"The feature that we like best is integration with Active Directory."
"Being cloud-based saves the provisioning aspect of an on-premises solution."
"The most valuable features of the solution are for management, such as dashboards."
"Reduces work for our IT teams and saves us a lot of time."
"This product is quite easy to use and is available on-demand."
"It is stable and scalable. It is useful for many applications and services, such as SharePoint, Microsoft Teams, and OneDrive."
"One of the best features is the last package security of upgrades to Microsoft Azure. Also, we like Azure's compatibility with other operating systems."
"The most valuable feature is cloud-based storage."
"Pivotal Cloud Foundry is very easy to use compared to other cloud technologies. It has a very good performance."
"PCF is open, so the applications run really smoothly and with little downtime."
"The most valuable feature of Pivotal Cloud Foundry is auto-healing and the plenty of other features that are provided."
"The most valuable feature of Pivotal Cloud Foundry is the UI, it is easy to use."
"The most valuable features are the monitoring and the deployment is easier."
"We like that they have the new capabilities, but sometimes they're deprecating capabilities faster than we can handle. If we had to improve it, we would want to stay on some of these older capabilities a bit longer."
"Technical support could be better. They need to be more responsive."
"The price could be improved as well as the interface speed, and technical support."
"Difficult to understand how it works and it's an expensive solution."
"Maybe Azure could add an address code to create your analysis without SQL or Python because some business users don't want it to code. So it's good to have a service application that connects to the data lake to conduct analysis and simplify the business process."
"The solution is less mature than AWS."
"The support, the cost, the way they have the tiers, this could all be improved."
"You don't get support from Microsoft very easily as compared to other solutions."
"In the next release, I would like to see easy integration with external tools."
"The Pivotal Cloud Foundry's initial setup has a learning curve for my team, but it was easy to use."
"Pivotal Cloud Foundry could improve on the technology it is a bit complex."
"It is not straightforward to setup."
"Pivotal Cloud Foundry is not scalable, infinitely, because when you install it on a set of virtual machines it is very hard to scale. It's easy to scale on an application level, but not it is not similar to if you were using Amazon. Amazon you can scale thousands of applications."
Microsoft Azure is ranked 1st in PaaS Clouds with 190 reviews while Pivotal Cloud Foundry is ranked 10th in PaaS Clouds with 5 reviews. Microsoft Azure is rated 8.4, while Pivotal Cloud Foundry is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure writes "This helps us meet multiple requirements other PaaS solutions do not but there is a lot of room for improvement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pivotal Cloud Foundry writes "High performance, reliable, and straightforward implementation". Microsoft Azure is most compared with Amazon AWS, Oracle Cloud Platform, Google Firebase, SAP Cloud Platform and IBM Public Cloud, whereas Pivotal Cloud Foundry is most compared with Amazon AWS, OpenShift, Google Cloud, VMware Tanzu Application Service and Google App Engine. See our Microsoft Azure vs. Pivotal Cloud Foundry report.
See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.
We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
