DX Performance Management vs Fortra's Intermapper comparison

Broadcom and Fortra are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Broadcom is ranked #41 with an average rating of 9.0, while Fortra is ranked #80. Broadcom holds a 0.6% mindshare in NMS, compared to Fortra’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Fortra users who would recommend it.

DX Performance Management

Read 32 DX Performance Management reviews

2,691 Views
2,045 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Fortra's Intermapper

Read 4 Fortra's Intermapper reviews

1,573 Views
1,510 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

DX Performance Management

Fortra's Intermapper

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

DX Performance Management and Fortra's Intermapper are competitive products in the network monitoring and management domain. DX Performance Management has the upper hand in cost efficiency and customer service, while Fortra's Intermapper stands out for its robust features, justifying its higher price.

Features: DX Performance Management provides comprehensive performance analytics, real-time insights, and proactive monitoring. Fortra's Intermapper offers broad compatibility, visualization capabilities, and detailed network maps that enhance network visibility.

Room for Improvement: DX Performance Management could enhance its visualization tools, expand compatibility, and improve scaling capabilities. Fortra's Intermapper might benefit from simplifying installation, reducing initial costs, and enhancing analytics depth.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: DX Performance Management features a streamlined deployment process and responsive customer service, facilitating smoother implementation. Fortra's Intermapper's installation can be complex but includes comprehensive support resources and detailed documentation.

Pricing and ROI: DX Performance Management is budget-friendly with lower upfront costs, appealing to cost-conscious organizations. Fortra's Intermapper involves higher initial expenditures but promises a competitive ROI through extensive features and network optimization benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed DX Performance Management vs. Fortra's Intermapper Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

DX Performance Management vs. Fortra's Intermapper

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 894,807 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

DX Performance Management

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

41st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Infrastructure Capacity Planning (1st), DX NetOps (2nd)

Fortra's Intermapper

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

80th

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of DX Performance Management is 0.6%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Fortra's Intermapper is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
DX Performance Management	0.6%
Fortra's Intermapper	0.5%
Other	98.9%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

reviewer1810893

Senior IT Operations Specialist at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees

Flexibility and detailed performance stats enable effective network monitoring

Spectrum is very good at monitoring all network faults and configurations. It enables me to take action based on network issues. The Performance Management provides detailed network performance stats, including CPU, memory, and interface bandwidth. Additionally, Spectrum is flexible and allows me to organize and treat devices uniquely without impacting other devices.

Read full review

Andrian Lubimov

SVP of Networking and Operations at Skywire Networks

It tremendously cuts down our troubleshooting timeframe, but needs advanced SLA monitoring and reporting

They can do a better job with SLA reporting. It does some basic reporting, but it really doesn't offer the ability to monitor devices by groups, customers, or carrier to give an overall health performance of specifically-defined environments. That's where HelpSystems Intermapper could have done a better job. I would love to see advanced SLA monitoring and reporting in this solution. They already have a lot of ingredients. They already have SNMP polling. It is really about what people are looking for from SLA monitoring, especially someone who looks at the network topology. You want to see your endpoints. You want to see half of your endpoints by simply analyzing ICMP or SNMP-based availability of your endpoints. Having an ability to define your group and how you bring devices into your group would be a huge benefit.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Scalability is great."

"The most valuable feature of DX Performance Management is the quick way we can collect data without putting much effort. They have a lot of customization and features with the solution internally and out of the box. We can discover the device, and start collecting information. For example, if the device is available, we can receive the CPU and memory utilization, and the interface optimization is simple and very fast to implement."

"Mainly as an MSP configuration, the multi-tenant model helps us to segment the customer and users, as well as providing our operation the capability to oversee all tenants."

"There is a good amount of vendor certification which comes with the product. That's all factory-loaded, no need to load any custom-made files. Most of the metrics are calibrated and captured from the devices based on the defaults available from vendor certification."

"One of the most valuable features is the ease of use."

"With this solution, we reduced about 15 performance management to only five machines."

"In the last three years, it has had a great improvement in its stability; it is great that it works and we have had no outages in this time."

"You can create intelligent alerts so you have enough time to replace the router or interface before it's full. The same is applicable for CBQoS channels."

More DX Performance Management pros

"Put Intermapper in as your base to start from, hands-down."

"It's a nice graphical interface, a nice map, that relates Layer 1 to Layer 3, virtually instantly, to the Helpdesk support staff. It provides a default place to get critical information so we can deploy our staff."

"What is really cool about HelpSystems InterMapper is that because of its SNMP base, you can integrate all different makes and models on the same map. You, of course, can have more than one map, but you have an option to have visibility into the entire network from one centralized system. You can monitor IPs, routers, radios, DC power plants, and UPS. You can do it all from one network management and monitoring solution. That's what really makes HelpSystems Intermapper great. Another great thing about HelpSystems InterMapper is that you can really bundle different probes under one device. You can have a bundled device. You can monitor the physical status of a host based on the IP availability. You can also monitor services and actually see if anything happens. You can quickly determine whether it is the application layer, host layer, or network layer. HelpSystems Intermapper gives such a unique representation of a network. Ever since we started using HelpSystems InterMapper, we don't have to document everything in a detailed format and store it somewhere. Right now, it is really a combination of network topology, network monitoring, and network analyzing. So, in my opinion, it is awesome. When you have your SNMP topology defined, you don't require a dedicated NMS engineer to manage your system, which is another great thing about HelpSystems InterMapper. I see how our operators get so excited by having the ability to map a device or interface and connect interfaces together. HelpSystems InterMapper is also very operator friendly; not just user friendly, but also operator friendly. This is a unique feature, and it works really great."

"Right now, it is really a combination of network topology, network monitoring, and network analyzing, so, in my opinion, it is awesome."

"It's all today portal-based which is a good feature for us."

"The solution has a couple of features which are really interesting; it's not a fancy or expensive solution but we wanted to have a cost effective one and it's doing its job pretty well."

"The most valuable features are its: log history, real-time monitoring capabilities, accuracy - the number of false positives is very low, and the mapping features."

"The graphical alerting with the ability to obtain a quick overview of a monitored device is my favorite feature."

Cons

"Global synchronization errors. Sometimes it just doesn't finish in time due to the load."

"There are some issues. We started supporting UTA and began to see both major and minor problems."

"I have mixed feeling about the scalability. I feel like there are things which are being put into UIM right now that are not being included in Performance Center that we need to see in Performance Center."

"It seems like we escalate more than I would like to. If anything, they should look at how the tier support goes in place."

"I would say the initial setup is complex."

"Spectrum's topology view sometimes does not rebuild automatically when a device is shut down and reconnected."

"Install is done as root, which is a security no-no, and the database IO requirements were not stated correctly, which lead to a year of instability."

More DX Performance Management cons

"I have seen instances where Intermapper does not seem to recover from network changes."

"It's a smaller solution so tools are not as advanced as you would find in a larger solution"

"I'd love to see more of the network management side of it coming back into it. If we were able to run scripts to bounce ports on switches, that would be great. It's asking a lot, but it's actually very doable because I do it through scripting into other products. If we could incorporate that directly into Intermapper, that would be fantastic."

"I'd love to see more of the network management side of it coming back into it."

"They can do a better job with SLA reporting. It does some basic reporting, but it really doesn't offer the ability to monitor devices by groups, customers, or carrier to give an overall health performance of specifically-defined environments. That's where HelpSystems Intermapper could have done a better job. I would love to see advanced SLA monitoring and reporting in this solution. They already have a lot of ingredients. They already have SNMP polling. It is really about what people are looking for from SLA monitoring, especially someone who looks at the network topology. You want to see your endpoints. You want to see half of your endpoints by simply analyzing ICMP or SNMP-based availability of your endpoints. Having an ability to define your group and how you bring devices into your group would be a huge benefit."

"It's a smaller solution so tools are not as advanced as you would find in a larger solution"

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I like the licensing model because it's device-based."

"We purchase a license to use the solution every three years and we have multiple contracts. They have been increasing the price annually. We have a baseline for three years and then we need to pay the difference from the baseline, and we are in the process of negotiating a new price for all the licenses we need. The price overall is affordable."

"We were looking at other vendors in the marketplace for NetFlow, and CA just beat everybody else in price, cost, and the size to implement. "

"Do your homework and know how many devices you will be managing out of the gate. Be sure to project what your growth will be each year."

"They should provide more scalable licensing for the product."

"The tool's pricing is based on the number of network devices."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

894,807 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Comms Service Provider

Government

17%

Construction Company

11%

University

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Large Enterprise	25

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with DX Performance Management?

Spectrum's topology view sometimes does not rebuild automatically when a device is shut down and reconnected. It requires manual discovery and rebuilding of the topology, which I hope can be improved.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for DX Performance Management?

I have used Spectrum for monitoring all network faults, configurations, and troubleshooting network issues. It provides network performance stats, such as CPU, memory, and interface bandwidth detai...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering DX Performance Management?

I would recommend this solution based on its functionality, flexibility, customizability, and ease of use. Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten. I am just a customer and not a par...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

DX Spectrum vs DX Performance Management

Compared 6% of the time

Datadog vs DX Performance Management

Compared 6% of the time

Kentik vs DX Performance Management

Compared 5% of the time

IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs DX Performance Management

Compared 5% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs DX Performance Management

Compared 5% of the time

More DX Performance Management Competitors

SolarWinds VoIP & Network Quality Manager vs Fortra's Intermapper

Compared 19% of the time

ConnectWise RMM vs Fortra's Intermapper

Compared 14% of the time

Nmap vs Fortra's Intermapper

Compared 11% of the time

Zabbix vs Fortra's Intermapper

Compared 8% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Fortra's Intermapper

Compared 6% of the time

More Fortra's Intermapper Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

DX Performance Management

May 2026

Download DX Performance Management product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

April 2026

Download Fortra's Intermapper product report

Also Known As

CA Performance Management

HelpSystems Intermapper

Overview

DX Performance Management provides crucial network visibility and performance monitoring, offering device certification, integration with key tools, and efficient network analytics through advanced features.

DX Performance Management is a comprehensive solution for network performance, health, and capacity monitoring. It facilitates baselining, trending, and real-time visibility, aiding in capacity planning and incident alerting. It integrates with services like NetFlow, NFA, and ADA, supporting multiple device types. Its database performance allows for efficient analysis with scalability across different device counts, while customizable dashboards provide a single-pane-of-glass view for network insights.

What are the key features of DX Performance Management?

Device Certification: Ensures network devices meet specific standards and requirements through thorough certification processes.
Integration: Seamlessly connects with NetFlow, NFA, ADA, Spectrum, and CAPC for robust network insights.
Report Generation: Offers automated report generation for enhanced network analysis.
Customizable Dashboards: Provides a tailored view of network performance metrics on a single screen.
Advanced Alerting: Monitors network conditions with sophisticated alerting mechanisms for proactive responses.
Scalability: Adapts to growing network demands with efficient performance across multiple device counts.
Multi-Tenancy: Supports various tenants within the same infrastructure, ensuring resource optimization.
Historical Data Analysis: Delivers past performance data for in-depth trend analysis and decision support.

Which benefits and ROI should users expect from using DX Performance Management?

Efficiency: Enhances network analysis through fast database performance and customizable interfaces.
Decision-Making: Improves decision support via comprehensive visibility and detailed performance metrics.
Scalability: Offers a flexible solution capable of growing with network demands.
Customization: Allows tailoring of reports and dashboards to meet specific analytical needs.
Integration: Provides seamless connectivity with other network management tools and service desks.

Network service providers implement DX Performance Management to deliver in-depth insights, monitoring routers and switches for SNMP data collection, aiding CPU, memory, and interface utilization analysis. It's integrated with network fault management and service desks, providing comprehensive performance analytics.

Broadcom

Fortra's Intermapper offers real-time network mapping and monitoring, ideal for IT teams seeking a reliable visualization and alerting tool to maintain uptime and connectivity.

Ideal for IT environments, Fortra's Intermapper provides dynamic and intuitive network mapping capabilities. Known for its ability to display an up-to-date graphical view of IT infrastructure, this solution enables proactive monitoring through instant alerts and performance insights. It helps IT teams swiftly address potential issues, ensuring consistent connectivity and performance.

What are the key features of Fortra's Intermapper?

Real-Time Network Mapping: Displays live network status for immediate infrastructure insight.
Customizable Alerts: Allows personalized notifications for targeted problem-solving.
Performance Monitoring: Tracks metrics to preemptively identify potential disruptions.
Cross-Platform Compatibility: Supports different operating systems for wider usability.
Historical Data Maintenance: Retains past network data for trend analysis and reporting.

Which benefits or ROI can users expect from Fortra's Intermapper?

Improved Network Visibility: Enhances understanding of network status and layout.
Faster Issue Resolution: Real-time alerts and monitoring minimize downtime.
Cost Efficiency: By reducing outages, operational costs decrease significantly.
Enhanced User Experience: Stable networks boost overall end-user satisfaction.

In industries such as healthcare, finance, and education, Fortra's Intermapper is a vital tool for maintaining high network performance and reliability. It plays a crucial role in environments where uptime is critical, ensuring that network issues are resolved swiftly to support essential operations.

Fortra

Sample Customers

Jack Henry & Assoc, Target, CenturyLink, Bell Canada, BrightHouse Networks, Telus, Unisys, Verizon, Southern California Edison, GEICO, Fidelity Investments, Wells Fargo, American Family Insurance Group, Deutsche Telekom AG

Greater Media Detroit, University of British Columbia, Don's Farm Supply

Buyer's Guide

DX Performance Management vs. Fortra's Intermapper

April 2026

Free Report: DX Performance Management vs. Fortra's Intermapper

Find out what your peers are saying about DX Performance Management vs. Fortra's Intermapper and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

894,807 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our DX Performance Management vs. Fortra's Intermapper report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.