Cisco UCS Manager vs PRTG Network Monitor comparison

PRTG Network Monitor and Cisco UCS Manager compete in the network and infrastructure management category. While both offer unique advantages, PRTG Network Monitor has an edge with its cost-effectiveness and rapid deployment, whereas Cisco UCS Manager excels in management flexibility and integration capabilities.

Features: PRTG Network Monitor stands out with rapid deployment, scalability, and out-of-the-box monitoring checks. It efficiently supports various infrastructures without extensive customization. Users find its frequent updates and reliability commendable. Cisco UCS Manager offers significant management flexibility and ease of provisioning multiple devices. Its integration with server hardware enables unified network and storage management, making it ideal for environments needing seamless hardware and software cohesion.

Room for Improvement: PRTG Network Monitor could benefit from an updated user interface, more competitive licensing cost structures, and expanded application monitoring capabilities. Users also suggest better cloud service integration and enhancements to sensors for emerging technologies. Cisco UCS Manager would gain from simplified deployment, improved firmware upgrade processes, and a more cost-effective approach given its robust features. Additional training resources and a user-friendly interface could broaden its appeal.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: PRTG Network Monitor offers flexibility by supporting hybrid cloud, on-premises, and public cloud environments. Its straightforward setup is praised, though technical support is limited to European business hours, posing a challenge for international users. Cisco UCS Manager, though more complex in deployment, offers consistent support and reliable performance, but its high ownership cost and required technical expertise might deter some users.

Pricing and ROI: PRTG Network Monitor is competitively priced with flexible sensor packages suitable for varied deployments. Its all-in-one licensing model provides cost-effectiveness, despite some users finding extended capabilities expensive. The solution offers pronounced ROI through reduced downtime and proactive maintenance. Cisco UCS Manager, while offering substantial value for high-performance needs, involves higher costs justified by its integration strengths and reliability. Its ROI is generally more evident in large-scale environments utilizing its extensive features fully.