PRTG Network Monitor and InfluxDB compete in the realm of monitoring solutions. While PRTG is favored for its network monitoring capabilities and ease of deployment, InfluxDB is renowned for its efficiency in handling time-series data.
Features: PRTG Network Monitor features rapid deployment, scalability, and detailed network monitoring, allowing users to integrate it seamlessly with existing infrastructure. It supports a variety of operating systems and provides comprehensive alerts and reporting functions. InfluxDB stands out with its performance in handling time-series data, offering high data volume handling and robust integration capabilities. It is highly compatible with tools like Grafana, making it excellent for visualizations.
Room for Improvement: PRTG Network Monitor can improve in map design, enhancing user-defined OS sensors, and better integration with cloud services. Users also desire improved templates and more dynamic dashboards. InfluxDB needs enhancements in error logging, more intuitive data backup processes, and smoother integration with Chronograf. Further development in query language and support for high-cardinality data is also suggested.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: PRTG Network Monitor is typically deployed on-premises and is appreciated for its responsive and efficient support, despite some delays due to time zone differences and lack of live support. InfluxDB is deployed across hybrid and public cloud environments, with positive feedback on customer support and available resources, though some users have reported challenges with response times.
Pricing and ROI: PRTG Network Monitor’s all-inclusive licensing is valued, but some find its pricing steep for enterprise features. Nonetheless, it provides a positive ROI due to time savings and reduced downtime. InfluxDB offers an open-source option for cost-effectiveness but its commercial pricing has increased, potentially impacting its affordability. PRTG’s comprehensive features are deemed worthwhile for large deployments, while InfluxDB’s flexibility is ideal for scalable solutions.
InfluxDB reduced my time to show data without any interruption, also reducing the number of people needed to manage the project; it is very good to have InfluxDB in my project.
It provides accurate data for utilization, allowing us to monitor and optimize our investments in WAN connection capacity.
After introducing PRTG Network Monitor, we have saved time, and it's easy for everybody to monitor everything.
The implementation reduced our employee resources from 20-25 to 5-6 employees.
They resolve our queries 24/7.
The setup process is well-documented, making it easy to deploy.
Tutorials are available so I can manage any issue with PRTG Network Monitor easily.
The main challenge with InfluxDB, which is common with all databases, was handling very high throughput systems and high throughput message flow.
We’ve scaled on volume with seven years of continuous data without performance degradation.
InfluxDB's scalability is fine for me; I gather a lot of metrics and have not had any issues.
On a scale of one to ten, scalability is rated as 9.5.
PRTG Network Monitor has the ability to scale and add new devices.
You can install them in each network, even if they are not connected, and it works.
It serves as the backbone of our application, and its stability is crucial.
It is very stable, with no reliability or downtime in InfluxDB.
After integrating Kafka, it never broke again, as Kafka handled messages and metrics appropriately, decreasing the message throughput.
We haven't needed vendor support for the last three years, which demonstrates the product's stability.
PRTG Network Monitor is stable in my experience, and I have not encountered issues with crashes or downtime.
PRTG Network Monitor is very stable and requires low maintenance.
InfluxDB deprecated FluxQL, which was intuitive since developers are already familiar with standard querying.
Having a SQL abstraction in InfluxDB could be beneficial, making it more accessible for teams that prefer querying with SQL-style syntax.
It could include automated backup and a monitoring solution for InfluxDB or a script developed by a REST API.
The initial auto-discovery added too many unnecessary sensors, so auto-discovery should only take the necessary sensors into consideration.
They need to improve application performance monitoring, error tracing mechanisms, and log management.
PRTG Network Monitor should provide syslog monitoring since it is not available at this time.
We use the open-source version of InfluxDB, so it is free.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for InfluxDB was great, as I did not use any license.
The licensing part is a recurring license for every year, which is very affordable, making PRTG Network Monitor budget-friendly.
Pricing is by the number of devices, not by sensor.
The prices are very high for PRTG Network Monitor.
The most important feature for us is low latency, which is crucial in building a high-performance engine for day trading.
InfluxDB’s core functionality is crucial as it allows us to store our data and execute queries with excellent response times.
It helps me maintain my solution easily because it is very reliable, so we didn't face any performance issues or crashes regarding our queries; we can get the results very fast.
PRTG Network Monitor already provided me with 100 free sensors, which is enough for my network monitoring.
PRTG Network Monitor has a good dashboard that shows each and every piece of information, so we can easily find out what is happening with the systems.
These reports help me in my day-to-day work, and I rely on them because they provide proof during escalation, with exact downtime logs and related information.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| PRTG Network Monitor | 3.5% |
| InfluxDB | 0.3% |
| Other | 96.2% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 5 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 59 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 19 |
| Large Enterprise | 46 |
InfluxDB is open-source software that helps developers and enterprises alike to collect, store, process, and visualize time series data and to build next-generation applications. InfluxDB provides monitoring and insight on IoT, application, system, container, and infrastructure quickly and easily without complexities or compromises in scale, speed, or productivity.
InfluxDB has become a popular insight system for unified metrics and events enabling the most demanding SLAs. InfluxDB is used in just about every type of industry across a wide range of use cases, including network monitoring, IoT monitoring, industrial IoT, and infrastructure and application monitoring.
InfluxDB offers its users:
InfluxDB Benefits
There are several benefits to using InfluxDB . Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:
Reviews from Real Users
InfluxDB stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are its flexible integration options and its data aggregation feature.
Shalauddin Ahamad S., a software engineer at a tech services company, notes, “The most valuable features are aggregating the data and the integration with Grafana for monitoring.”
PRTG Network Monitor runs on a Windows machine within your network, collecting various statistics from the machines, software, and devices which you designate. PRTG comes with an easy-to-use web interface with point-and-click configuration. You can easily share data from it with non-technical colleagues and customers, including via live graphs and custom reports. This will let you plan for network expansion, see what applications are using most of your connection, and make sure that no one is hogging the entire network just to torrent videos.
To monitor a large IT environment, it's important to be able to scale PRTG up. Paessler PRTG Enterprise Monitor includes all the proven capabilities of PRTG Network Monitor, which are enhanced by exclusive ITOps Board for a service-oriented, central overview of multiple PRTG servers.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
