Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Jakarta EE vs Spring Boot comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 27, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Jakarta EE
Ranking in Java Frameworks
3rd
Average Rating
7.4
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Spring Boot
Ranking in Java Frameworks
1st
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
41
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Java Frameworks category, the mindshare of Jakarta EE is 15.1%, down from 27.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Spring Boot is 38.9%, down from 42.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Java Frameworks Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Spring Boot38.9%
Jakarta EE15.1%
Other46.0%
Java Frameworks
 

Q&A Highlights

NC
Nov 29, 2021
 

Featured Reviews

Erick  Karanja - PeerSpot reviewer
A robust enterprise Java capabilities with complex configuration involved, making it a powerful choice for scalable applications while requiring a learning curve
When running applications in the cloud, scalability is highly dependent on how you configure it. Factors such as the number of instances you want to scale, and the threshold for scaling based on the quantity of messages or the amount of data, are all customizable based on your application's needs.
Venkataraju Nandam - PeerSpot reviewer
Has enabled me to implement flexible microservices and streamline deployment workflows for cloud and on-premises environments
I have not evaluated such scenarios because what we currently have allows us to use it effectively. We always face one challenge with Spring Boot applications when libraries are updated, libraries have changed, or class loaders or class-level implementation are modified based on Java or other libraries. At these times, we definitely face challenges, but this is something developers must handle by identifying the right library. Because it is open source, all external systems are actually external to Spring framework. The challenge could be addressed through auto-identification or auto-configuration based on versioning since version-to-version libraries are different. Based on versioning, that would be really helpful.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Configuring, monitoring, and ensuring observability is a straightforward process."
"Jakarta EE's best features include REST services, configuration, and persistent facilities. It's also incredibly cloud friendly."
"The feature that allows a variation of work space based on the application being used."
"The solution reduces our development time."
"Spring Boot's main feature is that it's great for DevOps because you can write your own application. You don't need to install Apache Tomcat. You can create your project easily with a few clicks."
"It is a very scalable solution."
"The most valuable feature of Spring Boot is it reduces the configuration needed. The configuration is handled by the solution. For example, if you're going to develop a web service, we needed to have a Tomcat web server and had to deploy the services and do tests. However, with Spring Boot, the default server comes with Spring Boot which reduces the task of doing all the configuration."
"I have found the starter solutions valuable, as well as integration with other products."
"It is a stable solution."
"The most valuable feature of Spring Boot is the microservices and change information. Additionally, there are plenty of features."
"The setup is straightforward."
 

Cons

"Jakarta EE's configuration could be simpler, which would make it more useful as a developer experience."
"It would be great if we could have a UI-based approach or easily include the specific dependencies we need."
"All the customization and plugins can make the interface too slow and heavy in some situations."
"Spring Boot's cost could be cheaper."
"This is a really good solution for me and I can't think of anything that can be improved."
"The performance could be better."
"Having to restart the application to reload properties."
"It's difficult to explain to junior developers what it does under the hood."
"We'd like to have fewer updates."
"I would like to see more integration in this solution."
"This solution could be improved if there were more libraries available. We would also like more mobile platform functionality using low levels of code."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate Jakarta EE's pricing seven out of ten."
"Spring Boot is free; even the Spring Tools Suite for Eclipse is free."
"The solution is free."
"This is an open source solution."
"Spring Boot is open source."
"It's open-source software, so it's free. It's a community license."
"It's an open-source solution."
"This is an open-source product."
"I use the free version of Spring Boot."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Java Frameworks solutions are best for your needs.
871,688 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
14%
Computer Software Company
13%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
30%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business19
Midsize Enterprise9
Large Enterprise17
 

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Spring Boot or Jakarta EE?
Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether the Spring Boot or Jakarta EE application creation software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Spring Boot. Spring Boot offe...
What do you like most about Jakarta EE?
Configuring, monitoring, and ensuring observability is a straightforward process.
What needs improvement with Jakarta EE?
Enhancements in configurations can be achieved by benchmarking against Spring Boot technology. It would be great if we could have a UI-based approach or easily include the specific dependencies we ...
What do you like most about Spring Boot?
1. Open Source2. Excellent Community Support -- Widely used across different projects -- so your search for answers would be easy and almost certain.3. Extendable Stack with a wide array of availab...
Which is better - Spring Boot or Eclipse MicroProfile?
Springboot is a Java-based solution that is very popular and easy to use. You can use it to build applications quickly and confidently. Springboot has a very large, helpful learning community, whic...
What needs improvement with Spring Boot?
There is potential for improvement in Spring Boot. Most features are already available, but they could work on integrating AI applications. Maybe a module could be enhanced with AI features. I don'...
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Jakarta EE vs. Spring Boot and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
871,688 professionals have used our research since 2012.