"Amazon has a much better understanding of the workflow of data scientists and machine learning processes. This is seen by their SageMaker which offers different versions of the models to be used."
"The initial setup is easy. The deployment is fast."
"The product is highly scalable."
"The documentation is very good."
"We are mostly using EC2 compute and other resources. Most of our managed services are in AWS, which some of our clients prefer."
"The most valuable features of Amazon AWS are ease of use, deployment, and short lead time. If you are using an on-premise solution, you need to wait for the hardware, and nowadays it is very difficult, the lead time becomes very long. We propose to our customers to use Amazon AWS because it is very easy, no need to wait for hardware delivery."
"In general, the cost management in Amazon is complicated. It's not too straightforward."
"The stability of the solution is very good."
"I have found Dell ECS to be scalable."
"It's my understanding that the initial setup is straightforward."
"I like that the solution is easy to scale and that's its stable."
"I have been satisfied with the stability."
"It is 100% stable. It is also scalable."
"The technology is very good, it performs well."
"Competitive object storage platform that's stable and scalable."
"This product is very competitive."
"It's a good cloud, however, if I compare it with Azure, Azure is more of a feature-rich cloud."
"The invoicing procedure of Amazon AWS needs to be improved. It can be difficult to manage."
"It would be ideal if they could provide automatic health reports. That way, I would be able to understand at a glance the state of my services at any given time."
"The solution could offer better integration capabilities."
"I would appreciate more direct support from AWS."
"Not all of the functionality is available in Europe and our customers in France want to be able to use features that are only available in the US."
"The problem with AWS is you have to keep up with the technology. If you don't stay up to date with the technology and its latest changes then you won't know what to use in your infrastructure."
"The interface is relatively complex."
"In Taiwan, they don't have professional technical support."
"The solution needs to provide better integration between this solution and all other kinds of systems."
"It is a good solution, except for the cost."
"You should be able to calculate so that when it's full it's 100% full, not just 90%."
"The solution could be more cost-effective and secure."
"The disaster recovery could be improved because there should be something in-built within the ECS. Search and recovery should be in-built. Right now, we have to use some external tools for performing the recovery itself. For example, we're using Atempo or deploying Golden Superna, so it has dependency on the external third party vendors."
"They do not have complete documentation, which is very weak and could be improved."
"Dell EMC ECS could improve by having Relational Database Services(RDS) to review progress. Additionally, if the training was provided it would be a benefit, it would be good for our engineers."
Amazon AWS is ranked 2nd in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 172 reviews while Dell ECS is ranked 5th in File and Object Storage with 11 reviews. Amazon AWS is rated 8.4, while Dell ECS is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Amazon AWS writes "Flexible, scales well, and offers good stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Dell ECS writes "Has load balancing facility, and good for unstructured data and DR". Amazon AWS is most compared with Microsoft Azure, SAP Cloud Platform, OpenShift, IBM Public Cloud and Google Firebase, whereas Dell ECS is most compared with Red Hat Ceph Storage, NetApp StorageGRID, MinIO, Dell PowerScale (Isilon) and Hitachi Content Platform.
We monitor all Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.