Fortra's Intermapper vs ThousandEyes comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Fortra and Cisco are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Fortra is ranked #80, while Cisco is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.4. Fortra holds a 0.5% mindshare in NMS, compared to Cisco’s 1.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Fortra users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Cisco users who would recommend it.

Fortra's Intermapper

Read 4 Fortra's Intermapper reviews

2,430 Views
2,357 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ThousandEyes

Read 34 ThousandEyes reviews

11,863 Views
8,897 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Fortra's Intermapper

ThousandEyes

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

ThousandEyes and Fortra's Intermapper compete in the network monitoring solutions category. ThousandEyes has the upper hand due to its extensive cloud-based capabilities, global monitoring reach, and superior support and pricing value.

Features: ThousandEyes offers advanced cloud and internet-based monitoring, detailed path visualization, and comprehensive outage detection. It monitors both internal networks and external factors such as ISPs and cloud services. Fortra's Intermapper provides real-time mapping, network performance monitoring, and strong network visualization tools.

Room for Improvement: ThousandEyes could expand its real-time visualization capacities and enhance local network insights. It may improve user interface customizability and reduce initial setup costs. Fortra's Intermapper could integrate more cloud monitoring features, refine its global monitoring scope, and enhance scalability for larger enterprises.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ThousandEyes provides easy cloud-based deployment with seamless integration and excellent responsive support. Fortra's Intermapper offers robust on-premise solutions with customizable setups and superior control over network configurations. ThousandEyes demonstrates a noted advantage in deployment simplicity with reliable customer service.

Pricing and ROI: ThousandEyes typically presents a higher initial setup cost with its comprehensive global monitoring capabilities, promising better ROI through detailed analytics and reporting features. Fortra's Intermapper is regarded as more budget-friendly upfront, offering long-term value with its visualization features.

To learn more, read our detailed Fortra's Intermapper vs. ThousandEyes Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Fortra's Intermapper vs. ThousandEyes

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 915,341 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fortra's Intermapper

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

80th

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

ThousandEyes

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

8th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Monitoring Software (8th), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Fortra's Intermapper is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ThousandEyes is 1.6%, down from 3.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
ThousandEyes	1.6%
Fortra's Intermapper	0.5%
Other	97.9%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Andrian Lubimov

SVP of Networking and Operations at Skywire Networks

It tremendously cuts down our troubleshooting timeframe, but needs advanced SLA monitoring and reporting

They can do a better job with SLA reporting. It does some basic reporting, but it really doesn't offer the ability to monitor devices by groups, customers, or carrier to give an overall health performance of specifically-defined environments. That's where HelpSystems Intermapper could have done a better job. I would love to see advanced SLA monitoring and reporting in this solution. They already have a lot of ingredients. They already have SNMP polling. It is really about what people are looking for from SLA monitoring, especially someone who looks at the network topology. You want to see your endpoints. You want to see half of your endpoints by simply analyzing ICMP or SNMP-based availability of your endpoints. Having an ability to define your group and how you bring devices into your group would be a huge benefit.

Read full review

Siddumanisria Mindi

Network engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Monitoring has transformed internet visibility and speeds up resolving external service issues

ThousandEyes needs to specify unit consumption forecasting or scaling testing and deeper app analytics. It needs deeper out-of-the-box Layer 7 code or database-level insights. Additionally, it should unify the GUI with broader Cisco platforms and flatten the learning curve, adding better correlation with local laptop system metrics such as endpoint depth, CPU, RAM, or processes. ThousandEyes isn't designed to be a full-blown SNMP monitoring tool for on-premises infrastructure. While it tracks network paths effectively, it doesn't provide deep local device telemetry such as switch port buffer utilization, fan status, or power supply health. For full internal device monitoring, you'll still need to pair it with traditional tools such as SolarWinds or Cisco Catalyst Center.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's a nice graphical interface, a nice map, that relates Layer 1 to Layer 3, virtually instantly, to the Helpdesk support staff. It provides a default place to get critical information so we can deploy our staff."

"The graphical alerting with the ability to obtain a quick overview of a monitored device is my favorite feature."

"The most valuable features are its: log history, real-time monitoring capabilities, accuracy - the number of false positives is very low, and the mapping features."

"Right now, it is really a combination of network topology, network monitoring, and network analyzing, so, in my opinion, it is awesome."

"Put Intermapper in as your base to start from, hands-down."

"What is really cool about HelpSystems InterMapper is that because of its SNMP base, you can integrate all different makes and models on the same map. You, of course, can have more than one map, but you have an option to have visibility into the entire network from one centralized system. You can monitor IPs, routers, radios, DC power plants, and UPS. You can do it all from one network management and monitoring solution. That's what really makes HelpSystems Intermapper great. Another great thing about HelpSystems InterMapper is that you can really bundle different probes under one device. You can have a bundled device. You can monitor the physical status of a host based on the IP availability. You can also monitor services and actually see if anything happens. You can quickly determine whether it is the application layer, host layer, or network layer. HelpSystems Intermapper gives such a unique representation of a network. Ever since we started using HelpSystems InterMapper, we don't have to document everything in a detailed format and store it somewhere. Right now, it is really a combination of network topology, network monitoring, and network analyzing. So, in my opinion, it is awesome. When you have your SNMP topology defined, you don't require a dedicated NMS engineer to manage your system, which is another great thing about HelpSystems InterMapper. I see how our operators get so excited by having the ability to map a device or interface and connect interfaces together. HelpSystems InterMapper is also very operator friendly; not just user friendly, but also operator friendly. This is a unique feature, and it works really great."

"The solution has a couple of features which are really interesting; it's not a fancy or expensive solution but we wanted to have a cost effective one and it's doing its job pretty well."

"It's all today portal-based which is a good feature for us."

"The support from ThousandEyes has been the best I have had."

"ThousandEyes has provided my organization with invaluable network visibility and insights and incredible ease of use."

"ThousandEyes has positively impacted our organization by enabling us to know if a third-party hosted application isn't functioning properly, allowing us to determine what's actually going on and whether the issue lies on our side or with the application provider."

"I would advise others looking into using ThousandEyes to consider it one of the best tools for monitoring their network infrastructure."

"The historical timeline feature is what I appreciate most about ThousandEyes because when people report that something occurs at a specific time of day, I can set up a test and capture the issue in action."

"We have only had good experiences with support, as they are helpful and responsive, and we are quite happy with the level of attention we get when we have issues."

"With ThousandEyes, it's one click or one place where I can see all of my public prefixes, how long it takes, when the last update was, where a route was missing from the internet, or is it actually causing a black hole."

"I think the analysis service that Cisco provides is extremely valuable."

More ThousandEyes pros

Cons

"They can do a better job with SLA reporting. It does some basic reporting, but it really doesn't offer the ability to monitor devices by groups, customers, or carrier to give an overall health performance of specifically-defined environments. That's where HelpSystems Intermapper could have done a better job. I would love to see advanced SLA monitoring and reporting in this solution. They already have a lot of ingredients. They already have SNMP polling. It is really about what people are looking for from SLA monitoring, especially someone who looks at the network topology. You want to see your endpoints. You want to see half of your endpoints by simply analyzing ICMP or SNMP-based availability of your endpoints. Having an ability to define your group and how you bring devices into your group would be a huge benefit."

"It's a smaller solution so tools are not as advanced as you would find in a larger solution"

"I'd love to see more of the network management side of it coming back into it. If we were able to run scripts to bounce ports on switches, that would be great. It's asking a lot, but it's actually very doable because I do it through scripting into other products. If we could incorporate that directly into Intermapper, that would be fantastic."

"I have seen instances where Intermapper does not seem to recover from network changes."

"I'd love to see more of the network management side of it coming back into it."

"Regarding the user interface, I appreciate dropdowns, but I prefer a guided experience where the interface explains itself instead of requiring extensive searching to reach a point."

"ThousandEyes could improve by implementing a similar incident management system like BigPanda or ServiceNow."

"ThousandEyes could be improved by unifying the GUI with the rest of the Cisco products since it remains legacy from its original state when Cisco acquired it."

"An area where ThousandEyes can be improved is in providing more in-depth packet analysis; we've found instances where ThousandEyes indicates everything is okay, but it's actually not."

"It would be nice if the solution covered other areas like server monitoring."

"For ThousandEyes, I am looking for AI integration, which would help us to auto-correct the problem and fix it before it creates any issues."

"The solution's network and reporting could be improved."

"The first thing is that we don't have any option to export the reports."

More ThousandEyes cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"It is a quite expensive solution."

"In our company, we incur a yearly expense in our company for the licensing part. I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten since it is expensive."

"The solution is cheap."

"The solution's pricing is cheap; I rate it a five out of ten."

"The solution costs several thousand dollars per year."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Construction Company

10%

Government

10%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	24

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?

It actually depends on the exact purpose or requirements. Some tools are better for only network devices while others are better from a cloud monitoring or APM monitoring perspective. You can check...

See all answers

What needs improvement with ThousandEyes?

I think ThousandEyes can be improved, specifically the licensing model. It's too complex, too expensive, and it takes a lot of time to manage the licensing model. My experience with pricing, setup ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ThousandEyes?

My main use case for ThousandEyes is path monitoring. I use ThousandEyes for path monitoring to see how my traffic is flowing in my network, what the hops are in between, and then see at what hop e...

See all answers

Comparisons

SolarWinds VoIP & Network Quality Manager vs Fortra's Intermapper

Compared 13% of the time

Zabbix vs Fortra's Intermapper

Compared 9% of the time

ConnectWise RMM vs Fortra's Intermapper

Compared 8% of the time

Nmap vs Fortra's Intermapper

Compared 7% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Fortra's Intermapper

Compared 7% of the time

More Fortra's Intermapper Competitors

SolarWinds NPM vs ThousandEyes

Compared 4% of the time

Zscaler Digital Experience (ZDX) vs ThousandEyes

Compared 4% of the time

Catchpoint vs ThousandEyes

Compared 3% of the time

HPE Aruba Networking UXI vs ThousandEyes

Compared 3% of the time

Kentik vs ThousandEyes

Compared 3% of the time

More ThousandEyes Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

September 2026

Download Fortra's Intermapper product report

Buyer's Guide

ThousandEyes

September 2026

Download ThousandEyes product report

Also Known As

HelpSystems Intermapper

No data available

Overview

Fortra's Intermapper offers real-time network mapping and monitoring, ideal for IT teams seeking a reliable visualization and alerting tool to maintain uptime and connectivity.

Ideal for IT environments, Fortra's Intermapper provides dynamic and intuitive network mapping capabilities. Known for its ability to display an up-to-date graphical view of IT infrastructure, this solution enables proactive monitoring through instant alerts and performance insights. It helps IT teams swiftly address potential issues, ensuring consistent connectivity and performance.

What are the key features of Fortra's Intermapper?

Real-Time Network Mapping: Displays live network status for immediate infrastructure insight.
Customizable Alerts: Allows personalized notifications for targeted problem-solving.
Performance Monitoring: Tracks metrics to preemptively identify potential disruptions.
Cross-Platform Compatibility: Supports different operating systems for wider usability.
Historical Data Maintenance: Retains past network data for trend analysis and reporting.

Which benefits or ROI can users expect from Fortra's Intermapper?

Improved Network Visibility: Enhances understanding of network status and layout.
Faster Issue Resolution: Real-time alerts and monitoring minimize downtime.
Cost Efficiency: By reducing outages, operational costs decrease significantly.
Enhanced User Experience: Stable networks boost overall end-user satisfaction.

In industries such as healthcare, finance, and education, Fortra's Intermapper is a vital tool for maintaining high network performance and reliability. It plays a crucial role in environments where uptime is critical, ensuring that network issues are resolved swiftly to support essential operations.

Fortra

ThousandEyes offers cutting-edge monitoring capabilities with advanced features such as end-to-end network monitoring, real-time alerts, and application insights. It supports integration with Cisco products and provides visibility into network paths, helping businesses maintain superior network performance.

ThousandEyes is renowned for its ability to diagnose network issues by offering comprehensive network path visualization and detailed analytics. Its ability to detect packet loss and monitor ISPs ensures robust network security. The integration capabilities, particularly with Cisco platforms, make it versatile for businesses requiring customizable dashboards. Users benefit from ease of use and real-time alert systems, though improvements in guest portal usability, packet analysis, and integration with Cisco platforms are needed. Enhancements in automation, knowledge resources, and application-level features could benefit users, alongside better network device monitoring through SNMP and improved path visualization. Additionally, better incident management and alert detection systems are anticipated.

What are the key features of ThousandEyes?

End-to-End Monitoring: Provides comprehensive insights across networks, applications, and users.
Real-Time Alerts: Sends immediate alerts for network disturbances or performance issues.
Network Path Visualization: Offers detailed views of network paths for easy diagnostics.
Application Insights: Delivers in-depth analytics on application performance.

What benefits or ROI can users expect from ThousandEyes?

Time Savings: Reduces diagnosis and troubleshooting time with advanced analytics.
Improved User Experience: Enhances network reliability, leading to better user satisfaction.
Increased Employee Satisfaction: Streamlines network operations, boosting employee efficiency.
Prevention of Downtime: Identifies potential issues early to avoid service interruptions.

Businesses across sectors leverage ThousandEyes for seamless network monitoring and diagnostics. It is invaluable for ensuring connectivity across LANs, Wi-Fi, internet, and SaaS applications. ThousandEyes provides critical insights into internet and ISP performance, significantly benefiting industries reliant on robust digital infrastructure.

Cisco

Sample Customers

Greater Media Detroit, University of British Columbia, Don's Farm Supply

Wayfair, GitHub, Craigslist, Comcast, SurveyMonkey, Lyft, Box, HP, Zendesk, IO Data Centers, Good Technology, NNTCommunications, Proofpoint, Schneider, Crowdstrike, Avera, Pitney Bowes, InstartLogic, Shutterfly, Shutterstock, Condé Nast, Roche, Jive, Actelion, Brocade, Infor, Okta, JLL, DigitalOcean, Zuora, NetSuite, CloudFlare, One, DemonWare, Quantcast, Carbonite, CareerBuilder, Prosper, Oscar, Slack

Buyer's Guide

Fortra's Intermapper vs. ThousandEyes

September 2026

Free Report: Fortra's Intermapper vs. ThousandEyes

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortra's Intermapper vs. ThousandEyes and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

915,341 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fortra's Intermapper vs. ThousandEyes report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.