

Cisco Meraki MX and Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls compete in the network security and management category. Cisco Meraki MX holds the upper hand in ease of use and cloud management, while Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls excel in comprehensive security features.
Features: Cisco Meraki MX offers easy deployment and configuration, centralized cloud management, and robust VPN capabilities. Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls provide advanced security capabilities, application-level controls, and threat prevention.
Room for Improvement: Cisco Meraki MX could enhance load balancing, advanced enterprise features, and reduce licensing costs. Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls could improve their reporting tools, scalability, and ease of initial setup.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco Meraki is praised for its seamless cloud-based deployment and excellent technical support, while Palo Alto Networks offers reliable hybrid deployment options and positively rated technical support.
Pricing and ROI: Cisco Meraki MX has high initial costs and licensing fees, but offers time and cost savings through ease of management, leading to favorable ROI for large-scale operations. Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls are more expensive but ensure significant ROI through superior security capabilities, reducing potential security breach costs.
I have seen a return on investment with Cisco Meraki MX because of the time saved through cloud management.
You can eliminate some positions because it manages itself.
It greatly helps out when I am moving away from the expensive MPLS circuits or MPLS hardware.
The solution helped reduce downtime, which is crucial in time-sensitive industries like manufacturing.
I have seen a return on investment as there are definitely clear cost reductions, resource savings, time savings, and improved risk detection.
Since we moved to Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls, we enabled the ECMP, and we were able to move some traffic over the second ISP, with most of the traffic going via the primary ISP.
The support is excellent, earning a rating of ten out of ten.
Every time I got a hold of someone, I was always able to resolve my issues.
When we raise a ticket with Meraki MX, they instantly become available to support us for configurations or troubleshooting.
Palo Alto's network support is excellent, and I would rate it a ten out of ten.
They offer fast and competent assistance.
They provide fast response and rapid remediation of problems.
When you have hundreds of thousands of people it is very difficult to scale in Meraki.
The scalability of Cisco Meraki MX is rated 10 out of 10; you can scale up and scale down with no effort.
Cisco Meraki MX scales with my growing needs for my organization very well because they are easy to deploy.
It is important to assess the infrastructure size before choosing a model.
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls are scalable and reliable.
They are able to secure data centers consistently across all workplaces, from the smallest office to the largest data centers.
There have been no outages, no stability issues, and we have not found any vulnerabilities during security audits.
I have had zero downtime at all with Cisco Meraki MX.
I assess the stability and the reliability of Cisco Meraki MX as good, and I have experienced no downtime, crashes, or performance issues.
With appropriately configured policies, these firewalls can provide robust network security.
After the upgrade, we are experiencing performance issues.
I have not experienced any outages or issues.
It should automatically remediate and find out the issue and then resolve it on its own without interrupting the work of the employees.
Data is the only path, so optimization is essential.
An improvement would be to use Cisco Meraki MX as a software solution as well, which might reduce the cost.
When performance degrades due to full packet inspection, the solution should be to increase the computing power within the same firewall, not to recommend upgrading to a larger, more expensive model.
Further integration into a unified system could improve usability.
Configurations related to different operating systems can be complex, and we have encountered issues with Linux systems.
I get it for $25,000, a device that can connect up to 75-100 users, whereas in Meraki MX, it goes to 75,000-80,000 per access point.
The price could be reduced by around 30% to make it more comfortable.
If Cisco can make the pricing less, customers can purchase more licenses.
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls are expensive.
Colleagues looking for the cheapest and fastest firewall can still use Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls because they are affordable.
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls is the most expensive solution without discussion.
Meraki MX is among those top solutions in their exceptional approach towards VPN-less, Zero Trust client access to office private networks.
Advanced security is the second tier of Cisco Meraki MX. It brings you the main next-generation firewalling features such as URL filtering, advanced malware protection, and threat protection.
Cisco Meraki MX API makes it really easy for me to automate a lot of changes over several thousand devices.
The most valuable features of Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls are DNS sync calls, enabled security features, and Wildfire.
Threat Vault allows us access to a comprehensive threat database, enabling us to get detailed information on threats and how to mitigate them.
The most valuable feature of Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls is Cortex Data Lake.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls | 5.3% |
| Cisco Meraki MX | 3.8% |
| Other | 90.9% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 50 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 23 |
| Large Enterprise | 20 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 77 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 56 |
| Large Enterprise | 89 |
Cisco Meraki MX offers centralized management for network security and SD-WAN, featuring advanced threat protection, VPN capabilities, and seamless integration with other Cisco products. It enhances operational efficiency through cloud management and intuitive interface.
Cisco Meraki MX is designed for ease of use with a user-friendly cloud management platform that provides real-time insights through a centralized dashboard. It includes AutoVPN for secure remote connections and advanced threat protection to ensure consistent policy enforcement. Its integration capabilities with Cisco products streamline network administration. Users highlight the need for improvements in advanced reporting, detailed alerts, and enhanced API flexibility. Cost concerns are noted, alongside desires for better security analytics and improved customer support.
What are the key features of Cisco Meraki MX?Cisco Meraki MX is implemented in industries like telecommunications and healthcare for secure network management and centralized control. It supports zero-touch deployment, dynamic routing, and traffic shaping, making it ideal for ISPs and multi-site environments, as well as managing Wi-Fi networks and guest security for wireless users.
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls provide advanced security with features like machine learning threat prevention and centralized management, ensuring protection across network environments.
Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls are structured to enhance security by engaging users with machine learning for real-time threat prevention, comprehensive application and user visibility, and secure VPN connections. They work seamlessly with SIEMs and cloud services, providing centralized management through Panorama for diverse environments. Despite high pricing and configuration complexity, they are instrumental for organizations aiming to secure network perimeters, data centers, and cloud environments effectively.
What key features define Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls?Organizations across industries rely on Palo Alto Networks NG Firewalls to secure network perimeters with advanced threat prevention features. They are deployed extensively for application-level visibility, managing internal network segmentation, and securing VPN connections. These firewalls play a crucial role in implementing zero trust security and integrating with other security tools to offer comprehensive protection.
We monitor all Firewalls reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.