, especially someone who looks at the network topology. You want to see your endpoints. You want to see half of your endpoints by simply analyzing ICMP or SNMP-based availability of your endpoints. Having an ability to define your group and how you bring devices into your group would be a huge benefit."

"Sometimes the solution does not register devices properly and that is a bug."

"The only downside to this software is the price."

"Maintenance is required for the system."

"The customer service and technical support of LiveAction LiveNX are rated at 4 out of 10."

"They need to create a more simplified UI."

"This is a horrible solution and I think everything needs to be improved."

"The tool crashes sometimes when we try to pull reports simultaneously."

"Improved documentation and more responsive customer support can help in addressing issues faster."

More LiveNX cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"It's very expensive."

"We use the free version."

"The solution is fairly expensive compared to other products."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,176 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

18%

Manufacturing Company

18%

Recreational Facilities/Services Company

University

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What needs improvement with LiveAction LiveNX?

The solution could be enhanced by implementing custom patterns for each customer.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for LiveAction LiveNX?

The customers use LiveAction LiveNX for network monitoring and management purposes.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering LiveAction LiveNX?

I work as an integrator with LiveAction LiveNX. Most customers prefer deploying it on premises rather than in the cloud. The advanced diagnostics capabilities, including flow-based surveillance and...

See all answers

Comparisons

SolarWinds VoIP & Network Quality Manager vs Fortra's Intermapper

Compared 36% of the time

Nmap vs Fortra's Intermapper

Compared 19% of the time

Meraki Dashboard vs Fortra's Intermapper

Compared 13% of the time

Zabbix vs Fortra's Intermapper

Compared 12% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Fortra's Intermapper

Compared 10% of the time

More Fortra's Intermapper Competitors

SolarWinds NPM vs LiveNX

Compared 9% of the time

Grafana Enterprise Stack vs LiveNX

Compared 7% of the time

Nmap vs LiveNX

Compared 6% of the time

NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs LiveNX

Compared 5% of the time

ThousandEyes vs LiveNX

Compared 5% of the time

More LiveNX Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

January 2026

Download Fortra's Intermapper product report

Buyer's Guide

LiveNX

January 2026

Download LiveNX product report

Also Known As

HelpSystems Intermapper

LiveNX

Overview

Fortra's software frees you up to focus on what matters most, aligning IT and business goals to help organizations build a competitive edge. Intermapper is network monitoring software for organizations who want to monitor their IT infrastructure in real time.

With Intermapper, you can visualize all your physical and virtual network components on a live map and get up-to-date performance data on its availability. Powerful and user-friendly, Intermapper helps leading businesses prevent costly outages and maximize uptime for 24/7 availability of network resources.

Features include flexible monitoring for anything with an IP address, free probes to monitor different types of equipment from various vendors, dynamic network mapping, bandwidth monitoring, real-time alerts, and remote access. Our add-on integration with Automate allows you to remediate network failures and conduct network self-healing.

Intermapper runs on Mac, Windows, and Linux.

Fortra

LiveNX enables real-time network monitoring with a graphical interface, offering detailed reports and advanced integration for comprehensive analysis and efficient network management.

LiveNX provides intuitive tools for real-time issue identification and resolution, leveraging advanced integration with platforms like Cisco SD-WAN to enhance network performance analysis. Through features such as visual analytics and QoS modeling, LiveNX supports capacity management planning and operational efficiency, although it requires improvements in pricing, resource efficiency, and web interface functionality. Users value its insights into traffic patterns, enabling optimization and proactive issue resolution.

What are the key features of LiveNX?

Real-Time Monitoring: Facilitates immediate issue identification.
Graphical Interface: Enhances user experience with detailed visualization.
Integration Capabilities: Supports platforms like Cisco SD-WAN for comprehensive analysis.
Visual Analytics: Provides insights into traffic patterns.
QoS Modeling: Aids in planning and maintaining service quality.
Custom Templates: Offers personalized network management tools.

What benefits should users look for?

Proactive Issue Resolution: Enables early detection and solving of network problems.
Comprehensive Analysis: Assists in understanding and managing network performance.
Operational Efficiency: Enhances overall network management processes.
Traffic Optimization: Improves service quality and network utilization.

Industries use LiveNX to monitor and troubleshoot network performance, manage traffic, and ensure QoS across on-premises and cloud environments. It is particularly valued for its ability to visualize and optimize network traffic, which is crucial for maintaining service quality.

BlueCat

Sample Customers

Greater Media Detroit, University of British Columbia, Don's Farm Supply

Tampa Electric, Digital First Media, Allscripts, Boxwood Technology

Buyer's Guide

Fortra's Intermapper vs. LiveNX

December 2025

Free Report: Fortra's Intermapper vs. LiveNX

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortra's Intermapper vs. LiveNX and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,176 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fortra's Intermapper vs. LiveNX report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.