Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
PRTG Network Monitor Logo

Top 10 PRTG Network Monitor Alternatives

Vendor: Paessler GmbH
4.1 out of 5
Leave a review

Top PRTG Network Monitor Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to PRTG Network Monitor based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Veeam Data Platform, Zabbix, and Datadog. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. PRTG Network Monitor surpasses its competitors by offering an intuitive interface combined with robust features like real-time network performance monitoring, customizable alerts, seamless scalability, and comprehensive reporting, ensuring optimal network efficiency and reliability.

Paessler GmbH Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Paessler GmbH, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Veeam Data Platform
4.3 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor is ideal for extensive monitoring, offering rapid deployment and robust alerting. In comparison, Veeam Data Platform excels in data protection, with seamless virtual integration and instant recovery. Tech buyers may choose PRTG for scalability or Veeam for comprehensive data recovery.
Download PRTG Network Monitor vs. Veeam Data Platform Report
PRTG Network Monitor offers a lower setup cost compared to Veeam Data Platform, providing a budget-friendly option with simpler deployment, while Veeam's higher initial cost reflects its comprehensive data protection capabilities tailored for complex IT environments.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor offers a lower setup cost compared to Veeam Data Platform, providing a budget-friendly option with simpler deployment, while Veeam's higher initial cost reflects its comprehensive data protection capabilities tailored for complex IT environments.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Zabbix
4.2 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Zabbix
4.2 out of 5
Zabbix offers a flexible, open-source platform ideal for customization without additional costs. In comparison, PRTG appeals to those valuing ease of use with intuitive setup and extensive monitoring capabilities. Zabbix's strength lies in cost-effectiveness, while PRTG provides comprehensive features for diverse business sizes.
Download PRTG Network Monitor vs. Zabbix Report
Zabbix offers a competitive setup with no initial costs, whereas PRTG Network Monitor involves an upfront fee. This distinction highlights Zabbix’s cost-effectiveness for budget-conscious users compared to the initial financial commitment required by PRTG.
View comparison
Pricing
Zabbix offers a competitive setup with no initial costs, whereas PRTG Network Monitor involves an upfront fee. This distinction highlights Zabbix’s cost-effectiveness for budget-conscious users compared to the initial financial commitment required by PRTG.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Datadog
4.3 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Datadog
4.3 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor offers simplicity and cost-effective network insights with easy setup and extensive sensor variety. In comparison, Datadog excels in real-time monitoring and cloud integration, offering deeper analysis but requiring careful management of its usage-based pricing model.
Download Datadog vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor offers a straightforward setup with minimal initial cost, while Datadog presents a more complex configuration process with higher initial expenses. This highlights a significant difference in startup approach between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor offers a straightforward setup with minimal initial cost, while Datadog presents a more complex configuration process with higher initial expenses. This highlights a significant difference in startup approach between the two solutions.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
New Relic
4.2 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
New Relic
4.2 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor offers flexibility in traffic monitoring and scalability. In comparison, New Relic excels in application performance monitoring with detailed insights. PRTG suits cost-conscious setups; New Relic meets comprehensive monitoring needs but can be costly for smaller businesses.
Download New Relic vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor involves a straightforward setup costing low upfront, while New Relic offers a more complex setup at a higher initial cost, highlighting PRTG's cost-efficiency compared to New Relic's extensive investment requirement.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor involves a straightforward setup costing low upfront, while New Relic offers a more complex setup at a higher initial cost, highlighting PRTG's cost-efficiency compared to New Relic's extensive investment requirement.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Azure Monitor
3.9 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Azure Monitor
3.9 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor efficiently serves small to medium enterprises with affordable costs and straightforward licensing. In comparison, Azure Monitor's pay-as-you-go model offers flexibility and scalability, with potential cost-effectiveness for those using Azure but may cause unpredictable expenses depending on data needs.
Download Azure Monitor vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor offers a straightforward setup cost, while Azure Monitor's setup involves a more complex pricing structure, highlighting a clear distinction between ease and complexity in initial setup costs.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor offers a straightforward setup cost, while Azure Monitor's setup involves a more complex pricing structure, highlighting a clear distinction between ease and complexity in initial setup costs.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Splunk AppDynamics
4.1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Splunk AppDynamics
4.1 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics excels in stack trace viewing and transactional awareness. In comparison, PRTG Network Monitor offers a user-friendly interface and broad monitoring. Splunk is versatile across environments, while PRTG is noted for its simplicity and licensing, making each appealing to different tech buyers.
Download PRTG Network Monitor vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics has a substantial setup cost, whereas PRTG Network Monitor offers a more budget-friendly option.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics has a substantial setup cost, whereas PRTG Network Monitor offers a more budget-friendly option.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Elastic Observability
4.0 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor ensures ease of deployment and flexible pricing, attracting businesses with straightforward monitoring. In comparison, Elastic Observability offers comprehensive data analytics and AI-enhanced operations, appealing to enterprises needing extensive data parsing and customization despite its pricing complexity.
Download Elastic Observability vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor's setup cost is straightforward, whereas Elastic Observability offers a more complex and scalable pricing model.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor's setup cost is straightforward, whereas Elastic Observability offers a more complex and scalable pricing model.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
SolarWinds NPM
4.1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
SolarWinds NPM
4.1 out of 5
SolarWinds NPM offers extensive multifunctional monitoring and configurability, ideal for complex environments. In comparison, PRTG Network Monitor provides a comprehensive, cost-effective package, appealing for its simplicity and rapid deployment. SolarWinds excels in flexibility, while PRTG benefits from an inclusive licensing model.
Download PRTG Network Monitor vs. SolarWinds NPM Report
SolarWinds NPM involves a high setup cost, while PRTG Network Monitor offers a more affordable initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
SolarWinds NPM involves a high setup cost, while PRTG Network Monitor offers a more affordable initial investment.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Cisco DNA Center
4.0 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Cisco DNA Center
4.0 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor offers rapid deployment, scalability, and cost-effective solutions, appealing to diverse environments. In comparison, Cisco DNA Center provides advanced automation and analytics for large enterprises but at a high cost, making PRTG more suitable for budget-conscious buyers.
Download Cisco DNA Center vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor offers a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while Cisco DNA Center requires a more significant investment in setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor offers a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while Cisco DNA Center requires a more significant investment in setup expenses.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
ThousandEyes
4.1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
ThousandEyes
4.1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor provides extensive sensor-based monitoring with rapid deployment, ideal for ease of use and broad applicability. In comparison, ThousandEyes excels in application monitoring with insights into complex cloud infrastructures, favorable for enterprises needing expansive network visibility and detailed cloud and ISP monitoring.
Download PRTG Network Monitor vs. ThousandEyes Report
PRTG Network Monitor offers a straightforward setup cost, whereas ThousandEyes presents a more complex pricing structure. Each solution has unique features that impact its installation expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor offers a straightforward setup cost, whereas ThousandEyes presents a more complex pricing structure. Each solution has unique features that impact its installation expenses.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
NinjaOne
4.1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
NinjaOne
4.1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor is ideal for complex infrastructures with its scalability and proactive alerting features. In comparison, NinjaOne suits small to medium businesses, offering strong automation and integration capabilities. PRTG excels in sensor variety, while NinjaOne emphasizes device management and automation.
Download NinjaOne vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor offers a seamless setup with minimal upfront costs, while NinjaOne provides a structured setup with transparent pricing. These differences highlight the distinct approaches each solution takes towards initial implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor offers a seamless setup with minimal upfront costs, while NinjaOne provides a structured setup with transparent pricing. These differences highlight the distinct approaches each solution takes towards initial implementation.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Cisco Secure Network Analytics
4.1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor offers ease of use, scalability, and affordability with its flexible sensor pricing, making it ideal for diverse setups. In comparison, Cisco Secure Network Analytics excels in security features and advanced analytics, better suited for large enterprises within a Cisco-centric ecosystem.
Download Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor offers competitive setup costs, while Cisco Secure Network Analytics involves higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor offers competitive setup costs, while Cisco Secure Network Analytics involves higher initial expenses.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Nagios XI
4.0 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Nagios XI
4.0 out of 5
Nagios XI excels with its customizable open-source foundation, fitting for complex environments, but demands technical skill. In comparison, PRTG Network Monitor offers simpler deployment and a unified dashboard, appealing to those valuing ease of use albeit with higher costs for extensive deployments.
Download Nagios XI vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
Nagios XI requires a higher setup cost compared to PRTG Network Monitor, making PRTG a more budget-friendly option while Nagios XI offers extensive customization features.
View comparison
Pricing
Nagios XI requires a higher setup cost compared to PRTG Network Monitor, making PRTG a more budget-friendly option while Nagios XI offers extensive customization features.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Splunk Observability Cloud
4.1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor is ideal for rapid deployment, scalability, and affordability. In comparison, Splunk Observability Cloud offers advanced visualization and robust log management. Tech buyers may choose PRTG for cost-effectiveness or Splunk for extensive features and AI-enhanced analysis.
Download PRTG Network Monitor vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
PRTG Network Monitor has a moderate setup cost, while Splunk Observability Cloud involves higher setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor has a moderate setup cost, while Splunk Observability Cloud involves higher setup expenses.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Auvik Network Management (ANM)
4.4 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor excels in deployment speed and infrastructure compatibility, offering affordable licensing. In comparison, Auvik impresses with network discovery and remote access. PRTG faces large-scale deployment challenges, while Auvik could improve integration options.
Download Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor offers a setup cost that appeals to those seeking cost-effective solutions, while Auvik Network Management requires a higher initial investment, highlighting its focus on robust features and scalability.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor offers a setup cost that appeals to those seeking cost-effective solutions, while Auvik Network Management requires a higher initial investment, highlighting its focus on robust features and scalability.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
LibreNMS
1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
LibreNMS
1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor is ideal for buyers seeking easy deployment and strong support, while offering intuitive setup and advanced alerting. In comparison, LibreNMS attracts those prioritizing cost-effectiveness and feature richness with robust multi-vendor support and scalability for adaptable monitoring.
PRTG Network Monitor has a one-time setup cost, while LibreNMS is free to install, highlighting a key difference in initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor has a one-time setup cost, while LibreNMS is free to install, highlighting a key difference in initial investment.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
SCOM
3.9 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
SCOM
3.9 out of 5
SCOM is ideal for Microsoft-centric environments with its deep integration and customizable dashboards. In comparison, PRTG Network Monitor offers cross-platform flexibility and an intuitive interface, making it accessible to diverse environments. Both are appealing for distinct technological needs and deployment preferences.
Download PRTG Network Monitor vs. SCOM Report
SCOM's setup cost is generally higher due to its extensive enterprise-focused capabilities, while PRTG Network Monitor offers a more cost-effective initial setup appealing to smaller organizations.
View comparison
Pricing
SCOM's setup cost is generally higher due to its extensive enterprise-focused capabilities, while PRTG Network Monitor offers a more cost-effective initial setup appealing to smaller organizations.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Checkmk
4.2 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Checkmk
4.2 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor is chosen for its ease of use and comprehensive feature set, ideal for quick deployment. In comparison, Checkmk offers cost-effective monitoring with strong resource management, appealing to enterprises seeking robust solutions without a significant financial outlay.
Download Checkmk vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor has a straightforward setup cost, while Checkmk offers a more complex initial configuration process; this difference highlights PRTG's ease of use compared to the more detailed setup requirements of Checkmk.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor has a straightforward setup cost, while Checkmk offers a more complex initial configuration process; this difference highlights PRTG's ease of use compared to the more detailed setup requirements of Checkmk.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
ServiceNow IT Operations Management
4.1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor excels with rapid deployment and cost-effectiveness, ideal for those needing quick setup without extensive customization. In comparison, ServiceNow IT Operations Management offers comprehensive service management, suitable for complex IT environments requiring extensive scalability and flexible integrations.
Download PRTG Network Monitor vs. ServiceNow IT Operations Management Report
PRTG Network Monitor offers a straightforward setup with low initial costs, which contrasts with ServiceNow IT Operations Management's higher setup expenses for more complex configurations.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor offers a straightforward setup with low initial costs, which contrasts with ServiceNow IT Operations Management's higher setup expenses for more complex configurations.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
LogicMonitor
4.5 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
LogicMonitor
4.5 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor is ideal for rapid deployment and cost-effectiveness with predefined templates. In comparison, LogicMonitor offers extensive customization and enterprise-level features, appealing to complex environments. Users should consider PRTG for simplicity and LogicMonitor for advanced capabilities when deciding which solution fits their needs.
Download LogicMonitor vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor offers a simpler setup at a lower cost, while LogicMonitor involves a more complex setup with higher initial expenses, highlighting a trade-off between ease of implementation and initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor offers a simpler setup at a lower cost, while LogicMonitor involves a more complex setup with higher initial expenses, highlighting a trade-off between ease of implementation and initial investment.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Icinga
3.8 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Icinga
3.8 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor offers rapid deployment, scalability, and easy monitoring sensors, while in comparison, Icinga features customization through its plugin architecture. A tech buyer might choose PRTG for user-friendliness or Icinga for customizable monitoring tasks.
Download Icinga vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor has a straightforward setup cost, while Icinga tends to have varying setup expenses due to its open-source nature.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor has a straightforward setup cost, while Icinga tends to have varying setup expenses due to its open-source nature.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Centreon
4.2 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Centreon
4.2 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor excels with its wide range of built-in sensors and ease of setup, ideal for rapid deployment needs. In comparison, Centreon offers extensive customizability, perfect for businesses requiring tailored data visualization and enhanced monitoring scenarios through plugins and modules.
Download Centreon vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor offers a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, whereas Centreon presents a higher setup cost, indicating a potentially more complex implementation process.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor offers a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, whereas Centreon presents a higher setup cost, indicating a potentially more complex implementation process.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Nagios Core
4.1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Nagios Core
4.1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor offers rapid deployment and intuitive features suitable for comprehensive monitoring, appealing to businesses prioritizing ease of use. In comparison, Nagios Core's open-source nature attracts budget-conscious organizations, valuing customization despite its steeper learning curve and complex configurations.
Download Nagios Core vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor offers a higher initial setup cost, while Nagios Core is open-source, potentially reducing setup expenditures significantly. PRTG's expenses include proprietary features, contrasting Nagios Core's flexible but less costly open-source model.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor offers a higher initial setup cost, while Nagios Core is open-source, potentially reducing setup expenditures significantly. PRTG's expenses include proprietary features, contrasting Nagios Core's flexible but less costly open-source model.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
OpsRamp
3.9 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
OpsRamp
3.9 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor excels in quick deployment and seamless integration across networks. In comparison, OpsRamp offers superior AI-driven insights and advanced analytics. OpsRamp's cloud-centric focus contrasts with PRTG's adaptability in hybrid setups, differing in scalability and deployment preferences.
Download OpsRamp vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor often incurs a higher setup cost compared to OpsRamp, highlighting a focus on initial investment when considering infrastructure monitoring.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor often incurs a higher setup cost compared to OpsRamp, highlighting a focus on initial investment when considering infrastructure monitoring.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
ScienceLogic
4.3 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
ScienceLogic
4.3 out of 5
ScienceLogic supports complex environments with scalability and customization, suitable for multi-tenancy and event management integration. In comparison, PRTG Network Monitor emphasizes simplicity, ease of setup, and cost-effectiveness, offering real-time monitoring and comprehensive built-in sensors for diverse environments.
Download PRTG Network Monitor vs. ScienceLogic Report
ScienceLogic generally requires a higher initial investment, while PRTG Network Monitor offers a more affordable setup cost.
View comparison
Pricing
ScienceLogic generally requires a higher initial investment, while PRTG Network Monitor offers a more affordable setup cost.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
ITRS Geneos
4.1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
ITRS Geneos
4.1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor is chosen for rapid deployment and cost-effectiveness across varied infrastructures. In comparison, ITRS Geneos suits enterprise needs with robust integrations and real-time data access. Tech buyers select PRTG for simplicity, while Geneos appeals for its specialized features and comprehensive monitoring.
Download ITRS Geneos vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor may have lower setup costs, making it potentially more affordable, while ITRS Geneos could involve higher initial investment, suggesting a more comprehensive setup.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor may have lower setup costs, making it potentially more affordable, while ITRS Geneos could involve higher initial investment, suggesting a more comprehensive setup.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Cisco Intersight
4.0 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Cisco Intersight
4.0 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor offers simplicity and cost-effectiveness with rapid deployment, attractive to those needing immediate solutions. In comparison, Cisco Intersight suits environments requiring robust hybrid management and cloud integration but may have higher initial costs offset by its extensive features.
Download Cisco Intersight vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor offers straightforward setup with minimal cost, while Cisco Intersight involves more complex configuration with potentially higher expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor offers straightforward setup with minimal cost, while Cisco Intersight involves more complex configuration with potentially higher expenses.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE
4.1 out of 5
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE excels in detailed traffic analysis and application layer insights, ideal for troubleshooting intricate network issues. In comparison, PRTG Network Monitor emphasizes ease of configuration with versatile sensors, appealing to streamlined monitoring needs and scalability for various environments.
Download NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE typically incurs a higher setup cost, while PRTG Network Monitor offers a more budget-friendly initial investment. This clear cost disparity might influence organizations prioritizing setup expenditures when selecting a network monitoring solution.
View comparison
Pricing
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE typically incurs a higher setup cost, while PRTG Network Monitor offers a more budget-friendly initial investment. This clear cost disparity might influence organizations prioritizing setup expenditures when selecting a network monitoring solution.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
InfluxDB
4.1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
InfluxDB
4.1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor appeals to tech buyers for its ease of deployment, scalability, and comprehensive monitoring features, making it ideal for simple setups. In comparison, InfluxDB attracts with its strong integration capabilities and flexibility, suitable for data-intensive, high-performance environments.
Download InfluxDB vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor has an upfront setup cost that may be higher, while InfluxDB offers a more flexible setup. This reflects differences in approach, with PRTG being more comprehensive and InfluxDB focusing on customization and scalability.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor has an upfront setup cost that may be higher, while InfluxDB offers a more flexible setup. This reflects differences in approach, with PRTG being more comprehensive and InfluxDB focusing on customization and scalability.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
VMware Aria Operations for Applications
4.0 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor is ideal for those prioritizing ease of setup, scalability, and cost-efficiency. In comparison, VMware Aria Operations for Applications attracts enterprises seeking comprehensive application performance management within virtual environments. PRTG offers user-friendliness; VMware Aria excels in extensive monitoring features.
Download PRTG Network Monitor vs. VMware Aria Operations for Applications Report
PRTG Network Monitor has a straightforward setup cost, while VMware Aria Operations for Applications requires a more complex initial investment, highlighting a key difference in approach and budget impact for organizations considering these monitoring solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor has a straightforward setup cost, while VMware Aria Operations for Applications requires a more complex initial investment, highlighting a key difference in approach and budget impact for organizations considering these monitoring solutions.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
BMC TrueSight
4.1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
BMC TrueSight
4.1 out of 5
BMC TrueSight offers extensive event management and integration for a holistic IT view, ideal for enterprises needing asset diversity monitoring. In comparison, PRTG Network Monitor features rapid deployment and simplicity, making it appealing for smaller setups prioritizing scalability and ease of use.
Download BMC TrueSight vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
BMC TrueSight involves significant setup costs, whereas PRTG Network Monitor offers a more budget-friendly initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
BMC TrueSight involves significant setup costs, whereas PRTG Network Monitor offers a more budget-friendly initial setup.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
WhatsUp Gold
3.9 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
WhatsUp Gold
3.9 out of 5
WhatsUp Gold excels in pricing and customer support, offering robust network visualization for small to mid-sized businesses. In comparison, PRTG Network Monitor excels with advanced features like multi-platform compatibility, making it ideal for organizations seeking extensive monitoring across diverse networks.
Download PRTG Network Monitor vs. WhatsUp Gold Report
WhatsUp Gold typically involves higher setup costs with a comprehensive package, while PRTG Network Monitor offers a more cost-effective initial setup, appealing for budget-conscious users.
View comparison
Pricing
WhatsUp Gold typically involves higher setup costs with a comprehensive package, while PRTG Network Monitor offers a more cost-effective initial setup, appealing for budget-conscious users.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)
4.2 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor appeals with affordability and rapid deployment, ideal for SMBs with its intuitive interface. In comparison, IBM SevOne NPM suits enterprises needing extensive integration and data metrics, offering scalability and detailed insights. Both ensure high ROI through operational efficiency.
Download IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor typically has a lower setup cost compared to IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM), making it a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor typically has a lower setup cost compared to IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM), making it a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
DX Spectrum
4.2 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
DX Spectrum
4.2 out of 5
DX Spectrum offers robust infrastructure visibility and scalability, ideal for extensive networks, while PRTG Network Monitor focuses on rapid deployment and ease of use. In comparison, DX Spectrum excels in fault management, and PRTG presents cost-effective monitoring with flexible sensor-based licenses.
Download DX Spectrum vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
DX Spectrum has a lower setup cost, while PRTG Network Monitor requires a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
DX Spectrum has a lower setup cost, while PRTG Network Monitor requires a higher initial investment.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
ManageEngine OpManager
4.0 out of 5
ManageEngine OpManager excels with robust automation, alerting, and reporting features, offering a comprehensive monitoring solution. In comparison, PRTG Network Monitor offers ease of deployment with a broad range of sensors, ensuring effective network traffic and device monitoring.
Download ManageEngine OpManager vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
ManageEngine OpManager features a straightforward setup cost, while PRTG Network Monitor offers a more flexible pricing structure.
View comparison
Pricing
ManageEngine OpManager features a straightforward setup cost, while PRTG Network Monitor offers a more flexible pricing structure.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
ControlUp
4.3 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
ControlUp
4.3 out of 5
PRTG offers rapid deployment, scalability, and cost-effectiveness with a broad sensor library, ideal for general network monitoring. In comparison, ControlUp provides real-time insights and powerful endpoint monitoring, perfect for environments focused on deeper session analysis and integration capabilities.
Download ControlUp vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor presents a straightforward setup cost, whereas ControlUp might require a more complex pricing structure. Differences in initial expenses can impact how businesses evaluate these solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor presents a straightforward setup cost, whereas ControlUp might require a more complex pricing structure. Differences in initial expenses can impact how businesses evaluate these solutions.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance
4.4 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor provides flexible IT environment monitoring with budget-friendly pricing, ideal for diverse operations. In comparison, Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance offers advanced connectivity features, appealing to users prioritizing connectivity assurance despite its higher initial costs and fewer customization options than PRTG.
Download Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor offers a lower setup cost compared to Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance, which may appeal to smaller budgets. In contrast, Cisco's solution may involve higher initial expenses, reflecting advanced capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor offers a lower setup cost compared to Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance, which may appeal to smaller budgets. In contrast, Cisco's solution may involve higher initial expenses, reflecting advanced capabilities.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Meraki Dashboard
4.3 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Meraki Dashboard
4.3 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor offers robust monitoring with ease of use and cost-effectiveness, appealing to smaller setups. In comparison, Meraki Dashboard provides cloud-based management and comprehensive visibility, ideal for extensive enterprise deployments. PRTG's strong ROI contrasts with Meraki's higher costs for smaller businesses.
Download Meraki Dashboard vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor offers a straightforward and affordable setup, while Meraki Dashboard incurs higher initial costs due to its comprehensive feature set.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor offers a straightforward and affordable setup, while Meraki Dashboard incurs higher initial costs due to its comprehensive feature set.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
HPE OneView
4.0 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
HPE OneView
4.0 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor offers flexible remote probe capabilities and cost-effective pricing for monitoring multiple sites. In comparison, HPE OneView provides centralized management for large infrastructures, with strengths in automation and integration, making it ideal for environments heavily utilizing HPE hardware.
Download HPE OneView vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor's setup cost is more budget-friendly and suited for small to medium businesses, while HPE OneView's higher setup cost reflects its extensive features for large IT infrastructures.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor's setup cost is more budget-friendly and suited for small to medium businesses, while HPE OneView's higher setup cost reflects its extensive features for large IT infrastructures.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Huawei eSight
3.7 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Huawei eSight
3.7 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor offers simplicity and adaptability, ideal for diverse infrastructures. In comparison, Huawei eSight excels in managing Huawei devices with centralized control. PRTG's flexible deployment contrasts with eSight's Huawei optimization, catering to users needing specific device management.
Download Huawei eSight vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor offers low initial setup costs, whereas Huawei eSight has higher setup costs, reflecting their different market approaches.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor offers low initial setup costs, whereas Huawei eSight has higher setup costs, reflecting their different market approaches.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
OpenNMS
1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
OpenNMS
1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor is favored for its competitive pricing and ease of setup, appealing to small and medium enterprises. In comparison, OpenNMS attracts larger deployments with its advanced features and scalability, suited for comprehensive network management and extensive customization needs.
PRTG Network Monitor generally has a lower setup cost compared to OpenNMS, highlighting its accessibility for small to mid-sized businesses, while OpenNMS's higher costs reflect its focus on extensive, scalable network management solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor generally has a lower setup cost compared to OpenNMS, highlighting its accessibility for small to mid-sized businesses, while OpenNMS's higher costs reflect its focus on extensive, scalable network management solutions.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Spiceworks
3.9 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Spiceworks
3.9 out of 5
Spiceworks suits SMBs needing free helpdesk and inventory solutions, while PRTG Network Monitor targets large-scale networks requiring scalable, robust monitoring. In comparison, Spiceworks faces monitoring tool challenges, and PRTG's licensing costs can rise, making it beneficial for complex infrastructure.
Download PRTG Network Monitor vs. Spiceworks Report
Spiceworks offers free setup costs, while PRTG Network Monitor uses a tiered licensing approach based on sensor usage. Spiceworks provides an economical entry point, whereas PRTG offers flexibility with its scalable pricing structure.
View comparison
Pricing
Spiceworks offers free setup costs, while PRTG Network Monitor uses a tiered licensing approach based on sensor usage. Spiceworks provides an economical entry point, whereas PRTG offers flexibility with its scalable pricing structure.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Cisco UCS Manager
4.1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Cisco UCS Manager
4.1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor is ideal for its rapid deployment and affordability, excelling in customization and proactive monitoring. In comparison, Cisco UCS Manager offers flexibility with robust security and is preferred for large businesses needing extensive integration and a stable network experience.
Download Cisco UCS Manager vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor has an initial setup cost that is straightforward and affordable, while Cisco UCS Manager presents a more complex and potentially higher setup investment, highlighting a significant difference in entry-level expense.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor has an initial setup cost that is straightforward and affordable, while Cisco UCS Manager presents a more complex and potentially higher setup investment, highlighting a significant difference in entry-level expense.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Moogsoft
3.9 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Moogsoft
3.9 out of 5
PRTG is prized for its cost-effectiveness, rapid deployment, and extensive monitoring options. In comparison, Moogsoft excels in AI-driven event correlation and integration capabilities, offering advanced features that justify its costs despite higher initial pricing, appealing to enterprise-level operations needing complex insights.
Download Moogsoft vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor has competitive setup costs compared to Moogsoft, which may have higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor has competitive setup costs compared to Moogsoft, which may have higher initial expenses.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
LiveAction LiveNX
3.6 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
LiveAction LiveNX
3.6 out of 5
LiveAction LiveNX offers advanced traffic visibility and integration, ideal for complex networks demanding detailed insights. In comparison, PRTG Network Monitor excels in simplicity and flexibility with its built-in sensors, appealing to organizations seeking a modular, easily adaptable monitoring solution with a straightforward deployment process.
Download LiveAction LiveNX vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
LiveAction LiveNX reviews highlight higher setup costs, while PRTG Network Monitor offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
LiveAction LiveNX reviews highlight higher setup costs, while PRTG Network Monitor offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
DX Unified Infrastructure Management
4.1 out of 5
DX Unified Infrastructure Management offers scalability and extensive monitoring, suitable for large enterprises. In comparison, PRTG Network Monitor is ideal for smaller environments with its intuitive setup and cost-effectiveness. DX UIM targets complex needs, while PRTG provides ease and affordability for straightforward monitoring.
Download DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
DX Unified Infrastructure Management requires a higher initial setup cost, while PRTG Network Monitor offers a more cost-effective alternative.
View comparison
Pricing
DX Unified Infrastructure Management requires a higher initial setup cost, while PRTG Network Monitor offers a more cost-effective alternative.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
eG Enterprise
4.1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
eG Enterprise
4.1 out of 5
eG Enterprise offers comprehensive monitoring with AI-based automation, focusing on scalability. In comparison, PRTG Network Monitor excels in rapid deployment and bandwidth analysis. eG Enterprise is cost-effective with versatile licensing, while PRTG suits simpler setups with competitive pricing.
Download PRTG Network Monitor vs. eG Enterprise Report
eG Enterprise requires a higher initial setup cost compared to PRTG Network Monitor, which offers a more budget-friendly entry point.
View comparison
Pricing
eG Enterprise requires a higher initial setup cost compared to PRTG Network Monitor, which offers a more budget-friendly entry point.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
vRealize Network Insight
4.3 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor offers rapid deployment and scalability, ideal for various infrastructures. In comparison, vRealize Network Insight provides in-depth network visualization for virtual environments. PRTG's cost-effectiveness attracts smaller businesses, while vRealize's advanced features appeal to complex VMware setups.
Download PRTG Network Monitor vs. vRealize Network Insight Report
PRTG Network Monitor has a straightforward setup cost, making it accessible for various businesses, while vRealize Network Insight requires a higher initial investment, reflecting its advanced analytics capabilities and comprehensive network visualization features.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor has a straightforward setup cost, making it accessible for various businesses, while vRealize Network Insight requires a higher initial investment, reflecting its advanced analytics capabilities and comprehensive network visualization features.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Kentik
4.6 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Kentik
4.6 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor excels in rapid deployment and intuitive use. In comparison, Kentik focuses on comprehensive traffic analysis. A tech buyer might choose PRTG for cost-effective licensing and setup, while Kentik suits enterprises needing detailed insights and sophisticated visualization tools.
Download Kentik vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor has no setup cost, while Kentik requires an upfront fee. The significant difference in initial expenses impacts immediate budget considerations for businesses choosing between these monitoring solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor has no setup cost, while Kentik requires an upfront fee. The significant difference in initial expenses impacts immediate budget considerations for businesses choosing between these monitoring solutions.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Zenoss Cloud
4.2 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Zenoss Cloud
4.2 out of 5
Zenoss Cloud excels in scalability and cloud integration, appealing to those seeking advanced cloud capabilities. In comparison, PRTG Network Monitor provides robust on-premise features, ideal for comprehensive network monitoring, offering flexibility with its detailed sensor insights and lower setup costs for traditional infrastructures.
Download PRTG Network Monitor vs. Zenoss Cloud Report
Zenoss Cloud has a higher setup cost due to its comprehensive cloud-based infrastructure, while PRTG Network Monitor provides a more cost-effective setup with its straightforward installation process, highlighting a significant difference in initial costs between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Zenoss Cloud has a higher setup cost due to its comprehensive cloud-based infrastructure, while PRTG Network Monitor provides a more cost-effective setup with its straightforward installation process, highlighting a significant difference in initial costs between the two solutions.

Related categories

Network Monitoring Software
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
Cloud Monitoring Software