Fortra's Intermapper vs NetMon comparison

Fortra and Exabeam are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. Fortra is ranked #81, while Exabeam is ranked #51 with an average rating of 7.7. Fortra holds a 0.5% mindshare in NMS, compared to Exabeam’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Fortra users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Exabeam users who would recommend it.

Fortra's Intermapper

Read 4 Fortra's Intermapper reviews

1,037 Views
985 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

NetMon

Read 12 NetMon reviews

1,621 Views
1,345 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Fortra's Intermapper

NetMon

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 1, 2026

Fortra's Intermapper and NetMon compete in the network monitoring solutions category. While Fortra's Intermapper is favored for its pricing and customer support, NetMon offers superior features, making it a preferred choice for feature-driven enterprises.

Features: Fortra's Intermapper provides real-time network maps, fault-tolerant data collection, and SNMP integration, ideal for monitoring complex networks. NetMon excels with advanced alerting, robust data aggregation, and deep packet analytics, offering comprehensive insights essential for monitoring and advanced analytics.

Room for Improvement: Fortra's Intermapper could enhance its feature set to appeal to enterprises seeking advanced analytics. Additional improvements in customization options and scalability for larger networks are also needed. NetMon may require simplification in deployment processes, more intuitive user interface designs, and enhancements in initial setup efficiency to attract a broader range of users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Fortra's Intermapper is praised for its straightforward deployment and responsive customer service team. NetMon, though slightly more complex to deploy, offers extensive documentation and support to ease the process, providing substantial guidance during deployment.

Pricing and ROI: Fortra's Intermapper is attractive for budget-conscious organizations, offering a cost-effective initial setup with fewer hidden costs and a quicker ROI. NetMon, while having higher initial costs, justifies the investment with its long-term benefits through advanced capabilities and comprehensive feature sets, appealing to feature-driven enterprises looking for long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed Fortra's Intermapper vs. NetMon Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Fortra's Intermapper vs. NetMon

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,376 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fortra's Intermapper

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

81st

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

NetMon

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

51st

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) (14th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Fortra's Intermapper is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetMon is 0.6%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
NetMon	0.6%
Fortra's Intermapper	0.5%
Other	98.9%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Andrian Lubimov

SVP of Networking and Operations at Skywire Networks

It tremendously cuts down our troubleshooting timeframe, but needs advanced SLA monitoring and reporting

They can do a better job with SLA reporting. It does some basic reporting, but it really doesn't offer the ability to monitor devices by groups, customers, or carrier to give an overall health performance of specifically-defined environments. That's where HelpSystems Intermapper could have done a better job. I would love to see advanced SLA monitoring and reporting in this solution. They already have a lot of ingredients. They already have SNMP polling. It is really about what people are looking for from SLA monitoring, especially someone who looks at the network topology. You want to see your endpoints. You want to see half of your endpoints by simply analyzing ICMP or SNMP-based availability of your endpoints. Having an ability to define your group and how you bring devices into your group would be a huge benefit.

Read full review

SumitRangari

Pan India IT Infrastructure Management / End-user Services at Tata Group

Has supported real-time event detection and reporting accuracy while database integration has required extra effort

Sometimes it may be difficult to incorporate new additional databases in NetMon, and we faced some challenges at that time. However, currently, it is not giving many challenges.It is difficult to integrate NetMon with other databases. We can customize NetMon's monitoring views, but it is done by the team who handles it, as it is outsourced.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's all today portal-based which is a good feature for us."

"The graphical alerting with the ability to obtain a quick overview of a monitored device is my favorite feature."

"It's a nice graphical interface, a nice map, that relates Layer 1 to Layer 3, virtually instantly, to the Helpdesk support staff. It provides a default place to get critical information so we can deploy our staff."

"Put Intermapper in as your base to start from, hands-down."

"Right now, it is really a combination of network topology, network monitoring, and network analyzing, so, in my opinion, it is awesome."

"What is really cool about HelpSystems InterMapper is that because of its SNMP base, you can integrate all different makes and models on the same map. You, of course, can have more than one map, but you have an option to have visibility into the entire network from one centralized system. You can monitor IPs, routers, radios, DC power plants, and UPS. You can do it all from one network management and monitoring solution. That's what really makes HelpSystems Intermapper great. Another great thing about HelpSystems InterMapper is that you can really bundle different probes under one device. You can have a bundled device. You can monitor the physical status of a host based on the IP availability. You can also monitor services and actually see if anything happens. You can quickly determine whether it is the application layer, host layer, or network layer. HelpSystems Intermapper gives such a unique representation of a network. Ever since we started using HelpSystems InterMapper, we don't have to document everything in a detailed format and store it somewhere. Right now, it is really a combination of network topology, network monitoring, and network analyzing. So, in my opinion, it is awesome. When you have your SNMP topology defined, you don't require a dedicated NMS engineer to manage your system, which is another great thing about HelpSystems InterMapper. I see how our operators get so excited by having the ability to map a device or interface and connect interfaces together. HelpSystems InterMapper is also very operator friendly; not just user friendly, but also operator friendly. This is a unique feature, and it works really great."

"The most valuable features are its: log history, real-time monitoring capabilities, accuracy - the number of false positives is very low, and the mapping features."

"The solution has a couple of features which are really interesting; it's not a fancy or expensive solution but we wanted to have a cost effective one and it's doing its job pretty well."

"The most valuable feature is the log, which can be analyzed by our SIEM solution."

"NetMon's best feature is traffic analysis."

"We were sold on the product based on the fairly narrow use cases that the sales reps gave us, and what we're seeing during our usage is that we can get there, and we're very excited about the potential."

"Visibility is a valuable feature, the ability to see even if the traffic is not going into the firewall"

"In general, this is a good product."

"NetMon's best feature is traffic analysis."

"The analytics feature is the most valuable feature."

"It has a very strong artificial intelligence engine."

More NetMon pros

Cons

"I'd love to see more of the network management side of it coming back into it. If we were able to run scripts to bounce ports on switches, that would be great. It's asking a lot, but it's actually very doable because I do it through scripting into other products. If we could incorporate that directly into Intermapper, that would be fantastic."

"They can do a better job with SLA reporting. It does some basic reporting, but it really doesn't offer the ability to monitor devices by groups, customers, or carrier to give an overall health performance of specifically-defined environments. That's where HelpSystems Intermapper could have done a better job. I would love to see advanced SLA monitoring and reporting in this solution. They already have a lot of ingredients. They already have SNMP polling. It is really about what people are looking for from SLA monitoring, especially someone who looks at the network topology. You want to see your endpoints. You want to see half of your endpoints by simply analyzing ICMP or SNMP-based availability of your endpoints. Having an ability to define your group and how you bring devices into your group would be a huge benefit."

"I have seen instances where Intermapper does not seem to recover from network changes."

"I'd love to see more of the network management side of it coming back into it."

"It's a smaller solution so tools are not as advanced as you would find in a larger solution"

"One thing that surprised me was the current version of LogRhythm does not natively support Windows 2016."

"Previously, it was typically every Monday that I was coming in - it would die over the weekend - and I would spend a day cleaning up databases."

"Our customers would always like to see additional features."

"Some of the automated tasks we can perform on QRadar cannot be performed on LogRhythm because the solution has limitations."

"The training for this product is not very good and needs to be improved."

"LogRhythm's support team isn't responsive enough - it's common to wait a day or two for someone to deal with a case."

"LogRhythm NetMon's pricing model is an area of concern that should be made a little bit cheaper in comparison to the other players in the market currently."

More NetMon cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"LogRhythm's licensing part is something that depends on the license you want since they offer it on a perpetual and subscription basis."

"The price of this solution is too high, so it should be made more practical and more valuable for the customer."

"NetMon's licensing costs about $85k per year, with some extra costs for support."

"The product is expensive for smaller companies."

"I don't have visibility into the pricing of LogRhythm NetMon as it's handled through our commercial partnerships."

"Pricing is okay. There were some competitors that were extremely expensive and there were some which were really inexpensive but LogRhythm stayed in the middle of them."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,376 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

19%

Construction Company

University

Recreational Facilities/Services Company

Transportation Company

15%

Performing Arts

10%

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about LogRhythm NetMon?

It has a very strong artificial intelligence engine.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LogRhythm NetMon?

I don't have visibility into the pricing of LogRhythm NetMon as it's handled through our commercial partnerships.

See all answers

What needs improvement with LogRhythm NetMon?

See all answers

Comparisons

SolarWinds VoIP & Network Quality Manager vs Fortra's Intermapper

Compared 22% of the time

ConnectWise RMM vs Fortra's Intermapper

Compared 17% of the time

Nmap vs Fortra's Intermapper

Compared 13% of the time

Zabbix vs Fortra's Intermapper

Compared 7% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs Fortra's Intermapper

Compared 6% of the time

More Fortra's Intermapper Competitors

SolarWinds NPM vs NetMon

Compared 7% of the time

Niagara Visibility Controller vs NetMon

Compared 7% of the time

SCOM vs NetMon

Compared 6% of the time

Ixia CloudLens vs NetMon

Compared 6% of the time

ObserverLIVE vs NetMon

Compared 6% of the time

More NetMon Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Network Monitoring Software

March 2026

Download Fortra's Intermapper product report

Buyer's Guide

NetMon

March 2026

Download NetMon product report

Also Known As

HelpSystems Intermapper

LogRhythm Network Monitor

Overview

Fortra's software frees you up to focus on what matters most, aligning IT and business goals to help organizations build a competitive edge. Intermapper is network monitoring software for organizations who want to monitor their IT infrastructure in real time.

With Intermapper, you can visualize all your physical and virtual network components on a live map and get up-to-date performance data on its availability. Powerful and user-friendly, Intermapper helps leading businesses prevent costly outages and maximize uptime for 24/7 availability of network resources.

Features include flexible monitoring for anything with an IP address, free probes to monitor different types of equipment from various vendors, dynamic network mapping, bandwidth monitoring, real-time alerts, and remote access. Our add-on integration with Automate allows you to remediate network failures and conduct network self-healing.

Intermapper runs on Mac, Windows, and Linux.

Fortra

NetMon offers significant capabilities in log aggregation, traffic analysis, and real-time network insights. Its ease of use accommodates both entry-level and advanced functionalities, enhancing network visibility and threat detection.

NetMon provides seamless analytics with its real-time dashboards and advanced AI integration. The platform is designed for comprehensive monitoring and detailed analysis, making it indispensable for identifying network traffic, origins, destinations, and facilitating threat detection through lateral traffic visibility. Despite its powerful analytics and customization features, improvements in product integration, customer support, and pricing could increase its competitive edge. Connectivity, topology visualization, and server performance are areas noted for enhancement. Integration with protocols like Gflow and Netflow might alleviate agent-based restriction challenges. NetMon sends correlated data to LogRhythm SIEM for enhanced threat analysis and is used for tasks like traffic analysis and DPA.

What are NetMon's key features?

Log Aggregation: Seamless collection of diverse network logs for analysis.
Traffic Analysis: Detailed inspection of network traffic for identifying irregular patterns.
AI Integration: Advanced analytics powered by robust AI capabilities.
Customizable Dashboards: Real-time insights tailored to user requirements.
Correlation Engine: In-depth correlation of network activity for comprehensive reports.
Deep Packet Analytics: Thorough examination of data packets for granular insights.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Enhanced Threat Detection: Significant improvements in identifying lateral threats.
Comprehensive Insights: Complete visibility into network and user activities.
Efficient Monitoring: Real-time analytics streamline network monitoring processes.
Compliance Support: Strong integration supports adherence to compliance standards.

NetMon is widely adopted in industries requiring detailed traffic monitoring and security, such as finance and healthcare. Its capabilities in traffic type identification and correlated analysis make it essential for environments where detecting irregular patterns is critical. It's utilized for network security through comprehensive analysis and integration with SIEM systems.

Exabeam

Sample Customers

Greater Media Detroit, University of British Columbia, Don's Farm Supply

Sera-Brynn

Buyer's Guide

Fortra's Intermapper vs. NetMon

March 2026

Free Report: Fortra's Intermapper vs. NetMon

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortra's Intermapper vs. NetMon and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,376 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Fortra's Intermapper vs. NetMon report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.