Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 31, 2022
 

Categories and Ranking

Amazon AWS
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
252
Ranking in other categories
Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) (2nd), PaaS Clouds (2nd)
Dell ECS
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
25
Ranking in other categories
File and Object Storage (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2024, in the Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) category, the mindshare of Amazon AWS is 16.0%, down from 27.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Dell ECS is 1.9%, down from 2.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)
Unique Categories:
PaaS Clouds
13.5%
File and Object Storage
9.3%
 

Featured Reviews

Richard Halter - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 1, 2022
Very fast with good stability and great for microservice architecture
I haven't delved down deep enough into the solution in order to come up with an answer for what may be lacking. The only real downside to AWS is they can easily shut you down if they want to. Clients ask us "Well, what happens if I go and put this on AWS and they don't like me for some screwy reason and all of a sudden they shut me down, they've killed my entire company?" While AWS often is at the top of my list to recommend to people, I always have to tell them, "Hey, you got to be careful because if they don't like you, they can shut you down in a heartbeat. And they can kill an entire company by doing that."
Amarjit Rathee - PeerSpot reviewer
Jan 25, 2024
A stable solution that has very few hardware failures and provides excellent technical support
Our archival is on Dell ECS. Some critical data is on the cloud. The rest is stored on-premise We have government compliances to follow. We manage compliance using the tool. We also have our backups. We must have backups for audits. It is a very good product. We face very few hardware failures.…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable features I have found are the Database Migration Service (DMS) for monitoring the host and routing, Route 53, and EC2 tools. The DMS is not available in any other solution that I am aware of. They have a very flexible and professional solution."
"The product is highly scalable."
"It's highly scalable. It's guaranteed 99.99% uptime, and it shows you can scale up or scale out whenever you need more space."
"The most valuable features are how stable and easy to use Amazon AWS is."
"The product is easy to use."
"We write a lot of Lambda functions for various services, as well as serverless functions."
"The most valuable feature is the backup ability. Most people are used to one type of backup solution that they're using, but most of these solutions have features that make it difficult to transfer to the cloud. I know that Veeam now gives people the opportunity to backup some on-premises solutions to the cloud. This feature is something that a lot of people are looking for."
"Works very quickly and is well managed."
"This solution is very easy to use, and is very reliable."
"What I like best about Dell ECS is its stability. I also like that you can use it for large-scale data purposes. The solution works fine for me, and I haven't encountered any issues with it."
"The most valuable feature for me is off-site storage."
"The stability is the most valuable aspect of the solution."
"Competitive object storage platform that's stable and scalable."
"It's my understanding that the initial setup is straightforward."
"What I like best about this product is that it is a complete solution, both hardware, and software, by the same vendor."
"It is 100% stable. It is also scalable."
 

Cons

"There's not much room for improvement but that being said, they can improve the overall process of the overall product features and backend."
"It should be easier to monitor the performance and generate analytic information so that we can determine how to provide better support for our clients."
"It works very well with open-source solutions like Java, but not with .NET technologies."
"The networking is overly complex."
"The dashboard and interface need improvement."
"Some of the storage services could be cheaper."
"I'd like to see AWS implement consolidated billing for businesses operating under one group. We want to consolidate the functionalities but keep the billing separate. That is a challenge we've faced, and I feel it's something they can improve on. For example, maybe you have three businesses that are operating under one group, and you want each entity to have a separate bill for the respective workload that they're using."
"I would like to receive some alerts when my consumption is getting out of the normal range."
"The disaster recovery could be improved because there should be something in-built within the ECS. Search and recovery should be in-built. Right now, we have to use some external tools for performing the recovery itself. For example, we're using Atempo or deploying Golden Superna, so it has dependency on the external third party vendors."
"The major weakness in the solution is that there is no cloud version for Dell ECS."
"Dell EMC ECS should support segregation of duty, particularly for role-based access controls. Having a single pane of glass for smarter observation and better control mechanism would also make this solution better."
"The troubleshooting feature of this solution needs to be improved, to allow organizations to fix issues without having to contact the support team."
"They could provide centralized reports."
"We have concerns about the write performance. We would also like it to be easier to scale out, to add more boxes to the system. And we want improved performance, to use a next-generation NFS service."
"The solution could be more cost-effective and secure."
"Dell ECS could improve the price of the solution. It is expensive."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price is quite good; it is a pay-as-you-go option."
"Pricing is an area that can be improved because it is very complicated. It considers the number of processes, bandwidth, and different kinds of usage. This makes it difficult to predict."
"The solution is expensive compared to other providers because you need many of the services and it can add up fast."
"It's a pay-per-use model."
"Its price should be lower. Currently, the price is the same if you are working in-house or in production. If you have to do internal testing or you are checking if things are working in-house, you need to pay for that, and the price is the same. The price for in-house usage should be different from production usage."
"We are on an annual subscription for Amazon AWS."
"The price for AWS is good."
"The price of the solution is fair compared to competitors."
"It is an inexpensive product."
"It's a lease-based model, so it's capacity-based. We already negotiated the price a lot, but we're still doing that with Dell because somehow the product was not installed successfully, so there was a lot of struggle in the distributor territory between Dell and the environment itself. I would give the solution a 6 out of 10 for the pricing. There's a little room for improvement."
"If I remember correctly, Dell ECS is an appliance, so if you buy Dell ECS, you also have to buy the hardware, while IBM is standalone software, so you can buy IBM as software only without needing to buy the hardware. On a scale of one to five, I'm rating the pricing for Dell ECS a four."
"The price of Dell ECS should be reduced."
"The product is quite expensive."
"It is an expensive solution. There is a need to make yearly payments towards the licensing costs attached to the product."
"Dell EMC ECS is too expensive."
"We are not paying for the license at this stage."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user8586 - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 14, 2013
Amazon vs Rackspace vs Microsoft vs Google: Cloud Hosting Services Comparison
Amazon Web Services, Rackspace OpenStack, Microsoft Windows Azure and Google are the major cloud hosting and storage service providers. Athough Amazon is top of them and is oldest in cloud market, Rackspace, Microsoft and Google are giving tough competition to each other and to Amazon also for…
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
24%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
21%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Government
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How does OpenShift compare with Amazon AWS?
Open Shift makes managing infrastructure easy because of self-healing and automatic scaling. There is also a wonderful dashboard mechanism to alert us in case the application is over-committing or ...
How is SAP Cloud Platform different than Amazon AWS?
How is SAP Cloud Platform different than Amazon AWS? Amazon AWS offers options both in terms of upgrading and expanding capabilities as well as acquiring greater storage space. These upgrades can ...
Looking to compare Google Firebase, Amazon AWS, and Microsoft Azure
We like Google Firebase hosting and authentication and also the excellent cloud functionality. Our team found the flexibility of handling and dealing with the database through EDL to be very useful...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Amazon Web Services, AWS
EMC ECS, Dell EMC Elastic Cloud Storage, EMC Elastic Cloud Storage
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Pinterest, General Electric, Pfizer, Netflix, and Nasdaq.
Atos
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Oracle and others in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS). Updated: June 2024.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.