ScienceLogic and PRTG Network Monitor compete in the IT monitoring and management tools category. ScienceLogic seems to have the upper hand for larger, more complex environments due to its comprehensive features and integration flexibility, while PRTG Network Monitor is better suited for simpler networks with its ease of use and competitive pricing.
Features: ScienceLogic offers comprehensive monitoring and management capabilities, integration flexibility, and detailed event management for various infrastructures, including AWS and cloud environments. PRTG Network Monitor is valued for its intuitive monitoring tools, ease of deployment, and robust sensors that cater effectively to simpler network setups.
Room for Improvement: ScienceLogic users highlight the complexity of its interface and desire enhanced reporting, API capabilities, and application monitoring. PRTG Network Monitor faces scalability challenges in large enterprises, with calls for more intuitive dashboards, better application sensors, and enhanced integration capabilities.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ScienceLogic supports on-premises, private, and hybrid cloud deployments, praised for its exceptional customer service, especially beneficial for larger deployments. PRTG Network Monitor, focusing mainly on on-premises deployment, provides significant ease of use and strong customer support but struggles with scalability in more complex setups.
Pricing and ROI: ScienceLogic's pricing targets enterprise-level customers and varies based on endpoints and devices, delivering notable ROI in service delivery and reduced outage times. PRTG Network Monitor is praised for its competitive pricing, especially for small and mid-sized businesses, offering a cost-effective solution with positive ROI due to its efficient network monitoring.
The return on investment is fair but often challenged by medium-sized businesses who may question its adequacy.
The setup process is well-documented, making it easy to deploy.
Tutorials are available so I can manage any issue with PRTG Network Monitor easily.
I received excellent support from ScienceLogic.
Problems with Skylar may require longer wait times due to limited resource expertise.
PRTG Network Monitor has the ability to scale and add new devices.
On a scale of one to ten, scalability is rated as 9.5.
For less than one hundred devices, it is stable.
The stability rating is nine out of ten, acknowledging some bugs, but indicating these are minor issues.
They need to improve application performance monitoring, error tracing mechanisms, and log management.
PRTG Network Monitor should provide syslog monitoring since it is not available at this time.
PRTG Network Monitor can sometimes be too detailed and cluttered at the beginning, making it heavy to use.
While some other companies have easier APIs, using this solution demands significant expertise.
If the knowledge for implementation could be spread through articles, it would reduce this dependency.
Integrating observability and APM monitoring into the overall portfolio would be beneficial.
The prices are very high for PRTG Network Monitor.
Pricing is by the number of devices, not by sensor.
It's not too high, nor too low, but it's reasonable.
ScienceLogic is not that expensive and is cost-effective overall.
It could be cheaper.
PRTG Network Monitor already provided me with 100 free sensors, which is enough for my network monitoring.
PRTG Network Monitor is easy to set up. Within a few minutes, it is operational.
It is advantageous because it can be deployed on-premises.
Notably, its automation features, such as Runbook action, enable domain experts like me to execute one-click automation solutions, which contributes significantly to reducing MTTR.
The solution excels in three areas: application monitoring, server monitoring, and network performance monitoring.
The CMDB update and the automatic CMDB update are valuable.
PRTG Network Monitor runs on a Windows machine within your network, collecting various statistics from the machines, software, and devices which you designate. PRTG comes with an easy-to-use web interface with point-and-click configuration. You can easily share data from it with non-technical colleagues and customers, including via live graphs and custom reports. This will let you plan for network expansion, see what applications are using most of your connection, and make sure that no one is hogging the entire network just to torrent videos.
To monitor a large IT environment, it's important to be able to scale PRTG up. Paessler PRTG Enterprise Monitor includes all the proven capabilities of PRTG Network Monitor, which are enhanced by exclusive ITOps Board for a service-oriented, central overview of multiple PRTG servers.
ScienceLogic is a comprehensive IT infrastructure monitoring solution that supports networks, servers, cloud environments, and applications, suitable for private cloud and on-premises deployments.
Organizations leverage ScienceLogic for its robust capabilities in monitoring IT infrastructures of all sizes. It offers granular discovery, integration with CMDB, and ticketing systems. Valued for its flexibility, incident automation, remediation, and real-time relationship mapping, it supports hybrid environments with scalable and efficient monitoring functionalities. AI and machine learning enhance its feature set, while ease of deployment and strong support are crucial benefits.
What are ScienceLogic's most important features?ScienceLogic is implemented across multiple industries, including large enterprises, for its capability to handle complex IT ecosystems. Its integration with CMDB and ticketing systems ensures it fits within existing workflows. Organizations use it to monitor diverse infrastructure landscapes, ensuring seamless performance and quick incident resolution.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
