Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 20, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
1.0
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN offers ROI through efficiencies and cost savings, though some note high expenses and mixed scalability results.
Sentiment score
1.0
Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points improve connectivity and network stability, earning user satisfaction despite indirect cost reductions.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
3.0
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN customer service is praised for responsiveness but needs improvement in regional knowledge base accuracy.
Sentiment score
6.0
Juniper Mist customer service offers responsive, knowledgeable support, but some users cite slow responses and contract renewal challenges.
It would be better if the SLA of technical support was less than four hours.
Technical support is very good.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.3
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN scales well and is flexible but may face cost or feature limitations for some organizations.
Sentiment score
6.8
Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points offer exceptional scalability, ease of expansion, and seamless integration, ideal for schools and enterprises.
Meraki is not scalable enough since it straightforwardly maps its products to segmented specifications.
The cloud, which operates on Amazon Web Services (AWS), can support unlimited access points.
It's built for larger environments.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
4.6
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is praised for stability, though some experience issues with older devices and external connectivity factors.
Sentiment score
6.0
Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points are praised for reliable performance, minimal downtime, strong stability, and swift rebooting capability.
We have experienced many instances where we have experienced a lag in our network, and I am not sure if it is due to their devices or our network.
Stability is not an issue for me because it comes with Cisco's proven manufacturer quality.
 

Room For Improvement

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN requires enhancements in support, scalability, security, integration, and user experience to boost satisfaction.
Juniper Mist Access Points need enhancements in support, affordability, integration, and features like AI, security, and regional supply.
The most important improvement needed is to eliminate the limitation of uplinks.
Some of the newer models of the Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN access point have encompassed the new wireless protocols and increased the strength of their antennas.
The reporting logs require improvement in terms of clarity.
 

Setup Cost

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is feature-rich but costly, with high renewal fees and no discounts, prompting competitive pricing structure needs.
Enterprise buyers find Juniper Mist Wireless pricing variable, potentially high, with negotiation possible, and alternatives like Fortinet considered.
Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is on par with other devices in that category, offering competitive pricing.
The pricing of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is not competitive enough for the SMB market compared to other brands.
Juniper Mist is cheaper than Meraki, placing it in the middle of the pack.
The price is very high, which is why not all enterprises can purchase this product.
Regarding pricing, Juniper's cost rates as a seven on a scale where one represents a high price and ten represents a low price.
 

Valuable Features

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is praised for its cloud-based management, ease of use, scalability, and real-time analytics features.
Juniper Mist Access Points provide AI-driven management, simplifying setup, integration, and offering comprehensive network insights and robust security.
It also manages security clients and switches, providing a single dashboard to manage multiple network infrastructures.
The ability to program all access points from the Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN dashboard, view the status of all of them, and examine the individual devices connected to each access point is very valuable.
It's a cloud solution with Mist, which helps troubleshoot and provides visibility to look at different access points.
From my perspective, the Juniper reporting logs are clear and provide necessary data, which supports better management and diagnosis.
 

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN
Ranking in Wireless LAN
4th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
4.5
Number of Reviews
120
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Juniper Mist Wireless Acces...
Ranking in Wireless LAN
6th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
21
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Wireless LAN category, the mindshare of Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is 12.3%, down from 12.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points is 5.7%, up from 4.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Wireless LAN
 

Featured Reviews

RezaPradipta - PeerSpot reviewer
Streamline network management with a unified dashboard for seamless device integration
The primary use case for Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN is mostly for enterprise wireless, including guest Wi-Fi and enterprise Wi-Fi. I use it across various industries with a focus on retail Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN offers a single pane of glass management. It only comes with a controller on the…
Raihan Hossain - PeerSpot reviewer
Consistently manages user capacity and satisfaction with ease
I have completed over twenty projects using Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points ( /products/juniper-mist-wireless-access-points-reviews ), and I continue to see exceptional performance in the areas of user capacity, user experience, and user satisfaction. This makes Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points highly recommended if the customer's budget allows, as the hardware performance is also very good. From my perspective, the Juniper reporting logs are clear and provide necessary data, which supports better management and diagnosis.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Wireless LAN solutions are best for your needs.
861,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
18%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Computer Software Company
16%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Educational Organization
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What are pros and cons of Aruba 515 Series AP vs. Cisco Meraki or Extreme Networks?
Depends. I have personally used both Cisco and Aruba so I am familiar with them. Extreme I am not, so unless they have some feature that I need or want, I wouldn't consider them. Do you have expe...
Which is better - Cisco Wireless or Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?
Cisco Wireless is very robust, very rugged, and can handle indoor and outdoor coverage extremely well. We found it to be very reliable and to consistently run very efficiently. Cisco Wireless helpe...
How does Ruckus Wireless compare to Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN?
Cisco’s Meraki Virtual MX is a virtual instance of the Meraki SD-WAN appliance. We liked the Meraki. The Wifi APs are a great feature. The dashboard is a simple interface and easy to learn. It feat...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series)?
The price is very high, which is why not all enterprises can purchase this product.
What needs improvement with Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series)?
The reporting logs require improvement in terms of clarity because it can be difficult to find specific information about network influences.
 

Also Known As

MR18, MR26, MR32, MR34, MR66, MR72, Meraki Wireless LAN, Meraki WLAN
Juniper Wireless Access Points (AP Series), Mist Access Points
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Advanced Medical Transport, Banco de Guayaquil, Baylor Scott & White Health, BH Telecom, Bowling Green State University, Calligaris, Children's Hospital Colorado, City of Biel, Del Papa Distributing, Department of Justice, Dimension Data, Dualtec Cloud Builders, Electricity Authority of Cyprus, Grupo Industrial Saltillo (GIS), Hertz, K&L Gates , LightEdge, Lone Star College System, Management Science Associates, Mindtree, NBC Olympics, Quest, Sony Corporation, The Department of Education in Western Australia, Valley Proteins
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN vs. Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
861,170 professionals have used our research since 2012.