Jakarta EE vs Spring Boot comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Eclipse Foundation Logo
10,221 views|8,821 comparisons
66% willing to recommend
VMware Logo
28,075 views|18,408 comparisons
95% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary
Updated on Sep 16, 2023

We compared Spring Boot and Jakarta EE across several parameters based on our users' reviews. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below:

  • Ease of Deployment: Spring Boot has a simple and uncomplicated setup process that can be completed quickly. Jakarta EE's initial setup is more difficult, especially when configuring it with Windows. 

  • Features: Spring Boot is highly regarded for its lightweight framework, customization options, and strong community support. Jakarta EE earned high marks for its REST services, configuration capabilities, and ability to work well in cloud environments.

  • Room for Improvement: Spring could improve its load-balancing, documentation, and cross-framework compatibility. On the other hand, Jakarta EE could enhance developer usability by simplifying configuration. 

  • Pricing: Spring Boot is a cost-effective option with no setup fees, while Jakarta EE has a moderate pricing rating. 

  • ROI: Boot is praised for its ability to enhance customer satisfaction, boost productivity, and decrease development time. Jakarta EE is valued for its cost savings, standardization, and future-proofing capabilities. 

  • Service and Support: Spring Boot's customer service and support receive high praise due to their large international community and quick feedback. Users rarely have to reach out for support because they can easily find answers online. Jakarta EE's customer service could be enhanced, especially in terms of making documentation more accessible.

Comparison Results: Spring Boot is highly regarded for its user-friendly setup, lightweight framework, extensive features, and strong backing from the community. However, it could improve integration, documentation, and performance. Jakarta EE excels in REST services, configuration capabilities, and compatibility with cloud environments. Its customer service leaves something to be desired. 

To learn more, read our detailed Jakarta EE vs. Spring Boot Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Q&A Highlights
Question: Which is better - Spring Boot or Jakarta EE?
Answer: Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether the Spring Boot or Jakarta EE application creation software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Spring Boot. Spring Boot offers users a solution that makes it easy to scale up the application to whatever degree the situation demands. The product can be used on the cloud, which allows users to truly scale their application according to their needs. With this cloud feature you can scale your application horizontally and at the same time ensure that your resources are used in the most effective way possible. Throughout the scaling process, resources are shared across the application. Instead of simply throwing ever more resources at the application as it grows, the resources that are already there will be distributed in a way that ensures that they go where they are needed. This makes it a very valuable solution for resource-conscious companies. Another aspect of the solution that makes it so valuable is its ability to create and customize applications. The design of the program is such that applications can be created to your specifications rather quickly. They can then be customized within a short time. When these abilities are combined, what results is a versatile product that saves an organization much in terms of time and resources. Ease of use means that now a company can create whatever it needs to with the minimum level of expenditure possible. Jakarta EE allows users to have different kinds of interfaces depending on the type of application that is being created. This shows an acute sensitivity to the needs of their users. There is no one-size-fits-all solution so far as they are concerned. As far as its ability to customize is concerned, though, Jakarta EE falls short of the mark set by Spring Boot. The customizations that can be added to the system slow it down and make it less effective. This is a disadvantage that makes it less likely to be employed by companies who view time as something to be carefully guarded. Conclusion: While Jakarta EE offers a competent product, Spring Boot is by far the better product.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Jakarta EE's best features include REST services, configuration, and persistent facilities. It's also incredibly cloud friendly.""Configuring, monitoring, and ensuring observability is a straightforward process.""The feature that allows a variation of work space based on the application being used."

More Jakarta EE Pros →

"Spring Boot's most valuable functionalities include inversion of control, dependency injection, and the ability to gather all services, models, and controllers together for easy connectivity to your REST API, as well as the ability to build a modular response and request system. It seamlessly integrates with various backends, such as SQL, events, and messaging systems, making it a user-friendly and efficient Java tool. Additionally, it functions as a reliable business transaction layer, providing excellent support for front-end and back-end visual tools.""This is a pretty light solution. It's not too heavy.""The most valuable feature of Spring Boot is it reduces the configuration needed. The configuration is handled by the solution. For example, if you're going to develop a web service, we needed to have a Tomcat web server and had to deploy the services and do tests. However, with Spring Boot, the default server comes with Spring Boot which reduces the task of doing all the configuration.""I have found the starter solutions valuable, as well as integration with other products.""Spring Boot is much easier when it comes to the configuration, setup, installation, and deployment of your applications, compared to any kind of MVC framework. It has everything within a single framework.""The API gateway and cloud configuration allows us to configure the properties outside of the service with respect to enrollment.""The solution reduces our development time.""Spring Boot could improve its integration with the major cloud providers. Connectivity with cloud solutions isn't easy compared to other frameworks like Django and Python."

More Spring Boot Pros →

Cons
"Jakarta EE's configuration could be simpler, which would make it more useful as a developer experience.""All the customization and plugins can make the interface too slow and heavy in some situations.""It would be great if we could have a UI-based approach or easily include the specific dependencies we need."

More Jakarta EE Cons →

"The services we develop are purely synchronous services, so there's a blocking and waiting state. This is a big problem in microservices.""Spring Boot could improve the interface, error handling, and integration performance.""They should integrate the solution with more AI and machine learning platforms.""It's difficult to explain to junior developers what it does under the hood.""This is a really good solution for me and I can't think of anything that can be improved.""It needs to be simplified, more user-friendly.""The solution has some vulnerabilities and fails our security audits, forcing us to keep fixing the solution.""We have specific algorithms for our Load Balancer or API gateway. So those things, if they could make it more precise, that would be beneficial. Sometimes when we are under pressure or any new person who looks into that stuff, we'll get confused or scared because of some difficulties in understanding Which algorithm needs to be used to implement a Load Balancer. When when we Yeah. Because when we say circuit breaker, we need to use it, and then the user gets a blank circuit breaker. This means we are saying the circuit breaker needs to be moved, and then that circuit breaker needs to be elaborated more. What type of algorithm should I do, and what exactly do I need to get done so that this circuit breaker can help me to resolve my issue? Because, you know, because if you go for the circuit breaker, it will ask to open the new tab, you know, since it will check. If the service is not responding, it will wait and go for another connection. So in similar words, if they can explain it a bit more, that will be helpful. Everyone could do their own Google stuff, and they will get it, but they need help understanding how this could help them to resolve the issue. It will be good if Spring Boot provides information about real-time use cases."

More Spring Boot Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "I would rate Jakarta EE's pricing seven out of ten."
  • More Jakarta EE Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Spring Boot is free; even the Spring Tools Suite for Eclipse is free."
  • "This is an open-source product."
  • "It's open-source software, so it's free. It's a community license."
  • "This solution is free unless you apply for support."
  • "As Spring Boot is an open-source tool, it's free."
  • "Spring Boot is an open source solution, it is free to use."
  • "If you want support there is paid enterprise version with support available."
  • "This is an open source solution."
  • More Spring Boot Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Java Frameworks solutions are best for your needs.
    772,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether the Spring Boot or Jakarta EE application creation software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Spring Boot. Spring Boot offers… more »
    Top Answer:Configuring, monitoring, and ensuring observability is a straightforward process.
    Top Answer:Enhancements in configurations can be achieved by benchmarking against Spring Boot technology. It would be great if we could have a UI-based approach or easily include the specific dependencies we… more »
    Top Answer:1. Open Source 2. Excellent Community Support -- Widely used across different projects -- so your search for answers would be easy and almost certain. 3. Extendable Stack with a wide array of… more »
    Top Answer:Springboot is a Java-based solution that is very popular and easy to use. You can use it to build applications quickly and confidently. Springboot has a very large, helpful learning community, which… more »
    Ranking
    4th
    out of 12 in Java Frameworks
    Views
    10,221
    Comparisons
    8,821
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    323
    Rating
    6.5
    1st
    out of 12 in Java Frameworks
    Views
    28,075
    Comparisons
    18,408
    Reviews
    28
    Average Words per Review
    415
    Rating
    8.5
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    Jakarta EE is a powerful platform for developing enterprise-level Java applications. It provides a set of specifications and APIs that enable developers to build scalable, secure, and portable applications. Jakarta EE is built on the foundation of Java EE, which has been widely adopted by organizations around the world.

    One of the key features of Jakarta EE is its support for distributed computing. It includes APIs for building distributed applications, such as remote method invocation (RMI) and message-driven beans. This allows developers to create applications that can run on multiple servers and communicate with each other seamlessly.

    Another important aspect of Jakarta EE is its focus on security. It provides a comprehensive set of security APIs and features, including authentication, authorization, and encryption. This ensures that applications built with Jakarta EE are robust and protected against potential security threats.

    Portability is also a major advantage of Jakarta EE. It allows developers to write applications that can run on any Jakarta EE-compliant server, regardless of the underlying operating system or hardware. This makes it easier to deploy and maintain applications across different environments.

    In addition, Jakarta EE offers a wide range of APIs and specifications for various enterprise-level services, such as database access, messaging, and web services. This simplifies the development process and allows developers to focus on building business logic rather than dealing with low-level details.

    Spring Boot is a tool that makes developing web applications and microservices with the Java Spring Framework faster and easier, with minimal configuration and setup. By using Spring Boot, you avoid all the manual writing of boilerplate code, annotations, and complex XML configurations. Spring Boot integrates easily with other Spring products and can connect with multiple databases.

    How Spring Boot improves Spring Framework

    Java Spring Framework is a popular, open-source framework for creating standalone applications that run on the Java Virtual Machine.

    Although the Spring Framework is powerful, it still takes significant time and knowledge to configure, set up, and deploy Spring applications. Spring Boot is designed to get developers up and running as quickly as possible, with minimal configuration of Spring Framework with three important capabilities.

    • Autoconfiguration: Spring Boot applications are initialized with pre-set dependencies and don't have to be configured manually. Spring Boot also automatically configures both the underlying Spring Framework and any third-party packages based on your settings and on best practices, preventing future errors. Spring Boot's autoconfiguration feature enables you to start developing Spring applications quickly and efficiently. With Spring Boot, you reduce development time and increase the overall efficiency of the development process.

    • Opinionated approach: Spring Boot uses its own judgment for adding and configuring starter packages for your application, depending on the requirements of your project. (These are defined by filling out a simple web-form during the initialization process.) Spring Boot chooses which dependencies to install and which default values to use according to the form’s values.

    • Standalone applications: Spring Boot allows developers to create applications that can run on their own without relying on an external web server, by embedding a web server inside the application. Spring Boot applications can be launched on any platform simply by hitting the Run command.

    Reviews from Real Users

    Spring Boot stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are its flexible integration options and its autoconfiguration feature, which allows users to start developing applications in a minimal amount of time.

    A system analyst and team lead at a tech services company writes, “Spring Boot has a very lightweight framework, and you can develop projects within a short time. It's open-source and customizable. It's easy to control, has a very interesting deployment policy, and a very interesting testing policy. It's sophisticated. For data analysis and data mining, you can use a custom API and integrate your application. That's an advanced feature. For data managing and other things, you can get that custom from a third-party API. That is also a free license.”

    Randy M., A CEO at Modal Technologies Corporation, writes, “I have found the starter solutions valuable, as well as integration with other products. Spring Security facilitates the handling of standard security measures. The Spring Boot annotations make it easy to handle routing for microservices and to access request and response objects. Other annotations included with Spring Boot enable move away from XML configuration.”

    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    Government8%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm42%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    Security Firm5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm22%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    Government7%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise60%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business43%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise40%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise67%
    Buyer's Guide
    Jakarta EE vs. Spring Boot
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Jakarta EE vs. Spring Boot and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    772,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Jakarta EE is ranked 4th in Java Frameworks with 3 reviews while Spring Boot is ranked 1st in Java Frameworks with 38 reviews. Jakarta EE is rated 7.4, while Spring Boot is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Jakarta EE writes "A robust enterprise Java capabilities with complex configuration involved, making it a powerful choice for scalable applications while requiring a learning curve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Spring Boot writes "It's highly scalable, secure, and provides all the enhanced tools I need. ". Jakarta EE is most compared with Spring MVC, Amazon Corretto, Eclipse MicroProfile, Vert.x and Apache Spark, whereas Spring Boot is most compared with Open Liberty, Apache Spark, Eclipse MicroProfile, Vert.x and Oracle Application Development Framework. See our Jakarta EE vs. Spring Boot report.

    See our list of best Java Frameworks vendors.

    We monitor all Java Frameworks reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.