LiveNX enables real-time network monitoring with a graphical interface, offering detailed reports and advanced integration for comprehensive analysis and efficient network management.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| LiveNX | 0.8% |
| Zabbix | 8.6% |
| SolarWinds NPM | 3.7% |
| Other | 86.9% |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zabbix | 4.2 | 8.6% | 95% | 108 interviewsAdd to research |
| Datadog | 4.3 | 2.5% | 97% | 209 interviewsAdd to research |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 7 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 95 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 47 |
| Large Enterprise | 238 |
LiveNX provides intuitive tools for real-time issue identification and resolution, leveraging advanced integration with platforms like Cisco SD-WAN to enhance network performance analysis. Through features such as visual analytics and QoS modeling, LiveNX supports capacity management planning and operational efficiency, although it requires improvements in pricing, resource efficiency, and web interface functionality. Users value its insights into traffic patterns, enabling optimization and proactive issue resolution.
What are the key features of LiveNX?
What benefits should users look for?
Industries use LiveNX to monitor and troubleshoot network performance, manage traffic, and ensure QoS across on-premises and cloud environments. It is particularly valued for its ability to visualize and optimize network traffic, which is crucial for maintaining service quality.
LiveNX was previously known as LiveNX.
Tampa Electric, Digital First Media, Allscripts, Boxwood Technology
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Senior Solution Consultant at Orange | 4.5 | I use LiveAction LiveNX for service provider networks, mainly for SD-WAN clients. It excels in network troubleshooting, topology, reporting, and monitoring. While no improvements are needed, integration with Azure, AWS, and multi-cloud networks could be beneficial. |
| Head of Sales Services Department at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees | 4.5 | I use LiveAction LiveNX for network monitoring and management, appreciating its real-time and historical traffic visualization capabilities. However, I wish it offered custom patterns per customer. Alternatives include Rapid7, Citrix, and Forcepoint products. |
| Senior Technology Services Specialist at FedEx | 3.5 | We use LiveAction LiveNX for real-time network monitoring and diagnostics to optimize our logistics network across Turkey. It offers valuable analytics, visualizations, alerting, and room for improvement in documentation and support, significantly enhancing our operational efficiency and service delivery. |
| L2 - Network Engineer at Sitel Group (previously Sykes) | 3.5 | I use LiveAction LiveNX for monitoring circuit utilization, benefiting from its granular traffic details and eye-catching graphical interface, which aids troubleshooting. While improvement is needed in proactive alerts, its features are superior to alternatives like SolarWinds. |
| Director feature network at a tech consulting company with 10,001+ employees | 3.5 | I find LiveAction LiveNX to be a highly featured platform that effectively manages reports and produces extensive data. However, its multi-tenancy capabilities are limited, requiring multiple installations instead of a single build for multiple customers. |
| IT at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees | 2.5 | We used LiveAction LiveNX to monitor traffic and diagnose issues, leveraging its valuable reporting and alerting features. However, we encountered device registration bugs and inadequate technical support, leading us to discontinue its use despite its advantages over our previous solution, Route Explorer. |
| Director feature network at a tech consulting company with 10,001+ employees | 4.0 | No summary available |
| Infrastructure Services Manager at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees | 4.0 | No summary available |
