Azure Stack and VMware Cloud Foundation compete in the hybrid cloud solutions category. Azure Stack has an edge due to ease of deployment and integration with Microsoft tools, while VMware excels in virtualization management.
Features: Azure Stack supports hybrid cloud integration, ease of use, and mirrors Azure's public offerings, providing local deployment solutions. VMware Cloud Foundation specializes in automation, lifecycle management, and unifying cloud operations, offering comprehensive data center solutions and strong virtualization management.
Room for Improvement: Azure Stack could improve by enhancing openness for third-party integrations, technical support, and simplifying complex features like Kubernetes services. VMware Cloud Foundation needs better integration support, cost reduction, and greater flexibility for third-party solutions, along with improved customization options.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Azure Stack integrates well in Microsoft-aligned environments despite mixed customer service feedback, while VMware Cloud Foundation offers smooth deployment in VMware environments but faces support efficiency challenges following the Broadcom acquisition.
Pricing and ROI: Azure Stack's pay-as-you-go model is flexible, with positive ROI noted, making it cost-effective against separate cloud setups. VMware Cloud Foundation is expensive but justified by its rich features, offering significant ROI savings in large implementations.
VMware Cloud Foundation allows cost and time savings by quickly deploying infrastructure requests and integrating automatic ticketing and backup services.
In terms of ROI, although VMware Cloud Foundation is expensive, it saves time in most cases, which indirectly saves costs for users.
The technicians handling the tickets do not seem very technical.
Any support we receive is through Dell EMC, as that's a policy from Microsoft itself.
There are times when support is unclear, and even VMware support personnel may lack familiarity with certain parts, causing difficulties.
Based on my nine years of experience with VMware, I would evaluate their technical support as effective.
Support was reliable and responsive before the acquisition by Broadcom.
Monitoring, changing plans, and consolidating things are necessary parts of the process to avoid excessive costs.
Our company seeks cost-effective and more flexible open systems, and we find it difficult to integrate with third-party hardware.
On a scale of one to ten, I would rate the scalability of Azure Stack as eight.
VMware Cloud Foundation supports scalability and company growth.
When more hosts are added, performance goes slow.
In terms of scalability, I also rate VMware Cloud Foundation as an eight out of ten.
If one component fails to operate in a timely manner, the entire infrastructure can go down because everything is interconnected.
The stability of VMware Cloud Foundation is very high.
I am currently satisfied with the stability of VMware Cloud Foundation, though having started only two to three months ago, I am still in the monitoring phase.
The precision of anonymous activity tracking should be improved, particularly in identifying the correct location because IP information is sometimes inaccurate.
Management looks for a balanced product that utilizes existing hardware, fulfills external customer demand, and leverages the scalability of the cloud model.
Many resources get created in Azure Stack, and managing those resources can be challenging.
VMware Broadcom needs to include auto resource allocation at the VM levels.
Each user needs deep knowledge of every aspect of virtualization.
VMware Cloud Foundation is complex, and there are always updates regarding security features, accessibility, and the user interface.
If Microsoft lowers the price, more small businesses would be able to adopt the Enterprise E5 license.
The cost has become very high, especially after Broadcom's acquisition, altering the licensing model to a more expensive core-based system.
The price is quite higher than some other vendors.
VMware Cloud Foundation is quite expensive when compared to its competitors, but it does save time, which in turn saves money.
I am very much impressed with Azure Stack, especially regarding security, complete compliance, data sovereignty, and data security.
They allow me to track all user activities.
We wanted to proceed with an integrated solution from the same cloud provider, so we are using Azure Stack.
With VMware Cloud Foundation, auto-deployment is possible by simply right-clicking and assigning a specific DHCP IP, enabling physical to vCenter level communication for automatic VM deployment.
All features of VMware Cloud Foundation are valuable to us, as it covers every industry standard protocol and requirement protocol.
VMware Cloud Foundation allows for extensive customization, aligning with our customer requirements.
Product | Market Share (%) |
---|---|
Azure Stack | 24.3% |
VMware Cloud Foundation | 19.6% |
Other | 56.099999999999994% |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 32 |
Midsize Enterprise | 13 |
Large Enterprise | 25 |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 7 |
Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
Large Enterprise | 27 |
VMware Cloud Foundation makes it easy to deploy and run a hybrid cloud. VMware Cloud Foundation provides integrated cloud infrastructure (compute, storage, networking, and security) and cloud management services to run enterprise applications in both private and public environments.
We monitor all Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.