Jakarta EE vs Spring Boot comparison

You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Eclipse Foundation Logo
7,020 views|6,049 comparisons
VMware Logo
21,702 views|15,487 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Jakarta EE and Spring Boot based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, Apache, Eclipse Foundation and others in Java Frameworks.
To learn more, read our detailed Java Frameworks Report (Updated: October 2022).
653,584 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Q&A Highlights
Question: Which is better - Spring Boot or Jakarta EE?
Answer: Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether the Spring Boot or Jakarta EE application creation software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Spring Boot. Spring Boot offers users a solution that makes it easy to scale up the application to whatever degree the situation demands. The product can be used on the cloud, which allows users to truly scale their application according to their needs. With this cloud feature you can scale your application horizontally and at the same time ensure that your resources are used in the most effective way possible. Throughout the scaling process, resources are shared across the application. Instead of simply throwing ever more resources at the application as it grows, the resources that are already there will be distributed in a way that ensures that they go where they are needed. This makes it a very valuable solution for resource-conscious companies. Another aspect of the solution that makes it so valuable is its ability to create and customize applications. The design of the program is such that applications can be created to your specifications rather quickly. They can then be customized within a short time. When these abilities are combined, what results is a versatile product that saves an organization much in terms of time and resources. Ease of use means that now a company can create whatever it needs to with the minimum level of expenditure possible. Jakarta EE allows users to have different kinds of interfaces depending on the type of application that is being created. This shows an acute sensitivity to the needs of their users. There is no one-size-fits-all solution so far as they are concerned. As far as its ability to customize is concerned, though, Jakarta EE falls short of the mark set by Spring Boot. The customizations that can be added to the system slow it down and make it less effective. This is a disadvantage that makes it less likely to be employed by companies who view time as something to be carefully guarded. Conclusion: While Jakarta EE offers a competent product, Spring Boot is by far the better product.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "It's open-source software, so it's free. It's a community license."
  • "This solution is free unless you apply for support."
  • "As Spring Boot is an open-source tool, it's free."
  • "Spring Boot is an open source solution, it is free to use."
  • "If you want support there is paid enterprise version with support available."
  • "This is an open source solution."
  • "The solution is free."
  • More Spring Boot Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Java Frameworks solutions are best for your needs.
    653,584 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether the Spring Boot or Jakarta EE application creation software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Spring Boot. Spring Boot offers… more »
    Top Answer:The feature that allows a variation of work space based on the application being used.
    Top Answer:There could be some improvement on the interface. I think all the customization and all the plugins we can instal make the interface too slow and heavy in some situations. It would be helpful if… more »
    Top Answer:1. Open Source 2. Excellent Community Support -- Widely used across different projects -- so your search for answers would be easy and almost certain. 3. Extendable Stack with a wide array of… more »
    Top Answer:Springboot is a Java-based solution that is very popular and easy to use. You can use it to build applications quickly and confidently. Springboot has a very large, helpful learning community, which… more »
    Top Answer:The platform is easy for developers to download.
    out of 11 in Java Frameworks
    Average Words per Review
    out of 11 in Java Frameworks
    Average Words per Review
    Learn More

    For many years, Java EE has been a major platform for mission-critical enterprise applications. In order to accelerate business application development for a cloud-native world, leading software vendors collaborated to move Java EE technologies to the Eclipse Foundation where they will evolve under the Jakarta EE brand.

    Spring Boot is a tool that makes developing web applications and microservices with the Java Spring Framework faster and easier, with minimal configuration and setup. By using Spring Boot, you avoid all the manual writing of boilerplate code, annotations, and complex XML configurations. Spring Boot integrates easily with other Spring products and can connect with multiple databases.

    How Spring Boot improves Spring Framework

    Java Spring Framework is a popular, open-source framework for creating standalone applications that run on the Java Virtual Machine.

    Although the Spring Framework is powerful, it still takes significant time and knowledge to configure, set up, and deploy Spring applications. Spring Boot is designed to get developers up and running as quickly as possible, with minimal configuration of Spring Framework with three important capabilities.

    • Autoconfiguration: Spring Boot applications are initialized with pre-set dependencies and don't have to be configured manually. Spring Boot also automatically configures both the underlying Spring Framework and any third-party packages based on your settings and on best practices, preventing future errors. Spring Boot's autoconfiguration feature enables you to start developing Spring applications quickly and efficiently. With Spring Boot, you reduce development time and increase the overall efficiency of the development process.

    • Opinionated approach: Spring Boot uses its own judgment for adding and configuring starter packages for your application, depending on the requirements of your project. (These are defined by filling out a simple web-form during the initialization process.) Spring Boot chooses which dependencies to install and which default values to use according to the form’s values.

    • Standalone applications: Spring Boot allows developers to create applications that can run on their own without relying on an external web server, by embedding a web server inside the application. Spring Boot applications can be launched on any platform simply by hitting the Run command.

    Reviews from Real Users

    Spring Boot stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are its flexible integration options and its autoconfiguration feature, which allows users to start developing applications in a minimal amount of time.

    A system analyst and team lead at a tech services company writes, “Spring Boot has a very lightweight framework, and you can develop projects within a short time. It's open-source and customizable. It's easy to control, has a very interesting deployment policy, and a very interesting testing policy. It's sophisticated. For data analysis and data mining, you can use a custom API and integrate your application. That's an advanced feature. For data managing and other things, you can get that custom from a third-party API. That is also a free license.”

    Randy M., A CEO at Modal Technologies Corporation, writes, “I have found the starter solutions valuable, as well as integration with other products. Spring Security facilitates the handling of standard security measures. The Spring Boot annotations make it easy to handle routing for microservices and to access request and response objects. Other annotations included with Spring Boot enable move away from XML configuration.”

    Learn more about Jakarta EE
    Learn more about Spring Boot
    Top Industries
    Comms Service Provider23%
    Computer Software Company18%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Financial Services Firm38%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Security Firm8%
    Comms Service Provider18%
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Company Size
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise67%
    Small Business40%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise44%
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise70%
    Buyer's Guide
    Java Frameworks
    October 2022
    Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, Apache, Eclipse Foundation and others in Java Frameworks. Updated: October 2022.
    653,584 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Jakarta EE is ranked 6th in Java Frameworks while Spring Boot is ranked 1st in Java Frameworks with 15 reviews. Jakarta EE is rated 0.0, while Spring Boot is rated 8.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Spring Boot writes "Lightweight, easy to understand, and is cloud-native". Jakarta EE is most compared with Spring MVC, Eclipse MicroProfile, Amazon Corretto, Apache Spark and Oracle Application Development Framework, whereas Spring Boot is most compared with Eclipse MicroProfile, Apache Spark, Open Liberty, Vert.x and Oracle Application Development Framework.

    See our list of best Java Frameworks vendors.

    We monitor all Java Frameworks reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.