DX NetOps vs Fortra's Intermapper comparison

Broadcom and Fortra are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Broadcom is ranked #37 with an average rating of 8.8, while Fortra is ranked #81. Broadcom holds a 0.7% mindshare in NMS, compared to Fortra’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Fortra users who would recommend it.

DX NetOps

Read 10 DX NetOps reviews

1,841 Views
1,638 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Fortra's Intermapper

Read 4 Fortra's Intermapper reviews

1,037 Views
985 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

DX NetOps

Fortra's Intermapper

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Fortra's Intermapper and DX NetOps are competing network monitoring solutions aimed at enhancing IT infrastructure management. DX NetOps seems to have the upper hand with advanced feature capabilities, while Fortra's Intermapper offers more favorable pricing and support options.

Features: Fortra's Intermapper focuses on intuitive network mapping, real-time monitoring, and simplicity in network visualization. DX NetOps offers comprehensive network analytics, scalability, and a robust set of customizable dashboards, appealing to larger enterprise networks requiring detailed insights. The key difference lies in DX NetOps's superior analytics and scalability.

Room for Improvement: Fortra's Intermapper could improve by incorporating more advanced analytics, offering greater scalability for larger networks, and enhancing its customizable dashboard options. DX NetOps could work on simplifying its deployment process, making its extensive feature set more accessible, and potentially lowering its pricing to better accommodate smaller organizations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Fortra's Intermapper is praised for its straightforward installation process, making it accessible for teams with limited technical expertise, and its customer service is noted for responsiveness. DX NetOps has a more complex deployment model that may require more technical knowledge and time but provides extensive documentation and support resources. DX NetOps's intricate setup reflects its extensive feature set, contrasting with Intermapper's accessibility and quicker deployment.

Pricing and ROI: Fortra's Intermapper offers competitive pricing, making it a cost-effective option with quick ROI, especially for smaller organizations. DX NetOps, while more expensive, tends to justify its price through its advanced capabilities, yielding long-term ROI for larger enterprises seeking detailed network performance metrics. The primary distinction is DX NetOps's higher cost balanced by extensive features and long-term network performance benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed DX NetOps vs. Fortra's Intermapper Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

DX NetOps vs. Fortra's Intermapper

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,376 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

DX NetOps

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

37th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AIOps (18th)

Fortra's Intermapper

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

81st

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of DX NetOps is 0.7%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Fortra's Intermapper is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
DX NetOps	0.7%
Fortra's Intermapper	0.5%
Other	98.8%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Balabrahmam_Chakka

Senior Program Manager at Tata Consultancy Services

Has provided topological insights and dashboard-driven network visibility across complex environments

DX NetOps can be improved by expanding its integrations with different tools, as it can currently integrate with Spectrum and other Broadcom products. It would be beneficial to gain integration capabilities with tools such as New Relic or SolarWinds. Integration with DX NetOps occurs through API, which fetches metrics from those tools, and this is currently happening in our area, with DX NetOps receiving data not only from Spectrum but also from New Relic and SolarWinds. DX NetOps could be improved by providing more communication methods beyond SNMP traps to accommodate different private clouds, especially as customers increasingly adopt vendor-specific clouds. For example, Sainsbury's uses SAP cloud, SAS, and Oracle cloud, where monitoring is not currently possible through DX NetOps and Spectrum, which are limited to certain mechanisms. Within the organization, SNMP is usable, but to display metrics from outside the organization, different communication methods such as agent-based connections, TCP/IP, or secured connections are necessary—features not currently available in DX NetOps and Spectrum.

Read full review

Andrian Lubimov

SVP of Networking and Operations at Skywire Networks

It tremendously cuts down our troubleshooting timeframe, but needs advanced SLA monitoring and reporting

They can do a better job with SLA reporting. It does some basic reporting, but it really doesn't offer the ability to monitor devices by groups, customers, or carrier to give an overall health performance of specifically-defined environments. That's where HelpSystems Intermapper could have done a better job. I would love to see advanced SLA monitoring and reporting in this solution. They already have a lot of ingredients. They already have SNMP polling. It is really about what people are looking for from SLA monitoring, especially someone who looks at the network topology. You want to see your endpoints. You want to see half of your endpoints by simply analyzing ICMP or SNMP-based availability of your endpoints. Having an ability to define your group and how you bring devices into your group would be a huge benefit.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is straightforward to configure, and you can quickly gather data from your infrastructure."

"The solution is stable."

"The best features I've seen so far with DX NetOps are that it can work with large scale systems, and it has a lot of functionalities and matrices."

"Real-time insights through DX NetOps benefit diagnosing and resolving network issues since Spectrum has all sorts of details, but it lacks dashboards and a readable tabular format."

"The product features include automation through AI, allowing out-of-the-box analysis of performance data, building baseline trends, and enabling configuration of dynamic thresholds relative to collected data."

"DX NetOps network monitoring and fault tolerance are the absolute best in the market, especially for the Indian market."

"The AI is the best feature in this solution."

"It's good for root cause analysis for network problems and network link problems."

More DX NetOps pros

"It's all today portal-based which is a good feature for us."

"It's a nice graphical interface, a nice map, that relates Layer 1 to Layer 3, virtually instantly, to the Helpdesk support staff. It provides a default place to get critical information so we can deploy our staff."

"What is really cool about HelpSystems InterMapper is that because of its SNMP base, you can integrate all different makes and models on the same map. You, of course, can have more than one map, but you have an option to have visibility into the entire network from one centralized system. You can monitor IPs, routers, radios, DC power plants, and UPS. You can do it all from one network management and monitoring solution. That's what really makes HelpSystems Intermapper great. Another great thing about HelpSystems InterMapper is that you can really bundle different probes under one device. You can have a bundled device. You can monitor the physical status of a host based on the IP availability. You can also monitor services and actually see if anything happens. You can quickly determine whether it is the application layer, host layer, or network layer. HelpSystems Intermapper gives such a unique representation of a network. Ever since we started using HelpSystems InterMapper, we don't have to document everything in a detailed format and store it somewhere. Right now, it is really a combination of network topology, network monitoring, and network analyzing. So, in my opinion, it is awesome. When you have your SNMP topology defined, you don't require a dedicated NMS engineer to manage your system, which is another great thing about HelpSystems InterMapper. I see how our operators get so excited by having the ability to map a device or interface and connect interfaces together. HelpSystems InterMapper is also very operator friendly; not just user friendly, but also operator friendly. This is a unique feature, and it works really great."

"Right now, it is really a combination of network topology, network monitoring, and network analyzing, so, in my opinion, it is awesome."

"The graphical alerting with the ability to obtain a quick overview of a monitored device is my favorite feature."

"The most valuable features are its: log history, real-time monitoring capabilities, accuracy - the number of false positives is very low, and the mapping features."

"The solution has a couple of features which are really interesting; it's not a fancy or expensive solution but we wanted to have a cost effective one and it's doing its job pretty well."

"Put Intermapper in as your base to start from, hands-down."

Cons

"Technical support needs to be better. They need to be more knowledgeable and responsive."

"DX NetOps could be improved by providing more communication methods beyond SNMP traps to accommodate different private clouds, especially as customers increasingly adopt vendor-specific clouds."

"I would like DX NetOps to integrate with all Broadcom products in the future to make it closer to a rating of 10."

"The hardware requirements can be improved."

"DX NetOps is somewhat convoluted, and some of the programming constructs can be documented or driven through languages such as Python, Perl, and shell scripting, but they have their proprietary language, which may not be very user-friendly."

"It would be useful to have more AI features."

"One improvement that could make the product better is to streamline its modules into a more cohesive solution."

"The licensing cost of DX NetOps is expensive, not very affordable, and on the top of the price range in the market."

More DX NetOps cons

"I'd love to see more of the network management side of it coming back into it."

"I'd love to see more of the network management side of it coming back into it. If we were able to run scripts to bounce ports on switches, that would be great. It's asking a lot, but it's actually very doable because I do it through scripting into other products. If we could incorporate that directly into Intermapper, that would be fantastic."

"I have seen instances where Intermapper does not seem to recover from network changes."

"It's a smaller solution so tools are not as advanced as you would find in a larger solution"

"They can do a better job with SLA reporting. It does some basic reporting, but it really doesn't offer the ability to monitor devices by groups, customers, or carrier to give an overall health performance of specifically-defined environments. That's where HelpSystems Intermapper could have done a better job. I would love to see advanced SLA monitoring and reporting in this solution. They already have a lot of ingredients. They already have SNMP polling. It is really about what people are looking for from SLA monitoring, especially someone who looks at the network topology. You want to see your endpoints. You want to see half of your endpoints by simply analyzing ICMP or SNMP-based availability of your endpoints. Having an ability to define your group and how you bring devices into your group would be a huge benefit."

"It's a smaller solution so tools are not as advanced as you would find in a larger solution"

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,376 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

10%

Construction Company

Healthcare Company

Government

19%

Construction Company

University

Recreational Facilities/Services Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for DX NetOps?

The pricing is fair for the level of enterprise capability it provides. Proper sizing and planning during deployment helps optimise licensing and overall cost. Anyone adopting it should account for...

See all answers

What needs improvement with DX NetOps?

I would like DX NetOps to integrate with all Broadcom products in the future to make it closer to a rating of 10. I would particularly like it to integrate with the Symantec portfolio and the Carbo...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for DX NetOps?

I use DX NetOps for large-scale network monitoring, fault detection, and performance analysis. My work involves evaluating how well it handles distributed environments, event correlation, and proac...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

WhatsUp Gold vs DX NetOps

Compared 11% of the time

LogicMonitor vs DX NetOps

Compared 11% of the time

ManageEngine OpManager vs DX NetOps

Compared 11% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs DX NetOps

Compared 7% of the time

DX Spectrum vs DX NetOps

Compared 6% of the time

More DX NetOps Competitors

SolarWinds VoIP & Network Quality Manager vs Fortra's Intermapper

Compared 22% of the time

ConnectWise RMM vs Fortra's Intermapper

Compared 17% of the time

Nmap vs Fortra's Intermapper

Compared 13% of the time

Zabbix vs Fortra's Intermapper

Compared 7% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Fortra's Intermapper

Compared 6% of the time

More Fortra's Intermapper Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

DX NetOps

March 2026

Download DX NetOps product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

March 2026

Download Fortra's Intermapper product report

Also Known As

No data available

HelpSystems Intermapper

Overview

DX NetOps by CA Technologies, a Broadcom company, improves your time to value through advanced AI capabilities and unified network visibility that delivers simplified NetOps intelligence into the user experience that traverses modern architectures. DX NetOps accomplishes this through high scale, unified network monitoring that enables full-stack analytics for assuring traditional and modern architectures. DX NetOps converts inventory, topology, device metrics, faults, flow and packet analysis into actionable intelligence for network operations teams. Complimented by our AIOps solution, DX NetOps enables IT teams to establish proactive, autonomous remediation capabilities across the applications, infrastructure, and networks that fuel superior user experiences.

Broadcom

Fortra's software frees you up to focus on what matters most, aligning IT and business goals to help organizations build a competitive edge. Intermapper is network monitoring software for organizations who want to monitor their IT infrastructure in real time.

With Intermapper, you can visualize all your physical and virtual network components on a live map and get up-to-date performance data on its availability. Powerful and user-friendly, Intermapper helps leading businesses prevent costly outages and maximize uptime for 24/7 availability of network resources.

Features include flexible monitoring for anything with an IP address, free probes to monitor different types of equipment from various vendors, dynamic network mapping, bandwidth monitoring, real-time alerts, and remote access. Our add-on integration with Automate allows you to remediate network failures and conduct network self-healing.

Intermapper runs on Mac, Windows, and Linux.

Fortra

Sample Customers

Fujitsu

Greater Media Detroit, University of British Columbia, Don's Farm Supply

Buyer's Guide

DX NetOps vs. Fortra's Intermapper

March 2026

Free Report: DX NetOps vs. Fortra's Intermapper

Find out what your peers are saying about DX NetOps vs. Fortra's Intermapper and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,376 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our DX NetOps vs. Fortra's Intermapper report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.