Azure Stack vs VMware Cloud Foundation comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary
Updated on Mar 6, 2024

We compared Azure Stack and VMware Cloud Foundation based on our user's reviews in several parameters.

The user feedback on Azure Stack emphasizes its seamless integration with Azure cloud, hybrid cloud environment, and strong security features. Additionally, positive reviews mention competitive pricing, helpful customer service, and positive ROI. On the other hand, VMware Cloud Foundation is praised for its ease of use, scalability, and reliability. Improvements suggested include enhanced user interface and deployment process.

Features: The valuable features of Azure Stack include seamless integration with Azure cloud, a consistent hybrid cloud environment, and advanced security and compliance features. In contrast, VMware Cloud Foundation offers ease of use, seamless integration with existing VMware environments, simplified management and configuration, reliability, scalability, and flexibility.

Pricing and ROI: The setup cost for Azure Stack is considered reasonable, with no unexpected expenses, according to user feedback. On the other hand, user feedback on VMware Cloud Foundation's setup cost is not mentioned in the summaries provided., Azure Stack has been reported to offer improved scalability, flexibility, security, and cost savings. Users appreciate its seamless integration with Azure services and ease of deployment. VMware Cloud Foundation, on the other hand, has been praised for its significant returns, improved efficiency, streamlined operations, and optimized resource utilization. It offers comprehensive features, seamless integration, and flexibility to adapt to evolving business needs. Both platforms have proven to be valuable investments with positive ROIs.

Room for Improvement: Azure Stack users have requested improvements in the user interface, documentation, platform performance, available services, and collaboration options. VMware Cloud Foundation users have highlighted the need for enhancements in interface, deployment process, configurability, documentation, compatibility, and overall user experience.

Deployment and customer support: The duration required to establish a new tech solution with Azure Stack varies, with users spending either three months on deployment and an additional week on setup, or one week for both deployment and setup. In comparison, VMware Cloud Foundation also varies in duration, with some users taking three months for deployment and others taking a week for setup., Azure Stack has received positive comments on its customer service for providing excellent assistance and prompt issue resolution, while VMware Cloud Foundation's customer service has been praised for their helpfulness, efficiency, and ability to promptly address and resolve queries and concerns.

The summary above is based on 42 interviews we conducted recently with Azure Stack and VMware Cloud Foundation users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.

To learn more, read our detailed Azure Stack vs. VMware Cloud Foundation Report (Updated: March 2024).
765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Q&A Highlights
Question: What are the constraints of Azure Stack and VMware Stack?
Answer: Here are some of the constraints of Azure Stack and VMware Stack: Azure Stack Azure Stack may not be as scalable Some say Azure Stack may be more expensive than other hybrid cloud solutions. Azure Stack requires specialized skills to manage and operate. VMware Stack VMware Stack can be complex to deploy and manage. It requires a high-performance network to achieve optimal performance. VMware Stack may not be as flexible as Azure Stack based on deployment options. Here are some of the differences between Azure Stack and VMware Stack: Azure Stack is a pre-packaged solution that can be deployed on-premises, while VMware Stack is a software solution that requires the installation of VMware hypervisors on physical servers. It is reported that Azure Stack may be priced based on the number of cores and memory used, while VMware Stack may be priced based on the number of virtual machines deployed. Azure Stack includes more features than VMware Stack, such as Azure Active Directory integration and machine learning capabilities. If you are looking for a scalable and easy-to-manage solution, it may be best to consider Azure Stack. If you value flexibility and cost-effectiveness more, it may be worth looking into VMware Stack.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It's a good and cost effective solution for any organization. We can deploy the tech solution on premises and also in the cloud.""The stability is good. We haven't had any issues with the viability or scalability. It's been good so far.""It's not as complex compared to Amazon or AWS products. Azure Stack is easier to use within the cloud.""The most valuable features are related to managing Kubernetes cluster nodes.""The most valuable features are the control and flexibility that we have, where we can build our own solutions from scratch.""The solution is certainly stable.""Its customer service is good.""The solution is pretty stable."

More Azure Stack Pros →

"The product enables flexibility in network structures.""They have in release 4.0 features from vSphere and Cloud Suite. It's a complete data center.""VMware Cloud Foundation makes it easy to set up new environments. You get hosts in a pool, which you can build into a new cluster.""The initial setup is straightforward and easy.""The mission aspect of the solution is the most valuable feature.""It is a scalable platform.""The solution is very stable.""The ability to auto-scale is the most valuable feature."

More VMware Cloud Foundation Pros →

Cons
"It should be improved in terms of integrations. It could be integrated more with external tools.""Certain elements are difficult to deploy.""It might be beneficial if Microsoft could introduce a more cost-effective data lake feature within their product.""Customers need to consider the Disaster Recovery. Microsoft tech is only providing support to Azure.""It would be better to have more services and functionality when it comes to database software and computing.""Azure Stack doesn't have all the services available in Microsoft Azure.""Azure Stack should be open to different technologies for more virtualization environments to accept it.""Azure Stack needs to improve integrations."

More Azure Stack Cons →

"The use of cloud and other integrations need to be improved and made easier.""We would like the ability to write to both sites at the same time, in a synchronous fashion.""VMware Cloud Foundation could be more flexible in terms of supporting other integration and components.""Life cycle management is an area for improvement.""I would like to be able to connect the APIs.""They need to offer more support for Mac.""The pricing could be a bit less expensive.""The solution is quite expensive."

More VMware Cloud Foundation Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The cost of Azure Stack is much cheaper than VCE."
  • "Pricing is always a hot topic, so the pricing can always improve."
  • "We are satisfied with the pricing."
  • "It is in the medium range cost-wise. For each component, I sort of buy licensing. Each component has its licensing fee by the number of users or by size."
  • "The pricing is very expensive."
  • "In terms of costs, it is a standard price, and there is no negotiation."
  • "Azure Stack is expensive."
  • "Azure Stack is cheaper than AWS."
  • More Azure Stack Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "This solutuion can be expensive for small and medium-sized companies."
  • "The pricing can be more competitive."
  • "The licensing is expensive compared with Hyper V and Unitech's platform."
  • "If our customer has the option to buy a server for $4,000 or $5,000, but VMware asks for two-person licensing $7,000 to $8,000, which is more than the hardware price. So sometimes, the customer cannot pay for it because it's too expensive."
  • "There is an annual license required to use the solution."
  • "VMware Cloud Foundation is overpriced, but I think we get what we pay for."
  • "The price of VMware Cloud Foundation is a bit high. However, it comes with a lot of useful features and can handle a lot of operational complexity. Overall the price can be seen as being fair for what it offers."
  • "The pricing of VMware Cloud Foundation could improve, it is expensive."
  • More VMware Cloud Foundation Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:We use Azure Stack for migration, application modernization, and cloud-native modernization.
    Top Answer:Azure stands out for its flexibility with pay-as-you-go options.
    Top Answer:Azure Stack's pricing could be improved.
    Top Answer:VMware Cloud Foundation makes it easy to set up new environments. You get hosts in a pool, which you can build into a new cluster.
    Ranking
    Views
    4,928
    Comparisons
    3,085
    Reviews
    25
    Average Words per Review
    529
    Rating
    7.8
    Views
    3,167
    Comparisons
    2,089
    Reviews
    12
    Average Words per Review
    467
    Rating
    8.2
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview
    Information Not Available

    VMware Cloud Foundation makes it easy to deploy and run a hybrid cloud. VMware Cloud Foundation provides integrated cloud infrastructure (compute, storage, networking, and security) and cloud management services to run enterprise applications in both private and public environments.

    Sample Customers
    Weblink, Fathym, Sage, CFD Support Ltd, The UberCloud Inc.
    ricoh, dell technologies, sky
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company23%
    Comms Service Provider20%
    Manufacturing Company17%
    Financial Services Firm17%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Educational Organization13%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    REVIEWERS
    Comms Service Provider33%
    Computer Software Company33%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Retailer8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Government9%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Retailer7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business39%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise42%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise65%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise4%
    Large Enterprise70%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise68%
    Buyer's Guide
    Azure Stack vs. VMware Cloud Foundation
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Stack vs. VMware Cloud Foundation and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    765,234 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Azure Stack is ranked 1st in Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms with 56 reviews while VMware Cloud Foundation is ranked 2nd in Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms with 23 reviews. Azure Stack is rated 8.0, while VMware Cloud Foundation is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Azure Stack writes "Effective tool for cloud and on-premise environments that offers seamless deployment". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware Cloud Foundation writes "Reliable with good hyper-converged sizing flexibility and an automated setup". Azure Stack is most compared with AWS Outposts, Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2), Google Anthos, VMware Software Defined Data Center and Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI), whereas VMware Cloud Foundation is most compared with Nutanix Cloud Clusters (NC2), AWS Outposts, Google Anthos and Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI). See our Azure Stack vs. VMware Cloud Foundation report.

    See our list of best Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms vendors.

    We monitor all Hybrid Cloud Computing Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.